Books, Movies, Music & Entertainment - The Crash of Cruise

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




View Full Version : The Crash of Cruise


VegasVic
05-08-06, 12:31 PM
First Sharon Stone, now Tom Cruise. I guess turning into a complete whacko doesn't help sell tickets.

New 'Mission' Opens Weaker Than Expected

By SHARON WAXMAN

LOS ANGELES, May 7 — Paramount Pictures and its leading star, Tom Cruise, failed to live up to expectations this weekend when "Mission: Impossible III" opened to weak numbers at the domestic box office despite a barrage of public appearances by Mr. Cruise to promote the film.

The poor opening followed nearly a year of public mocking of Mr. Cruise, Hollywood's most reliable star and the centerpiece of Paramount's biggest franchise, across the pop culture landscape — by Internet bloggers and late-night comedians and constantly on tabloid covers — after his public, over-the-top wooing of the actress Katie Holmes and his outspoken remarks against psychiatry and antidepressant medications last year.

Opening in 4,054 theaters, "Mission: Impossible III" had estimated ticket sales of $48 million for the weekend, according to Exhibitor Relations, almost $10 million less than the second "Mission: Impossible" movie in 2000, which opened in 385 fewer theaters and at lower ticket prices. Based on market research, the film had been expected to reach about $65 million at the box office.

Many in Hollywood had been watching expectantly to see if the negative publicity surrounding Mr. Cruise would have an effect at the box office, and this weekend — as "Mission: Impossible III" kicked off the film industry's peak summer moviegoing period — it appeared as if it had.

Paramount reported that "Mission: Impossible III" took in $118 million worldwide in 55 countries, doing well in Asia, Latin America and Britain and poorly in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, where there is public opposition to Mr. Cruise's championing of his religion, Scientology.

But Paramount executives said that Mr. Cruise's public image did not hurt the film. "I don't believe that is a factor in how the movie opened," said Rob Moore, Paramount's president for worldwide marketing, distribution and operations. He noted that the opening domestic figure was close to that of "Mr. and Mrs. Smith" last summer, which starred Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt, and said the "Mission" franchise was struggling against the fact that it had been six years since the previous installment.

Others disagreed, noting that Mr. Cruise personally spearheaded the marketing campaign. He visited four countries in rapid succession ahead of the opening — going to Rome, Paris, London and Mexico City — and on Friday attended four different premieres in Manhattan alone, traveling by helicopter, fire truck, subway and boat in a promotional blitz across the city.

"I can't fault the marketing campaign; I can't fault the trailers," said Paul Dergarabedian, president of Exhibitor Relations, which tracks the box office, adding that the film, directed by J. J. Abrams, received strong reviews. "The only X factor here is the Tom Cruise factor."

The derision of Mr. Cruise began last spring when he embarked on his relationship with Ms. Holmes just as both actors were preparing to release big-budget movies, "War of the Worlds" for Mr. Cruise and "Batman Begins" for Ms. Holmes. The news media and fans expressed skepticism at the public nature of the romance, which intensified even as the formerly private Mr. Cruise increasingly involved Scientology in his business affairs.

Since then, Mr. Cruise has evolved into a kind of cultural punch line. In "Scary Movie 4," which is still in theaters, one scene is a parody of Mr. Cruise's couch-jumping appearance on "The Oprah Winfrey Show" last May.

Several reviews of "Mission: Impossible 3" pointed out that Mr. Cruise's public persona had become a distraction when watching him on the big screen. "It's impossible to watch 'M:I-3' without asking: Do we still, you know, like Tom Cruise?" the critic Owen Gleiberman wrote in Entertainment Weekly, while Manohla Dargis wrote in The New York Times: "It would be a stretch to say that Tom Cruise needs a hit. What this guy needs is an intervention."

In addition to being the kickoff for the summer movie season, "Mission: Impossible III" was the first major release that had been given a green light by Paramount under Brad Grey, who took over as chairman in early 2005. Mr. Grey caused a stir last year when the studio threatened to pull the plug on the movie just ahead of production unless the budget was cut and Mr. Cruise — who is also a producer of the film — cut his fee.

As a result of that stand, the budget was trimmed to $165 million from about $200 million, and Mr. Cruise agreed to take about 25 percent of the movie's gross revenue, several percentage points less than his original deal, according to a senior Paramount executive.

Paramount executives said that exit polls this weekend showed the film's audience to be mainly over 25, adding that they hoped strong word-of-mouth would help drive a younger audience to the film as the summer continued. But market research ahead of the movie's release also showed that Mr. Cruise had lost ground among an important part of his fan base, female moviegoers.

In Hollywood many were left this weekend pondering the future of star power and looking ahead to the next test case, "The Da Vinci Code," starring Tom Hanks, on May 19. As Mr. Dergarabedian put it, "It shows you the importance of the star and their public image."


cycle17
05-08-06, 01:10 PM
I may see it on DVD like the previous two, but the last movie he made that I thought was any good was Vanilla Sky. And yes...his public persona does have some impact on the movie going public in general.

timmhaan
05-08-06, 01:21 PM
i didn't see war of the worlds either. pretty much only on the basis that it's a cruise movie. i'm just all tom cruised out.


VegasVic
05-08-06, 01:35 PM
i didn't see war of the worlds either. pretty much only on the basis that it's a cruise movie. i'm just all tom cruised out.
You didn't miss much.

FastFreddy
05-08-06, 02:27 PM
I watch the box office regularly and my take on MI-III is that the $48M opening weekend is higher than I expected. I figured that two things were working against it: (a) Tom’s Scientologist image – he seems to be getting crazier by the day – and that image doesn’t match very well with his MI character; and (b) the movie doesn’t seem to be anything more than a remake of the first two – which were remakes of a mediocre TV series. The only explanation I can come up with is that rising-star Philip Seymour Hoffman (he’s great as the villain, BTW) helped the box office. Michelle Monaghan was great as “the girl.” Overall, I thought the movie was on a par with the first two – neither of which thrilled me.

I read somewhere that Tom Cruise used to have a manager who tightly controlled his public appearances but she (and I’m pretty sure that it was a woman) no longer works for him and he’s been out of control ever since.

Karldar
05-09-06, 08:04 AM
I wonder if anyone boycotted because of the threat against Comedy Central rebroadcasting the South Park scientology episode....

CyLowe97
05-09-06, 08:16 AM
I watch the box office regularly and my take on MI-III is that the $48M opening weekend is higher than I expected.


$48M ain't what it used to be, what with the price of movie tickets these days. It always cracks me up when a new movie will "break box office records." Of course they do! They cost a lot more to attend! It would be better to pro-rate the prices of older movies for comparison, or better yet, tell us how many people actually attended.

MI:3 made big bucks overseas. The US market doesn't concern the studios as much as foreign does for big-budget action flicks like this. And DVD sales help to cover a lot, as well.

Cruise has become a supreme twit, though, hasn't he? Poor poor Katie....

Michigander
05-10-06, 07:11 PM
I wonder if anyone boycotted because of the threat against Comedy Central rebroadcasting the South Park scientology episode....


I would of had I had any interest in the movie to begin with, but I don't.

neaolin
05-12-06, 04:32 PM
I wonder if anyone boycotted because of the threat against Comedy Central rebroadcasting the South Park scientology episode....

Tom Cruise needs to come out of the closet ;)

Seriously, he needs more charisma points. He may be able to sway Katie, but the public isn't buying it.

classic1
05-12-06, 08:27 PM
War of the Worlds. That's two hours of my life I will never ever get back.

Karldar
05-13-06, 02:46 PM
War of the Worlds. That's two hours of my life I will never ever get back.
I liked the original better. Well, the movie, that is. The book rules, of course.

FlatTop
05-13-06, 06:02 PM
I wonder if anyone boycotted because of the threat against Comedy Central rebroadcasting the South Park scientology episode....

Only partly. Maybe Cruise should seek a less likeable character for his next role? I'd pay to see him acting more true to character.

Maybe they could do a movie based on L. Ron Hubbard's Mission Earth series, and Tom Cruise could play the loathsome agent who continually sabotages the good guy's mission to save the planet?

Karldar
05-14-06, 12:48 AM
Only partly. Maybe Cruise should seek a less likeable character for his next role? I'd pay to see him acting more true to character.

Maybe they could do a movie based on L. Ron Hubbard's Mission Earth series, and Tom Cruise could play the loathsome agent who continually sabotages the good guy's mission to save the planet?
I would love to see a Mission: Earth movie series. That's the stuff I try to remember when I think of Hubbard. Be a huge undertaking to do it right, tho. I'd like to see it done with "bleeps," too.;)

FlatTop
05-14-06, 04:58 PM
I would love to see a Mission: Earth movie series. That's the stuff I try to remember when I think of Hubbard. Be a huge undertaking to do it right, tho. I'd like to see it done with "bleeps," too.;)

Agreed. Recall the movie version of Battlefield Earth? It was a real letdown for me. I'm not a Scientologist, BTW...just a fan of SciFi, mainly old guard stuff. I like to see a workmanlike job done when a decent piece of fiction is made into a motion picture.

Karldar
05-14-06, 05:01 PM
Agreed. Recall the movie version of Battlefield Earth? It was a real letdown for me. I'm not a Scientologist, BTW...just a fan of SciFi, mainly old guard stuff. I like to see a workmanlike job done when a decent piece of fiction is made into a motion picture.
Loved the book, but I haven't seen the movie. Doesn't sound like I missed much, really.

Guest
05-14-06, 05:12 PM
I haven't liked Cruise in a movie since "A Few Good Men". That's been a long long time. I got tired of Cruise a long time ago, though. Him in the media lately just is like a cavity that needs refilling and gets sore every time you take a bite of food. Uugh.

Women just aren't desperate these days- so if they're depending on women to drive this movie, they'll be waiting a long long time.

I think Cruise needs some lithium, if you ask me.

Koffee

operator
05-14-06, 05:28 PM
Agreed. Recall the movie version of Battlefield Earth? It was a real letdown for me. I'm not a Scientologist, BTW...just a fan of SciFi, mainly old guard stuff. I like to see a workmanlike job done when a decent piece of fiction is made into a motion picture.

BE was possibly the worst movie to hit the theatres since the creation of the universe.

Guest
05-14-06, 07:32 PM
Worse than Ishtar? I refuse to believe it! :D

Koffee

va_cyclist
05-15-06, 07:12 AM
It's impossible to watch 'M:I-3' without asking: Do we still, you know, like Tom Cruise?

I'm not sure, you know, that we ever did.