Singlespeed & Fixed Gear - Steamroller riders, help me...
Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
09-14-05, 04:51 PM
I'm ordering a Surly Steamroller tommorow but I can't decide on a size. I'd get a 57 or 58 and be fine but the only come in 56 and then jump to 59. I know people say that they like there track frames a little smaller than normal but I just want to make sure. Anyone close to my height (6 foot) ride either of those sizes? What do you guys think?
I'm 6 feet exactly. I ride the 56 - it has a 56.8 cm top tube (that's probably the most important dimension to get right), and that's even a tad (like 0.5 cm) bit long for me, but I have a short torso and long arms.
09-14-05, 05:19 PM
Steamrollers tend to run a bit long. I'd go for the 56.
09-14-05, 11:36 PM
I just gotna Steamroller frame a couple of weeks ago but have yet to put it together. I think it's the largest or close to it, maybe it's a 61 or 62. I'm 6'2", so I figured it would be a perfecr size. My current rig, an 04' Pista, is a 61cm frame, and it fits me perfectly. I think you should go with a 59cm frame, but that's just my opinion. Roll with it, baby.......
09-14-05, 11:43 PM
If it doesn't look like it's your size, why bother?
09-14-05, 11:49 PM
the guy at the lbs i don't go to anymore says they are pretty heavy
any truth to that?
he is also an *******
09-15-05, 05:44 AM
I believe that size is measured center to top. So a 56 is more like a 54.5 or 55 and the 59 is more like a 58. As another poster said, the top tube length is more important. I think a 56.8 cm top tube would fit a 6'0" rder well. So I would go with the 56 if I were you.
i'm 6'1" or 6'2" ish, with long legs, and ride a 56cm steamroller. and it doesn't look goofy or undersized at all. very comfortable.
09-16-05, 06:26 AM
Yeah, my Steamroller seems a little heavy, but then again I'm compairing it to my Pista, which is slightly lighter, but who cares at this point?
Tell your LBS ******* about my Steamroller. It's plenty light.
[Edit: Ok, I concede that the frame is hardly the lightest thing ever, but unless you want to blow through the 15 lbs. barrier, you can still make a Steamroller pretty light, i.e. less than 16.5 lbs when I'm done.]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.