Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy
(Post 10516177)
I think you brought her into this.
|
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
(Post 10516214)
You'd have to be pretty stupid to post your IQ on here. Hence anyone claiming a high number is lying.
And the ones not posting it, might be ashamed of how low it is. Conclusion: Everybody is stupid. |
What is an average IQ?
|
Originally Posted by Voodoo76
(Post 10516261)
What is an average IQ?
|
I think that is the mean.
|
Originally Posted by Gluteus
(Post 10516234)
Exactly.
And the ones not posting it, might be ashamed of how low it is. Conclusion: Everybody is stupid. |
None of the accumulated data provided from posters on a forum will have any integrity.
Does that answer your question? |
Pre-BF or post-BF?
|
Originally Posted by ARider2
(Post 10516077)
What's an IQ?
|
Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy
(Post 10516283)
I think that is the mean.
|
outliers on the chart could cause the mean and the average to diverge.
|
Any MENSA folks here?
|
Well, this is the internet, so 192.
|
130 mm
|
Originally Posted by ARider2
(Post 10516389)
Any MENSA folks here?
edit: I'm in it :D |
Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy
(Post 10516367)
outliers on the chart could cause the mean and the average to diverge.
|
|
Originally Posted by tspek
(Post 10516449)
They design the test around a 100 point baseline. Whether or not it's actually the average, or mean for that matter, isn't the point.
I suggest you look up standard deviation and normal distribution. |
Originally Posted by urbanknight
(Post 10516415)
Well, this is the internet, so 192.
|
Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy
(Post 10516518)
incorrect.
I suggest you look up standard deviation and normal distribution. The test doesn't look at other results to make the comparison, that's something we do. The test is flawed and so realistically the mean, mode and average are likely to be different from 100. |
Is that standard or metric?
|
my iq is around 80, but I think about everything twice, so I am gonna answer 160
|
Originally Posted by tspek
(Post 10516346)
I think that's considered average. Below 100 is less than average, above is above average. I'm pretty certain that 100 is the baseline...it's all fairly arbitrary.
Originally Posted by tspek
(Post 10516449)
They design the test around a 100 point baseline. Whether or not it's actually the average, or mean for that matter, isn't the point.
Originally Posted by Trumpy McGrumpy
incorrect.
I suggest you look up standard deviation and normal distribution. Being an ESE teacher I have a little practical experience. The Stanford test is set up with 100 as the baseline measure for "normal intelligence." "Normal intelligence" is considered to be any number within 2 standard deviations of 100 and the SD=15. Therefore normal intelligence is considered to be within the IQ range of 70 to 130. Above that school kids start getting recommended for Gifted programs. Below that, until recently they were considered to fall within a range of mental handicaps and before that they were labeled ********. Some psychologists still use terms like ******** but schools no longer do. The Stanford is widely considered outdated and the current version of the WISC is preferred. Also, IQ can be assessed through performance as well. It is not an indicator of academic success. Of course I'm contributing to a thread I should move to Foo so my performance IQ must be pretty low. :rolleyes: |
Standard deviation in the 41 is pretty high.
|
Potato.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:00 AM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.