Touring - 8 versus 9 speed for touring
Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
I was hoping to hear some opinions on 8 versus 9 speed for a touring bike. I am seriously considering having a touring bike built and the LBS has recommended that an 8 speed shifter is best. Their rational is that the thinner chain for a 9 speed is subject to stretching. I have never read about this concern. When I look at the trek 520 or the Cannondales I see that they are 9 speed.
Anyway I would be interested in hear some opinions. I am aiming to have a bike with a range of approx 20 to 100 gear inches and my feeling is that the additional increments in the lower range would be beneficial. The area that I ride has a lot of hills and unfortunaltely my knees are not getting any younger.
Thank for your opinions
03-10-06, 07:29 PM
Eight speed parts are much cheaper and slightly more durable. For the most part 8 and 9 speed components are interchangeable so if you need to make a field replacement at a shop that only has one or the other, you can get by.
The advantage of nine speed is that you can have your gearing a bit closer spaced which allows you to keep a more consistent cadence.
I run 8.
03-10-06, 08:59 PM
All my bikes are 7-speed so 8 would be a luxury. I think 8-speed is a good compromise of strength and versatility, and with 24-36-48 in the front and a "P" cassette (12-32) in the back you are all set with 20 to 108 GI. That ought to cover all the bases and the gaps aren't too wide between gears.
Matthew A Brown
03-10-06, 09:48 PM
8 is fine. Just get a biggish cassette, at least up around a 30 if yr doing loaded stuff.
03-10-06, 10:59 PM
9 and 10-speed use narrower components and are possibly not as rugged. But they're bling, so the new bikes use 'em. I wouldn't think "chain stretch" is any worse, but certainly the gears would wear faster; all around, 9-speed uses closer tolerances which would have a greater chance to go haywire in tough conditions.
7 and 8-speed are cheaper, still easy to get.
I tour on 6 and 7-speed. Tight gear ranges and single-step shifting aren't that important for touring; racers need 'em to keep up with the wheel in front of them. On tour, you just downshift to the best gear and enjoy the view. You want a good range, but the most important gears are the highest and lowest.
03-10-06, 11:20 PM
My commuter and tourer are 7 & 8 speeds, respectively, and I love them and will continue to use them. My mtb's are 9 speed. But if I were to start from scratch building a new tourer with new components, I'll probably go 9 speed.....as I'm not too tough on equipment and they tend to last a long time, regardless. Some 9 speed components might be more expensive initially, but I don't wear them out frequently, therefore cost is not a factor when equipping a new tourer with 9 speed....:)
Chains don't stretch -- they wear. I doubt a 9 speed would wear faster than an 8. (I have a 9 speed on a Cannondale touring bike - T800)
03-11-06, 08:41 AM
I get really tired of hearing from bike shops that 8 speed will soon be obsolete, cassettes hard to find..... We have been hearing that for years about 7 speed and they are still out there and easy to find.
I just like eight speed because for touring, I like bigger jumps between gears. Personal preference. I have heard the chain argument, that 8 speed chains are stronger, but like stated above, I doubt that's true. 8 speed chains and cassettes are definitely less expensive.
I also use 8 speed on my Miyata. I made one cassett out of 3 to get the gearing I liked. Still experimenting with this. The whole set up has standed very well after 1500 km. Was thinking of STI shifters until the idea of being stuck in Nowhere, Canada with a broken STI and since I'm oldschool down tubes were the final choice. My philosophy is KISS (keep it simply stupid).
03-11-06, 01:11 PM
I've toured with 9 speed and for loaded touring found that the increments in gearing were too small to allow for the inertia caused by the weight of luggage. This meant changing two at a time up and down. As long as you have a good range i.e. for me with bad knees this means 17-95 inches, then 8 is fine.
03-12-06, 01:50 AM
Well if you go with 9 speed, get a 12-34 cassette and you'll have all the gears you need. When pulling weight, you want a good range of gears to allow for a comfortable cadence. I use a 12-32 8 speed on my tourer with a 52-38 double, and it work fine for me. Of course I am not into hauling exess weight either on a tour; lite is my motto.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.