Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

The Helmet Thread 2

Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.
View Poll Results: What Are Your Helmet Wearing Habits?
I've never worn a bike helmet
52
10.40%
I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped
24
4.80%
I've always worn a helmet
208
41.60%
I didn't wear a helmet, but now do
126
25.20%
I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions
90
18.00%
Voters: 500. You may not vote on this poll

The Helmet Thread 2

Old 10-24-14, 03:01 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
Cyclosaurus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Chicago Western 'burbs
Posts: 1,065

Bikes: 1993 NOS Mt Shasta Tempest, Motobecane Fantom Cross CX, Dahon Speed D7, Dahon Vector P8, Bullitt Superfly

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mconlonx
If you break "Falls" down into more specific categories, Motor Vehicle crashes are by far the largest single cause of TBI.
True...I made the point earlier that those people should wear helmets too.
Cyclosaurus is offline  
Old 10-24-14, 03:14 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
mconlonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,558
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7148 Post(s)
Liked 134 Times in 92 Posts
Originally Posted by Cyclosaurus
True...I made the point earlier that those people should wear helmets too.
Really, everyone should wear a helmet all the time. Just in case. Cycling is a vast minority of TBI compared to other activities. Like sex -- head pounding into the headboard sans helmet is never a good thing... except when it is.

My safe word is "helmet."
mconlonx is offline  
Old 10-24-14, 03:32 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Originally Posted by Cyclosaurus
Here comes the CDC


Children 0-4, Teenagers (15-19), and the Elderly (65+) are the most likely to sustain a TBI.

All of those people should wear helmets all the time. Many hit their head even when they aren't on a bike.
Reason I brought it up, walking to lunch today we saw a guy stumble on the sidewalk (not fall) and I mentioned that it was the most common cause of traumatic brain injury. Then I wondered a) if I remembered that right (I thought 50% so I was only part right) and b) if it was general knowledge among the Helmet Thread gang. I had the same thought as you did, maybe the guy should be wearing a helmet.
wphamilton is offline  
Old 10-24-14, 04:22 PM
  #54  
Cycle Dallas
 
MMACH 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Land of Gar, TX
Posts: 3,777

Bikes: Dulcinea--2017 Kona Rove & a few others

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by mconlonx
...
My safe word is "helmet."
My safe word is "mconlonx." It's especially effective since whomever I'm with has to stop and say, "What did you say?"
MMACH 5 is offline  
Old 10-25-14, 08:51 AM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
rydabent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,920

Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3344 Post(s)
Liked 1,054 Times in 634 Posts
But the main point is------------------any injury a helmet prevents is a good thing.
rydabent is offline  
Old 10-25-14, 09:09 AM
  #56  
Disco Infiltrator
 
Darth Lefty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,775

Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem

Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3124 Post(s)
Liked 2,101 Times in 1,366 Posts
Originally Posted by wphamilton
Just curious, does anyone know what is the most common cause of traumatic brain injury?
Worldwide, "lead poisoning" would be a good guess.
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Darth Lefty is offline  
Old 10-25-14, 02:41 PM
  #57  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 588

Bikes: Gary Fisher Hi-Fi Deluxe, Giant Stance, Cannondale Synapse, Diamondback 8sp IGH, 1989 Merckx

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Since about 1982, automobiles have been, essentially, helmets. When you enter one of these latter-day wonders, your brain & other lesser parts will be protected against many and even most opportunities for other, lesser objects to cause you cranial harm. The reason your car has a rounded & somewhat padded interior is to reduce peak loading on your brain (such as it may be). The main reason for seat belts & shoulder straps is to keep you from hitting the front of your car & to keep you inside where the padded interior might limit how badly you are hurt. --- The main purpose of air bags is to protect those who don't attach their seat belts.

Joe

Last edited by Joe Minton; 10-25-14 at 03:34 PM.
Joe Minton is offline  
Old 10-25-14, 05:07 PM
  #58  
Tractorlegs
Thread Starter
 
Mark Stone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 3,185

Bikes: Schwinn Meridian Single-Speed Tricycle

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Liked 60 Times in 42 Posts
Originally Posted by wphamilton
Just curious, does anyone know what is the most common cause of traumatic brain injury?
Ooooh! Oooooh! I know!! Republicans and Democrats!
__________________
********************************
Trikeman
Mark Stone is offline  
Old 10-25-14, 11:28 PM
  #59  
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Cyclosaurus
Here comes the CDC


Children 0-4, Teenagers (15-19), and the Elderly (65+) are the most likely to sustain a TBI.

All of those people should wear helmets all the time. Many hit their head even when they aren't on a bike.
I lost an 'online' friend earlier this year. When he was driving and he was hit by another vehicle. He survived the initial crash enough to tell me via Facebook. I told him to get his posterior to the ER ASAP!! He went into neurosurgery almost immediately. The OR nurse told me at one point, that he had the same condition as a result of the accident. Which I have had all my life. The next message from the OR nurse was that he did not make it out of surgery. The fact that he was in a car, a helmet may have kept him from getting a TBI. It may have also help keep him alive, at least to a certain extent.
Chris516 is offline  
Old 10-26-14, 11:32 AM
  #60  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by elcruxio
People who disagree with seatbelts and even mandatory seatbelt use are quite different from people who disagree with mandatory bicycle helmet use.
I wear a seatbelt every time because I have read through all the statistics and am convinced that they make a significant difference. I also am aware that there are many, many variables which are out of my control when I am driving. So seat belts make sense for me. But I am against mandatory seatbelt laws simply because I think people should have complete freedom to do what they want as long as it doesn't do harm to others.

I generally don't wear a helmet while riding because I read through all the statistics and am convinced that bicycle helmets are of very little value. Also, on the bicycle, I am generally able to control most of the variables - if I fall it will almost certainly be my own fault and I will take my lumps if/when it happens. So bicycle helmets generally don't make sense for me. And I am against mandatory bicycle helmet laws for exactly the same reason I am against mandatory seat belt laws.
Six jours is offline  
Old 10-26-14, 11:45 AM
  #61  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Joe Minton
Since about 1982, automobiles have been, essentially, helmets. When you enter one of these latter-day wonders, your brain & other lesser parts will be protected against many and even most opportunities for other, lesser objects to cause you cranial harm. The reason your car has a rounded & somewhat padded interior is to reduce peak loading on your brain (such as it may be). The main reason for seat belts & shoulder straps is to keep you from hitting the front of your car & to keep you inside where the padded interior might limit how badly you are hurt. --- The main purpose of air bags is to protect those who don't attach their seat belts.
And yet 30,000 people die every year in car accidents just in the United States. So it kind of looks like cars don't make very good helmets. If a car driver wants good head protection, there is a vast selection of effective motorsports helmets. For some reason though, even the most passionate of the helmeteers scoff when driving helmets are mentioned. That's actually pretty damning, when you think it through.

As for the notion that airbags are for people who don't wear seatbelts, the NHTSA notes that seatbelt wearers are 26% less likely to die in a car crash when they also have airbags, and that of the several hundred people killed BY airbags, most were unbelted.
Six jours is offline  
Old 10-27-14, 08:20 AM
  #62  
Senior Member
 
spoiledrotten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon
Posts: 217

Bikes: 2015 Scott Speedster XL Frame, 2014 Diamondback hybrid, and a 20" Schwinn Unicycle (does that count?)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm fixing to go shop for a helmet this afternoon. Not because I'm scared of falling and hurting myself, but because the government has, again, created laws that restrict my individual freedoms. One of the bike trails that we enjoy riding has a helmet ordinance in place. It's only for the city limits of that city, but it's a place that I have to go through if I ride that trail along the famous Natchez Trace Parkway. And we all know that the government knows what's best for all of us! (last line typed extreme sarcasm)
spoiledrotten is offline  
Old 10-27-14, 09:46 AM
  #63  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,942

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,511 Times in 1,027 Posts
Originally Posted by spoiledrotten
I'm fixing to go shop for a helmet this afternoon. Not because I'm scared of falling and hurting myself, but because the government has, again, created laws that restrict my individual freedoms. One of the bike trails that we enjoy riding has a helmet ordinance in place. It's only for the city limits of that city, but it's a place that I have to go through if I ride that trail along the famous Natchez Trace Parkway. And we all know that the government knows what's best for all of us! (last line typed extreme sarcasm)
What "government" has this helmet ordinance in place that restricts your freedom, and what does the helmet ordinance require? Reference?
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 10-27-14, 10:05 AM
  #64  
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Well, here we go again. Not that I have anything new to say, it just feels wrong to fail to contribtue to a helmet thread having posted so often in its predecessors.

To summarize: please feel free to wear a helmet if you wish. If you're a mountainbiker tackling technical or challenging trails, definitely wear a full-face helmet. But if you're a roadie and expect the helmet to make a material difference in the event of a collision that might otherwise kill you, you're almost certainly mistaken.
chasm54 is offline  
Old 10-27-14, 10:48 AM
  #65  
Senior Member
 
rydabent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,920

Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3344 Post(s)
Liked 1,054 Times in 634 Posts
I guess it is about time I mention an "authority" on cycling safety John Forester. In his book he states that simple falling covers around 80% of cycling accidents. If that is true, then it follows that a helmet is far more effective than the anti helmet crowd is willing to admit.

I wear my helmet even on my trike, altho I really cant fall since I am already down.
rydabent is offline  
Old 10-27-14, 11:26 AM
  #66  
Banned.
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by rydabent
I guess it is about time I mention an "authority" on cycling safety John Forester. In his book he states that simple falling covers around 80% of cycling accidents. If that is true, then it follows that a helmet is far more effective than the anti helmet crowd is willing to admit.
Don't pretend to be stupid. Of course it doesn't "follow". Before you could make such an assertion you would need to know the proportion of simple falls that gave rise to head injuries, the severity of those injuries, the efficacy of helmets in mitigating those effects, and so on and so on.
chasm54 is offline  
Old 10-27-14, 11:31 AM
  #67  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,942

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,511 Times in 1,027 Posts
Originally Posted by rydabent
I guess it is about time I mention an "authority" on cycling safety John Forester. In his book he states that simple falling covers around 80% of cycling accidents. If that is true, then it follows that a helmet is far more effective than the anti helmet crowd is willing to admit.
Classic! Rydabent paraphrasing John Forester brand so-called accident statistics and drawing a John Forester type specious conclusion.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 10-27-14, 01:27 PM
  #68  
Senior Member
 
mconlonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,558
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7148 Post(s)
Liked 134 Times in 92 Posts
Originally Posted by rydabent
...since I am already down.
They've made great strides in depression treatment, these days...
mconlonx is offline  
Old 10-27-14, 01:47 PM
  #69  
Senior Member
 
spoiledrotten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon
Posts: 217

Bikes: 2015 Scott Speedster XL Frame, 2014 Diamondback hybrid, and a 20" Schwinn Unicycle (does that count?)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
What "government" has this helmet ordinance in place that restricts your freedom, and what does the helmet ordinance require? Reference?
Local government! What's the issue with you not understanding that city laws/ordinances are government? Do you not have local speed limits set forth by a specific city? Other rules set for by a city? A city is the "local government" that is creating laws that over-ride your beliefs that you know what's better for you than your government does. And that is the freedom that I'm talking about. If you believe that you are safe enough riding without a helmet, but your local government thinks that you will be more safe riding the way they think, then they have taken a freedom away and imposed restrictions on you. Socialism in a form that many don't pay attention to, until it hits them with something they don't agree with. You may be one that won't mount an indoor exercise bike without a helmet, therefore you won't think this is a freedom restricting law, but if your local government stated that you couldn't ride your bike without a full geared football uniform, training wheels on your bike, and that you can't ride faster than 5 MPH, you'd be hollering "damned government!".
spoiledrotten is offline  
Old 10-27-14, 01:54 PM
  #70  
Senior Member
 
spoiledrotten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon
Posts: 217

Bikes: 2015 Scott Speedster XL Frame, 2014 Diamondback hybrid, and a 20" Schwinn Unicycle (does that count?)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
What "government" has this helmet ordinance in place that restricts your freedom, and what does the helmet ordinance require? Reference?
And here is the ordinance:
ORDINANCE OF'THE MAYOR
AND BOARD OF'ALDERMEN OX'

THE CITY
OF RIDGELAND, MISSISSIPPI TO REQUIRE ALL PERSONS

TO WEAR PROTECTIVE HELMETS
\ryHEN RIDING A BICYCLE,

EITHER
AS AN OPERATOR OR A PASSENGER

V/HEREAS, the
Mayor and BoaĦd of Aldermen of the City of Ridgeland are

charged
with the obligation to protect and preserve public health, safety, and welfare;

ffid,

WHEREAS,
research has determined that two-thirds (2/3) of the deaths from

bicycle/vehicle
crashes are from traumatic brain injury; and,

WHEREAS,
one in eight cyclist with reported injuries had a brain injury; and,

WHEREAS,
an estimated 45o/o to 88% of cyclist brain injuries can be prevented

by
a helmet; and,

WHEREAS,
the Mayor and Board of Aldermen of the City of Ridgeland,

Mississippi find
that it would be in the best interest of its citizens that all operators and

passengers
of bicycles within the-public areas of the City of Ridgeland should wear

protective
helmets as a means to protect and preserve the public health, safety and

welfaĦe
of its citizens and visitors.

NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen

of
the City of Ridgeland, Mississippi as follows, to-wit:

Section
l.

It
shall be unlawful for any person to operate, ride, or be a passenger upon a

bicycle on
any highway, street, road, sidewalk, bikeway, trial, or other public property,

unless
that person wears a protective helmet that is properly fitted and fastened. This

requirement shall apply
to a passenger who rides upon a bicycle while in a restraining

seat
which is attached to the bicycle or in a trailer towed by the bicycle.
spoiledrotten is offline  
Old 10-27-14, 03:39 PM
  #71  
Senior Member
 
rydabent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,920

Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3344 Post(s)
Liked 1,054 Times in 634 Posts
I guess I can assume chasm and i like dont like Forester since he doesnt agree with them.
rydabent is offline  
Old 10-27-14, 08:02 PM
  #72  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,942

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,511 Times in 1,027 Posts
Originally Posted by spoiledrotten
You may be one that won't mount an indoor exercise bike without a helmet, therefore you won't think this is a freedom restricting law, but if your local government stated that you couldn't ride your bike without a full geared football uniform, training wheels on your bike, and that you can't ride faster than 5 MPH, you'd be hollering "damned government!".
Only if I was a raving lunatic.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 10-27-14, 08:12 PM
  #73  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,942

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,511 Times in 1,027 Posts
Originally Posted by spoiledrotten
And here is the ordinance:
ORDINANCE OF'THE MAYOR
AND BOARD OF'ALDERMEN OX'

THE CITY
OF RIDGELAND, MISSISSIPPI TO REQUIRE ALL PERSONS

TO WEAR PROTECTIVE HELMETS
WHEN RIDING A BICYCLE,

EITHER
AS AN OPERATOR OR A PASSENGER

V/HEREAS, the
Mayor and BoaĦd of Aldermen of the City of Ridgeland are

charged
with the obligation to protect and preserve public health, safety, and welfare;

ffid,

WHEREAS...[blah, blah,blah]
Whereas this sounds like a hot air proclamation made to the PTA during a speech, and not any legal code or requirement for anybody to do anything. What penalty is invoked by this evil government to violators of this so-called helmet ordinance?
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Likes For I-Like-To-Bike:
Old 10-28-14, 05:50 AM
  #74  
Senior Member
 
spoiledrotten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon
Posts: 217

Bikes: 2015 Scott Speedster XL Frame, 2014 Diamondback hybrid, and a 20" Schwinn Unicycle (does that count?)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
On the sign itself, I didn't see any fine to be imposed if one should fail to conform to the ordinance, then again, they don't post a fine on the stop signs and speed limit signs, but....

"It shall be unlawful for any person to operate, ride, or be a passenger ...."

sounded like pretty strong words and I hate to be the guinea pig that sees how far they go to enforce it.

So now.... truce?? I think we are on the same side. But if not, we can keep going.
spoiledrotten is offline  
Old 10-28-14, 06:23 AM
  #75  
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 4,335

Bikes: Canyon Endurace SLX 8Di2

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 14 Posts
The ordinance is here https://www.ridgelandms.org/wp-conten...ds/HELMET1.pdf, but since the posted copy is unsigned and undated its not clear if it was ever signed into law. Fine for violation is in section 3 Section $25 to $75

According to Municode its been adopted but not yet codified, whatever that means. Wonder if its ever enforced?
howsteepisit is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.