Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Bicyclist arrested

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Bicyclist arrested

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-23-14, 07:39 PM
  #101  
♋ ☮♂ ☭ ☯
 
-=(8)=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 40205 'ViLLeBiLLie
Posts: 7,902

Bikes: Sngl Spd's, 70's- 80's vintage, D-tube Folder

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
The arrogant "ME ME ME" attitude that is on display by the anti-shoulder radicals lead me to believe a lot of these people, like Schill, just simply enjoy antagonizing people more than anything else. With such petty nitpickery and moot scenarios, it's almost as if they enjoy being angry and look for anything to get tweaked over.
-=(8)=- is offline  
Old 09-23-14, 08:53 PM
  #102  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 464

Bikes: Sun EZ-Speedster SX, Volae Expedition

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by dpeters11
But if she loses this case, is there a chance that it will become case law to prevent cyclists from taking the lane on any street or road in Kentucky?
Yes.
benjdm is offline  
Old 09-23-14, 10:14 PM
  #103  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267

Bikes: NA

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by boattail71
Thanks OP c_bach for posting the provocative video. As a staunch cyclist, I have to say that she is doing a disservice to us cyclists who try responsibly to work at getting along with motorists. Like most of us, us cyclists also drive cars. As a motorist, I would be perturbed at best at this cyclist hogging the lane, legal or not. The shoulder did look fine to me, regardless, if you, Ms. Schill, truly deem that that shoulder is unsafe or otherwise inappropriate to ride in, please choose another road (or other means of transport) where you're not inciting such rancor and do all of us (cyclists especially - and motorists) a favor.

As a daily commuter and oft kitted-up racer, I'm embarrassed by her behavior.
i walk or bike most of the time and almost never drive a car. i'm embarrased that a cyclist would be willing to give up their right to the road. evidently bike stockholm syndrome is a chronic affliction for some.
spare_wheel is offline  
Old 09-23-14, 10:16 PM
  #104  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267

Bikes: NA

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by benjdm
Yes.
I honestly think this would be hilarious. Maybe after cyclists loose their right to take the lane some of these "lie back and think of england" cyclists (who also drive a lot) will be force to pick a side.
spare_wheel is offline  
Old 09-23-14, 10:52 PM
  #105  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by -=(8)=-
The arrogant "ME ME ME" attitude that is on display by the anti-shoulder radicals lead me to believe a lot of these people, like Schill, just simply enjoy antagonizing people more than anything else. With such petty nitpickery and moot scenarios, it's almost as if they enjoy being angry and look for anything to get tweaked over.
Some people are avant garde nonconformists who simply do things their own way, others are disenfranchised malcontents who lash out at the society that has rejected them.
Its easy to tell one from the other, the former are happy people who are pleasant to be around, the latter are angry people who spread misery.

Since advocacy is about correcting inequities to improve the quality of life for everyone, its wise to not base it on a foundation of anger and misery, or support those who are only acting in their own self interest, without any consideration for those they claim to represent.

Last edited by kickstart; 09-23-14 at 10:58 PM.
kickstart is offline  
Old 09-23-14, 11:45 PM
  #106  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by spare_wheel
i walk or bike most of the time and almost never drive a car. i'm embarrased that a cyclist would be willing to give up their right to the road. evidently bike stockholm syndrome is a chronic affliction for some.
The right to utilize public assets is not carte blanche for an individual to controvert the reasonable expectations of all others.
kickstart is offline  
Old 09-24-14, 05:09 AM
  #107  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 477

Bikes: 2010 Trek FX 7.5, 2011 Trek 2.1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by -=(8)=-
The arrogant "ME ME ME" attitude that is on display by the anti-shoulder radicals lead me to believe a lot of these people, like Schill, just simply enjoy antagonizing people more than anything else. With such petty nitpickery and moot scenarios, it's almost as if they enjoy being angry and look for anything to get tweaked over.
I ride FRAP, but there are times where the only real option is to take a lane. I'm not saying she's doing everything right here, but if those in Kentucky lose that right, or the few times I ride Route 8 in Kentucky I'm either not allowed on it anymore or have to use what shoulder there is, that is a problem. I'm glad that this isn't happening in Ohio.
dpeters11 is offline  
Old 09-24-14, 05:46 AM
  #108  
Senior Member
 
trailmix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 684

Bikes: 50+/-

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 48 Posts
Originally Posted by spare_wheel
The percentage of people driving in Lexington who have heard of Cherokee Schill is almost certainly miniscule.
That is almost certainly hard to say when you are all the way in Portland. I live in Lexington so I KNOW FOR A FACT that this has been a major story and the number of people who have heard of this case is rather large. I also know that there seems to have been a large backlash against cyclists in this area as a result.
trailmix is offline  
Old 09-24-14, 06:19 AM
  #109  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Seems to me if the local folks n Lexington want to ensure that cyclists use the shoulder and stay off their precious travel lanes, those folks would ensure that the shoulder is very inviting to cyclists.

It also seems to me that the stop lights on that road are doing as much if not more to impede motor vehicle traffic than the occasional, yet rare cyclist.
genec is offline  
Old 09-24-14, 06:40 AM
  #110  
For The Fun of It
 
Paul Barnard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,851

Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,645 Times in 827 Posts
Originally Posted by spare_wheel
i walk or bike most of the time and almost never drive a car. i'm embarrased that a cyclist would be willing to give up their right to the road. evidently bike stockholm syndrome is a chronic affliction for some.
I don't understand this attitude at all. Because one has a right to something doesn't mean they can't or shouldn't be willing to give it up. I do it in my car many times every day and it facilitates the better overall flow of traffic. Does it embarrass you that I had the right of way on my drive to work this morning and allowed someone to come into traffic ahead of me? As long as it doesn't adversely affect my safety, I am more than happy to abstain from exercising a right.
Paul Barnard is offline  
Old 09-24-14, 06:47 AM
  #111  
For The Fun of It
 
Paul Barnard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,851

Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,645 Times in 827 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
Seems to me if the local folks n Lexington want to ensure that cyclists use the shoulder and stay off their precious travel lanes, those folks would ensure that the shoulder is very inviting to cyclists.

It also seems to me that the stop lights on that road are doing as much if not more to impede motor vehicle traffic than the occasional, yet rare cyclist.
That's an interesting thought. There are roadways around here where signals don't appear to be engineered at all. I go to work at 5am. There can be no autos at cross streets and I can get caught by nearly every traffic light on that roadway. It's the same during peak traffic hours. Put a bicyclist on that road during rush hour and people would go nuts. Yet like sheep, they will happily sit and stare at a red light in an empty intersection without ever uttering disapproval.
Paul Barnard is offline  
Old 09-24-14, 07:16 AM
  #112  
Banned
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S. of A.
Posts: 7,466
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1268 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 67 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
Seems to me if the local folks n Lexington want to ensure that cyclists use the shoulder and stay off their precious travel lanes, those folks would ensure that the shoulder is very inviting to cyclists.
Agree, especially on a number of lesser traveled roads in the area, that I've viewed, where there are no shoulders or just barely.
dynodonn is offline  
Old 09-24-14, 07:33 AM
  #113  
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
 
AlmostTrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398

Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times in 504 Posts
I don't believe for one minute that a single rider's actions will cause cyclists to lose their rights to the road.

We have a substantial percentage of cyclists actually breaking laws, and while a few here will say that "gives all cyclists a bad name" the fact is our rights remain. Yet somehow one rider's (yet to be determined) LEGAL action is going to kick us off the road? Pure hyperbole.

It's almost as if some enjoy being angry and look for anything to get tweaked over.
AlmostTrick is offline  
Old 09-24-14, 08:04 AM
  #114  
For The Fun of It
 
Paul Barnard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,851

Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,645 Times in 827 Posts
Originally Posted by AlmostTrick
I don't believe for one minute that a single rider's actions will cause cyclists to lose their rights to the road.

We have a substantial percentage of cyclists actually breaking laws, and while a few here will say that "gives all cyclists a bad name" the fact is our rights remain. Yet somehow one rider's (yet to be determined) LEGAL action is going to kick us off the road? Pure hyperbole.

It's almost as if some enjoy being angry and look for anything to get tweaked over.
You are right. It seems that a fairly substantial slice of our society is laying in wait to take offense or express indignation over some perceived slight.
Paul Barnard is offline  
Old 09-24-14, 08:19 AM
  #115  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by AlmostTrick
I don't believe for one minute that a single rider's actions will cause cyclists to lose their rights to the road.

We have a substantial percentage of cyclists actually breaking laws, and while a few here will say that "gives all cyclists a bad name" the fact is our rights remain. Yet somehow one rider's (yet to be determined) LEGAL action is going to kick us off the road? Pure hyperbole.

It's almost as if some enjoy being angry and look for anything to get tweaked over.
Agreed,
Some folks have lost sight of the fact that this is about the actions of one person, and has nothing to do with cyclists rights. Nobody in an official capacity is suggesting cyclists may not use the road in question or changing applicable laws.
kickstart is offline  
Old 09-24-14, 08:22 AM
  #116  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Paul Barnard
You are right. It seems that a fairly substantial slice of our society is laying in wait to take offense or express indignation over some perceived slight.
They're more than likely a very small minority that make lots of noise.
kickstart is offline  
Old 09-24-14, 08:48 AM
  #117  
For The Fun of It
 
Paul Barnard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,851

Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,645 Times in 827 Posts
Originally Posted by kickstart
They're more than likely a very small minority that make lots of noise.
With a hugely disproportionate representation here? Man, I see lots and lots of umbrage expressed here.
Paul Barnard is offline  
Old 09-24-14, 09:28 AM
  #118  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267

Bikes: NA

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Paul Barnard
Does it embarrass you that I had the right of way on my drive to work this morning and allowed someone to come into traffic ahead of me? As long as it doesn't adversely affect my safety, I am more than happy to abstain from exercising a right.
These court cases threaten to eliminate the right of all cyclists in KY to take the lane. IMO, it's a no brainer for any cyclist who gives a tiny crap about "right to the road" to support Ms. Schill. Our rights are often threatened by outrage over people who push these rights to extremes (see freedom of speech). These extreme cases need to be defended just as fervently as the less extreme scenarios.
spare_wheel is offline  
Old 09-24-14, 09:47 AM
  #119  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,971

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,534 Times in 1,044 Posts
Originally Posted by trailmix
That is almost certainly hard to say when you are all the way in Portland. I live in Lexington so I KNOW FOR A FACT that this has been a major story and the number of people who have heard of this case is rather large. I also know that there seems to have been a large backlash against cyclists in this area as a result.
Haven't you heard of the Portland Syndrome?
It is easy for someone in Portland to make wacky and absurd online claims about living, cycling or anything else in other areas of the country; all based on the Heaven on Earth lifestyle allegedly found in Portland.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 09-24-14, 09:47 AM
  #120  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Paul Barnard
That's an interesting thought. There are roadways around here where signals don't appear to be engineered at all. I go to work at 5am. There can be no autos at cross streets and I can get caught by nearly every traffic light on that roadway. It's the same during peak traffic hours. Put a bicyclist on that road during rush hour and people would go nuts. Yet like sheep, they will happily sit and stare at a red light in an empty intersection without ever uttering disapproval.
It's probably worse during rush hour as the stop and start at the lights tends to bunch up the traffic. But blame the cyclist, cause no doubt that's the problem.
genec is offline  
Old 09-24-14, 09:50 AM
  #121  
For The Fun of It
 
Paul Barnard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,851

Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,645 Times in 827 Posts
Originally Posted by spare_wheel
These court cases threaten to eliminate the right of all cyclists in KY to take the lane. IMO, it's a no brainer for any cyclist who gives a tiny crap about "right to the road" to support Ms. Schill. Our rights are often threatened by outrage over people who push these rights to extremes (see freedom of speech). These extreme cases need to be defended just as fervently as the less extreme scenarios.

I could be behind Ms Schill on the charges of wanton endangerment. Any good lawyer will get that tossed. From what I have seen of her video and additional exploration of the area on Google, I think the judge had it right. Where there is not a specific hazard in that shoulder area, that's where the hell she needs to be. I won't get behind an obstinate idiot who refuses to employ a spirit of cooperation with other road users. There well may be a need for greater advocacy in that area, but Ms Schill isn't doing it productively.
Paul Barnard is offline  
Old 09-24-14, 09:56 AM
  #122  
Arizona Dessert
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030

Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times in 1,288 Posts
Originally Posted by dpeters11
I ride FRAP, but there are times where the only real option is to take a lane. .
should not be 'but' but instead be 'and' because if the only option is to 'take the lane' you are still riding FRAP.
noisebeam is offline  
Old 09-24-14, 11:07 AM
  #123  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 477

Bikes: 2010 Trek FX 7.5, 2011 Trek 2.1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by noisebeam
should not be 'but' but instead be 'and' because if the only option is to 'take the lane' you are still riding FRAP.
Based on my definition. I have to make the call as to whether there is something causing me to not be on the far right side. I rarely use a shoulder. And I won't just take a lane due to debris. Some areas it's for visibility. Others may be due to construction and I don't want to give a driver the illusion that there is room to pass.

What's practicable for some isn't for everyone. I'm no Peter Sagan in the handling department.
dpeters11 is offline  
Old 09-24-14, 12:13 PM
  #124  
Senior Member
 
trailmix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 684

Bikes: 50+/-

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 48 Posts
My problem with this situation is the method she is employing, it is totally counterproductive. Any hopes of infrastructure improvements on that road are completely gone thanks to her. If the county did put in a bike lane now, it would look like they caved in. That would send a message that anytime you want something done, just raise a big stink and call the news.
It would be much more productive to create a situation that people can get behind, not against. She has backed the county into a corner and the county overreacted-now we have this pissing contest that really benefits no one.
trailmix is offline  
Old 09-24-14, 12:33 PM
  #125  
♋ ☮♂ ☭ ☯
 
-=(8)=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 40205 'ViLLeBiLLie
Posts: 7,902

Bikes: Sngl Spd's, 70's- 80's vintage, D-tube Folder

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by trailmix
My problem with this situation is the method she is employing, it is totally counterproductive. Any hopes of infrastructure improvements on that road are completely gone thanks to her.

Agreed

-=(8)=- is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.