Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Africa (https://www.bikeforums.net/africa/)
-   -   What is your IQ? (https://www.bikeforums.net/africa/627976-what-your-iq.html)

Daytrip 03-12-10 10:04 AM


Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy (Post 10516177)
I think you brought her into this.

Yeah, some son I turned out to be--dragging her into the 41.

Gluteus 03-12-10 10:05 AM


Originally Posted by merlinextraligh (Post 10516214)
You'd have to be pretty stupid to post your IQ on here. Hence anyone claiming a high number is lying.

Exactly.

And the ones not posting it, might be ashamed of how low it is. Conclusion: Everybody is stupid.

Voodoo76 03-12-10 10:09 AM

What is an average IQ?

Urthwhyte 03-12-10 10:11 AM


Originally Posted by Voodoo76 (Post 10516261)
What is an average IQ?

By definition, it's 100

Grumpy McTrumpy 03-12-10 10:14 AM

I think that is the mean.

Voodoo76 03-12-10 10:16 AM


Originally Posted by Gluteus (Post 10516234)
Exactly.

And the ones not posting it, might be ashamed of how low it is. Conclusion: Everybody is stupid.

No, self-selection bias.

Barrettscv 03-12-10 10:18 AM

None of the accumulated data provided from posters on a forum will have any integrity.

Does that answer your question?

Daytrip 03-12-10 10:22 AM

Pre-BF or post-BF?

thompsonpost 03-12-10 10:25 AM


Originally Posted by ARider2 (Post 10516077)
What's an IQ?

The same as in town.

tspek 03-12-10 10:26 AM


Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy (Post 10516283)
I think that is the mean.

I think that's considered average. Below 100 is less than average, above is above average. I'm pretty certain that 100 is the baseline...it's all fairly arbitrary.

Grumpy McTrumpy 03-12-10 10:30 AM

outliers on the chart could cause the mean and the average to diverge.

ARider2 03-12-10 10:34 AM

Any MENSA folks here?

urbanknight 03-12-10 10:39 AM

Well, this is the internet, so 192.

hao 03-12-10 10:39 AM

130 mm

urbanknight 03-12-10 10:39 AM


Originally Posted by ARider2 (Post 10516389)
Any MENSA folks here?

It's a secret society. Anyone in it can't tell you, so anyone who tells you is not in it :D

edit: I'm in it :D

tspek 03-12-10 10:44 AM


Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy (Post 10516367)
outliers on the chart could cause the mean and the average to diverge.

They design the test around a 100 point baseline. Whether or not it's actually the average, or mean for that matter, isn't the point.

tspek 03-12-10 10:45 AM

http://medical-dictionary.thefreedic...elligence+Test

Grumpy McTrumpy 03-12-10 10:55 AM


Originally Posted by tspek (Post 10516449)
They design the test around a 100 point baseline. Whether or not it's actually the average, or mean for that matter, isn't the point.

incorrect.

I suggest you look up standard deviation and normal distribution.

Voodoo76 03-12-10 10:58 AM


Originally Posted by urbanknight (Post 10516415)
Well, this is the internet, so 192.

And you are a scratch golfer?

tspek 03-12-10 11:01 AM


Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy (Post 10516518)
incorrect.

I suggest you look up standard deviation and normal distribution.

We're sort of speaking about different things. I know what a normal distribution is, what I'm saying is that when they design the test (and it's redesigned frequently as IQ tends to collectively change over time) they do so in a way that they hope the mean, mode and average is 100. If you score 100 you are considered exactly normal, no more, no less.

The test doesn't look at other results to make the comparison, that's something we do. The test is flawed and so realistically the mean, mode and average are likely to be different from 100.

lpolliard 03-12-10 11:03 AM

Is that standard or metric?

jsharr 03-12-10 11:03 AM

my iq is around 80, but I think about everything twice, so I am gonna answer 160

Walter 03-12-10 11:10 AM


Originally Posted by tspek (Post 10516346)
I think that's considered average. Below 100 is less than average, above is above average. I'm pretty certain that 100 is the baseline...it's all fairly arbitrary.

Not really


Originally Posted by tspek (Post 10516449)
They design the test around a 100 point baseline. Whether or not it's actually the average, or mean for that matter, isn't the point.

Already nailed


Originally Posted by Trumpy McGrumpy
incorrect.

I suggest you look up standard deviation and normal distribution.

Much closer

Being an ESE teacher I have a little practical experience. The Stanford test is set up with 100 as the baseline measure for "normal intelligence." "Normal intelligence" is considered to be any number within 2 standard deviations of 100 and the SD=15. Therefore normal intelligence is considered to be within the IQ range of 70 to 130. Above that school kids start getting recommended for Gifted programs. Below that, until recently they were considered to fall within a range of mental handicaps and before that they were labeled ********. Some psychologists still use terms like ******** but schools no longer do.

The Stanford is widely considered outdated and the current version of the WISC is preferred. Also, IQ can be assessed through performance as well. It is not an indicator of academic success.

Of course I'm contributing to a thread I should move to Foo so my performance IQ must be pretty low. :rolleyes:

ahsposo 03-12-10 11:10 AM

Standard deviation in the 41 is pretty high.

Mose 03-12-10 11:17 AM

Potato.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:00 AM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.