Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

The Helmet Thread 2

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.
View Poll Results: What Are Your Helmet Wearing Habits?
I've never worn a bike helmet
52
10.40%
I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped
24
4.80%
I've always worn a helmet
208
41.60%
I didn't wear a helmet, but now do
126
25.20%
I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions
90
18.00%
Voters: 500. You may not vote on this poll

The Helmet Thread 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-15, 02:10 PM
  #1651  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,272
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4257 Post(s)
Liked 1,354 Times in 940 Posts
Originally Posted by wphamilton
I am honestly perplexed about your distinction, unless by "routine" you mean that it's easier in a dojo with the padded floor and you know it's coming. But the whole point of it is being able to perform the fall or roll in real conditions, at full speeds. I'm not anywhere skilled as a black belt or gymnast, but I consider a bike fall to be a routine use of those techniques, at any normal biking speed.
???

In martial arts (eg judo/aikido), it's routine/typical/common/regular to "fall" (especially in training/practice). That is, everybody falls, frequently.

Falling when bicycling is considered fairly exceptional (even when training). Falls are rare for the vast majority of cyclists.

Obviously, the two things are not the same.


Originally Posted by wphamilton
Avoiding falls is your first line of defense. That's not always possible, and when it does happen we are vastly better off knowing how. I sometimes get the sense that people who are dismissive of those skills don't really understand what I'm talking about, or they just don't believe that it's possible. Wearing a helmet is the last line of defense, when your training cannot prevent a head impact.
All this is obvious. The issue is what sort of training has the best benefit/cost ratio. It's not clear that training to fall would have the best ratio. Especially, since bicycle falls are rare.

Last edited by njkayaker; 10-09-15 at 02:25 PM.
njkayaker is offline  
Old 10-09-15, 02:21 PM
  #1652  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Originally Posted by mr_bill
What *other* "confounding factor" are you leaving out of the "ER stats that I've seen." That's right, age. (Oh, and another hint since you like to make up facts - the majority of TBIs from falls do *NOT* happen on sidewalks.)
CDC shows "falls" as the most significant cause. CDC | Get the Facts | Traumatic Brain Injury | Injury Center.
This page is about traumatic brain injury, so the reader should keep in mind that it's a subset of the more general "head injury". Nevertheless it proves that it's a fact.
Or in a nice chart from the CDC regarding general non-fatal injuries:
For statistics on the cause of falls you need a different source, sources for which I have cited previously on this thread. If you're that interested, and familiar enough with my writing to attempt that kind of personal attack, I'm sure you've seen it or can find it.

There are any number of external variables which correlate with the probability of falls, and age is one of them. But your objection is misplaced because I am not demonstrating a correlation beyond a very general activity. Notice in the chart above, the high ranking of accidental falls in all age groups.
wphamilton is offline  
Old 10-09-15, 02:32 PM
  #1653  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,972

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times in 1,045 Posts
Originally Posted by mr_bill
You know who recommends helmets for automobile drivers and passengers?
Originally Posted by mr_bill
You know who recommends helmets for showers?
Originally Posted by mr_bill
You know who recommends walking helmets?
Originally Posted by mr_bill
You know who recommends couch helmets?

Anti-helmet zealots and ?

-mr. bill
Helmet true believers who have any integrity.
Anti-helmet "zeolots exist only in the nightmares of rydabent and others of his ilk, or as straw man arguments for BF rhetorical funnymen.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 10-09-15, 02:35 PM
  #1654  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Originally Posted by njkayaker
???

In martial arts (eg judo/aikido), it's routine/typical/common/regular to "fall" (especially in training/practice). That is, everybody falls, frequently.

Falling when bicycling is considered fairly exceptional (even when training). Falls are rare for the vast majority of cyclists.

Obviously, the two things are not the same.
You mean "infrequent" then. Routine is something that is practiced and invariant, as much as practicable. In this context, since we're talking about people who have trained for falls and rolling (so that it is routine for them), it doesn't make much sense to say that it is not routine for them on the bike unless there is some physical differentiation.

Even though one event is more infrequent that the other, they may still be the same technique, the same actions. Recall that you said "Bicycle falls aren't very much like those things." Frequency doesn't seem to a very logical distinction in that context. Are you sure that's what you meant, or did you have something else in mind when you wrote it?
wphamilton is offline  
Old 10-09-15, 07:43 PM
  #1655  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada, PG BC
Posts: 3,849

Bikes: 27 speed ORYX with over 39,000Kms on it and another 14,000KMs with a BionX E-Assist on it

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1024 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times in 49 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
So what? Those "other things" only reduce the risk for "most things", not eliminate it; wearing a "no burden helmet" in conjunction with the "other things" involved with getting off the living room couch might reduce the risk even more. So why not?
There's the rub.... Nobody says helmets eliminate the risk of head injuries... Reducing injuries, is what wearing a helmet is about. JMO To try and eliminate or reduce injury is a totally different subject... NO?
350htrr is offline  
Old 10-09-15, 09:47 PM
  #1656  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,272
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4257 Post(s)
Liked 1,354 Times in 940 Posts
Originally Posted by wphamilton
You mean "infrequent" then. Routine is something that is practiced and invariant, as much as practicable. In this context, since we're talking about people who have trained for falls and rolling (so that it is routine for them), it doesn't make much sense to say that it is not routine for them on the bike unless there is some physical differentiation.

Even though one event is more infrequent that the other, they may still be the same technique, the same actions. Recall that you said "Bicycle falls aren't very much like those things." Frequency doesn't seem to a very logical distinction in that context. Are you sure that's what you meant, or did you have something else in mind when you wrote it?
It's normal and very frequent in one case and exceptional and very rare in the other. It's awfully close to routine in the martial arts.

There is probably a much wider variation in bicycle falls. Involving things like bicycles, higher speeds, vehicles, harder surfaces, etc. Different in many cases. Obviously.

It doesn't seem like the two are much alike at all.

Last edited by njkayaker; 10-09-15 at 09:52 PM.
njkayaker is offline  
Old 10-10-15, 07:22 AM
  #1657  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924

Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times in 635 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
So what? Do you wear your Colorado pickup when you walk up or down stairs, take a shower, or venture outside the friendly confines of your living room couch? Would not your precious "no burden at all" helmet offer additional "protection" even when driving your air bag equipped Colorado pickup? If you do not wear your helmet at these times/all the time for any additional protection that you believe it offers, why not, since it is "no burden at all"?
The safety equiptment I use on the stairs is the hand rail. I wear sneakers that cost some more that has a "roll bar" built in to prevent the twisting of the shoe on uneven ground. There is a hand rail in the shower. There is in fact some safety equiptment available for most everything a person does. When you get older you get wiser. I have no death wish, I dont like pain.

So------------as you can see I have access to passive safety equiptment when Im not cycling. Pretty much blows all to hell one of the biggest arguments anti helmet people have doesnt it.

Oh------------and I dont run with scissors, stick beans up my nose, and pet porcupines. Any other non cycling activity that pretty much dont belong on a cycling forum you want to bring up?
rydabent is offline  
Old 10-10-15, 08:56 AM
  #1658  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Originally Posted by njkayaker
It's normal and very frequent in one case and exceptional and very rare in the other. It's awfully close to routine in the martial arts.

There is probably a much wider variation in bicycle falls. Involving things like bicycles, higher speeds, vehicles, harder surfaces, etc. Different in many cases. Obviously.

It doesn't seem like the two are much alike at all.
Trying to see this from your point of view, I realize that as a young man I'd have completely agreed with you. I was on motorcycles constantly, a lot of dirt-biking on them, also on road motorbikes and a little motocross and enduro, always pushing the limits and crashing all the time. I thought that I was pretty good at it, and I would have said that my main impression of a crash at 25 mph or better, road or dirt, was that it felt incredibly violent. The ground pummels you, trees and rocks banging on your body, even a brief touch of the road surface abrades your skin. It does seem like they're two different things.

I learned a couple of falls, not even martial arts, and discovered that the earlier impression was wrong. I still had help from the self-taught skills from before, but a motorcycle crash at high speeds was no longer uncontrolled violence. You can control your body in ways to eliminate injury. It was only later that I learned some more advanced methods from martial arts, and I did practice them on all surfaces and full speed, and I know now that it's exactly the same when falling from a bike. You're right, it doesn't seem like it would be, but it is.

The only time I've had a hard hit to the head by the way, or hard enough to matter, was when I was 17 doing jumps on a motorcycle. I was wearing a helmet at the time. I've never done more than scrape the backside of a helmet on a bicycle crash. From my experience therefore, knowing how is far, far more effective than is the helmet itself and I don't see how any sport worthy of safety equipment is also not worthy of training for the same incidents.

I'm pretty sure that I don't want to try a straight backfall or normal shoulder roll with an aero helmet. With a normal Bell helmet I haven't really noticed it in the way, except for the light scratches that one time. Somewhere in between, the helmets will become dangerous and I think that it's something pretty important to know. These articles and studies present it as speculative, even the one that skye linked, but someone who is really good at the techniques could strap one on, try it and tell us. I'm not trained well enough that I want to take the risk.
wphamilton is offline  
Old 10-10-15, 11:27 AM
  #1659  
vol
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,797
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by rydabent
The safety equiptment I use on the stairs is the hand rail. I wear sneakers that cost some more that has a "roll bar" built in to prevent the twisting of the shoe on uneven ground. There is a hand rail in the shower.
All those hand rails on your stairs and in the shower, sneaker roll bars serve to prevent an accident from happening, not in case an accident does happen and you do hit your head.

So you think you don't need helmet because you have those preventive measures.

That's exactly we, who don't regularly wear cycling helmet do. We make sure to be highly visible and use bright head and tail lights in the dark. This helps prevent being hit, reducing accident likelihood, though not guaranteed to eliminate it.

If the above is too much to be clear to you, in simple words:

Hand rails in shower and on stairs ~ high-visibility + bike lights during cycling ===> Accident prevention

Wearing helmet on stairs and in showers ~ wearing helmet while cycling ====> In case an accident does occur

No helmet on stairs and in showers ~ No helmet while cycling ===> Head trauma if an accident does occur in which one's head gets hit

So------------as you can see I have access to passive safety equiptment when Im not cycling. Pretty much blows all to hell one of the biggest arguments anti helmet people have doesnt it.
Not only false, but you have just exposed your reasoning flaw under plain day light

I hope this post has convinced you that you do need to wear a helmet in the shower and on the stairs.
vol is offline  
Old 10-10-15, 06:21 PM
  #1660  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times in 443 Posts
Oh, please.

Seatbelts and airbags are *NOT* accident prevention - they are personal protection devices. (Well, admittedly seatbelts also do have a bit of preventive benefit. But that's not their primary function in street automobiles.)

Yet you are so anti-helmet that you insist that automobile drivers and passengers wear helmets.

Are the bunch of you all done with your mutual rhetorgasms yet?

-mr. bill

Last edited by mr_bill; 10-10-15 at 08:40 PM.
mr_bill is offline  
Old 10-11-15, 02:42 PM
  #1661  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,272
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4257 Post(s)
Liked 1,354 Times in 940 Posts
Originally Posted by wphamilton
Trying to see this from your point of view, I realize that as a young man I'd have completely agreed with you. I was on motorcycles constantly, a lot of dirt-biking on them, also on road motorbikes and a little motocross and enduro, always pushing the limits and crashing all the time. I thought that I was pretty good at it, and I would have said that my main impression of a crash at 25 mph or better, road or dirt, was that it felt incredibly violent. The ground pummels you, trees and rocks banging on your body, even a brief touch of the road surface abrades your skin. It does seem like they're two different things.

I learned a couple of falls, not even martial arts, and discovered that the earlier impression was wrong. I still had help from the self-taught skills from before, but a motorcycle crash at high speeds was no longer uncontrolled violence. You can control your body in ways to eliminate injury. It was only later that I learned some more advanced methods from martial arts, and I did practice them on all surfaces and full speed, and I know now that it's exactly the same when falling from a bike. You're right, it doesn't seem like it would be, but it is.

The only time I've had a hard hit to the head by the way, or hard enough to matter, was when I was 17 doing jumps on a motorcycle. I was wearing a helmet at the time. I've never done more than scrape the backside of a helmet on a bicycle crash. From my experience therefore, knowing how is far, far more effective than is the helmet itself and I don't see how any sport worthy of safety equipment is also not worthy of training for the same incidents.

I'm pretty sure that I don't want to try a straight backfall or normal shoulder roll with an aero helmet. With a normal Bell helmet I haven't really noticed it in the way, except for the light scratches that one time. Somewhere in between, the helmets will become dangerous and I think that it's something pretty important to know. These articles and studies present it as speculative, even the one that skye linked, but someone who is really good at the techniques could strap one on, try it and tell us. I'm not trained well enough that I want to take the risk.
Interesting.

If you are spending a lot of time crashing, it might be worthwhile practicing. If crashing is a rare and exceptional event, it might not be.
njkayaker is offline  
Old 10-11-15, 05:19 PM
  #1662  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Originally Posted by njkayaker
Interesting.

If you are spending a lot of time crashing, it might be worthwhile practicing. If crashing is a rare and exceptional event, it might not be.
I wasn't soliciting your advice. And no I do not crash frequently.

If you just meant that in general, yes that's true and the same applies to wearing a helmet. My point is that the skills are worth more, more effective, than the helmet. Anyone requiring a helmet should more logically be acquiring the skills.

Last edited by wphamilton; 10-11-15 at 05:40 PM.
wphamilton is offline  
Old 10-12-15, 01:44 AM
  #1663  
Senior Member
 
CarinusMalmari's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 223
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1662 Post(s)
Liked 226 Times in 131 Posts
Originally Posted by mr_bill

You know who recommends helmets for grandma and grandpa?

Anti-helmet zealots and ?

-mr. bill
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
CarinusMalmari is offline  
Old 10-12-15, 03:50 AM
  #1664  
Senior Member
 
Looigi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Helmeted riders: 58% lower odds of severe brain injury

"The researchers found that among this group of patients—those who sustained traumatic brain injury after a bicycle related accident—the ones wearing helmets had a 58 percent reduced odds of severe traumatic brain injury and a 59 percent reduced odds of death. Further, the use of helmets reduced by 61 percent the odds of craniotomy (an operation to remove part of the bone from the skull to expose the brain) and facial fractures by 26 percent. "

https://www.facs.org/media/press-releases/2015/haider
Looigi is offline  
Old 10-12-15, 05:15 AM
  #1665  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times in 443 Posts
Originally Posted by CarinusMalmari
....
Anti-helmet sophists.

-mr. bill
mr_bill is offline  
Old 10-12-15, 08:45 AM
  #1666  
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924

Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II

Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times in 635 Posts
This needs to be posted on the helmet thread also.
rydabent is offline  
Old 10-12-15, 08:52 AM
  #1667  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada, PG BC
Posts: 3,849

Bikes: 27 speed ORYX with over 39,000Kms on it and another 14,000KMs with a BionX E-Assist on it

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1024 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times in 49 Posts
Originally Posted by wphamilton
I wasn't soliciting your advice. And no I do not crash frequently.

If you just meant that in general, yes that's true and the same applies to wearing a helmet. My point is that the skills are worth more, more effective, than the helmet. Anyone requiring a helmet should more logically be acquiring the skills.
Skills are certainly worth more than a helmet to avoid a crash... But stuff happens, a squirrel could run out in front of you and get stuck in the spokes and over you go... A helmet then could also certainly be worth it's weight in gold when head hits the ground...
350htrr is offline  
Old 10-12-15, 09:47 AM
  #1668  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,972

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times in 1,045 Posts
Originally Posted by rydabent
This needs to be posted on the helmet thread also.
This thread needs to be moved to the helmet thread.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 10-12-15, 10:06 AM
  #1669  
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Looigi
"The researchers found that among this group of patients—those who sustained traumatic brain injury after a bicycle related accident—the ones wearing helmets had a 58 percent reduced odds of severe traumatic brain injury and a 59 percent reduced odds of death. Further, the use of helmets reduced by 61 percent the odds of craniotomy (an operation to remove part of the bone from the skull to expose the brain) and facial fractures by 26 percent. "

https://www.facs.org/media/press-releases/2015/haider
I use a helmet so I don't get another TBI. But the first one was due to brain operations connected to a (congenital)brain aneurysm, and (congenital)hydrocephalus.
Originally Posted by rydabent
This needs to be posted on the helmet thread also.
Agreed

Last edited by Chris516; 10-12-15 at 10:11 AM.
Chris516 is offline  
Old 10-12-15, 10:18 AM
  #1670  
Senior Member
 
badger1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1581 Post(s)
Liked 1,189 Times in 605 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
This thread needs to be moved to the helmet thread.
Agreed.
badger1 is offline  
Old 10-12-15, 10:22 AM
  #1671  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Hudson Valley, New York
Posts: 481

Bikes: 2014 Giant Roam

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Good thing we have these experts to let us know that helmets protect the head. If they want to raise awareness of helmets or make better helmets that's fine but I stop short of creating more laws. Anyone not wearing a helmet today is of age and a casual rider around town or just dumb.

We can get on New Yorks case. They provide citibikes to any random tourist in a place with possibly the worst cycling infrastructure of any major city and i dont believe they come with helmets. You'd have to be mad to try and ride around the nitty gritty there on a rented bike. Makes me wonder who the average citibike rider is and where they go on them.
TheLibrarian is offline  
Old 10-12-15, 10:41 AM
  #1672  
Just Plain Slow
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 6,026

Bikes: Lynskey R230

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Merged. Carry on.
PhotoJoe is offline  
Old 10-12-15, 11:00 AM
  #1673  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times in 443 Posts
Just the abstract so far.

-mr. bill
mr_bill is offline  
Old 10-12-15, 11:32 AM
  #1674  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Originally Posted by 350htrr
Skills are certainly worth more than a helmet to avoid a crash... But stuff happens, a squirrel could run out in front of you and get stuck in the spokes and over you go... A helmet then could also certainly be worth it's weight in gold when head hits the ground...
I mean skills during a crash, not just the skills to avoid one.
wphamilton is offline  
Old 10-12-15, 01:30 PM
  #1675  
vol
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,797
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Looigi
"The researchers found that among this group of patients—those who sustained traumatic brain injury after a bicycle related accident—the ones wearing helmets had a 58 percent reduced odds of severe traumatic brain injury and a 59 percent reduced odds of death. Further, the use of helmets reduced by 61 percent the odds of craniotomy (an operation to remove part of the bone from the skull to expose the brain) and facial fractures by 26 percent. "
Replace "bicycle" by "shower" or "stairs", or just about any activities that may result in head injury, do you think the statement would be far from true?

That's why it's important to wear a helmet on the stairs or in the shower, according to the logic of some people.

Still looking forward to a reply to my post #1659 (#1660 was not a direct reply since seat belts and airbags were not mentioned in #1657 or #1659).
vol is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.