Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Cell Phone violation again

Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Cell Phone violation again

Old 03-08-15, 07:33 PM
  #1  
24-Speed Machine
Thread Starter
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Cell Phone violation again

Driver was on Facebook before crash that killed three, say cops - CNET

While it didn't involve a cyclist. It is another example of cell phone abuse. All because someone couldn't bear to wait until they were not at the wheel.

It is stories like this. Which is why I am such a proponent of 'taking the lane'.
Chris516 is offline  
Old 03-08-15, 07:40 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 4,335

Bikes: Canyon Endurace SLX 8Di2

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 14 Posts
So how does being in the lane protect you from a driver who is looking at their phone rather than the road and whats in front of them? Seems to me being in the lane would be a much bigger risk than being on the sidewalk or a bike path under this circumstance. Fortunately this type of event is still rare.
howsteepisit is offline  
Old 03-08-15, 07:49 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by howsteepisit
So how does being in the lane protect you from a driver who is looking at their phone rather than the road and whats in front of them?
I think the model is that distracted motorists do look up just enough to see if there is anything in front of them that they need to respond to. A bike gutter-hugging is less likely to make the grade than one that is right smack in the middle of the lane. In that three-tenths of a second a facebooker is looking up, they may never even look anyplace but the center of the lane.

Of course, there are countless counter-examples where people drive into school buses, big rigs and even buildings. As you say, fortunately these events are quite rare (still not rare enough, but I'll live with risks that are rarer than being struck by lightning).
B. Carfree is offline  
Old 03-08-15, 08:44 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 4,335

Bikes: Canyon Endurace SLX 8Di2

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 14 Posts
My objection is that in the case cited as justification for always taking the lane, the distracted driver hit a truck in a lane. Thus, the citation does not provide justification for taking the lane. I believe any safety advantage for as far right as proper vrs taking the lane is minimal.
howsteepisit is offline  
Old 03-08-15, 09:16 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by howsteepisit
I believe any safety advantage for as far right as proper vrs taking the lane is minimal.
It seems to me the wisest course of action is to observe ones environment, and choose which option best suits the prevailing conditions, rather than assigning cute names to particular options, and declare their virtues out of hand to suit ones ideologies.
By their very nature, distracted drivers throw a monkey wrench into any, and all dogmatic riding styles.
kickstart is offline  
Old 03-08-15, 09:24 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by howsteepisit
My objection is that in the case cited as justification for always taking the lane, the distracted driver hit a truck in a lane. Thus, the citation does not provide justification for taking the lane. I believe any safety advantage for as far right as proper vrs taking the lane is minimal.
First off, FRAP is as far right as practicable, which is often the center of the lane.

If we're talking about the relative safety of various lane positions when dealing with a distracted driver (what my wife calls driving while playing with a vibrator), then I agree that there isn't likely to be much advantage in one lane position versus any other.

However, I know that when I switched from gutter-hugging to taking the lane in lanes that weren't wide enough for a safe pass I began to experience far fewer close passes and haven't been hit by a passing vehicle since (got side-swiped a few times when I rode too far right), in spite of many more miles post-switch. It's not really evidence, but things have played out exactly as the model I operate under predicted.
B. Carfree is offline  
Old 03-08-15, 09:55 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,546

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 139 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5703 Post(s)
Liked 2,434 Times in 1,346 Posts
The case of a car hitting a truck in the opposing lane, is totally irrelevant to any question relating to bicycle lane placement. All it shows is that no place is safe.

BTW- based on the report that the was on her phone 2 minutes before the collision (if the timing holds up), I suspect that the DA will have a tough case arguing that she was distracted at the time of the event. I know that if I were a juror, saying something that happened before was a proximate cause would be a stretch. Of course, driving under the influence of prescription drugs isn't good either. I suspect that the drugs might make for a better chance of sustaining a reckless homicide charge. (but then again, I'm not the DA, judge, or possible juror).
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.

Last edited by FBinNY; 03-08-15 at 10:00 PM.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 03-08-15, 10:50 PM
  #8  
24-Speed Machine
Thread Starter
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by howsteepisit
So how does being in the lane protect you from a driver who is looking at their phone rather than the road and whats in front of them? Seems to me being in the lane would be a much bigger risk than being on the sidewalk or a bike path under this circumstance. Fortunately this type of event is still rare.
Because, There are more options when 'taking the lane'. Than there are 'hugging the side', or being on the sidewalk. Because, Sometimes' the bike route goes on the sidewalk.
Originally Posted by kickstart
It seems to me the wisest course of action is to observe ones environment, and choose which option best suits the prevailing conditions, rather than assigning cute names to particular options, and declare their virtues out of hand to suit ones ideologies.
By their very nature, distracted drivers throw a monkey wrench into any, and all dogmatic riding styles.
While I understand your reasoning, and position. I still stand by my position. Because, The video previously mentioned in another thread of the guy on the sidewalk who yells at one driver supposedly blowing a stop sign as the cyclist was about to cross. Is one example. Also, By taking the lane, a cyclist is seen better. They have a better chance of evading a collision with an ignorant motorist.
Originally Posted by B. Carfree
First off, FRAP is as far right as practicable, which is often the center of the lane.

If we're talking about the relative safety of various lane positions when dealing with a distracted driver (what my wife calls driving while playing with a vibrator), then I agree that there isn't likely to be much advantage in one lane position versus any other.

However, I know that when I switched from gutter-hugging to taking the lane in lanes that weren't wide enough for a safe pass I began to experience far fewer close passes and haven't been hit by a passing vehicle since (got side-swiped a few times when I rode too far right), in spite of many more miles post-switch. It's not really evidence, but things have played out exactly as the model I operate under predicted.
I switched to 'taking the lane', a long time ago. For that reason. The only time I was hit from behind while 'taking the lane'. Was when I wasn't moving. Waiting to merge in to the traffic from a dual-turn lane.
Chris516 is offline  
Old 03-09-15, 10:04 AM
  #9  
Señior Member
 
ItsJustMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749

Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
This is the reason I ride with such ridiculous taillights. I figure that there are people out there glancing at the road maybe for a half a second once every 4 or 5 seconds. I need to not just be visible but rather so bright it's effectively impossible to ignore, and it needs to be so from 10 seconds away, or about 700 feet.

I went through a lot of the lights on the market, but eventually I gave up and bought a Designshine.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
ItsJustMe is offline  
Old 03-09-15, 11:43 AM
  #10  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris516
Because, There are more options when 'taking the lane'. Than there are 'hugging the side', or being on the sidewalk. Because, Sometimes' the bike route goes on the sidewalk.

While I understand your reasoning, and position. I still stand by my position. Because, The video previously mentioned in another thread of the guy on the sidewalk who yells at one driver supposedly blowing a stop sign as the cyclist was about to cross. Is one example. Also, By taking the lane, a cyclist is seen better. They have a better chance of evading a collision with an ignorant motorist.

I switched to 'taking the lane', a long time ago. For that reason. The only time I was hit from behind while 'taking the lane'. Was when I wasn't moving. Waiting to merge in to the traffic from a dual-turn lane.
The lane taking cyclist is only seen better when motorists are actually looking.

The glance and go motorists are looking for large car shaped objects... they can see right through a cyclist who is right in front of them. And the most fatal form of car bike collision is still being hit from behind. As long as motorists continue to try to multi-task behind the wheel... taking the lane is an iffy proposition.

I take the lane when I have to... but given the choice, I'd prefer to be out of the way of the distracted drivers of fast heavy vehicles.
genec is offline  
Old 03-09-15, 11:50 AM
  #11  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,951

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,517 Times in 1,031 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
The lane taking cyclist is only seen better...
Allegedly seen better/allegedly less at risk than cyclist riding to the far right or on the shoulder.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 03-09-15, 02:29 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
KD5NRH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Stephenville TX
Posts: 3,697

Bikes: 2010 Trek 7100

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 697 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
"This isn't the first time a driver has been accused of being on Facebook before a deadly crash. Last year, a 20-year-old from North Dakota was allegedly driving at 84 to 86 miles per hour down a highway while checking pictures on Facebook. Her SUV allegedly went into the back of another SUV."

Ok, maybe they're not sure about whether she was on FB, but that other bit should be easy to verify beyond any reasonable doubt. Or maybe they're just leaving open the possibility that the alleged victim SUV was taking an alleged bad-driver-SUV-shaped dump in the middle of the road when it died of a heart attack.
KD5NRH is offline  
Old 03-09-15, 02:45 PM
  #13  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
Allegedly seen better/allegedly less at risk than cyclist riding to the far right or on the shoulder.
True dat!

Although sight lines ARE often better for middle of the lane vice far right.
genec is offline  
Old 03-09-15, 08:44 PM
  #14  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,951

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,517 Times in 1,031 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
True dat!

Although sight lines ARE often better for middle of the lane vice far right.
And drivers often drive in a traffic lane, or at least not on the shoulder, and alleged better sight lines are immaterial for these drivers even with this alleged tunnel vision.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 03-09-15, 10:50 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,600
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18320 Post(s)
Liked 4,489 Times in 3,338 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
And drivers often drive in a traffic lane, or at least not on the shoulder, and alleged better sight lines are immaterial for these drivers even with this alleged tunnel vision.
It depends on the road.

If the shoulder is wide enough that a car can safely get past a bike without swerving... then being on the shoulder, the car is more likely to just pass by, even without seeing the bicycle (although any cars will cut corners).

On the other hand, if the bike must be in part of the lane which is normally occupied by the car, then perhaps there would be an advantage of being more in the middle.

HOWEVER, keep in mind that you are reducing the options available to the driver.

Consider you riding at 10 MPH in the middle of the lane and a car driving at 60 MPH. If the car doesn't see you early for some reason, there are 2 options available, slow down from 60 to 10, or the car must pass (which may be precluded by traffic), leaving only one option, slowing down... if the driver reacts quick enough. (or the rare third option of hitting the ditch, if there isn't a guard rail or a ravine).

With the bike on the side of the road, there are 3 options.
Pass, slow down... or scootch past. As a bicyclist, you may not like the close brush-bys, but it is a valid option where a car moves over as far in the lane to safely avoid an obstruction (bike, pedestrian), while still maintaining clearance from opposing traffic.

I'd rather hear wind over my shoulder than the squeal of a skid on the road behind. And, what about about a bad road surface or condition. Hill, wet, oily, curve, rain, fog, etc. Do you take that into consideration?

Oh... I should also add...
If things are hairy... It takes less effort to move a vehicle a foot to the left than moving it 8 feet to the left.

Last edited by CliffordK; 03-09-15 at 11:57 PM.
CliffordK is offline  
Old 03-09-15, 11:00 PM
  #16  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,951

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,517 Times in 1,031 Posts
Originally Posted by CliffordK
On the other hand, if the bike must be in part of the lane which is normally occupied by the car, then perhaps there would be an advantage of being more in the middle.
Perhaps, but only if here is any significant truth in the theory/Urban Legend propagated by disciples of Vehicular Cycling that cyclists are more visible/safer when riding in the middle of the lane than elsewhere within the same traffic lane.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 03-09-15, 11:03 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris516

While I understand your reasoning, and position. I still stand by my position.
That's just the thing.......I don't have a "position", and I won't limit myself just to "stand by" an internal belief.
I have situational awareness, and the willingness to adapt to actual conditions.

I ride the same roads every day on my commute, yet I ride them differently every day. Distracted drivers are a concern, but they are a random encounter, and they don't all behave the same, some weave like a drunk, some forge straight ahead without seeing a thing, and the transition to such behavior can be as sudden as flipping a light switch. Not the best circumstances for the expectation that they will see and react correctly in a timely manner. there's simply to many constantly changing variables beyond "being seen" to make decisions based on preconceived notions, or being reliant on a single course of action.

Last edited by kickstart; 03-09-15 at 11:08 PM.
kickstart is offline  
Old 03-09-15, 11:51 PM
  #18  
24-Speed Machine
Thread Starter
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by genec
The lane taking cyclist is only seen better when motorists are actually looking.

The glance and go motorists are looking for large car shaped objects... they can see right through a cyclist who is right in front of them. And the most fatal form of car bike collision is still being hit from behind. As long as motorists continue to try to multi-task behind the wheel... taking the lane is an iffy proposition.

I take the lane when I have to... but given the choice, I'd prefer to be out of the way of the distracted drivers of fast heavy vehicles.
Riding the shoulder would be far more iffy. Because, The safe assumption, is that every motorist is going to be distracted by one thing or another. Just like in a sense, when someone says another person isn't above reproach. Meaning that, always look out for, and assume every motorist is, a distracted driver. Never letting your guard down from that train of thought.

Last edited by Chris516; 03-10-15 at 06:57 AM.
Chris516 is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 07:08 AM
  #19  
24-Speed Machine
Thread Starter
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by jacson33
o how does being in the lane protect you from a driver who is looking at their phone rather than the road and whats in front of them? Seems to me being in the lane would be a much bigger risk than being on the
Because, Riding on the shoulder gives no 'wiggle room', in a pinch. If a cyclist is subjected to a 'close pass'. There would be no room to get away from the vehicle, and enhances the inability of a motorist to not see the cyclist while passing. Whereas, Taking the lane puts the cyclist directly in front of the motorist, causing them to have to pay attention.
Chris516 is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 07:38 AM
  #20  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris516
Because, Riding on the shoulder gives no 'wiggle room', in a pinch. If a cyclist is subjected to a 'close pass'. There would be no room to get away from the vehicle, and enhances the inability of a motorist to not see the cyclist while passing. Whereas, Taking the lane puts the cyclist directly in front of the motorist, causing them to have to pay attention.
If what is in front of you causes you to pay attention... why is it that people have driven into large trucks, garbage trucks and other large vehicles... right in front of them?

Alcohol and snow are not the only conditions that have caused motorists to drive right into something right in front of them... did these folks simply just not see the large objects looming straight ahead... how?

One hurt when driver rear ends garbage truck on U.S. 127
Truck Rear-Ends Texas School Bus; More Than A Dozen Hurt
4 injured, traffic stopped after landscape truck rear-ends five vehicles on Ravenel - Post and Courier
Five people hospitalized after truck rear-ends RTA bus in downtown Cleveland | cleveland.com
Crashes and Crossroads, Springfield's Top 10 intersections for accidents

"The vast majority are rear-end crashes,"
"We look at changes that need to be made or can be made," she said. "Unfortunately a lot of it is driver distraction."
1 dead, 1 hospitalized after truck rear-ends semi in Ness County | Hays Post
Lakeland man, 71, killed in Parrish when he rear-ends tractor trailer; 2 passengers hurt | Breaking News Blog | Bradenton Herald
Firefighters free driver from wreckage after pickup rear-ends log truck | Local & Regional News | Eugene News, Weather, Sports, Breaking News | KVAL CBS 13
genec is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 07:46 AM
  #21  
20+mph Commuter
 
JoeyBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA USA
Posts: 7,491

Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1422 Post(s)
Liked 315 Times in 210 Posts
Originally Posted by kickstart
By their very nature, distracted drivers throw a monkey wrench into any, and all dogmatic riding styles.
Yep. Allow me to illustrate...

My dogmatic riding style: I cycle in a manner that most reduces the number of motor vehicles overtaking me. All of my cycling is in a densely populated city with maximum 35 mph speed limits. So it is fairly easy to make my way to work 6 miles and only be overtaken be a handful of cars and trucks. This is because I ride fast (20+ MPH) and I selectively run red lights with a plan in mind - to cycle in the traffic gaps created by the red lights. Been doing this for 40 years and I have the technique perfected. Along with limiting the numbers of murderers coming up behind me, I wear a rear-view mirror on my helmet and USE IT. If a line of cars does somehow look like they will overtake me I will very often just pull over in a gap between parallel parked cars and let them all go by, then catch the gap behind them and try to keep up with the last car. This might happen three times a week during my commute. I also run very powerful headlight and tail light. I flash them by day. They can be seen from space.

OK...this^^ is my Dogma. It is well known by most A&S veterans. They are likely tired of hearing it.

The monkey wrench has been thrown! It has gotten so ridiculous (to my sensibilities) how many people are not looking through their windshields, increasing every year seemingly, that I now limit my cycling to the bare necessities - getting to work, grocery, and doctors/dentists. I do not own a car so I must use the bike. But for pleasure riding...done with that. I have seen dozens of cars bump the car in front of them stopped at red lights RIGHT NEXT TO ME as I split the lane past them. I have not cycled one mile over the past 12 months for the joy of cycling. It's just not joyful anymore. I have thrown in the towel.

So my new 2015 dogma: Cycle only when absolutely necessary, limit the number of cars getting a free shot at me, use strobes to get attention, and keep an eye over my shoulder (mirror). The odds of me getting smacked by a distracted driver is still not zero, but darned low for sure. I am just not giving them many shots at me.

Last edited by JoeyBike; 03-10-15 at 07:53 AM.
JoeyBike is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 08:30 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
To be honest, I'm not real concerned about distracted drivers, just aware of the potential issue. I'm far more concerned with impatient drivers who are in a hurry, but lack skill and judgment. Fortunately they are fairly easy to spot most of the time.
kickstart is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 09:01 AM
  #23  
20+mph Commuter
 
JoeyBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA USA
Posts: 7,491

Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1422 Post(s)
Liked 315 Times in 210 Posts
Originally Posted by kickstart
To be honest, I'm not real concerned about distracted drivers, just aware of the potential issue. I'm far more concerned with impatient drivers who are in a hurry, but lack skill and judgment. Fortunately they are fairly easy to spot most of the time.
Yes, drivers who became infuriated just 30 seconds ago by some texter who was slow getting off the green light causing half a dozen other cars to catch the red twice. So now, thanks to phone users, there are even MORE drivers late for wherever they are trying to go and pi$$ed at the world. Now there is some idiot cyclist slowing them down.
JoeyBike is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 09:07 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 4,335

Bikes: Canyon Endurace SLX 8Di2

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 14 Posts
Its really quite simple. If a drive is not looking, they will not see you no matter where you are. If by chance you actually see a car approaching from behind, and driving erratically because the are not looking, dodging them becomes a best guess, irrespective of you position on the road. IF they are approaching from the front or sides you dodge the best you can. Saying that they have a better chance of seeing you when they are not looking is hoping against hope.

In scenarios other than looking at a smart phone and Facebook, other analyses may be more appropriate.
howsteepisit is offline  
Old 03-10-15, 09:08 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 4,335

Bikes: Canyon Endurace SLX 8Di2

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeyBike
Yes, drivers who became infuriated just 30 seconds ago by some texter who was slow getting off the green light causing half a dozen other cars to catch the red twice. So now, thanks to phone users, there are even MORE drivers late for wherever they are trying to go and pi$$ed at the world. Now there is some idiot cyclist slowing them down.
I think this a good analysis of many instances.
howsteepisit is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.