PDA

View Full Version : Another great reason to ride to work in NYC



wheezl
07-22-05, 11:39 AM
The things gov't will do to make people *feel* safe while just wasting taxpayer money.


New York Times
July 22, 2005
New Yorkers Handle Subway Checks as Part of Their Day

By MARIA NEWMAN AND SHADI RAHIMI
Commuters arriving at the subway station near 42nd Street and 8th Avenue during the morning rush today were met with this greeting from a police sergeant bellowing into a white bullhorn:

"Attention passengers: All purses and bags in the subway system are subject to inspection. If you do not agree to inspection, you must exit the system."

This is the reality of life for commuters in New York City in the wake of the London subway attacks: Police here began random searches last night of backpacks and packages carried by commuters on the city's subways and on area rail lines, in the broadest such search that officials can recall. And New Yorkers for the most part seemed to take it in stride.

"Everybody understands," said Sgt. Betsy Guzman, who was monitoring the station entrance at 42d and 8th Avenue, along with eight other police officers. "It's a little time out of their day, and a few people rushing to catch their train have been upset, but most people are O.K. with it."

The searches were conducted all over the metropolitan area. .

"You lost the time, but it's good for your life," said Macario Tejada, 33, a restaurant worker from Ecuador who waited at a subway station at Roosevelt Avenue and Broadway in Jackson Heights, Queens.

Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly said this morning that most people seemed to be cooperating with the searches.

"So far it's been going well," he told CNN. "The public understands we live in changed times. This is a tool, not a panacea. I think it gives potential terrorists something to think about. I think this is a reasonable step to take."

At the 42d and 8th Avenue subway entrance, most people asked to have their bags searched by officers obliged without complaint, though a few were confused and asked why, while some others rolled their eyes or grumbled quietly as they rushed over to the small, white fold-out table to the left of the turnstiles, where two officers went through their bags.

The officers would unzip suitcases and lift up clothing and towels to pat beneath them with their gloved hands. With purses or backpacks, they would rifle briefly through papers and notebooks. For most people, the process took about 10 to 15 seconds.

Nancy James, a 34-year-old Bronx resident, had her large black suitcase and small purse searched. She said the searches were "a good idea" for safety reasons, though she is not really worried about another terrorist attack in New York.

But she said they did not appear random to her.

"I think they're only checking people with big bags," she said. "They should be checking everyone, no matter what size bag you have."

Ms. Guzman acknowledged that big bags are something of a red flag for the officers, and she said they were also looking for "anything that might alert us, like wires sticking out of bags."

The searches throughout the metropolitan have already netted one arrest, after police on Long Island noticed something suspicious about a van near a Suffolk County train station.

The Associated Press said Suffolk County police arrested Gilbert Hernandez, 34, during Thursday evening's rush hour at the Brentwood Long Island Rail Road station after they searched his van and discovered a machete, imitation handguns, an electronic stun gun and chukka sticks in the vehicle. The police told The A.P. that Mr. Hernandez had been convicted of possessing a pipe bomb in 1996.

Some commuters said after they heard about the searches, which were announced on Thursday, they changed their routine somewhat.

"I go to the gym every day, and I didn't bring my gym bag today," said Shaquille Qureshi, a 21-year-old intern at the investment services firm UBS who was waiting for the D train at the Fordham Road Station in central Bronx.

Today, he carried only an umbrella and a newspaper.

Mr. Qureshi, a Pakistani Muslim, said he worried that racial profiling would determine who would be stopped and searched.

"I don't really buy the randomness of the searches," he said. "I even tell my friends, 'Don't even fly with me.' When I go to the airport, I get delayed an hour; they take my license and check my bag. I don't mind it because it's procedure, but I have to get there an hour earlier than most people."

Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg acknowledged that passengers might be inconvenienced.

"It's a complex world where, sadly, there are a lot of bad people," he said on Thursday. "We know that our freedoms are threatening to certain individuals, and there's no reason for us to let our guard down."

Today, he also said he was aware of legal challenges to the searches, and said city was prepared to defend itself against any lawsuit.

Donna Lieberman, executive director at the New York Civil Liberties Union, said riders have a legal right to enter the subways even if they refuse to have their bags searched.

"We are absolutely looking into litigation," she said about the searches.

In a telephone interview from New Orleans, where she was attending a meeting organized by the American Civil Liberties Union, she said her organization plans to post a notice on its Web site by tonight informing passengers of their rights. She also encouraged riders who encountered problems with the searches to send an email to her organization at nyclu215@aol.com.

In response to concerns about civil liberties violations, Mr. Kelly said this morning on CNN that there would be no racial profiling involved in the searches, and that the department was using a "numerical criteria" to determine which commuters to search.

For example, he said, they might stop every one in 10 commuters, or every one in five, "depending on how busy the subway is."

Mr. Kelly said his department would "reserve the right" to expand the searches to buses and ferries, and he made it clear that many subway riders will be affected.

"Ideally, it will be before you go through the turnstile," he said. "You have a right to turn around and leave, but we also reserve the right to do those types of searches if someone is already inside the system."

But in Queens this morning, no one walked away when they were asked to open their bags.

Carli Beardsley was nervous when she opened her large tote bag, revealing a bottle of water and a pair of scissors, which she uses for work. She explained that she uses the scissors each day in her job as an interior designer in Lower Manhattan.

Ms. Beardsley, 42, said she felt anxious about subway security even before the July 7 bombings in London.

"I can't go through the 53rd Street and Lexington Avenue station without thinking about King's Cross," she said, referring to the London subway station that was the scene of one of the bombings on July 7.

Some riders not only supported the searches, but criticized the police for not inspecting bags more assiduously.

Catherine Courrier, 50, a vice president for marketing at Estee Lauder, the cosmetics firm, was carrying a rolling knapsack with clothing and toiletries for a weekend trip to the Hamptons. She said the police officers who stopped her gave only a cursory glance into the outside pocket of the knapsack, and did not even ask her to open the main compartment.

"They didn't even look inside it," Ms. Courrier complained. "I think it's as good idea if they do it properly, with gloves, like in the airport, but this type of search is useless."

Tony Bourdier, 38, works as a wood finisher and carries a toolbox with him every day. "I guess it's got to be done," he said of the searches. "I just have to leave a little bit earlier from the house."

Sewell Chan contributed reporting for this article. .

scarry
07-22-05, 12:20 PM
The things gov't will do to make people *feel* safe while just wasting taxpayer money.

Right, while they are riffling though backpacks looking for wires, a clever bomber walks in with a bomb disguised as a boombox, no pun intended.

rideabike
07-22-05, 12:23 PM
Is that like increasing airport security while leaving the planes unlocked on the tarmack?

But you shouldn't really post things like this. After all, if the word "security" is attached to an action, the action must be correct. Attaching the word "security" to an action presses a button inside of all of us and we say things like:

"These are difficult times. We must all make sacrifices." "The world is changing." Etc, etc.

oboeguy
07-22-05, 12:28 PM
Haha I was going to post the same thing. I doubt it will cause many NYCers to start bike commuting, though.

I agree -- this is a policy to try to make people feel better. Pointless, IMO (well unless they catch some idiot).

Ubie
07-22-05, 01:18 PM
I agree -- this is a policy to try to make people feel better. Pointless, IMO (well unless they catch some idiot).

/begin Rant
Arghhh! i can't begin to explain how pointless this whole thing is. They *can't* catch anybody, all anybody has to do is not consent to the search and enter at the next subway station! This is simply a waste of money, and i'm personally amazed Bloomberg thought this was a good idea. It just brings me to a place i like to call 'Irritation Station'

/end Rant

ch0mb0
07-22-05, 02:06 PM
fear of an attack on the transit system and the whole paranoia search thing will definitely see a few more bikes on the road. not many, though...people still can't/don't see cycling as an option. maybe that's a good thing.

been expecting a subway attack for a long time now. if they want to do it, it will happen. not a high chance of stopping it...

Bikepacker67
07-22-05, 02:10 PM
The only problem with the searches, is that they're random.

The should be searching the bags of every arab-looking male between 15-45.

brokenrobot
07-22-05, 02:19 PM
The only problem with the searches, is that they're random.

The should be searching the bags of every arab-looking male between 15-45.


I guess you've missed the part where at least some of the British suspects are white anglo-saxons; the CSM interviewed a 30-year-old Irish jihadist this week, as well, who was described as "not out of place in any pub".

What the city *should* be doing is pressuring the feds to provide port security funding, which they've shown no interest in doing. The subway's never going to be made invulnerable - but we could almost certainly do a lot to prevent a nuclear hit on one of our cities, if Bush and Co showed any interest whatsoever in doing so.

The_Dude
07-22-05, 02:36 PM
I doubt it will cause many NYCers to start bike commuting, though.

You never know...
More Londoners Ride Bikes to Work (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050722/ap_on_re_eu/bombings_biking_to_work_1)

Bikepacker67
07-22-05, 02:43 PM
I guess you've missed the part where at least some of the British suspects are white anglo-saxons; the CSM interviewed a 30-year-old Irish jihadist this week, as well, who was described as "not out of place in any pub".



Ya, ya, ya...
Just the exceptions that prove the rule.
I'm sure the lefty leaning press had to search far and wide for its "let's not racially profile" pablum.

scarry
07-22-05, 02:55 PM
Ya, ya, ya...
Just the exceptions that prove the rule.
I'm sure the lefty leaning press had to search far and wide for its "let's not racially profile" pablum.

O boy, here we go. You had to pull the race card. This tells us more about you than anything else.

wheezl
07-22-05, 02:57 PM
Ya, ya, ya...
Just the exceptions that prove the rule.
I'm sure the lefty leaning press had to search far and wide for its "let's not racially profile" pablum.


Oh geeeze I should have known better.. some admin move this to politics and religion quick!

Bikepacker67
07-22-05, 03:11 PM
No prob...

I won't thread steal.

Back to NYC....
Why do folks live there, anyway?

There's so much bucolic elbow room left in this country, and now with i-net, brainy folks can work anywhere....

So why would people (freedom/space loving cyclists, especially) subject themselves to such a sardine-like existence?

And don't tell me culture... I can take a 3 day bike tour to the Berkshires for that.

Bikepacker67
07-22-05, 03:20 PM
O boy, here we go. You had to pull the race card. This tells us more about you than anything else.


Let me tell ya a little story...

Back when I was around 20 (a million years ago) my gym rat friend and I (both Caucasian) where driving back from a late nite work-out session, when the cops pulled us over - guns drawn.

After a heartpounding 15 mins (10 of which had us both in handcuffs - while my car was tossed) they finally let us go.

It turns out, that two young white guys had just held up a Subway Shop at gunpoint.
We were racially profiled - plain and simple.

And ya know what... if that bit of inconvenience helps cops catch dangerous criminals (and terrorists) I can live with that.

Let me ask you a question... if a cop stopped someone for wearing a bright red shirt, because someone in a bright red shirt just mugged an old lady... is that profiling?

Of course it is.
And it's good policework as well.

Laika
07-22-05, 04:01 PM
Ya, ya, ya...
Just the exceptions that prove the rule.
I'm sure the lefty leaning press had to search far and wide for its "let's not racially profile" pablum.
And the dealiest terror attack on US soil previous to 9/11 was comitted by who, again?

Take your time. Google if you must.

Stubacca
07-22-05, 04:13 PM
It turns out, that two young white guys had just held up a Subway Shop at gunpoint.
We were racially profiled - plain and simple.

<snip>

Let me ask you a question... if a cop stopped someone for wearing a bright red shirt, because someone in a bright red shirt just mugged an old lady... is that profiling?

Are you being serious here?

You give examples of two crimes already committed, both witnessed, where police are looking for individuals who fit the description of the perpetrators.

You think this is the same as targeting a particular group because, if a crime were to be committed in the future, the perpetrator(s) statistically (lies, damn lies and statistics) might fit that description????

Bikepacker67
07-22-05, 04:39 PM
I'm saying that I was stopped for no other reason than that I was a white male.

That my Aussie-lovin friend, is racial profiling.

If you're asking me whether I think that that technique is a valid preemptive action to stop the slaughter of NYC subway users, then my answer is a resounding YES.

And let me be perfectly clear.
If it was the ol' IRA that was targeting the US, I'd have no problem with my blonde haired, blue-eyed *** being singled out for 3 mins to make sure I wasn't up to ill deeds.

oboeguy
07-22-05, 07:16 PM
No prob...

I won't thread steal.

Back to NYC....
Why do folks live there, anyway?

There's so much bucolic elbow room left in this country, and now with i-net, brainy folks can work anywhere....

So why would people (freedom/space loving cyclists, especially) subject themselves to such a sardine-like existence?

And don't tell me culture... I can take a 3 day bike tour to the Berkshires for that.

If you have to ask, you'll never know. That's really the only answer. Well that and W(here)TF else do you expect us to live? Anywhere else (other than maybe Paris or London) would be a huge letdown. :D

wheezl
07-22-05, 07:25 PM
If you have to ask, you'll never know. That's really the only answer. Well that and W(here)TF else do you expect us to live? Anywhere else (other than maybe Paris or London) would be a huge letdown. :D


Heh, I am working on Italy. :D

Seattle was awesome, San Francisco was great, New York is incredible.... I suppose I could live out in the sticks.

Different strokes I guess.

Bikepacker67
07-22-05, 07:30 PM
If you have to ask, you'll never know. That's really the only answer. Well that and W(here)TF else do you expect us to live? Anywhere else (other than maybe Paris or London) would be a huge letdown. :D


Ummm... if I have to ask, I prolly don't wanna know.

About the only thing I think I like about NYC is the fact that I can get a REAL slice of thin (foldable, with tiny puddles of olive oil) pizza with relative ease.

Out here in the "sticks" ya gotta hunt for just the right crust.

wheezl
07-22-05, 07:36 PM
Ummm... if I have to ask, I prolly don't wanna know.

About the only thing I think I like about NYC is the fact that I can get a REAL slice of thin (foldable, with tiny puddles of olive oil) pizza with relative ease.

Out here in the "sticks" ya gotta hunt for just the right crust.


mmmm, I think my fave is Li'l Frankie's on 1st Ave. The prosciutto and arugula pie.... might be time to get back on my bike and go over there :)

Bikepacker67
07-22-05, 07:45 PM
mmmm, I think my fave is Li'l Frankie's on 1st Ave. The prosciutto and arugula pie.... might be time to get back on my bike and go over there :)

But I was really disappointed with NYC asian food.

Boston has just as good, and that ain't saying much.

Nope.. the best real non-americanized asian cuisine (that didn't cost a fortune cookie or need a reservation) was in Florida believe it or not.

Some lil place in Tampa/St Pete area.

EDIT: and the ambiance was killer... I was sure I was on some far east pacific island.

Dahon.Steve
07-22-05, 08:39 PM
No prob...

I won't thread steal.

Back to NYC....
Why do folks live there, anyway?

There's so much bucolic elbow room left in this country, and now with i-net, brainy folks can work anywhere....

So why would people (freedom/space loving cyclists, especially) subject themselves to such a sardine-like existence?

And don't tell me culture... I can take a 3 day bike tour to the Berkshires for that.

Why do we live here?

Well for starters, salaries are very high here and I frequently meet loads of people making 6 figures and more on the street and in my office. Second, the women here can't be beat. Seriously. I like to take you out to luch and we can spend all afternoon at Starbucks looking at just the women in tight skirts and dresses trying so hard to look good. Last, New York City rocks at night unlike the Berkshires which is probably dead. It's 24/7 parties, clubs and everything in between.

You don't have to live sardine-like but you gotta make money! I live 15 miles away and still get into the city for the action. So do all those in the burbs!

Bikepacker67
07-22-05, 08:44 PM
Well for starters, salaries are very high here and I frequently meet loads of people making 6 figures and more on the street and in my office.


Ya... that really comes in handy when you're paying 2k/mo for a studio apartment!

Ubie
07-22-05, 11:19 PM
Ya... that really comes in handy when you're paying 2k/mo for a studio apartment!

Hrm, well, i live in Manhattan and have a 2 bedroom for under $900/mo...
Granted, i make nowhere near 6 figures, but the price inflation some of you think we live under is insane. I will be the first to grant some things (most things) are more expensive, but not exponentially so.

nycm'er
07-23-05, 06:22 AM
Did anyone see the Aux. Police car on the WillyB last night? Man, that was a real deterrent, the pretend cops can't even walk the bridge but have to take a car, with flashing lights, that blocks 4/5ths of the upper path.

I wouldn't worry about anything, with effectiveness and vigilance of the NYPD we are all really, really safe.

wheezl
07-23-05, 09:25 AM
Heh, I ususally take the Manhattan. it only adds 0.2 of a mile to my ride and is soooooo much nicer than Billy :) The cops there have always walked the bridge... no golf carts or anything.