PDA

View Full Version : On the road to safe cycling?



billh
05-23-05, 08:31 AM
Moderator comment: Billh, you are correct this deserves it's own thread. Enjoy.
vrkelley
Forum Moderator
===============
The local paper has a Health & Fitness section every Monday. Today it was about cycling. Curious what you think about it. Bill H.

link (http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/lifestyle/stories.nsf/healthfitness/story/04B5983FD6BD92728625700A0007821C?OpenDocument)

On the road to safe cycling
By Dave Luecking
Of the Post-Dispatch
Monday, May. 23 2005

Bicycling nearly killed me, and except for the grace of God, modern medicine
and dumb luck, my name appears in print on this page instead of in marble under
a tree somewhere.

No other good reasons explain how I cheated death three times in a three-month
span a couple of years ago to continue living and breathing, never mind
walking, talking, and, yes, riding . . . with my faculties and limbs mostly in
tact.

In some ways, I have been forever scarred by my adventures on two wheels.
Bicycling has given me . . .
An inch-long-by-half-inch-wide scar on my left shin where the carbon-fiber fork
of my road bike opened a gash after being sheered off in a 20 mph joust with an
Oldsmobile Achieva.
A right shoulder that aches after anything resembling a throwing motion, as the
result of being unable to stick the landing after cart-wheeling over the top of
the aforementioned Achieva.
A small indentation on my right shin where a surgeon had to slice a hole to
drain the crash-related infection that had festered for more than a week,
reached the circumference of a grapefruit and caused my lower leg to swell to
roughly the size of Florida.
More emotional scars than I care to admit. Suffice it to say the therapy seems
to be working . . . well, mostly working . . . sometimes.

I still ride, though not with quite the same passion and, dare I say, love as
before. I'd like to think I'm smarter now, more mindful and respectful of the
hazards of sharing the road, and perhaps that sense of caution has taken away
the joy. Or maybe the thrill is gone because I'm just scared, afraid of the
pain that accompanies falling flat on one's face in pursuit of the
risk-begets-reward scenario.



You see, when cycling morphs into something more than recreation, you get a
little crazy - in a good way, mostly - and you live for that perfect ride, your
legs and heart pumping, your confidence soaring. Before long, you feel limited
by the boring and mundane sameness of the nearby paved trail, and cycling
expands your world and leads you to the streets and into traffic where you are
exposed and vulnerable, with your well-being dependent upon the trust you place
in those with whom you share the road.

Sharing the road is hazardous enough without the cyclist adding to the danger
by being careless or inattentive, as I learned in April 2003. As I leaned into
a left turn off a small hill in Illinois farm land, I became momentarily
distracted, failed to notice the pothole and took quite a tumble.

The thing about having your front wheel swallowed by a pothole at 15-20 mph is
that the bike pretty much stops, but you keep going. One moment you're riding
high in the saddle and the next your bike's trailing 10 feet behind and you're
sliding along on the pavement, your flesh wounds being imbedded with tarry road
gunk.

A little road rash - even a lot of road rash - isn't that bad considering the
head, neck or shoulder injuries that can result from somersaulting over the
handlebar. Antibacterial soap, antiseptic and a generous slathering of
antibiotic ointment take care of road rash in a few days . . . except if you
miss a spot, as I did. A small discoloration that I believed to be a bruise
evolved into a civilization of germs hell bent on expanding their universe and
thereby threatening mine.

The surgeon's scalpel and a course of antibiotics ended that invasion, and in
no time I was back in the saddle, only to be nearly done in by a 0 mph rumble
with a semi in Washington, Mo., in early July 2003.

I had pulled up alongside the 18-wheeler at a stop light and stopped in the
trucker's blind spot, a very bad move. As the driver turned right, cutting the
corner way short, he didn't see the knucklehead on the bicycle standing in the
trailer's path. Fortunately, I realized the danger in time to dive onto the
sidewalk, getting myself and most of my bike out of the way, my heart racing as
the truck clipped my back wheel, then bounded over the curb and on its merry
way.

Like the pothole/infection, this mishap gave me pause - and a $150 bill for a
new wheel - but didn't slow down my cycling, which nearly came to a permanent
halt a few weeks later on a gorgeous July day - July 24, 2003 - because I
failed to stop at a flashing red light downtown.

Of course, any 5-year-old will tell you red means stop and green means go, yet
I treated this flashing red as a green and blew into the intersection of 18th
and Locust streets at 20 mph, incorrectly assuming that the drivers on Locust
also had a flashing red and would be stopping for both of us.

Nearly a fatal mistake, that one.

The woman in the Oldsmobile Achieva had a flashing yellow light, hence the
right of way, putting us on a collision course. I saw her coming, reached for
my brakes in a panic - and missed. She didn't see me at all until she heard the
sickening ka-thump of my bicycle and my body plowing into her right-front
fender, then saw my frightened face streaking past her windshield.

Hey, that'd freak anybody out.

From where I sat, the collision itself wasn't so bad. In fact, the anticipation
of the impact was worse than the actual impact - it seemed . . . to . . . take
. . . for . . . ev . . . er - and it wasn't until I went out of control and
into cartwheel mode that things got really dicey. It felt like sailing through
the corkscrew on the Ninja at Six Flags, only faster, followed by a violent
body slam onto my shoulder, back and behind as I crash landed on the street.

Though my helmet was scuffed, I remained conscious throughout the ordeal and
the first thing I told the woman was that the crash was totally my fault. I
figured that if the internal injuries kicked in, the white lights beckoned and
I passed to the great beyond, I wanted her to know that she was not at all to
blame for my stupidity.

In the emergency room, doctors sewed up the gash in my leg, observed me for
internal injuries, then sent me home a few hours later, battered and bruised,
to ride another day.

More than one person wondered whether my two-wheel mishaps were cries for help,
suggesting that I should have had my head examined as well. My standard
response was that these were merely unfortunate mistakes, correctable errors
from which I not only recovered but learned and improved as a cyclist. But over
time I've concluded that my mistakes were evidence of romance run amok - being
distracted, ignoring or not sensing danger, misreading stop signs.

So now I ride with trepidation, caution and an aversion to risk, all of which
protects me from the biggest menace I've encountered on two wheels - me.

Reporter Dave Luecking
E-mail: dluecking@post-dispatch.com
Phone: 314-340-8188

Dr. Moto
05-23-05, 08:37 AM
He's an idiot and a terrible rider, but at least he's honest about it. I'm not sure this article does much to advance the cause of safe cycling.

Map tester
05-23-05, 08:44 AM
The pothole incident could have been avoided, but let's call it a accident. The semi-truck incident was his fault for being in the truck driver's blind spot. And running the red flashing light--well, you get what you pay for.

But then again, if he had always been a 'safer' cyclist, he wouldn't have a subject for a column. :rolleyes:

pj7
05-23-05, 08:47 AM
bah!
I have worse scars from being a back in hurling and it never made me think twice about using my head to block a sliotar. Had my jaw broken by a hurley twice and my shins are bashed in, but every weekend I'd be out there playing.
I'd assume that with my constitution for taking pain that bike riding will be no differant.
Though I applaud this fella for getting back out there on two wheels, his bad luck/experiences are his, and I'd say that less than 1% of people on bikes will even come close to experiencing this. At least he gives credit where it is due and takes the blame for his mistakes, which is more than alot of the people who've started the "I got hit today" threads can say.

Dr. Moto
05-23-05, 08:48 AM
hurling
sliotar
hurley

translation please?

eubi
05-23-05, 08:50 AM
The first sentance bothers me, where he says cycling nearly killed him. It sound more like inattentiveness, bad luck and disregard for the traffic signals nearly killed him. He just happened to be riding a bicycle.

I could go on and on...I'll leave the rest to you guys...

billh
05-23-05, 09:01 AM
The first sentance bothers me, where he says cycling nearly killed him. It sound more like inattentiveness, bad luck and disregard for the traffic signals nearly killed him. He just happened to be riding a bicycle.

I could go on and on...I'll leave the rest to you guys...

Well said. The article bothers me on several levels, but can't quite articulate yet. I guess from a advocacy perspective, I'd like to see a little more positive spin on cycling in general. Given most of the readers are motorists-only, I think the article pretty much confirms their prior beliefs that cycling is dangerous, and cyclists are huge risk-takers. Well, the truth is there is a risk, but most cyclists don't endure 3 major incidents in such a short time period.

Roody
05-23-05, 09:12 AM
The worst thing about this horrible article is that it overdramatizes the risks of cycling without informing readers that these outcomes are atypical, and without suggesting solutions to the problem. If this moron drove as recklessly as he cycles, he would have far more serious injuries. And he owes it to his readers to tell them that safe cycling requires education, not "trepidation, caution and an aversion to risk." This kind of first person journalism is incomplete, inaccurate and unethical. In other words, the writer's reporting is as sloppy and careless as his cycling.

JohnBrooking
05-23-05, 09:18 AM
with your well-being dependent upon the trust you place in those with whom you share the road.
Well, there's his first mistake... We all know you can't trust everyone else to do the right thing even if you are, much less if you are not!

It'd be great if someone who lives in the area could craft a response, as a letter to the editor or even a guest editorial, if the paper is open to that. I'm sure this thread can provide plenty of suggested input!

pj7
05-23-05, 09:18 AM
translation please?

http://www.iol.ie/~coolmine/typ/gaa/introhur.html
hurling == a sport (gaelic game, still played in appalachia america, great great great grandfather of ice hockey)
sliotar == hurley ball (think softball, only harder :D)
hurley == a stick (think: short, fat hockey stick)

kirkmuffin
05-23-05, 09:25 AM
the author is not out to be balanced or informative, he's out to write a dramatic article. In the process, he's reinforcing beliefs about cycling being dangerous.

thechrisproject
05-23-05, 09:36 AM
bah!
I have worse scars from being a back in hurling and it never made me think twice about using my head to block a sliotar. Had my jaw broken by a hurley twice and my shins are bashed in, but every weekend I'd be out there playing.
Hurling? Sliotar? Hurley? You're just makin' stuff up!

edit: shoulda read farther

pj7
05-23-05, 09:56 AM
Hurling? Sliotar? Hurley? You're just makin' stuff up!

edit: shoulda read farther

lol
No one where I live now has heard of the sport either
oh well

we now return you to your regularly scheduled thread

genec
05-23-05, 10:47 AM
He's an idiot and a terrible rider, but at least he's honest about it. I'm not sure this article does much to advance the cause of safe cycling.

Really. At the first paragraph I was sympathetic... but reading on I see the guy is a bone head... persistant, but a bone head.
:eek:

JohnBrooking
05-23-05, 10:57 AM
I just noticed upon re-reading that this appeared in the Health and Fitness section of the paper. How ironic for a column discouraging cycling as dangerous. Isn't a Health and Fitness section supposed to promote health and fitness? Yeesh.

Helmet Head
05-23-05, 11:38 AM
This article is nothing short of an outrage. Any self-respecting cyclist who subscribes to the Post-Dispatch should cancel immediately, and reference this article as the reason.

'nother
05-23-05, 11:40 AM
At least he gets this bit right: "So now I ride with trepidation, caution and an aversion to risk, all of which protects me from the biggest menace I've encountered on two wheels - me."

genec
05-23-05, 11:41 AM
This article is nothing short of an outrage. Any self-respecting cyclist who subscribes to the Post-Dispatch should cancel immediately, and reference this article as the reason.

OMG... we are in agreement. :D

Certainly this article should be referenced in several letters to the editor... and someone should take away that guy's bike... maybe he should try just walking.

sbhikes
05-23-05, 12:07 PM
What on earth was the purpose of an article like that?

genec
05-23-05, 02:04 PM
whoops... this was a bad combination of threads... "Crash or near miss," might work for some of these, but this last conversation is about a very bad cycling article... not even in the same vein as the others.

Helmet Head
05-23-05, 04:43 PM
Gene, we agree again.
A discussion of this article deserves its own thread... its an advocacy issue.
The other personal stories about crashes are about safety.

billh
05-24-05, 08:32 AM
whoops... this was a bad combination of threads... "Crash or near miss," might work for some of these, but this last conversation is about a very bad cycling article... not even in the same vein as the others.

I thought the thread was deleted for some reason, then I find it here with some lame note from the moderator in my box. Way to kill a thread. Maybe he is a friend of the editors of the Post-Dispatch. All those editors stick together. :(

billh
05-27-05, 08:18 AM
Here's the letters to the editor in response to that cycling "safety" story last Monday.

link (http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/editorialcommentary/story/A28573B86EEA6DE38625700D0032C78D?OpenDocument)

Lights on

Please remind bicycle riders that they also must obey the rules ("Share the road, obey the rules," May 20), such as having lights on after dusk. I can't tell you how many times I have come much too close to a bicycle along the edge of the road because the rider didn't have or use any lights.

Bicyclists are not visible to an automobile driver in the dark until it may be too late for that driver to avoid the cyclist. Laws require drivers to turn on their vehicle's headlights and taillights starting an hour before sundown and up to an hour after sunrise. These laws apply equally to bicycles on public roads.

Please remind bicyclists to use lights as the rules of the road require.

Ruth Woodson
Florissant

Tolerance for safety

Bicycling is the most powerfully optimistic answer to health, pollution, noise and fossil-fuel madness.

Yes, bicyclist are in control of their actions. Yes, there are loony bicyclists who ignore lanes, stop signs, lights and don't signal. There also are drivers of cars who run lights, tailgate, don't signal and don't pay attention who cause deaths and damage to other drivers, bikers and pedestrians.

So I'm concerned that in "On the road to safe cycling" (May 23), the Post-Dispatch did not point out the little-known fact that bicyclists have the same rights and responsibilities as car drivers do, according to Missouri state law: They must use signals, ride in a safe, predictable manner, have working lights, etc.

But we law-abiding bicyclists who commute on the roads each day are the minority out there among cars. We offer a better way to travel, commute and live. We follow the laws, and do our best to educate drivers and other riders. We have somewhere to go, too. Please notice also that we take up a lot less space than a car, don't make noise or pollute.

We don't hate drivers. We're friendly. We smile and want you to get where you're going safely, too.

So, yes, share the road. But share a piece of your minds, too.

Paul MacFarlane
St. Louis

Helmet Head
05-27-05, 10:26 AM
Bill,

If I lived in St. Louis, I would consider looking up that Paul MacFarlane guy and offer buying him a beer. If only all cyclists had his attitude and outlook.

Serge

weed eater
05-27-05, 10:53 AM
good heavens, this guy is a menace to other road users--motorized or otherwise! reminds me of a Diane Ackerman article in the New York Times where she described her repeated bouts with concussions--each one from accidentally banging her head into a wall or glass patio door. At the end of the article she tried to lighten the mood by joking how she rode her bike wearing a full-face helmet. Why? Because cycling is so dangerous? seems to me she should have worn her helmet indoors.

a reminder of how easy it is to rely on fear and unfounded myths.

lilHinault
05-28-05, 02:06 AM
Haha that glass door thing reminds me of something, once when I was a skinny little kid, playing at a friend's house, the friend and my sister rushed out of the room to climb up into the treehouse in the yard, and I stayed behind a moment, wondering if I should put the toys away (the room was full of them, I decided not to, since it didn't look like anyone else did). I rushed outside too, but somehow the glass door was closed, and I bounced off of the sucker! WHAP!!! I found myself sitting on my butt feeling like a swatted fly, and very carefully got up, opened the door, went out, and closed the door. The next day, that door was COVERED with decals! Little birds, suns, etc you name it, that kid's mom has plastered them all over the thing.

---

Now, if Mr Klutz had been in a car, the pothole would have been a nonissue, the truck blind spot thing, assuming he stopped his car in a blind spot to the right of a truck etc like that, well, trucks also run over CARS that way, why do you think there are those signs on the backs of many of them with the little diagram of how they turn? And the 3rd incident, if he were in a car, could well have ended up in a real t-bone, which means he could have REALLY gotten hurt, plus his car totaled which represents a huge financial hit.

Verdict: maybe he should stay on a bike, just get himself a Michelin Man suit.