"Equipment" Traffic Violation
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
So much fail, so little time.
Really? Stick a stick in your spokes, and that's a brake? Can you cite a case in Portland where a judge was that truly stupid? (Not that that matters in NYC - it's pretty much settled that if you ride a fixie in NYC without brakes you will get a ticket during enforcement days. And possibly other days too. Stick be damned. Or anchor.)
I know there are fixies with fauxster brakes. I know of no fixies with functional coaster brakes. (By the time you've put a fauxster brake on your fixie, why not put a functional brake on your fixie? Stupid question, more stupider answers.)
A fixie pretty much rules out a coaster brake. Think about it for a nano-second.
There might be few traffic enforcement officers who are dumbest enough to look for a coaster brake on a fixie. I didn't think that "advocates" would stoop that low.
-mr. bill
Really? Stick a stick in your spokes, and that's a brake? Can you cite a case in Portland where a judge was that truly stupid? (Not that that matters in NYC - it's pretty much settled that if you ride a fixie in NYC without brakes you will get a ticket during enforcement days. And possibly other days too. Stick be damned. Or anchor.)
I know there are fixies with fauxster brakes. I know of no fixies with functional coaster brakes. (By the time you've put a fauxster brake on your fixie, why not put a functional brake on your fixie? Stupid question, more stupider answers.)
A fixie pretty much rules out a coaster brake. Think about it for a nano-second.
There might be few traffic enforcement officers who are dumbest enough to look for a coaster brake on a fixie. I didn't think that "advocates" would stoop that low.
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 09-05-14 at 06:13 PM.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Carlstadt, NJ
Posts: 404
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
In NJ, at least, an equipment violation on a bike is a "special complaint" which doesn't get reported to MV. It might not be the same way in NYC. That's why you should call the violations dept. and find out. If you go to court, and even if you win, the judge may still impose court costs. If you lose, he will definitely impose court costs.
[edit]
I just wanted to add that if you plead guilty or are found guilty and then don't pay the fine, your drivers license will be suspended. That's what's confusing about whether something is reported to MV or not. If you don't pay a "special complaint" ticket, e.g., walking your dog without a leash, your drivers license is suspended. But it's still not the same as a "motor vehicle" violation which will affect your insurance, driving record, etc.
[edit]
I just wanted to add that if you plead guilty or are found guilty and then don't pay the fine, your drivers license will be suspended. That's what's confusing about whether something is reported to MV or not. If you don't pay a "special complaint" ticket, e.g., walking your dog without a leash, your drivers license is suspended. But it's still not the same as a "motor vehicle" violation which will affect your insurance, driving record, etc.
Last edited by Coal Buster; 09-06-14 at 06:36 AM. Reason: added info
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,811
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1591 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,018 Times
in
571 Posts
Don't know about NY, but in FL the problem with contesting a ticket is that they charge court fees if you lose. So the effective fine jumps by about $85. (At least that was the case the last time I had a moving violation in a car. Which was some time ago.)
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Carlstadt, NJ
Posts: 404
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Right, and there's also a difference between dismissing a ticket and being found not guilty. That's why you can still wind up paying court costs even if your fine is dismissed.
#30
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
So much fail, so little time.
Really? Stick a stick in your spokes, and that's a brake? Can you cite a case in Portland where a judge was that truly stupid? (Not that that matters in NYC - it's pretty much settled that if you ride a fixie in NYC without brakes you will get a ticket during enforcement days. And possibly other days too. Stick be damned. Or anchor.)
I know there are fixies with fauxster brakes. I know of no fixies with functional coaster brakes. (By the time you've put a fauxster brake on your fixie, why not put a functional brake on your fixie? Stupid question, more stupider answers.)
A fixie pretty much rules out a coaster brake. Think about it for a nano-second.
There might be few traffic enforcement officers who are dumbest enough to look for a coaster brake on a fixie. I didn't think that "advocates" would stoop that low.
-mr. bill
Really? Stick a stick in your spokes, and that's a brake? Can you cite a case in Portland where a judge was that truly stupid? (Not that that matters in NYC - it's pretty much settled that if you ride a fixie in NYC without brakes you will get a ticket during enforcement days. And possibly other days too. Stick be damned. Or anchor.)
I know there are fixies with fauxster brakes. I know of no fixies with functional coaster brakes. (By the time you've put a fauxster brake on your fixie, why not put a functional brake on your fixie? Stupid question, more stupider answers.)
A fixie pretty much rules out a coaster brake. Think about it for a nano-second.
There might be few traffic enforcement officers who are dumbest enough to look for a coaster brake on a fixie. I didn't think that "advocates" would stoop that low.
-mr. bill
#32
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,084
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
I agree. I've yet meet a cop who knew much about traffic law as it relates to cyclists, let alone specific details about drivetrains and braking systems. It may be different in nyc, but anecdotes on the interwebs about NYC
cops writing tickets for perfectly legal actions astride a bike suggest otherwise.
cops writing tickets for perfectly legal actions astride a bike suggest otherwise.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
The traffic officers out writing equipment tickets to cyclists *FOLLOWING A PEDESTRIAN DEATH IN CENTRAL PARK* know the difference between a fixie and a beach cruiser.
This guy wouldn't know. But he's also not a traffic officer out on a detail enforcing bike law.
-mr. bill
This guy wouldn't know. But he's also not a traffic officer out on a detail enforcing bike law.
-mr. bill
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,084
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
The traffic officers out writing equipment tickets to cyclists *FOLLOWING A PEDESTRIAN DEATH IN CENTRAL PARK* know the difference between a fixie and a beach cruiser.
This guy wouldn't know. But he's also not a traffic officer out on a detail enforcing bike law.
-mr. bill
This guy wouldn't know. But he's also not a traffic officer out on a detail enforcing bike law.
-mr. bill
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Carlstadt, NJ
Posts: 404
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
It's not up to the cops to decide whether a fixie is considered to have brakes. Unless there's been a definitive ruling, they're not wrong writing tickets to fixies. It's up to the courts to decide.
And according to most of the arguments made in this thread, I don't need brakes on my car because I can just downshift to stop.
And according to most of the arguments made in this thread, I don't need brakes on my car because I can just downshift to stop.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Leeds UK
Posts: 2,085
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
The law apparently says braked wheels. Even if you can make your rear wheel lock up, the front is still free of any braking effect.
No advice as to what you should do, tho'.
UK law requires both wheels be braked, unless it is a fixie. In which case, only the front wheel must be equipped with one
No advice as to what you should do, tho'.
UK law requires both wheels be braked, unless it is a fixie. In which case, only the front wheel must be equipped with one
#40
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,470 Times
in
1,435 Posts
I don't know what legal strategy is best for you, but I think the law is appropriate, and I'd like it if all bikes on public roads had brakes. A fixed gear plus a front brake seems adequate to me. I ride that way sometimes.
There are some people who can stop reasonably fast with just their legs, but these people are rare. There are people who think they can but actually can't. And even those who can do it have to be on their game every second, which cannot be guaranteed. Some riders avoid collision by making fancy evasion motions to avoid slowing the speed of the bike. Fancy and impressive, but the whole point of vehicle laws is to define what is to be expected. When a cyclist swerves with a big hip dance to avoid colliding with a car, the driver of the car may not know what the cyclist is up to and may respond badly.
So I think you earned the ticket, and I hope word gets out to fixie riders that they better have a front brake.
I hear the enforcement of this law in California is heavy in Davis. Apparently, you won't get away with riding a brakeless fixie there.
There are some people who can stop reasonably fast with just their legs, but these people are rare. There are people who think they can but actually can't. And even those who can do it have to be on their game every second, which cannot be guaranteed. Some riders avoid collision by making fancy evasion motions to avoid slowing the speed of the bike. Fancy and impressive, but the whole point of vehicle laws is to define what is to be expected. When a cyclist swerves with a big hip dance to avoid colliding with a car, the driver of the car may not know what the cyclist is up to and may respond badly.
So I think you earned the ticket, and I hope word gets out to fixie riders that they better have a front brake.
I hear the enforcement of this law in California is heavy in Davis. Apparently, you won't get away with riding a brakeless fixie there.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#41
Senior Member
Example A: Bicyclist strikes a pedestrian.
Example B: Bicyclist strikes a motor vehicle that has an operator inside.
If you really had "scrutinized" my statement, you would have realized that you interpreted it incorrectly. Try to take a deep breath and think critically next time. What's disturbing about this is that you had to have taken my statement completely out of context to interpret the way you had. Go back and re-read my post and you will see what I mean.
Last edited by VTBike; 09-06-14 at 03:48 PM.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,549
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,581 Times
in
2,342 Posts
I fight every ticket, even parking tickets. Haven't been found responsible in 20 years and countless tickets. last one was a speeding ticket in the Bronx 21 mph over the limit. Hired a lawyer. Took 16 months but got it dismissed. Yeah it cost me $400 but my record is clean, so is my insurance. I also now know the Route 95 speed limit drops to 50 in the Bronx. In the meantime get a brake on the bike even if you don't use it.
Last edited by rumrunn6; 09-07-14 at 07:34 AM.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,084
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Oh, that makes sense then... carry on.
I am serious. I stand by my belief. Specifically, I believe that the non-bicyclist in example A (below) is more likely to be hurt than the non-bicyclist in example B:
Example A: Bicyclist strikes a pedestrian.
Example B: Bicyclist strikes a motor vehicle that has an operator inside.
If you really had "scrutinized" my statement, you would have realized that you interpreted it incorrectly. Try to take a deep breath and think critically next time. What's disturbing about this is that you had to have taken my statement completely out of context to interpret the way you had. Go back and re-read my post and you will see what I mean.
Example A: Bicyclist strikes a pedestrian.
Example B: Bicyclist strikes a motor vehicle that has an operator inside.
If you really had "scrutinized" my statement, you would have realized that you interpreted it incorrectly. Try to take a deep breath and think critically next time. What's disturbing about this is that you had to have taken my statement completely out of context to interpret the way you had. Go back and re-read my post and you will see what I mean.
#44
♋ ☮♂ ☭ ☯
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 40205 'ViLLeBiLLie
Posts: 7,902
Bikes: Sngl Spd's, 70's- 80's vintage, D-tube Folder
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
How/why did the Cop stop you? He had to have a reason. I cant believe a cop just randomly stopped you for no reason . . . You say you "think" you know why, but I would be willing to bet that if this goes to court, another reason will be said by the Cop.
Why do fixie riders think "skidding" is an acceptable method of stopping?
Lets be real, rules are only made because an undesirable situation repeats itself often enough that authoritarian figures feel they need to become involved. Fixies cannot stop as quickly as a bike with brakes. And when you combine that with the skill level of the average fixie rider, you understand why authoritarians feel these rules need to be put in place. Just pay it an move on.
Why do fixie riders think "skidding" is an acceptable method of stopping?
Lets be real, rules are only made because an undesirable situation repeats itself often enough that authoritarian figures feel they need to become involved. Fixies cannot stop as quickly as a bike with brakes. And when you combine that with the skill level of the average fixie rider, you understand why authoritarians feel these rules need to be put in place. Just pay it an move on.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: NYC
Posts: 476
Bikes: Schwinn World Sport Jamis Ventura
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Good luck with that.
Bikes present a much greater likelihood of hurting a pedestrian than someone in a motor vehicle. So good luck trying to get a judge to adopt an interpretation of the statute that says that pedestrians shall have no protection from bicyclists if they are on a recreational path. Good luck indeed.
Bikes present a much greater likelihood of hurting a pedestrian than someone in a motor vehicle. So good luck trying to get a judge to adopt an interpretation of the statute that says that pedestrians shall have no protection from bicyclists if they are on a recreational path. Good luck indeed.
#46
Senior Member
My point was: bikes do more damage to a person upon the bike impacting if that person is not inside of a car.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,084
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
You are now the second person to misunderstand my point. I'm talking about bike hitting two different things. My comment had nothing to do with motor vehicles hitting an object.
my point was: bikes do more damage to a person upon the bike impacting if that person is not inside of a car.
my point was: bikes do more damage to a person upon the bike impacting if that person is not inside of a car.
#48
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
The traffic officers out writing equipment tickets to cyclists *FOLLOWING A PEDESTRIAN DEATH IN CENTRAL PARK* know the difference between a fixie and a beach cruiser.
This guy wouldn't know. But he's also not a traffic officer out on a detail enforcing bike law.
-mr. bill
This guy wouldn't know. But he's also not a traffic officer out on a detail enforcing bike law.
-mr. bill
I've seen the coaster brake arm attached to a seat stay... vice chain stay, thus further obscuring the actual brake configuration.
#49
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
It's not up to the cops to decide whether a fixie is considered to have brakes. Unless there's been a definitive ruling, they're not wrong writing tickets to fixies. It's up to the courts to decide.
And according to most of the arguments made in this thread, I don't need brakes on my car because I can just downshift to stop.
And according to most of the arguments made in this thread, I don't need brakes on my car because I can just downshift to stop.
#50
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,517
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1434 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times
in
219 Posts
BTW...I currently have 5 bikes, all of which have two hand brakes, one even has DISK brakes yet, I never stop for the cops. They can scramble the chopper and follow me home by air if they really want to talk to me. Otherwise they have no chance.