How about creating a law that says---
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
How about creating a law that says---
How about creating a law that says anyone that causes an accident who was found to be on a cell phone will have his or her penality doubled. This would apply both to car, property and cycling accidents.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Cabot, Arkansas
Posts: 1,538
Bikes: Lynskey Twisted Helix Di2 Ti, 1987 Orbea steel single speed/fixie, Orbea Avant M30, Trek Fuel EX9.8 29, Trek Madone 5 series, Specialized Epic Carbon Comp 29er, Trek 7.1F
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Rather than creating more laws how about just making the devices inactive while moving unless on hands free.
#3
Custom User Title
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239
Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2863 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times
in
14 Posts
How about just enforcing current law, tacking on a distracted driving ticket, leaving cell phones alone, and moving this thread to A&S?
#5
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
612 Posts
Or is this about the "mechanics" of creating laws ?
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,712
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5781 Post(s)
Liked 2,578 Times
in
1,429 Posts
Make all the laws you want, or apply technical fixes like this but it won't change anything. Cell phones are the latest issue and it's trendy to blame them for everything, but there has always been distracted driving. Things like trying to read a map, eating/drinking (coffee/soda), children/pets, tuning the radio/adjusting the a/c, applying makeup, daydreaming, even reading the morning paper propped up on the steering wheel.
If I had to name the single biggest problem, I'd say it's that we've socialized the cost of driving stupidity (or lack of skill) through insurance. Folks are nearly 100% insulated from the harm they cause. IMO the way to get drivers to be more responsible isn't through technology or criminalization, but by making them more exposed financially. Things like higher minimum deductibles, and/or co-insurance for liability (up to a limit) would lower driving costs for responsible drivers and put more of the cost of poor driving back on those who are the problem. I'm not saying it would magically solve the problem, but it would be a step in the right direction.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Cabot, Arkansas
Posts: 1,538
Bikes: Lynskey Twisted Helix Di2 Ti, 1987 Orbea steel single speed/fixie, Orbea Avant M30, Trek Fuel EX9.8 29, Trek Madone 5 series, Specialized Epic Carbon Comp 29er, Trek 7.1F
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
A hands free headset would still be a good idea even in those situations but you make an excellent point. You can't make anything idiot proof because they just come up with better idiots.
#8
Custom User Title
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239
Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2863 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times
in
14 Posts
What about those on a bus or train? Or even passengers in a car?
Make all the laws you want, or apply technical fixes like this but it won't change anything. Cell phones are the latest issue and it's trendy to blame them for everything, but there has always been distracted driving. Things like trying to read a map, eating/drinking (coffee/soda), children/pets, tuning the radio/adjusting the a/c, applying makeup, daydreaming, even reading the morning paper propped up on the steering wheel.
If I had to name the single biggest problem, I'd say it's that we've socialized the cost of driving stupidity (or lack of skill) through insurance. Folks are nearly 100% insulated from the harm they cause. IMO the way to get drivers to be more responsible isn't through technology or criminalization, but by making them more exposed financially. Things like higher minimum deductibles, and/or co-insurance for liability (up to a limit) would lower driving costs for responsible drivers and put more of the cost of poor driving back on those who are the problem. I'm not saying it would magically solve the problem, but it would be a step in the right direction.
Make all the laws you want, or apply technical fixes like this but it won't change anything. Cell phones are the latest issue and it's trendy to blame them for everything, but there has always been distracted driving. Things like trying to read a map, eating/drinking (coffee/soda), children/pets, tuning the radio/adjusting the a/c, applying makeup, daydreaming, even reading the morning paper propped up on the steering wheel.
If I had to name the single biggest problem, I'd say it's that we've socialized the cost of driving stupidity (or lack of skill) through insurance. Folks are nearly 100% insulated from the harm they cause. IMO the way to get drivers to be more responsible isn't through technology or criminalization, but by making them more exposed financially. Things like higher minimum deductibles, and/or co-insurance for liability (up to a limit) would lower driving costs for responsible drivers and put more of the cost of poor driving back on those who are the problem. I'm not saying it would magically solve the problem, but it would be a step in the right direction.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On the bridge with Picard
Posts: 5,932
Bikes: Specialized Allez, Specialized Sirrus
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Moved from Mechanics to A&S.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 997
Bikes: 2013 leader 721. 2015 leader 725. 2012 fuji feather
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Because it's a terrible idea. If that we're the case:
You couldn't report reckless drivers and be able to get their plate number.
You couldn't call 911 while escaping from a robbery,mugging,assault, etc.
There are loads of other situations but I don't feel like typing a list.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,840
Bikes: Bianchi San Remo - set up as a utility bike, Peter Mooney Road bike, Peter Mooney commute bike,Dahon Folder,Schwinn Paramount Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The fundamental problem is that the vast majority of drivers know that their driving skill is well above average, and that driving does not require 100% of their attention. I still believe that the best solution would be to mount a 6" long, sharpened steel spike to the center of the steering wheel of every vehicle - it would make drivers pay more attention, and those who didn't wouldn't become repeat offenders.
#12
Senior Member
How 'bout actually pursuing legislation in real life instead of harping about it online? Have you contacted your state legislators regarding this?
#13
Custom User Title
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239
Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2863 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times
in
14 Posts
The fundamental problem is that the vast majority of drivers know that their driving skill is well above average, and that driving does not require 100% of their attention. I still believe that the best solution would be to mount a 6" long, sharpened steel spike to the center of the steering wheel of every vehicle - it would make drivers pay more attention, and those who didn't wouldn't become repeat offenders.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,840
Bikes: Bianchi San Remo - set up as a utility bike, Peter Mooney Road bike, Peter Mooney commute bike,Dahon Folder,Schwinn Paramount Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Because it's a terrible idea. If that we're the case:
You couldn't report reckless drivers and be able to get their plate number.
You couldn't call 911 while escaping from a robbery,mugging,assault, etc.
There are loads of other situations but I don't feel like typing a list.
You couldn't report reckless drivers and be able to get their plate number.
You couldn't call 911 while escaping from a robbery,mugging,assault, etc.
There are loads of other situations but I don't feel like typing a list.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 997
Bikes: 2013 leader 721. 2015 leader 725. 2012 fuji feather
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Just from personal experience, I encountered a very reckless motorist a few weeks ago (I was driving as well) that was running red lights and changing lanes erratically. I was able to telephone the police, follow them at a safe distance, and relay their direction of travel and vehicle description so that the local police could stop them.
In instances like that, crazy drivers get away with crimes.
I'm all for stopping distracted driving, but I think it would be better to tackle the problem with high fines and strict enforcement versus putting people at risk by taking away cell phones.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
I guess if you could also make it to where you could call 1 emergency contact on your contact list + local police (non emergency numbers).
Just from personal experience, I encountered a very reckless motorist a few weeks ago (I was driving as well) that was running red lights and changing lanes erratically. I was able to telephone the police, follow them at a safe distance, and relay their direction of travel and vehicle description so that the local police could stop them.
In instances like that, crazy drivers get away with crimes.
I'm all for stopping distracted driving, but I think it would be better to tackle the problem with high fines and strict enforcement versus putting people at risk by taking away cell phones.
Just from personal experience, I encountered a very reckless motorist a few weeks ago (I was driving as well) that was running red lights and changing lanes erratically. I was able to telephone the police, follow them at a safe distance, and relay their direction of travel and vehicle description so that the local police could stop them.
In instances like that, crazy drivers get away with crimes.
I'm all for stopping distracted driving, but I think it would be better to tackle the problem with high fines and strict enforcement versus putting people at risk by taking away cell phones.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
What about those on a bus or train? Or even passengers in a car?
Make all the laws you want, or apply technical fixes like this but it won't change anything. Cell phones are the latest issue and it's trendy to blame them for everything, but there has always been distracted driving. Things like trying to read a map, eating/drinking (coffee/soda), children/pets, tuning the radio/adjusting the a/c, applying makeup, daydreaming, even reading the morning paper propped up on the steering wheel.
If I had to name the single biggest problem, I'd say it's that we've socialized the cost of driving stupidity (or lack of skill) through insurance. Folks are nearly 100% insulated from the harm they cause. IMO the way to get drivers to be more responsible isn't through technology or criminalization, but by making them more exposed financially. Things like higher minimum deductibles, and/or co-insurance for liability (up to a limit) would lower driving costs for responsible drivers and put more of the cost of poor driving back on those who are the problem. I'm not saying it would magically solve the problem, but it would be a step in the right direction.
Make all the laws you want, or apply technical fixes like this but it won't change anything. Cell phones are the latest issue and it's trendy to blame them for everything, but there has always been distracted driving. Things like trying to read a map, eating/drinking (coffee/soda), children/pets, tuning the radio/adjusting the a/c, applying makeup, daydreaming, even reading the morning paper propped up on the steering wheel.
If I had to name the single biggest problem, I'd say it's that we've socialized the cost of driving stupidity (or lack of skill) through insurance. Folks are nearly 100% insulated from the harm they cause. IMO the way to get drivers to be more responsible isn't through technology or criminalization, but by making them more exposed financially. Things like higher minimum deductibles, and/or co-insurance for liability (up to a limit) would lower driving costs for responsible drivers and put more of the cost of poor driving back on those who are the problem. I'm not saying it would magically solve the problem, but it would be a step in the right direction.
Usually, probability of "getting caught" is a much more important factor for behaviour modification than the severity of the punishment. You could have instant beheading with a rusty saw as punishment for an offense, but unless people acknowledge the possibility that it could happen to them, it won't matter.
So sure, a steep cost MIGHT reduce the number of repeat offenders, but it won't do much for the first timers. And among those, it'll hit equally hard regardless if it's an accident stemming from avoidable carelessness, or from truly unforeseeable circumstances.
A less painful, but more frequently applied correction will be kinder on the "innocents" and still provide good reason for the deliberate sinners to get their act together.
#19
Señior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
You can't legislate away stupidity. People will just root their phones and work around the block.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
#20
Señior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
That's the thing. Any cop could issue as many tickets as he could write in a day if he just decided to actually enforce this. It's almost to the point where it's unusual to see someone on the expressway that is NOT holding a phone to their ear.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
#21
Transportation Cyclist
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Montana U.S.A.
Posts: 1,206
Bikes: Too many to list, some I built myself including the frame. I "do" ~ Human-Only-Pedal-Powered-Cycles, Human-Electric-Hybrid-Cycles, Human-IC-Hybrid-Cycles, and one Human-IC-Electric-3way-Hybrid-Cycle
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's not the cell phone that is the problem. If it weren't the cell phone it would be something else.
How about instead of doing this piece meal and banning this and that specific behavior we just start treating driving an automobile on the public right of ways as the narrow privilege it legally is and start charging those who willfully engage in criminal negligence in the operation of a highly dangerous lethal machine around other innocent people with exactly that along with full civil liability along with the criminal charges ? Showing that the driver was drunk or high or texting would only serve as evidence of being willfully criminally negligent and the resulting public endangerment.
As to insurance that should be about ensuring victims and/or their families are compensated. Anything major and its a one time payout because your not going to be allowed to drive ever again because you have proven you can't handle the responsibility of the narrow privilege of being permitted to operate a dangerous lethal machine around other innocent people on the public right of ways.
I look forward to the day when the self driving car technology gets good enough and wide spread enough that the scales get tipped far enough that manually driving such a dangerous machine around other innocent people on the public right of ways actually gets treated like the narrow privilege with full responsibility that it actually is.
How about instead of doing this piece meal and banning this and that specific behavior we just start treating driving an automobile on the public right of ways as the narrow privilege it legally is and start charging those who willfully engage in criminal negligence in the operation of a highly dangerous lethal machine around other innocent people with exactly that along with full civil liability along with the criminal charges ? Showing that the driver was drunk or high or texting would only serve as evidence of being willfully criminally negligent and the resulting public endangerment.
As to insurance that should be about ensuring victims and/or their families are compensated. Anything major and its a one time payout because your not going to be allowed to drive ever again because you have proven you can't handle the responsibility of the narrow privilege of being permitted to operate a dangerous lethal machine around other innocent people on the public right of ways.
I look forward to the day when the self driving car technology gets good enough and wide spread enough that the scales get tipped far enough that manually driving such a dangerous machine around other innocent people on the public right of ways actually gets treated like the narrow privilege with full responsibility that it actually is.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,840
Bikes: Bianchi San Remo - set up as a utility bike, Peter Mooney Road bike, Peter Mooney commute bike,Dahon Folder,Schwinn Paramount Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
670. A "vehicle" is a device by which any person or property may be propelled, moved, or drawn upon a highway, excepting a device moved exclusively by human power or used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks.
Section 231 defines a bicycle:
231. A bicycle is a device upon which any person may ride, propelled exclusively by human power through a belt, chain, or gears, and having one or more wheels. Persons riding bicycles are subject to the provisions of this code specified in Sections 21200 and 21200.5.
So although in most states a bicycle is a vehicle, in California, it is a device.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago, the leafy NW side
Posts: 2,479
Bikes: 1974 Motobecane Grand Record, 1987 Miyata Pro, 1988 Bob Jackson Lady Mixte (wife's), others in the family
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Liked 155 Times
in
79 Posts
How about creating a law (or at least a stipulation on this forum) that says that anyone who spends much of his time complaining about overreaching 'gubmint' and 'bureaucrats' should not be promoting impractical, impossible to enforce ordinances, which would be a matter for local government anyway, and which he has no intention of actually making the slightest effort to get introduced?
Also, anyone who posts about cycling advocacy matters (like legal ones) in a forum other than A&S (like, say, Bike Mechanics) should be horse-whipped.
Also, anyone who posts about cycling advocacy matters (like legal ones) in a forum other than A&S (like, say, Bike Mechanics) should be horse-whipped.
__________________
I never think I have hit hard, unless it rebounds.
- Dr Samuel Johnson
I never think I have hit hard, unless it rebounds.
- Dr Samuel Johnson