Road Cycling - litespeed arenberg vs. tuscany vs. classic

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.



PDA
Flash
06-12-02, 10:41 AM
Can anyone with riding experience on any of the above-mentioned Litespeed models (Arenberg, Tuscany, Classic) comment on the major differences between the group. I've test ridden an Arenberg at a local shop and loved it. I notice that the Arenberg is positioned as Litespeed's "affordable" model. I'd be going with the Campy group, which I notice upgrades to Chorus/Record on the Classic/Tuscany and I notice the Classic has straight seat stays.

Otherwise, how much more is one paying for a Tuscany/Classic, and, with this price increase, what is one getting? I ask because the local dealer has neither the Tuscany nor the Classic in the shop but would have to order.

Thanks.

RonH
06-12-02, 03:46 PM
I own a 2001 Tuscany and love it. :love:

The major differences between the Arenberg and Tuscany are that the Tuscany has:
1. Excellent handling due to the added frame stiffness of the teardrop shaped down tube.
2. Front-end stability due to the triangular top tube.
3. Ride-softening compliance and consistent power transfer from ovalized, triple bend seatstays.
The bent seatstays offer a softer ride.


The Arenberg has limited choices for component upgrades (according to Litespeed's website (http://www.litespeed.com/english/road/road.html)).

There are no paint color options for the Arenberg.



The frame geometry of the Classic is "classic" European style.
oxologic
06-13-02, 02:50 AM
I think that Litespeed is trying to sell out all the Arenberg models as they are quite cheap. Okay, I admit that this is an assumption, I'm an S alright? Maybe Litespeed would want to make more quality bikes and perhaps even a new model next year? Arenberg would be a good bike still since it is titanium and so what if the handling is slightly inferior? It won't differ too much either!

roadbuzz
06-13-02, 10:34 AM
I think...
The Tuscany has a shorter wheelbase than the Classic and Arenberg (look at the space between the seat tube and rear tire)... it will feel more nimble, but possibly a little rougher on long rides.

The Classic used to have a braze-on for the front derailleur, others require clamp on, they may have changed that, tho'. Classic also does not have an integrated head set. I call that a feature. The only reason I can see that the Classic is more expensive than the Tuscany is the additional Ti for longer seat & chain stays.