Singlespeed & Fixed Gear - IRO mark V rear breaks?

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
i was planning on putting together a singlespeed IRO and like the Mark V frame, but on their site it says regarding the mark V pro frame and fork:
"There is no rear brake mount on the bridge"
but in the description for the regular mark V frame and fork it says:
"The frame and fork are drilled for standard road calipers in case you want to add brakes and use it as a single speed."
so i'm wondering if anyone can tell me if there are in fact mounts for a rear break on the regular mark V frame?
thanks
Devolution
09-21-05, 06:17 AM
...And that would be the difference between the Mark V and the Mark V Pro.
My Mark V Pro did not come with a rear break, or I would have returned it immediately as a defective product. If your bike comes with a rear break, I would suggest the same.
-brad
queerpunk
09-21-05, 06:28 AM
strong words, Devolution. aeser wants to go SS, and a r. break--er, brake--is a good idea. in fact, whatever the f.u.c.k. somebody else wants on their bike is a good idea, as long as they want it on, and it's safe. it would be nice to see fixed/track culture be a little less severe with the coolness requirements.
aeser--the Mark V has brazed-on guides on the top tube and has a rear seatstay bridge that's drilled for a r. brake. the Mark V Pro is without these things. enjoy your ride.
WaitUpForMe
09-21-05, 08:22 AM
strong words, Devolution. aeser wants to go SS, and a r. break--er, brake--is a good idea. in fact, whatever the f.u.c.k. somebody else wants on their bike is a good idea, as long as they want it on, and it's safe. it would be nice to see fixed/track culture be a little less severe with the coolness requirements.
Jeez . . . looks like Devolution was simply saying he wouldn't accept a bike that literally was broken in the rear. Or not.
i spel gud
anyways thanks for the info, it is most appreciated.
Aeroplane
09-21-05, 09:45 AM
Jeez . . . looks like Devolution was simply saying he wouldn't accept a bike that literally was broken in the rear. Or not.
Does anybody else find this misspelling to be the most annoying one of all? I was at a LBS the other day, and on their custom printed sign that detailed prices for regular repairs, it said:
REGULAR TUNE-UP: Lube all bearings, adjust shifters, align breaks
That, on top of crap-tastic service, is why they will get no more business from me.
jayrooney
09-21-05, 09:49 AM
Does anybody else find this misspelling to be the most annoying one of all?
it's so bad! and it's so common on this site that i am almost becoming immune to it...
to the point where i read devolution's post and didn't get it for a second. reading breaks/brakes is turning me into an idiot.
i'm sorry. i won't let it happen again i promise.
wangster
09-21-05, 10:24 AM
does the same apply to 'tyres' or 'aksing' a question?
somnambulant
09-21-05, 10:41 AM
'tyres' is the accepted British spelling, I think. :)
isotopesope
09-21-05, 10:48 AM
my peddles are creeking. eye think eye knead two use sum greece.
eddiebrannan
09-21-05, 10:59 AM
rediculous. happens ridiculously frequently.
rediculous. happens ridiculously frequently.
how about recokulous? whats the ratio?
Aeroplane
09-22-05, 06:59 AM
my peddles are creeking. eye think eye knead two use sum greece.
Good lord, the peddling one. Whenever I read "I was peddling down the street... I imagine a prostitute. Or an old-timey salesman, ritter brush man, etc.
LóFarkas
09-23-05, 01:19 AM
'tyres' is the accepted British spelling, I think. :)
It is the accepted non-American spelling, I think. Only you guys write in a baby-simplified way: tire, lite...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.