[erhan]

I was just thinking about how accurate they are, but I'm a little confused.

The only input variable is the users heart rate. There are also pre-entered/constant values like age, resting HR, max HR, and weight (not sure how they are used for the calculation).

Ok, here is what confuses me. Let's say in reality I am burning 700 calories in one hour, with an average HR of 160 BPM. After some time, I become more powerful, none of the constant values change (age, weight, etc.), and I am burning, say, 1000 calories in one hour, with the same average HR (160).

If what I said above is correct, then a HRM has no accurate method of calculating the calories burned. Am I right?

Also, does anyone know a mathematical formula for calculating calories burned, based on HR?

Thanks

[The BikeForums Team]

This is an archived thread, you can find the full version of this thread, with images, links and more content here.

Ready to buy? Check out these two online bike stores:
- http://www.nashbar.com (you can find the latest bike nashbar coupons in this thread)
- http://www.performancebike.com (you can find the latest performance bike coupons in this thread)

Cya on the forums,
- The BikeForums Team
- http://www.bikeforums.net

[socalrider]

Most HRM ask you to input height / weight and age..

From that and effort during an exercise it gives you calories burned.. I always felt that they estimate a little on the high side..

[terrymorse]

The Polar 700 series HRMs ask you to enter your personal VO2max figure, which scales linearly with power and calorie consumption. More oxygen consumed = more calories consumed.