Custom Bikes Illegal?
#1
Pavement Taste-Tester
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Custom Bikes Illegal?
I was doing a little reading on local bike laws in Massachusetts, and I came across this list of restrictions:
"You must ride astride a regular, permanent seat that is attached to your bicycle. You must keep one hand on your handlebars at all times.
...
You may not carry a passenger anywhere on your bike except on a regular seat permanently attached to the bike, or to a trailer towed by the bike. You may not carry any child between the ages of 1 to 4, or weighing 40 pounds or less, anywhere on a single-passenger bike except in a baby seat attached to the bike. The child must be able to sit upright in the seat and must be held in the seat by a harness or seatbelt. Their hands and feet must be out of reach of the wheel spokes. You may not carry any child under the age of 1 on your bike, even in a baby seat. You may not use a siren or whistle on your bike to warn pedestrians. You may not park your bike on a street, road, bikeway or sidewalk where it will be in other people's way. You may not carry anything on your bike unless it is in a basket, rack, bag, or trailer designed for the purpose. You may not modify your bike so that your hands are higher than your shoulders when gripping the handlebars. You may not alter the fork of your bike to extend it."
I haven't yet been able to find the actual text of the law, but this came from the Mass Bike Coalition.
I was amused by the actual legal requirement of a seat, but surprised by there being laws addressing handlebar height and fork length.
"You must ride astride a regular, permanent seat that is attached to your bicycle. You must keep one hand on your handlebars at all times.
...
You may not carry a passenger anywhere on your bike except on a regular seat permanently attached to the bike, or to a trailer towed by the bike. You may not carry any child between the ages of 1 to 4, or weighing 40 pounds or less, anywhere on a single-passenger bike except in a baby seat attached to the bike. The child must be able to sit upright in the seat and must be held in the seat by a harness or seatbelt. Their hands and feet must be out of reach of the wheel spokes. You may not carry any child under the age of 1 on your bike, even in a baby seat. You may not use a siren or whistle on your bike to warn pedestrians. You may not park your bike on a street, road, bikeway or sidewalk where it will be in other people's way. You may not carry anything on your bike unless it is in a basket, rack, bag, or trailer designed for the purpose. You may not modify your bike so that your hands are higher than your shoulders when gripping the handlebars. You may not alter the fork of your bike to extend it."
I haven't yet been able to find the actual text of the law, but this came from the Mass Bike Coalition.
I was amused by the actual legal requirement of a seat, but surprised by there being laws addressing handlebar height and fork length.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 64
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Probably to stop those crazy bikes with ape hanger's and 6 foot long forks ....... which look cool (in my opinion at least) but are NOT safe for road use ... they have the turning circle measured in miles.
#3
holyrollin'
I think the old method of extending forks used to involve chopping up a few forks and brazing the bits together. If the restriction was addressing that issue, I might agree. Forks ought to be stronger than that.
Apehangers shouldn't even be restricted. They are no worse than any set of bars.
The reality is that modifying bicycles is a "who cares" issue, and the chances of being hassled by the law over your customized bike probably aren't worth considering.
The closest analog to this is the enforcement of laws relating to automobile modifications. Back in the '50s-'70s many fix-it tickets were written for loud exhausts, no fenders, lowered suspensions etc. I see street-driven cars and motorcycles flaunting these still-on-the-books laws today, and nobody really gives a damn. This is as it should be, there are bigger problems to solve than whether Johnny has fenders on his bike or car.
Apehangers shouldn't even be restricted. They are no worse than any set of bars.
The reality is that modifying bicycles is a "who cares" issue, and the chances of being hassled by the law over your customized bike probably aren't worth considering.
The closest analog to this is the enforcement of laws relating to automobile modifications. Back in the '50s-'70s many fix-it tickets were written for loud exhausts, no fenders, lowered suspensions etc. I see street-driven cars and motorcycles flaunting these still-on-the-books laws today, and nobody really gives a damn. This is as it should be, there are bigger problems to solve than whether Johnny has fenders on his bike or car.
#4
You gonna eat that?
It doesn't say you can't ride a modified bike; it says you're not supposed to modify the bike in those two ways. So as long as you get someone else to modify your bike, I think you're good to go.
#5
You gonna eat that?
Heck, when we were kids, we just slipped them together. Brazing? Who did that?
#6
coasterbrakelockup
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: parts unknown
Posts: 824
Bikes: surly steamroller w/coaster brake, electra single speed cruiser, specialized rockhopper commuter, no-name single speed folder, 700c ultimate wheel, 24" unicycle, specialized bmx lsd, single seat single speed huffy tandem, pink upsidedown parade bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Also, "modify" would imply changing a bike after it was initially manufactured. So if you built the frame yourself it could have as long a fork and/or bars as you wanted. Silly legislators.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 148
Bikes: Townie, Kickbike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I read that same thing, a few years ago. Made me chuckle, most of my bikes are LAW BREAKERS......My wife married me because I was a BAD boy!
#8
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 127
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#9
Powerful-Ugly Creature
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 569
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Okay, they were probably just trying to get people to stick with things like bells. I do have to wonder how they feel about an Air Zound to warn cars.
#11
Stealing Spokes since 82'
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Boy-z, Ideeeho
Posts: 1,875
Bikes: The always reliable kuwie
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
MA probably wrote that law when they wrote the motorcycle laws, they have pretty strict laws regarding modified motorcycles in regards to the bars and forks, some guy probably just transfered it over to the bicycle laws.
#12
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Grid Reference, SK
Posts: 3,768
Bikes: I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
But anything 'in a bag designed for the purpose <of carrying things (as all bags are)>' then it is ok. Doesn't need to be securely fastened or held safely... buy five cartons of smokes at the drugstore, wrap them up in the bag they came in and carry it under your arm and that is OK. But a pack of smokes under your T-shirt sleeve is a no-no.
I would like to read the original text just to see if there is as much ambiguity.
#13
Pavement Taste-Tester
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Got it: MA Bike Law.
This part is funny, too-
Grabbing onto a car while riding is actually kind of tricky. I tried it once for fun, but the pulling force on my left arm transferred to my right before I could try to compensate, forcing the handlebar to turn hard and ending with about a four inch scar. It was pretty funny because it was so unexpected at the time. We were only going 5-10mph.
(6) The operator shall not carry any package, bundle or article except in or on a basket, rack, trailer or other device designed for such purposes. The operator shall keep at least one hand upon the handlebars at all times.
(5) The operator shall not permit the bicycle to be drawn by any other moving vehicle. The operator shall not tow any other vehicle or person, except that bicycle trailers properly attached to the bicycle which allow for firm control and braking may be used.
Last edited by Harutz; 12-23-10 at 10:57 PM. Reason: spell better!
#15
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Grid Reference, SK
Posts: 3,768
Bikes: I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
Fromt he statute:
"Violations of any provision of this section except violations of subclause (iii) of clause (2) shall be punished by a fine of not more than twenty dollars."
Twenty dollars? TWENTY DOLLARS!?!??? In Ontario, Canada, there is a $90 fine for riding without a bell. I think there are 'service fees' on top of that so the actual fine is closer to $110.
"Violations of any provision of this section except violations of subclause (iii) of clause (2) shall be punished by a fine of not more than twenty dollars."
Twenty dollars? TWENTY DOLLARS!?!??? In Ontario, Canada, there is a $90 fine for riding without a bell. I think there are 'service fees' on top of that so the actual fine is closer to $110.
#16
Pwnerer
As always, John Brain has more info on this era.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: IL-USA
Posts: 1,859
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 111 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
There was a Florida (I think) guy on one of the Recumbent forums who had a policeman stop him on his recumbent tadpole trike and warn him that riding it in the street was not legal.
The reason was that the trike had 16-inch front wheels, and there was a law that said that any bicycle with wheels smaller than 20" were sidewalk bikes (presumably toddler bikes) and could not be used on public roads.
There might be a law but I wouldn't worry about getting such a ticket too much, though.
On the other hand, I know a lot of US states have laws saying that you cannot mount sirens on bicycles, even now.
~
The reason was that the trike had 16-inch front wheels, and there was a law that said that any bicycle with wheels smaller than 20" were sidewalk bikes (presumably toddler bikes) and could not be used on public roads.
There might be a law but I wouldn't worry about getting such a ticket too much, though.
On the other hand, I know a lot of US states have laws saying that you cannot mount sirens on bicycles, even now.
~
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pacific, WA
Posts: 1,260
Bikes: Custom 531ST touring, Bilenky Viewpoint, Bianchi Milano, vintage Condor racer
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I recall another recumbent trike rider in, I think, California, who was ticketed because the law required that he be able to put a foot down when stopped. The law doesn't require that you do put a foot down when stopped, and on a trike he had no need to put a foot down to hold up the trike, but the law says you have to be able to put a foot down when stopped.
In effect, faired trikes, Ordinaries, and tall bikes are illegal there.
But again, the probability of enforcement seems low.
In effect, faired trikes, Ordinaries, and tall bikes are illegal there.
But again, the probability of enforcement seems low.
#19
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26391 Post(s)
Liked 10,366 Times
in
7,197 Posts
I recall another recumbent trike rider in, I think, California, who was ticketed because the law required that he be able to put a foot down when stopped. The law doesn't require that you do put a foot down when stopped, and on a trike he had no need to put a foot down to hold up the trike, but the law says you have to be able to put a foot down when stopped.
In effect, faired trikes, Ordinaries, and tall bikes are illegal there.
But again, the probability of enforcement seems low.
In effect, faired trikes, Ordinaries, and tall bikes are illegal there.
But again, the probability of enforcement seems low.
anti-apehanger provisions here in California.
As to the probability of enforcement, here are the stats
from last September's "Ride Safe Month" here in the state
capital:
A total of 183 citations (type of violation and number):
21650 CVC – Riding of the wrong side of the road 75
10.76.010 SCC – Riding on a Sidewalk in a business district 56
21212a CVC – Under 18 riding without a helmet 17
21201a CVC – non-operable brakes 8
21208a CVC – Not riding in a bike lane when one is provided 8
27400 CVC – Riding with both ears covered (headset) 8
21453a CVC – Red Light 4
22450 CVC – Stop Sign 3
21461a CVC – Failure to Obey sign 2
21209 CVC – Car driving in Bike Lane 1
10.12.090 SCC – Loud Music 1
Note that there were a total of 18 reported bicycle involved collision reports, which is less
as compared to the same month in both 2008 (31) and 2009 (19). None of the collisions in
September 2010 involved a fatality.
21650 CVC – Riding of the wrong side of the road 75
10.76.010 SCC – Riding on a Sidewalk in a business district 56
21212a CVC – Under 18 riding without a helmet 17
21201a CVC – non-operable brakes 8
21208a CVC – Not riding in a bike lane when one is provided 8
27400 CVC – Riding with both ears covered (headset) 8
21453a CVC – Red Light 4
22450 CVC – Stop Sign 3
21461a CVC – Failure to Obey sign 2
21209 CVC – Car driving in Bike Lane 1
10.12.090 SCC – Loud Music 1
Note that there were a total of 18 reported bicycle involved collision reports, which is less
as compared to the same month in both 2008 (31) and 2009 (19). None of the collisions in
September 2010 involved a fatality.
bicycle fatalities over the summer. I really
would love to know how the loud music guy
managed to piss off the constabulary.
But it seems you are correct so far in that
there is only sporadic enforcement here at all,
and the finer points of the code only come
into play if you fail the attitude test.
Respectfully,
Mike Larmer
__________________
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 539
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The motor vehicle codes still contain the foot down and
anti-apehanger provisions here in California.
As to the probability of enforcement, here are the stats
from last September's "Ride Safe Month" here in the state
capital:
This was the police response to a string of five
bicycle fatalities over the summer. I really
would love to know how the loud music guy
managed to piss off the constabulary.
But it seems you are correct so far in that
there is only sporadic enforcement here at all,
and the finer points of the code only come
into play if you fail the attitude test.
Respectfully,
Mike Larmer
anti-apehanger provisions here in California.
As to the probability of enforcement, here are the stats
from last September's "Ride Safe Month" here in the state
capital:
This was the police response to a string of five
bicycle fatalities over the summer. I really
would love to know how the loud music guy
managed to piss off the constabulary.
But it seems you are correct so far in that
there is only sporadic enforcement here at all,
and the finer points of the code only come
into play if you fail the attitude test.
Respectfully,
Mike Larmer