Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-11-14, 08:13 AM   #1
mr_bill
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Bikes:
Posts: 1,361
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 123 Post(s)
Paris is changing

Paris is always changing.

If you want an idea of where the 1st-4th Arrondissement are located:



The full interview in French and English - (google translate).

-mr. bill
mr_bill is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-14, 08:35 AM   #2
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Posts: 24,772
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 458 Post(s)
What I think is most interesting is that major cities such as NYC, London and now Paris are all coming to the same conclusion, that there just isn't enough room for cars...
genec is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-14, 09:03 AM   #3
CrankyOne
Senior Member
 
CrankyOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 1,890
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by genec View Post
What I think is most interesting is that major cities such as NYC, London and now Paris are all coming to the same conclusion, that there just isn't enough room for cars and that the noise, pollution, and safety problems of them degrade the city for humans...
Agree. :-)
CrankyOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-14, 10:42 AM   #4
Feldman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Bikes:
Posts: 863
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by genec View Post
What I think is most interesting is that major cities such as NYC, London and now Paris are all coming to the same conclusion, that there just isn't enough room for cars...
A way you can tell--I live in an exurb of Portland, OR and like most who do, go into the Rose City pretty often.
Central Portland neighborhoods have an obvious sign of 19th century traffic engineering--horse hitching rings sunk into the cement curbs! I used to live around the block from a pedestal-mounted ring that must have been intended for carriage horses. You could maybe call this a sign of a neighborhood that was laid out before cars existed?
Feldman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-14, 11:34 AM   #5
HawkOwl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 2,635
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by genec View Post
What I think is most interesting is that major cities such as NYC, London and now Paris are all coming to the same conclusion, that there just isn't enough room for cars...
Additionally, on a global basis there is a growing recognition that there isn't enough room for our current population, let alone forecasted growth.

As populations grow they become subject to all kinds of ills. Members become more aggressive to each other. There is less concern for other members of the community. The population becomes less able to clean up after itself creating ever increasing levels of pollution. All of which directly affect cycling as well as the rest of our lives.
HawkOwl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-14, 12:10 PM   #6
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Posts: 24,772
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 458 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkOwl View Post
Additionally, on a global basis there is a growing recognition that there isn't enough room for our current population, let alone forecasted growth.

As populations grow they become subject to all kinds of ills. Members become more aggressive to each other. There is less concern for other members of the community. The population becomes less able to clean up after itself creating ever increasing levels of pollution. All of which directly affect cycling as well as the rest of our lives.
Ah yes, nothing a good world wide plague won't clean up, eh?

Actually the terrible truth is that food is probably the biggest shortage... and while the US throws food away, other countries starve... and we can't figure out why our method of sending in troops doesn't make us friends... Sigh.
genec is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-14, 11:04 PM   #7
Rollfast
What happened?
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Bikes:
Posts: 3,700
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 112 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feldman View Post
A way you can tell--I live in an exurb of Portland, OR and like most who do, go into the Rose City pretty often.
Central Portland neighborhoods have an obvious sign of 19th century traffic engineering--horse hitching rings sunk into the cement curbs! I used to live around the block from a pedestal-mounted ring that must have been intended for carriage horses. You could maybe call this a sign of a neighborhood that was laid out before cars existed?
With THAT I'll agree fully...Portland is a MESS, and a good radio for traffic reports is a must. My mother scared the dickens out of me once by traveling straight on a road where traffic forward had to split to the right on a Y and we were suddenly going the wrong way on a one-way road! I almost overheated there on my way into Washington a few years ago and it was a bit unnerving finding a place to stop and take car of my car.

This was just coming into and leaving town and dealing with the interstate.
__________________
Dear banned sock puppets...stop taking all the potential great ID names from future newbies?
Rollfast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-14, 12:44 AM   #8
B. Carfree
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Bikes:
Posts: 6,302
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkOwl View Post
Additionally, on a global basis there is a growing recognition that there isn't enough room for our current population, let alone forecasted growth.

As populations grow they become subject to all kinds of ills. Members become more aggressive to each other. There is less concern for other members of the community. The population becomes less able to clean up after itself creating ever increasing levels of pollution. All of which directly affect cycling as well as the rest of our lives.
Ah yes. I too long for the civilized days of yore when the western territories of the US, with their low population densities, were so renowned for their civilized ways.
B. Carfree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-14, 12:54 AM   #9
spare_wheel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Bikes: NA
Posts: 4,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feldman View Post
A way you can tell--I live in an exurb of Portland, OR and like most who do, go into the Rose City pretty often.
This is why we need congestion tolls for non-residents in PDX.
spare_wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-14, 01:03 AM   #10
B. Carfree
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Bikes:
Posts: 6,302
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
This is why we need congestion tolls for non-residents in PDX.
Many cities need those, including the small ones like mine.
B. Carfree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-14, 02:49 PM   #11
kickstart 
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Posts: 4,722
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
This is why we need congestion tolls for non-residents in PDX.
That seems backwards, rewarding locals who have options but don't use them, and penalizing those who don't have options because they're not locals.

There must be something more sensible than that.
kickstart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-14, 04:52 PM   #12
spare_wheel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Bikes: NA
Posts: 4,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kickstart View Post
That seems backwards, rewarding locals who have options but don't use them, and penalizing those who don't have options because they're not locals.
There must be something more sensible than that.
one could argue that urban centers subsidize people who live in suburbs and exurbs by providing them with attractive destinations and associated infrastructure without having to pay for it.
spare_wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-14, 06:22 PM   #13
kickstart 
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Posts: 4,722
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
one could argue that urban centers subsidize people who live in suburbs and exurbs by providing them with attractive destinations and associated infrastructure without having to pay for it.
Urban areas are where most capital is generated, that's a given, but isn't the question about transportation, not money?

The primarily objections to personal motor vehicles are the pollution, resources consumed, and physical dangers, right? Statistics show most accidents happen close to ones home, vehicles are the least efficient, and most polluting on short trips, and a large percentage of commutes are under 10 miles, ergo the biggest issue is in fact intraurban transportation, not "non resident" transportation.
kickstart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-14, 09:04 PM   #14
B. Carfree
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Bikes:
Posts: 6,302
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kickstart View Post
Urban areas are where most capital is generated, that's a given, but isn't the question about transportation, not money?

The primarily objections to personal motor vehicles are the pollution, resources consumed, and physical dangers, right? Statistics show most accidents happen close to ones home, vehicles are the least efficient, and most polluting on short trips, and a large percentage of commutes are under 10 miles, ergo the biggest issue is in fact intraurban transportation, not "non resident" transportation.
Urban residents are still subsidizing the suburbanites. We are the ones paying for the road repair and even road widening to support their car habits. Meanwhile we also get a generous dose of their pollution on our doorsteps. Clearly they should pay more for this privilege. And they do have choices. They can move close enough to give up their car habit, get fitter so they don't feel the need to drive or take the extra time involved with public transit. The subsidy from urban to suburban is part of why they aren't changing their behavior; time to fix that.
B. Carfree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-14, 09:21 PM   #15
CrankyOne
Senior Member
 
CrankyOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 1,890
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by B. Carfree View Post
Urban residents are still subsidizing the suburbanites.
I think it's actually the other way around. Taxes from wealthy homeowners in the suburbs subsidize inner cities. Most states have a resource sharing pool that facilitates this.

If every property owner paid the same amount then cities might subsidize suburbs because there is much less infrastructure (roads, sewer, water, etc.) miles per property in urban areas than suburban. In most states property taxes are based on land + building value though and while there can be some quite expensive and grand homes within cities the average is usually massively greater in suburbs. Core cities also have greater expenses per capita for police & fire.
CrankyOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-14, 12:43 AM   #16
kickstart 
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Posts: 4,722
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrankyOne View Post
I think it's actually the other way around. Taxes from wealthy homeowners in the suburbs subsidize inner cities. Most states have a resource sharing pool that facilitates this.

If every property owner paid the same amount then cities might subsidize suburbs because there is much less infrastructure (roads, sewer, water, etc.) miles per property in urban areas than suburban. In most states property taxes are based on land + building value though and while there can be some quite expensive and grand homes within cities the average is usually massively greater in suburbs. Core cities also have greater expenses per capita for police & fire.
Quote:
Originally Posted by B. Carfree View Post
Urban residents are still subsidizing the suburbanites. We are the ones paying for the road repair and even road widening to support their car habits. Meanwhile we also get a generous dose of their pollution on our doorsteps. Clearly they should pay more for this privilege.
Urban areas may "subsidize" suburbanite transportation in regards to road spending, but its the suburbanites and urban businesses that subsidize urbanites in general. Its a symbiotic relationship, but that's not a transportation issue unless one is selectively looking to justify peripheral agendas.

Quote:
Originally Posted by B. Carfree View Post
And they do have choices. They can move close enough to give up their car habit, get fitter so they don't feel the need to drive or take the extra time involved with public transit.
And that attitude is why most people dismiss cycling advocates as flakes.
Most people don't desire, or have the resources to structure their lives around alternative transportation, "get fitter" is too silly to justify a response, and public transit has many more issues than the time and effort involved.

Maybe it would be best for the productive businesses and people to abandon urban areas, and just let those left to founder and consume themselves.



Outrageous and insensitive?


That's probably what would happen if it becomes too expensive and inconvenient to work or do business in urban areas. The net result being those with the fewest options and resources, who do the least harm, would see their lives go from bad to worse.
kickstart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-14, 11:43 PM   #17
B. Carfree
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Bikes:
Posts: 6,302
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrankyOne View Post
I think it's actually the other way around. Taxes from wealthy homeowners in the suburbs subsidize inner cities. Most states have a resource sharing pool that facilitates this.
Not in the West. There's very little resource sharing other than a small amount for schools, and that only transfers from suburbs to cities in California. In Oregon it goes the other way for the most part. The jobs, and most all of the amenities outside of television and tree farms, are in the cities. I can't count the number of public meetings at the county level wherein suburbanites have explained that they choose to live outside the city limits solely to pay lower taxes (and often lower mortgages as there is a trade-off between time/money spent on transportation and the value of the property). It's their choice, but I think it's high time we stopped paying them to decide poorly.
B. Carfree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-14, 11:45 PM   #18
B. Carfree
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Bikes:
Posts: 6,302
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kickstart View Post

Maybe it would be best for the productive businesses and people to abandon urban areas, and just let those left to founder and consume themselves.

Even from you that's lame. Sure, let's see how that works. Just what planet are you currently living on? Do you understand thing one about locating a business or running one successfully? Methinks you've been drinking too deeply from the fuel nozzle.
B. Carfree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-14, 07:08 AM   #19
CrankyOne
Senior Member
 
CrankyOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 1,890
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by B. Carfree View Post
Not in the West. There's very little resource sharing other than a small amount for schools, and that only transfers from suburbs to cities in California. In Oregon it goes the other way for the most part. The jobs, and most all of the amenities outside of television and tree farms, are in the cities. I can't count the number of public meetings at the county level wherein suburbanites have explained that they choose to live outside the city limits solely to pay lower taxes (and often lower mortgages as there is a trade-off between time/money spent on transportation and the value of the property). It's their choice, but I think it's high time we stopped paying them to decide poorly.
How are you paying them to decide poorly? What do you recommend to correct this whole situation?
CrankyOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-14, 10:41 AM   #20
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Posts: 23,848
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
More on the Paris mayor's plans:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/16/wo...politics-.html
I-Like-To-Bike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-14, 01:01 PM   #21
kickstart 
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8
Posts: 4,722
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by B. Carfree View Post
Even from you that's lame. Sure, let's see how that works. Just what planet are you currently living on? Do you understand thing one about locating a business or running one successfully? Methinks you've been drinking too deeply from the fuel nozzle.
I think you need to reread my previous post, I was simply pointing out that would most likely be the outcome of your suggestions and why they're unrealistic.

On the planet I'm living on, social engineering by coercion harms those who do the least damage and have the fewest options.

In other words, I was being sarcastic.


BTW, I'm car free too, but its not an affectation for me.

Last edited by kickstart; 12-17-14 at 01:09 PM.
kickstart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-14, 03:59 PM   #22
Feldman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Bikes:
Posts: 863
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by spare_wheel View Post
This is why we need congestion tolls for non-residents in PDX.
We're starting to get an integrated enough transit system around here so I could agree with that.
Wife and I are considering renting bike lockers at Delta Park for multi-modal trips. There's even local talk (bikeportland.org) about how many low car and zero car households are in Washington county.
Feldman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-14, 04:28 PM   #23
spare_wheel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Bikes: NA
Posts: 4,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kickstart View Post
BTW, I'm car free too, but its not an affectation for me.
Meh.

If it's not an affectation then start to think like someone who believes, based on personal experience, that active transport is possible for most people. (And many of the other trips could occur via mass or shared transport.)

Last edited by spare_wheel; 12-20-14 at 04:33 PM.
spare_wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-14, 04:33 PM   #24
spare_wheel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Bikes: NA
Posts: 4,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feldman View Post
There's even local talk (bikeportland.org) about how many low car and zero car households are in Washington county.
Yeah...seeing that statistic was awesome.
Maybe a little social engineering (*gasp*) is preferable to a tragedy of the commons!
spare_wheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-14, 03:14 PM   #25
CrankyOne
Senior Member
 
CrankyOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 1,890
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feldman View Post
There's even local talk (bikeportland.org) about how many low car and zero car households are in Washington county.
What's good is that this is becoming socially acceptable or even desirable outside of NYC and similar east coast cities. Not long ago someone in St Paul or Seattle who didn't have a car was viewed a bit awkwardly. Fortunately that's changing and the change isn't just from younger folks but many older folks as well.
CrankyOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:52 PM.