View Poll Results: What Are Your Helmet Wearing Habits?
I've never worn a bike helmet
52
10.40%
I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped
24
4.80%
I've always worn a helmet
208
41.60%
I didn't wear a helmet, but now do
126
25.20%
I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions
90
18.00%
Voters: 500. You may not vote on this poll
The Helmet Thread 2
#1028
Senior Member
#1029
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Exactly. That's why no one should ever consider getting in a vehicle that has a gas tank with anything less than a full Nomex fire-******ent suit. I've personally seen several cars go up in flames, incl. one belonging to a close friend, and the difference between surviving and being burned to death might be only a few seconds. And then there's all the other safety equipment that should always be used (even in the absence of government regulations) - full 5-point harnesses, auxiliary roll bars, exterior tubular steel cage (today's unibodies can be crushed like an egg in a serious impact), etc. Always plan for the worst case scenario; after all, what can go wrong will go wrong.
#1030
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
How many times does one have to answer the same question of the bullies here on the so-called helmet thread? (Roll cages? Seriously?)
My helmet, my head, my decision.
Your knee pads, your knees, your decision.
Got it yet?
-mr. bill
My helmet, my head, my decision.
Your knee pads, your knees, your decision.
Got it yet?
-mr. bill
#1031
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
It is still amusing to watch you complain about "rudeness" and "bullying", though.
#1032
Just a person on bike
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,140
Bikes: 2015 Trek 1.1, 2021 Specialized Roubaix, 2022 Tern HSD S+
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times
in
56 Posts
Far as I can tell you haven't yet answered a single question on this thread. Your stuff consists entirely of "Apropos of nothing, here's a hint, look at this graphic I made up out of thin air."
It is still amusing to watch you complain about "rudeness" and "bullying", though.
It is still amusing to watch you complain about "rudeness" and "bullying", though.
__________________
The value of your life doesn't change based on the way you travel. - Dawn Schellenberg (SDOT)
The value of your life doesn't change based on the way you travel. - Dawn Schellenberg (SDOT)
#1033
Senior Member
#1034
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,259
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4245 Post(s)
Liked 1,350 Times
in
936 Posts
And, congratulations on not actually addressing the implied question!
Last edited by njkayaker; 01-28-15 at 11:09 AM.
#1035
Senior Member
#1036
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,259
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4245 Post(s)
Liked 1,350 Times
in
936 Posts
Your point being that you make up stuff? Why do you do that?
Actually, it appears you are just really bad at writing!
No one should trust you to be able to identify a rational argument anyway.
Actually, it appears you are just really bad at writing!
No one should trust you to be able to identify a rational argument anyway.
Last edited by njkayaker; 01-28-15 at 04:24 PM.
#1037
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,648
Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1606 Post(s)
Liked 2,570 Times
in
1,218 Posts
Why didn't the Survey carry over to this thread? Kind of like taking the odometer off your bike...
#1038
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
#1039
Tractorlegs
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 3,185
Bikes: Schwinn Meridian Single-Speed Tricycle
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Liked 60 Times
in
42 Posts
You're right! @tractorlegs should add the poll please.
. . . poll added . . .
But only cuz ya said "please"
__________________
********************************
Trikeman
Trikeman
Last edited by Mark Stone; 01-28-15 at 06:34 PM.
#1040
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Berkley, Michigan USA
Posts: 76
Bikes: 1972 Gitane Gransport, 1985 Gitane Performance
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Interesting thread......although a bit warn.
I do wear a helmet:
1. I wear one because I want to be role model for 5 grand daughters. Hard to tell them to wear one if I don't.
2. I am convinced (do not want to run the A vs B test though) that my helmet reduced my injuries a few years back. I had a testosterone attack a few years back on a path I knew nothing about. Came around a blind corner at a high speed and discovered that the path continued to turn because there was a DITCH in the way. Path turned...I didn't. T-boned the ditch. Over the hand-bars I flew as the bike fork reshaped itself. Head hit first, helmet broke into several pieces but stayed in the plastic shell. Shoulder hit next and tore a few tendons. Lucky I didn't break my neck.
I wear one, if you don't, I think that is your choice. As long as I don't have subsidize any of your medical bills.
My neighbor was out for a spin 3 years back, down by the library in our sleepy little town and this 80 year old senior didn't see him as he came around a corner (not clear since all our side streets have stop signs, so how could he get going so fast so soon). Neighbor got launched into space and landed on his head. Did his helmet reduce his brain damage....who knows. $1,000,000 later (real number according to his wife) and 3 years and his speech is almost 'normal'. Still walks slow and of course had to retire several years early because he could hold up his end in a small company any more. Was in hospital for almost an entire year his wife thought she was loosing him at least twice in that time. He doesn't ride a bike anymore but I am sure if he did he would still put a helmet on. I doubt he could balance on one anymore even if he wanted to ride again.
You debate it.....I will wear one. Good luck.
I do wear a helmet:
1. I wear one because I want to be role model for 5 grand daughters. Hard to tell them to wear one if I don't.
2. I am convinced (do not want to run the A vs B test though) that my helmet reduced my injuries a few years back. I had a testosterone attack a few years back on a path I knew nothing about. Came around a blind corner at a high speed and discovered that the path continued to turn because there was a DITCH in the way. Path turned...I didn't. T-boned the ditch. Over the hand-bars I flew as the bike fork reshaped itself. Head hit first, helmet broke into several pieces but stayed in the plastic shell. Shoulder hit next and tore a few tendons. Lucky I didn't break my neck.
I wear one, if you don't, I think that is your choice. As long as I don't have subsidize any of your medical bills.
My neighbor was out for a spin 3 years back, down by the library in our sleepy little town and this 80 year old senior didn't see him as he came around a corner (not clear since all our side streets have stop signs, so how could he get going so fast so soon). Neighbor got launched into space and landed on his head. Did his helmet reduce his brain damage....who knows. $1,000,000 later (real number according to his wife) and 3 years and his speech is almost 'normal'. Still walks slow and of course had to retire several years early because he could hold up his end in a small company any more. Was in hospital for almost an entire year his wife thought she was loosing him at least twice in that time. He doesn't ride a bike anymore but I am sure if he did he would still put a helmet on. I doubt he could balance on one anymore even if he wanted to ride again.
You debate it.....I will wear one. Good luck.
Last edited by Len S; 01-28-15 at 06:57 PM.
#1042
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,513
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1431 Post(s)
Liked 330 Times
in
218 Posts
Footnote: I am a hat wearer because I like wearing hats. A bike helmet is a ventilated hat that stays on my head, shades my eyes, and holds my rear view mirror. And my new health insurance coverage subsidizes all of the above knuckleheads including 56 year old men who get pregnant.
#1043
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Two points:
1) The thread tends to be a "bit warm" in large part due to smug helmet wearers posting things like "As long as I don't have to pay your medical bills".
2) The "I set an example for the children" thing doesn't hold water, because there are all sorts of things that parents do while telling their children they cannot. Doubtless there are folks who think having a glass of wine with dinner sets a bad example...
1) The thread tends to be a "bit warm" in large part due to smug helmet wearers posting things like "As long as I don't have to pay your medical bills".
2) The "I set an example for the children" thing doesn't hold water, because there are all sorts of things that parents do while telling their children they cannot. Doubtless there are folks who think having a glass of wine with dinner sets a bad example...
#1044
Senior Member
Inj Prev. 2015 Feb;21(1):47-51. doi: 10.1136/injprev-00002-0038rep.
[h=1]Epidemiology of bicycle injuries and risk factors for serious injury.[/h]A study of 3,854 cyclist lives, across seven hospitals in the Seattle area found "Risk for serious injury was not affected by helmet use."
Yet another study nailing the lid on the helmet-usage coffin. Time to give it up, boys, logic and science outguns your irrational fears.
Here's the PubMed link:
Epidemiology of bicycle injuries and risk factors for serious injury. - PubMed - NCBI
[h=1]Epidemiology of bicycle injuries and risk factors for serious injury.[/h]A study of 3,854 cyclist lives, across seven hospitals in the Seattle area found "Risk for serious injury was not affected by helmet use."
Yet another study nailing the lid on the helmet-usage coffin. Time to give it up, boys, logic and science outguns your irrational fears.
Here's the PubMed link:
Epidemiology of bicycle injuries and risk factors for serious injury. - PubMed - NCBI
#1045
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Inj Prev. 2015 Feb;21(1):47-51. doi: 10.1136/injprev-00002-0038rep.
Epidemiology of bicycle injuries and risk factors for serious injury.
A study of 3,854 cyclist lives, across seven hospitals in the Seattle area found "Risk for serious injury was not affected by helmet use."
Yet another study nailing the lid on the helmet-usage coffin. Time to give it up, boys, logic and science outguns your irrational fears.
Here's the PubMed link:
Epidemiology of bicycle injuries and risk factors for serious injury. - PubMed - NCBI
Epidemiology of bicycle injuries and risk factors for serious injury.
A study of 3,854 cyclist lives, across seven hospitals in the Seattle area found "Risk for serious injury was not affected by helmet use."
Yet another study nailing the lid on the helmet-usage coffin. Time to give it up, boys, logic and science outguns your irrational fears.
Here's the PubMed link:
Epidemiology of bicycle injuries and risk factors for serious injury. - PubMed - NCBI
Their conclusions tend to confirm my own, but there were a few things that lean the other way. First let me point out that "Use of a helmet was only associated with a 10% decreased risk of severe injury" which they dismiss as "not statistically significant". And also regarding the more minor injuries, "In a separatereport based on this same series of injuries however, we demonstrated a 65% reduction in upper and mid-face injuries from helmets."
My first reaction to the abstract was, it's all from hospital and ER data. What about the accidents with injuries that never reach that point? Maybe helmets prevented those injuries and those incidents were never taken into account. But the full study allays that to some extent by ranking the severity of injuries according to a defined standard. If helmet use did mitigate injuries from "serious" to non-serious, that data would be captured in the ER and hospital reports, and reflected in the results. In fact it was captured that way, but only a 10% reduction. 10% seems like a lot to me, if it's a reliable number, but they're saying that the number of examples is too small for 10% improvement to be a hard and fast conclusion.
It still would not be captured if a "serious" would have been suffered, but the helmet stopped it and also prevented any injury at all. Who knows how many of those there might have been. I would expect that preventing a serious head injury, there would still be minor injuries as well and an ER visit in many cases, but that's common sense not data.
The other thing that bugs me is that the helmet use was self-reported, including from parents of young children who were injured, which makes me suspect that many of them may have simply lied. The inclination would be to refuse to admit in writing on some official-looking questionnaire that their child's serious injury may have been due to their neglect to make him or her wear a helmet. Especially if there are helmet laws there. So I have to take it with a grain of salt.
#1046
Cycle Dallas
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Land of Gar, TX
Posts: 3,777
Bikes: Dulcinea--2017 Kona Rove & a few others
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
5 Posts
Two points:
1) The thread tends to be a "bit warm" in large part due to smug helmet wearers posting things like "As long as I don't have to pay your medical bills".
2) The "I set an example for the children" thing doesn't hold water, because there are all sorts of things that parents do while telling their children they cannot. Doubtless there are folks who think having a glass of wine with dinner sets a bad example...
1) The thread tends to be a "bit warm" in large part due to smug helmet wearers posting things like "As long as I don't have to pay your medical bills".
2) The "I set an example for the children" thing doesn't hold water, because there are all sorts of things that parents do while telling their children they cannot. Doubtless there are folks who think having a glass of wine with dinner sets a bad example...
We helmeteers tend to argue from a rather emotional place and it doesn't help our case much. However, don't think for a minute that we've cornered the market of smugness in this thread.
It's always fun to be "the only guy in the room" who knows something. Bare-headed cycling is an unpopular position in America, especially amongst non-cyclists. To have the knowledge that many helmet-threaders have is not the norm.
The bare-headers and helmeteers, alike tend to look down their noses on those of who see the same evidence but reach a different conclusion than they do.
Sorry, I started rambling, there.
#1047
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,259
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4245 Post(s)
Liked 1,350 Times
in
936 Posts
Those replies are are to posts from "smug" non-helmet wearers.
I suspect that the real purpose of this "ghetto" is to keep the antihelmeteers (like skye) from repeatedly derailing threads that were not really "pro helmet".
#1048
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,513
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1431 Post(s)
Liked 330 Times
in
218 Posts
The base issue here on the helmet thread is basic human tribalism.
"Tribalism implies the possession of a strong cultural or ethnic identity that separates one member of a group from the members of another group. Based on strong relations of proximity and kinship, members of a tribe tend to possess a strong feeling of identity." -Wiki...see tribalism link above.
Helmet wearers as well as bare-headers often IDENTIFY with certain things in their lives. Diet, religion, political or sexual orientation, country of origin, etc. We tend to OWN or beliefs as if they were freckles on our noses. It is nearly impossible to change a tribal belief or superstition. So all of the data in the world will almost never change the mind, no...the PERSONA, of anyone here no more than you can change their religion based on "facts".
But it's fun to nudge the other tribe isn't it?
"Tribalism implies the possession of a strong cultural or ethnic identity that separates one member of a group from the members of another group. Based on strong relations of proximity and kinship, members of a tribe tend to possess a strong feeling of identity." -Wiki...see tribalism link above.
Helmet wearers as well as bare-headers often IDENTIFY with certain things in their lives. Diet, religion, political or sexual orientation, country of origin, etc. We tend to OWN or beliefs as if they were freckles on our noses. It is nearly impossible to change a tribal belief or superstition. So all of the data in the world will almost never change the mind, no...the PERSONA, of anyone here no more than you can change their religion based on "facts".
But it's fun to nudge the other tribe isn't it?
Last edited by JoeyBike; 01-29-15 at 10:36 AM.
#1049
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,259
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4245 Post(s)
Liked 1,350 Times
in
936 Posts
For those with some questions about the abstract, Google found this for me: Epidemiology of bicycle injuries and risk factors for serious injury the full study.
Their conclusions tend to confirm my own, but there were a few things that lean the other way. First let me point out that "Use of a helmet was only associated with a 10% decreased risk of severe injury" which they dismiss as "not statistically significant". And also regarding the more minor injuries, "In a separatereport based on this same series of injuries however, we demonstrated a 65% reduction in upper and mid-face injuries from helmets."
My first reaction to the abstract was, it's all from hospital and ER data. What about the accidents with injuries that never reach that point? Maybe helmets prevented those injuries and those incidents were never taken into account. But the full study allays that to some extent by ranking the severity of injuries according to a defined standard. If helmet use did mitigate injuries from "serious" to non-serious, that data would be captured in the ER and hospital reports, and reflected in the results. In fact it was captured that way, but only a 10% reduction. 10% seems like a lot to me, if it's a reliable number, but they're saying that the number of examples is too small for improvement to be a hard and fast conclusion.
It still would not be captured if a "serious" would have been suffered, but the helmet stopped it and also prevented any injury at all. Who knows how many of those there might have been. I would expect that preventing a serious head injury, there would still be minor injuries as well and an ER visit in many cases, but that's common sense not data.
The other thing that bugs me is that the helmet use was self-reported, including from parents of young children who were injured, which makes me suspect that many of them may have simply lied. The inclination would be to refuse to admit in writing on some official-looking questionnaire that their child's serious injury may have been due to their neglect to make him or her wear a helmet. Especially if there are helmet laws there. So I have to take it with a grain of salt.
Their conclusions tend to confirm my own, but there were a few things that lean the other way. First let me point out that "Use of a helmet was only associated with a 10% decreased risk of severe injury" which they dismiss as "not statistically significant". And also regarding the more minor injuries, "In a separatereport based on this same series of injuries however, we demonstrated a 65% reduction in upper and mid-face injuries from helmets."
My first reaction to the abstract was, it's all from hospital and ER data. What about the accidents with injuries that never reach that point? Maybe helmets prevented those injuries and those incidents were never taken into account. But the full study allays that to some extent by ranking the severity of injuries according to a defined standard. If helmet use did mitigate injuries from "serious" to non-serious, that data would be captured in the ER and hospital reports, and reflected in the results. In fact it was captured that way, but only a 10% reduction. 10% seems like a lot to me, if it's a reliable number, but they're saying that the number of examples is too small for improvement to be a hard and fast conclusion.
It still would not be captured if a "serious" would have been suffered, but the helmet stopped it and also prevented any injury at all. Who knows how many of those there might have been. I would expect that preventing a serious head injury, there would still be minor injuries as well and an ER visit in many cases, but that's common sense not data.
The other thing that bugs me is that the helmet use was self-reported, including from parents of young children who were injured, which makes me suspect that many of them may have simply lied. The inclination would be to refuse to admit in writing on some official-looking questionnaire that their child's serious injury may have been due to their neglect to make him or her wear a helmet. Especially if there are helmet laws there. So I have to take it with a grain of salt.
Where is the other report?
For those with some questions about the abstract, Google found this for me: Epidemiology of bicycle injuries and risk factors for serious injury the full study.
Put another way, people want to be 100% sure that an effect is real. "Statistical significance" means that an effect is deemed real if it's 95% or more sure.
It's possible that the "10% difference" is 94% sure to be real (we'd have to read the article to know).
Last edited by njkayaker; 01-29-15 at 10:53 AM.
#1050
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Point 1, I absolutely agree. Point 2 is a bit of a gray area. I think we all do our best to set a good example for our kids.
We helmeteers tend to argue from a rather emotional place and it doesn't help our case much. However, don't think for a minute that we've cornered the market of smugness in this thread.
It's always fun to be "the only guy in the room" who knows something. Bare-headed cycling is an unpopular position in America, especially amongst non-cyclists. To have the knowledge that many helmet-threaders have is not the norm.
The bare-headers and helmeteers, alike tend to look down their noses on those of who see the same evidence but reach a different conclusion than they do.
Sorry, I started rambling, there.
We helmeteers tend to argue from a rather emotional place and it doesn't help our case much. However, don't think for a minute that we've cornered the market of smugness in this thread.
It's always fun to be "the only guy in the room" who knows something. Bare-headed cycling is an unpopular position in America, especially amongst non-cyclists. To have the knowledge that many helmet-threaders have is not the norm.
The bare-headers and helmeteers, alike tend to look down their noses on those of who see the same evidence but reach a different conclusion than they do.
Sorry, I started rambling, there.
WRT the rest, if the average bare-header is looking down his nose at anything, it's at the intentional and aggressive ignorance displayed by the helmeteers who show up to post the usual "organ donor/Darwin candidate/don't expect me to pay for you" routine. As always, I don't believe this thread would exist at all if the helmet advocates would shut up about it.