Law Enforcement
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
#27
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Waterloo, ON
Posts: 431
Bikes: Surly Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There is the real possibility that this is of their own doing. According to the "Broken Window" model of law enforcement, by refusing to enforce traffic law police have allowed for the idea that "low-level" crimes will not be prosecuted to flourish. As I recall, when I lived where police did traffic law enforcement, they generally solved burglaries before the crimes were reported during a traffic stop.
We could also automate traffic enforcement to some degree. Photo radar always generated public backlash, but only because people don't like to get caught.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,700
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Interesting take on "there oughta be a law" mentality:
Law Puts Us All in Same Danger as Eric Garner
Law Puts Us All in Same Danger as Eric Garner
On the opening day of law school, I always counsel my first-year students never to support a law they are not willing to kill to enforce. Usually they greet this advice with something between skepticism and puzzlement, until I remind them that the police go armed to enforce the will of the state, and if you resist, they might kill you.
I wish this caution were only theoretical. It isn’t. Whatever your view on the refusal of a New York City grand jury to indict the police officer whose chokehold apparently led to the death of Eric Garner, it’s useful to remember the crime that Garner is alleged to have committed: He was selling individual cigarettes, or loosies, in violation of New York law.
...
Wrote Nick Gillespie in the Daily Beast, “Clearly something has gone horribly wrong when a man lies dead after being confronted for selling cigarettes to willing buyers.”
...there will never be a perfect technology of law enforcement, and therefore it is unavoidable that there will be situations where police err on the side of too much violence rather than too little. Better training won’t lead to perfection. But fewer laws would mean fewer opportunities for official violence to get out of hand.
... Every new law requires enforcement; every act of enforcement includes the possibility of violence. ...
I wish this caution were only theoretical. It isn’t. Whatever your view on the refusal of a New York City grand jury to indict the police officer whose chokehold apparently led to the death of Eric Garner, it’s useful to remember the crime that Garner is alleged to have committed: He was selling individual cigarettes, or loosies, in violation of New York law.
...
Wrote Nick Gillespie in the Daily Beast, “Clearly something has gone horribly wrong when a man lies dead after being confronted for selling cigarettes to willing buyers.”
...there will never be a perfect technology of law enforcement, and therefore it is unavoidable that there will be situations where police err on the side of too much violence rather than too little. Better training won’t lead to perfection. But fewer laws would mean fewer opportunities for official violence to get out of hand.
... Every new law requires enforcement; every act of enforcement includes the possibility of violence. ...
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,261
Bikes: Salsa Vaya
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 172 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
This is an interesting article on Ferguson and the use of traffic fines as a revenue source in lieu of taxes. Riot-torn Ferguson's distrust of police flows from a city run on fines - World - CBC News
We have to distinguish between a cash grab and legitimate enforcement/education. Based on what I see every day, there is much more of the former.
We have to distinguish between a cash grab and legitimate enforcement/education. Based on what I see every day, there is much more of the former.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
Traffic law enforcement is legit. If you get a citation, you were breaking the law and it is whiny to complain about paying this completely voluntary "tax".
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,261
Bikes: Salsa Vaya
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 172 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
You're pulling our legs, right? Why stop at fines? We need prison for jaywalkers and the lash for sidewalk spitters. That'll learn 'em.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
Looks like someone is off their medications.
#34
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Waterloo, ON
Posts: 431
Bikes: Surly Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: D'uh... I am a Cutter
Posts: 6,159
Bikes: '17 Access Old Turnpike Gravel bike, '14 Trek 1.1, '13 Cannondale CAAD 10, '98 CAD 2, R300
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1571 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
The best way to eliminate bicycling injuries.... is to make cycling illegal. And I've always thought that is where the "safety advocates" are heading.
The true solution is to incarcerate the entire population.... and then control the prisoners through work-release programs and half-way houses.
Last edited by Dave Cutter; 12-07-14 at 12:29 AM.
#37
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Waterloo, ON
Posts: 431
Bikes: Surly Krampus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Fair enough; I just thought fines went into general revenue. When it comes to corruption and how police are overseen, that's a whole other problem. But I still believe that more basic traffic enforcement and stiffer penalties for all road users who break the law would be a good thing.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
The pattern is obvious to most people.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,261
Bikes: Salsa Vaya
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 172 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
More generally, I conclude from the emphasis police place on bulk ticketing for trivial offenses and their apparent unwillingness to enforce more difficult serious offenses that there is some connection between traffic fines and funding though not a direct one. Parking fines (enforced by the courts) are a direct city money-maker, of course.
#40
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267
Bikes: NA
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
PS: An entrenched majority that benefits from an unequal and unfair status quo is almost always opposed to change.
Last edited by spare_wheel; 12-07-14 at 12:35 PM.
#41
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Stay out of their way then.
What is so hard about that?
You fail to understand one thing...
If you were to tell me you are smarter than a locomotive I would have to tell you that the train doesn't care and won't come to a stop until it's a mile from your bugsplatter.
Apples and oranges. Never take a knife to a gunfight. Don't argue with anything that can easily kill you.
It's not a matter of your CIVIL RIGHTS. You only live once.
Keep pointing it out and work to get it prosecuted but don't assume you are going to stop it by your lone self.
Life isn't a mandatory arbitration. Things will suck and may never stop sucking. Work on that.
What is so hard about that?
You fail to understand one thing...
If you were to tell me you are smarter than a locomotive I would have to tell you that the train doesn't care and won't come to a stop until it's a mile from your bugsplatter.
Apples and oranges. Never take a knife to a gunfight. Don't argue with anything that can easily kill you.
It's not a matter of your CIVIL RIGHTS. You only live once.
Keep pointing it out and work to get it prosecuted but don't assume you are going to stop it by your lone self.
Life isn't a mandatory arbitration. Things will suck and may never stop sucking. Work on that.
Perhaps they should just wear orange uniforms so we can identify them right way... eh?
#42
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267
Bikes: NA
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
This is not rocket science.
Why yurpeeuhns don't slaughter as many human beings with their cars, trucks, and suvs.
1. Mandatory drivers education (often part of core educational curriculum).
2. Very strict licensing and testing requirements (sometimes with periodic re-review).
3. Liability laws that put the onus on motorists to not slaughter human beings.
4. Lower speed limits along with traffic reconfiguration that encourages safety in areas with vulnerable human beings.
5. Ubiquitous speed/signal cameras and CCTV.
Why yurpeeuhns don't slaughter as many human beings with their cars, trucks, and suvs.
1. Mandatory drivers education (often part of core educational curriculum).
2. Very strict licensing and testing requirements (sometimes with periodic re-review).
3. Liability laws that put the onus on motorists to not slaughter human beings.
4. Lower speed limits along with traffic reconfiguration that encourages safety in areas with vulnerable human beings.
5. Ubiquitous speed/signal cameras and CCTV.
#43
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 44
Bikes: 09 Kona Honk-y Tonk
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I disagree with both. Yes drunk drivers are dangerous, and so are drivers that don't pay attention.
But I think the 'me first' drivers are worse. Because, Drunk drivers while drunk, don't have a 'drunks first' attitude, just ignorance. Although the 'ignorant' drivers do seem to be in close competition with the 'me first' drivers'. Because the 'me first' drivers, don't give a darn who is on the road. They are the first ones' to commit road rage. Drunks don't commit road rage with premeditated intention, and 'ignorant' drivers' just aren't paying attention. But 'me first' drivers are BOTH.......selfish and ignorant
But I think the 'me first' drivers are worse. Because, Drunk drivers while drunk, don't have a 'drunks first' attitude, just ignorance. Although the 'ignorant' drivers do seem to be in close competition with the 'me first' drivers'. Because the 'me first' drivers, don't give a darn who is on the road. They are the first ones' to commit road rage. Drunks don't commit road rage with premeditated intention, and 'ignorant' drivers' just aren't paying attention. But 'me first' drivers are BOTH.......selfish and ignorant
#44
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267
Bikes: NA
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Lie back and think of england...
If you were to tell me you are smarter than a locomotive I would have to tell you that the train doesn't care and won't come to a stop until it's a mile from your bugsplatter.
Apples and oranges. Never take a knife to a gunfight. Don't argue with anything that can easily kill you.
It's not a matter of your CIVIL RIGHTS. You only live once.
Keep pointing it out and work to get it prosecuted but don't assume you are going to stop it by your lone self.
Apples and oranges. Never take a knife to a gunfight. Don't argue with anything that can easily kill you.
It's not a matter of your CIVIL RIGHTS. You only live once.
Keep pointing it out and work to get it prosecuted but don't assume you are going to stop it by your lone self.
It's also pure unadulterated hogwash. Even in the USA cycling for transportation is safe. My neighbors do not want to kill me for riding in the lane.
Last edited by spare_wheel; 12-07-14 at 12:32 PM.
#45
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
This is not rocket science.
Why yurpeeuhns don't slaughter as many human beings with their cars, trucks, and suvs.
1. Mandatory drivers education (often part of core educational curriculum).
2. Very strict licensing and testing requirements (sometimes with periodic re-review).
3. Liability laws that put the onus on motorists to not slaughter human beings.
4. Lower speed limits along with traffic reconfiguration that encourages safety in areas with vulnerable human beings.
5. Ubiquitous speed/signal cameras and CCTV.
Why yurpeeuhns don't slaughter as many human beings with their cars, trucks, and suvs.
1. Mandatory drivers education (often part of core educational curriculum).
2. Very strict licensing and testing requirements (sometimes with periodic re-review).
3. Liability laws that put the onus on motorists to not slaughter human beings.
4. Lower speed limits along with traffic reconfiguration that encourages safety in areas with vulnerable human beings.
5. Ubiquitous speed/signal cameras and CCTV.
#46
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Lie back and think of england...
I view your comment as a "stay out of the way or we/they will kill you" threat. It's intended to intimidate and cow a minority that challenges societal norms.
It's also pure unadulterated hogwash. Even in the USA cycling for transportation is safe. My neighbors do not want to kill me for riding in the lane.
I view your comment as a "stay out of the way or we/they will kill you" threat. It's intended to intimidate and cow a minority that challenges societal norms.
It's also pure unadulterated hogwash. Even in the USA cycling for transportation is safe. My neighbors do not want to kill me for riding in the lane.
#47
24-Speed Machine
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Maybe it is just me. But, Unless they are trying to ram an officer off the road during a chase. I don't see them doing intentionally to anyone else. Because, There is a difference between a driver with 'premeditated intention', and one in a drunken haze.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Carlstadt, NJ
Posts: 404
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
According to the article I posted, police in little places like Ferguson depend on fines to finance their operations as there is no local tax base.
More generally, I conclude from the emphasis police place on bulk ticketing for trivial offenses and their apparent unwillingness to enforce more difficult serious offenses that there is some connection between traffic fines and funding though not a direct one. Parking fines (enforced by the courts) are a direct city money-maker, of course.
More generally, I conclude from the emphasis police place on bulk ticketing for trivial offenses and their apparent unwillingness to enforce more difficult serious offenses that there is some connection between traffic fines and funding though not a direct one. Parking fines (enforced by the courts) are a direct city money-maker, of course.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
Its discouraging how some let their ideologies blind them to everyday issues, and forget reason.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,261
Bikes: Salsa Vaya
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 172 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Not necessarily. In Canada a 'sheriff' is an officer of the court who enforces court orders. In any event traffic fines are ultimately enforced through the court which issues arrest warrants which the police execute. Same difference effectively.