Touring - Loaded Touring Bike Chainring choise?
Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
05-16-05, 08:05 PM
Hi, I Have a Cannondale T600 with 54/42/30 chainring, Looking at the Bruce Gordon BLT and it has 44/32/22 chainring. What is the + and - of the smaller set and should I look at changing chainrings or does that work? Thank You for any Information. Ken J.
If you want lower gearing, sure. You can also throw on a larger cassette, but that might require a megarange rear der to match.
Mine is 34t. My rings are something like 52/40/28
05-16-05, 09:28 PM
Thank You, Doing ok with lite load, but just bought a bob trailer and I may need a lower gear or two.
05-16-05, 09:51 PM
I have a 1994 Cannodale T700 which I toured with extensively in the latter half of the 90's in the mountainous terrain of BC, Alberta, Montana, Idaho and Washington. I usually carried a full load of four panniers plus a large duffel bag on the rear rack. To make it easier to push this load, I put the lowest gearing possible on the T700. I can't remember the component names but hear are the tooth counts for the lowest gear -- small chainring:20, largest gear on cassette: 28. This is a gearing ration of .71 which made many of my companions envious!!
05-17-05, 04:38 AM
You really need gearing for the steepest hill/roughest track/headwind at the end of the hardest day.
I switched from a road triple to a Shimano LX chainset and never regretted the loss of stupid-high gears.
The front mech may still work with smaller rings.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.