Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-16-14, 11:31 AM   #51
Notso_fastLane
Senior Member
 
Notso_fastLane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Medford, OR
Bikes: Kona MTN bike, Bent TW Elegance
Posts: 710
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It seems to me that if a city/county is going to go through that trouble, it would be more effective to put up signs about how to share the MUP. Some kind of diagram showing peds to stay right, bikes left, or however they want it. My favorite configuration was in Germany, where the bike paths and sidewalks were clearly delineated. Bikes have the right of way in the bike paths, peds have the right of way on the sidewalk part (and note: these aren't actually physically separate paths, just delineated, usually by a different colored row of bricks) and everything worked quite well.
Notso_fastLane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-14, 01:46 PM   #52
asmac
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
asmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto ON CA
Bikes: Salsa Vaya
Posts: 963
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Notso_fastLane View Post
It seems to me that if a city/county is going to go through that trouble, it would be more effective to put up signs about how to share the MUP.
Will never happen here, it makes way too much sense. Not only that it's very European, kind of like soccer.

While driving to pick up a new chainring today I took a route thru a lane that entered the street past a sidewalk with the view blocked by a brick wall on the right. I was going very slowly and it was a good thing as two young girls ran in front of me just as I was approaching the sidewalk. I hit the brakes, they kept running and all was well.

It was an unsettling experience and made me reflect:

1. That accidents can happen very easily with terrible consequences. I wasn't being reckless but this could have easily gone another way and it would have been all on me.
2. For the purposes of this thread, that cars are treated quite differently than bikes. This location (next to a library, near a school and on a busy street) is an obvious high risk location. There are no signs, no warnings and no markings of any kind. It's a sharp contrast to the over-the-top warnings, injunctions, gates and general state of alarm that apply to bikes on bike paths.
asmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-14, 01:55 PM   #53
Notso_fastLane
Senior Member
 
Notso_fastLane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Medford, OR
Bikes: Kona MTN bike, Bent TW Elegance
Posts: 710
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by asmac View Post
Will never happen here, it makes way too much sense. Not only that it's very European, kind of like soccer.

While driving to pick up a new chainring today I took a route thru a lane that entered the street past a sidewalk with the view blocked by a brick wall on the right. I was going very slowly and it was a good thing as two young girls ran in front of me just as I was approaching the sidewalk. I hit the brakes, they kept running and all was well.

It was an unsettling experience and made me reflect:

1. That accidents can happen very easily with terrible consequences. I wasn't being reckless but this could have easily gone another way and it would have been all on me.
2. For the purposes of this thread, that cars are treated quite differently than bikes. This location (next to a library, near a school and on a busy street) is an obvious high risk location. There are no signs, no warnings and no markings of any kind. It's a sharp contrast to the over-the-top warnings, injunctions, gates and general state of alarm that apply to bikes on bike paths.
Good observations. We clearly have auto sickness in the US. I might have to move back to Germany (I would in a heartbeat if the job opportunity was there).
Notso_fastLane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-14, 02:05 PM   #54
Keith99
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeyBike View Post
I agree. Put the sign up top and make it read "Walk Bike Across Grate". I MIGHT actually do that (not really) because it make some sense.

What does not show up in the Google photo is the light weight concrete that they filled the grating up with, at least on the Eastbound side. I almost never ride the Westbound side as this bridge is part of a loop ride we do. Anyway, even wet the grating is not an issue even on skinny road tires. Years ago they welded steel plates to cover up and gaps where the drawbridge pieces meet.
You would be a fool not to the first time as far to often there are still grates running the wrong way for biking over. I tend to follow such warnings the first time, just in case the danger is real.

Second time of course is an entirely different matter.
Keith99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-14, 01:47 PM   #55
jputnam
Senior Member
 
jputnam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pacific, WA
Bikes: Custom 531ST touring, Bilenky Viewpoint, Bianchi Milano, vintage Condor racer
Posts: 1,261
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FBinNY View Post
Yes and no. Unlike roads and streets that have regulated traffic patterns and rules, sidewalks and park paths don't. There's no such rule as obstructing traffic on them, no rule about keep right/pass left, no yield or stop when entering a wider or more major "avenue".
That actually varies quite a bit by jurisdiction. In summer, when our local MUPs get choked with foot traffic and fast recreational riders, the county's safety patrol is out, too, with quite-enforceable citations for excessive speed, dangerous passing, or blocking the trail.

We get annual outpourings of indignation on local cycling forums from riders ticketed for trail violations, they never get too much sympathy.

A few of the more common citations,

GROUPS ON TRAIL
No group of trail users, including their animal(s), shall occupy more than one half of the trail as measured from the right side, so as to impede the normal and reasonable movement of trail users.

AUDIBLE SIGNAL WHEN PASSING
Every user shall give an audible warning signal before passing another trail user. The signal must be produced in such a manner as to allow adequate time for response. The signal may be given by voice, bell or horn.

OVERTAKING TRAIL USERS ON THE LEFT
Any trail user overtaking another trail user proceeding in the same direction shall pass to the left of such overtaken user at a safe distance, and shall stay to the left until safely clear of the overtaken user.

ENTERING AND CROSSING TRAIL
Trail users entering or crossing the trail at uncontrolled points shall yield to traffic on the trail.
jputnam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-14, 03:42 PM   #56
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Posts: 29,404
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jputnam View Post
That actually varies quite a bit by jurisdiction. In summer, when our local MUPs get choked with foot traffic and fast recreational riders, the county's safety patrol is out, too, with quite-enforceable citations for excessive speed, dangerous passing, or blocking the trail.....
I should have been clearer that I was referring to pedestrian traffic, as opposed to vehicles (including bicycles. I found the groups restricted to half width rule interesting, but am surprised it gets any enforcement (if it does).

Either IMO MUPs are basically pedestrian paths where cycling is permitted, and are not suited to faster riding except when very uncrowded. Sadly, whenever they pave dedicated bike paths it's only a short time before pedestrians discover them. We may not like sharing the road with autos, but they do a good job keeping pedestrians from getting too unruly.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

“Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-14, 02:05 AM   #57
Schwinnhund
Gearhead
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chatsworth, Ga.
Bikes: 1982 Schwinn Sidewinder, Sun EZ-1 Recumbent, Cannondale R-400
Posts: 215
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
First, I have no idea what an MUP is. But I would imagine the signs were put up because of a perceived threat to pedestrian safety, and in some cases, it may be valid. I mean, how far do you have to walk your bike? 20 yards, 100 yards? It doesn't hurt to have a little cool-down once in a while. Now, if it was 1/2 mile, or farther, then I would start haranging my elected officials, because that would be ridiculous. Pedestrians always have the Right-Of-Way, and I think it should be that way. After all, I can only imagine how I would feel if I creamed some young woman carrying a baby while she was trying to cross a path, or even somebody's mother, or grandmother. I pay close attention when riding, but people on foot do very stupid and unpredictable things sometimes, especially when they think they have the Right-Of-Way, like in the Kroger or Walmart parking lots. I know they don't mean to, but things happen to everybody.

Or perhaps I just don't understand the issue. Either way, you need to obey the laws and statutes, at least until you can get them changed. I consider myself something of a bicycle emissary when I am out riding, and I try hard not to do anything that would reflect badly on bicycles as transportation, as much as is possible. Breaking the law does not help our cause at all.....
Schwinnhund is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-14, 08:52 AM   #58
dicktill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Allegany NY (rural, hilly, Western NY state)
Bikes: 1973 Schwinn World Voyageur (orange & lugged!), 2000 Airborne Zeppelin (27-speed Ultegra), 1999 Specialized Crossroads (hybrid), 2011 Montague Navigator (full-sized folding)
Posts: 178
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schwinnhund View Post
First, I have no idea what an MUP is. .....
MUP = multi-use path
dicktill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-14, 01:14 PM   #59
Schwinnhund
Gearhead
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chatsworth, Ga.
Bikes: 1982 Schwinn Sidewinder, Sun EZ-1 Recumbent, Cannondale R-400
Posts: 215
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The only one of those we have around here are streets and highways.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dicktill View Post
MUP = multi-use path
Schwinnhund is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-14, 03:41 PM   #60
dougmc
Senior Member
 
dougmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Bikes: Giant OCR2, Bridgestone RB-T, Bike-E, Vision R-40, Novara Safari
Posts: 3,029
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by asmac View Post
a man out with his family carefully blocked the way and asked if I was walking when I requested to get by
I don't know what the law is there, but here intentionally blocking a highway or passageway is a class B misdemeanor and violators don't get tickets -- they get arrested and taken to jail.

I imagine your state has a similar law, so you could bring that up with him next time -- he's upset at you for violating an imaginary law, but his actions violate a real one.
dougmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-14, 07:59 AM   #61
nelson249
"Per Ardua ad Surly"
 
nelson249's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kitchener, Ontario
Bikes: Bianchi Specialissima, Mongoose Hilltopper ATB, Surly Cross-Check, Norco City Glide
Posts: 1,416
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by -=(8)=- View Post
Reoccurring events are what led to a determination that signs like that are put up. Do you think the local Gov. was just sitting around and said "lets buy expensive and unnecessary signs and arbitrarily place them" ? Signs like that are put up for a reason. That reason would most likely be lots of other arrogant cyclists who cannot comport themselves in a civilized manner where making life difficult for peds, en mass. I cannot understand why you ride somewhere where you know it is going to be an issue and purposely disturb peds/people.
Yes my local government spends an inordinate about of time and money posting useless signs usually to appease some local busybody so they can "correct" everyone else's behaviour save their own. Besides it's cheaper than fixing the infrastructure which is usually the problem in the first place.
nelson249 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-14, 08:06 AM   #62
-=(8)=-
♋ ☮♂ ☭ ☯
 
-=(8)=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 40205 'ViLLeBiLLie
Bikes: Sngl Spd's, 70's- 80's vintage, D-tube Folder
Posts: 7,903
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nelson249 View Post
Yes my local government spends an inordinate about of time and money posting useless signs usually to appease some local busybody so they can "correct" everyone else's behaviour save their own. Besides it's cheaper than fixing the infrastructure which is usually the problem in the first place.
What size backpack does it take to hold that chip?

"We have met the enemy, and he is us"
Pogo logic would apply to most of the posts in A&S
-=(8)=- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-14, 08:37 AM   #63
asmac
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
asmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto ON CA
Bikes: Salsa Vaya
Posts: 963
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Woman breaks back in seawall cyclist collision | CTV Vancouver News

Obviously excessive speed and other careless behaviour is a problem. The question is how to deal with it and I don't think knee-jerk-reaction signs (or bike licensing) do much to change behaviour.
asmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-14, 08:56 AM   #64
spivonious
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Lancaster, PA, USA
Bikes: 2012 Trek Allant, 2016 Bianchi Volpe Disc
Posts: 1,857
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
We have some in my area, and having been a committee member for Parks & Rec, I can say that they are a legal requirement whenever a MUP crosses a road.

But if you're annoying peds by riding through, then just swallow your pride and dismount. It takes an extra 30 seconds and generates more goodwill towards cyclists.
spivonious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-14, 10:40 AM   #65
findude
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Metro DC
Bikes:
Posts: 57
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Environmental factors can be very important. DC area riders familiar with the Mount Vernon Trail along the GW Memorial Parkway may remember the camelback bridge by the Navy/Merchant Marine Memorial on the Virginia side. This bridge was widened and flattened a few years ago but used to have a narrow asphalt walkway for bicyclists and pedestrians that wasn't much more than three feet wide. There were "bicyclists must dismount" signs at both ends of the bridge. Southbound riders had to come around a blind, uphill curve to get on the bridge before having a sight line of oncoming traffic.

I witnessed a southbound bicyclist traveling at a high speed come around that blind curve only to come face-to-face with a wheelchair user who was taking up most of the lane. The cyclist veered off the curb into oncoming vehicular traffic; luckily I was only going about 35 mph in my car or he would have become a messy hood ornament. I still remember the expression on his face.

Unless you are very familiar with an area, ignore warning signs at your peril. Chances are they were put up by, or in response to, people who know more about the environmental factors.
findude is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:30 AM.