PDA

View Full Version : The Unbearable Frightfulness of Biking



EnigManiac
06-11-06, 07:40 AM
Feature in todays Sunday Toronto Star

The unbearable frightfulness of biking
CYCLing | The mayor says the city's biking culture is changing for the better. Not everyone would agree. By Leslie Scrivener

Toronto mayor David Miller rode his bike to work the other day. He made it to City Hall safely.

That may not seem like news, especially during the city's annual Bike Week (which ends today) but riding along Bloor St. W. during morning rush hour on the day of the wildcat transit strike, the mayor passed Albany Ave. — where, the next day, Susan Oppenheim, a regular cyclist, was knocked off her 20-year-old Raleigh as she left a matinee at the Bloor Cinema.

The 57-year-old community worker was clipped by a driver. As she tried to right herself, she fell under the vehicle, her left elbow pinned under the van's rear wheel. The driver got out, saw her on the street, got back in the van, and drove forward off her. She had tire marks up her arm.

Oppenheim ended up in hospital with a broken shoulder and a fractured neck. She says that a police officer who came to St. Michael's to investigate the collision told her since she didn't have witnesses, the driver would not be charged.

Oppenheim says she overheard the officer saying, "We really ought to get all those bikes off the streets of Toronto."

That doesn't exactly jibe with the city's stated plan to get more cyclists on the road, which will help calm traffic and make the streets safer for cyclists, drivers, and pedestrians alike.

The mayor "had to be exceptionally vigilant" on his recent morning ride, though he was part of a group commute celebrating Bike Week's theme of ride to work. He was a more regular cyclist when he worked downtown as a lawyer and could ride along the Martin Goodman Trail, which hugs the lakeshore and is a traffic-free route to the south part of the city.

He continues to cycle the trail with his family, including his two children, who are in elementary school. "But they do ride on the streets, and as a parent that makes me nervous."

The notion of cyclists and motorists sharing the road was at the core of the Sunday Star's Cycling Manifesto, drafted by Jennifer Wells in the May 28 issue, which demanded, please, hundreds of kilometres of new bike lanes, an east-west corridor, and a new philosophy in which Toronto embraces cycling "right to its very soul."

Though the mayor supports, and agreed to sign, the Manifesto, and says cycling has been a priority of his administration, progress has been slow.

Miller says that is changing. Money set aside for cycling has increased — to $3 million this year from $2.2 million last year — and things are starting to move forward. A bike path opened last month in the parkland west of Ontario Place, and the new waterfront design competition calls for closing the south lanes of Queen's Quay to traffic. That could happen on a trial basis as early as this summer, the mayor says.

What the city really needs, he acknowledges, is a strong east-west connection. "But I don't have the answer where... perhaps on Bloor or Dundas or Eglinton, because that cuts across every single former city that constitutes Toronto."

It's unlikely that the connector will be built any time soon, given that only one kilometre of bike lanes was built last year and only 12 kilometres planned for 2006. Some of the money budgeted for cycling paths last year wasn't even spent because the proposals got bogged down in community consultation.

"The challenge is, in some places when you propose bike lanes, people don't want them," Miller says. "We need to ensure that people are well educated about the benefits of the cycling network.

"We need cyclists in neighbourhoods to come forward [at public meetings] when pieces of the bike network are proposed in public consultation," Miller says. "They need to say, `This is important. I live in this neighbourhood, I use a bike for transportation, and I need this to get around the city safety.'"

With 5,200 kilometres of roads in Toronto, it's important to have cyclists across Toronto, Miller says, not just in the downtown core. He observes — though not all would agree — that biking culture is changing and more people are looking at their bikes as transportation not just leisure activity.

"That helps us. You get a virtuous circle, and it makes it easier to sell the bike lane to communities."

And, he adds, "You significantly change the political dynamic when you're debating the issue in one neighbourhood."

Toronto cyclists also argue there should be more rigorous enforcement and penalties for drivers who park or drive in bike lanes. Last year there were 1,185 cyclist-motor vehicle collisions; two cyclists — one a University of Toronto professor, the other a 16-year-old girl — were killed when they were crushed by trucks in April.

Meanwhile, Oppenheim has been visiting a physiotherapist and doing her best to track down witnesses who saw the collision, and pondering how to make cycling in the city less dangerous.

"Bike lanes," she sighs, "oh, I'd love to see more of them."

EnigManiac
06-11-06, 08:01 AM
I submitted the following letter to the editor regarding the above article:

It has been long been a distressing truth to the almost one million
cyclists in Toronto that the police arbitrarily ignore, dismiss and
otherwise disrespect the rights, safety and value of cyclists on
Toronto streets. Such an attitude is perfectly illustrated in the
quoted officer's remark "We really ought to get all those bikes off of
Toronto's streets." Does the officer hold that same contempt for his
brothers in blue on bicycles, I wonder.

Such ignorance perpetuate the myth that cyclists impede traffic, rather than understand that
bicycles ARE traffic. They perpetuate the misguided notion that roads
are made for cars when, in fact, roads are public spaces, free for
pedestrians, cyclists and other modes of transportation and, because
motorists require licenses, they are guests upon the public roads. I
have seen police observe serious infractions commited by motorists
against cyclists and simply turn a blind eye rather than recognize the
danger and potential calamity that occured and acted appropriately.

By the same token, equal attention must be applied to cyclists who
ignore stop-signs and red-lights and commit other dangerous and
reckless acts. The legend on the side of police cruisers states 'To
serve and protect,' but who are they serving and protecting?
Certainly not cyclists. They need to be held accountable for their
negligence and they need to know we are not only not going to go away,
but we're getting bigger.

LilSprocket
06-11-06, 09:36 AM
wow....

good for you EnigM, I saw this post of yours as well...
http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=202681

hopefully good for all of us... thank you

donnamb
06-11-06, 10:02 AM
Wow. I can't help but compare Toronto to Portland in my head. Toronto is a much bigger city with many more cyclists and a larger cyclist to car ratio. What would it be like to have a police department that unresponsive and downright hostile to us? It's horrifying.

Does the traffic division have a bicycle patrol? I believe that bike positive attitudes from the police here start with the bike cops. I always feel safer around cranky cars in rush hour traffic downtown when we all see a bike cop cruise by. It warms my heart to see police on bikes pull over cars...

sgtsmile
06-11-06, 11:37 AM
I hope I dont find myself faced with a cop with that attitude. I think I might have a temper tantrum.....

If two cars hit each other, it can be investigated and guess what, the guilty one charged - witness or not. When a bike and a car hit, it cannot be done so?!? What utter bs.

Well, time to brave the Sunday afternoon winds and go ride a while. Cheers.

Golf XRay Tango
06-11-06, 03:50 PM
It's not just an anti-bicycle bias. It's a bias against everything but cars. My brother was killed by a driver that ran a stop sign in front of his motorcycle. Because there were no witnesses, and the driver refused to give a statement, she wasn't charged.

Ready to Ruck
06-11-06, 03:59 PM
Wow. I can't help but compare Toronto to Portland in my head. Toronto is a much bigger city with many more cyclists and a larger cyclist to car ratio. What would it be like to have a police department that unresponsive and downright hostile to us? It's horrifying.

Does the traffic division have a bicycle patrol? I believe that bike positive attitudes from the police here start with the bike cops. I always feel safer around cranky cars in rush hour traffic downtown when we all see a bike cop cruise by. It warms my heart to see police on bikes pull over cars...
Bike cops here only ride in the road in neighborhoods. They mostly stick to sidewalks. Gives others
an image that we belong on the sidewalk.

Golf XRay Tango
06-11-06, 04:00 PM
To balance off the negativity of my last post, I have to say that in general, Toronto is a fantastic place to ride a bike. Sure there's lots of traffic, but the vast majority of drivers simply merge left a little and go by without fanfare. I can count on one hand the number of negative experiences I've had with motorists in the last few years, and even they very minor.

EnigManiac
06-11-06, 04:06 PM
wow....

good for you EnigM, I saw this post of yours as well...
http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=202681

hopefully good for all of us... thank you

Thank you. I honestly feel I have found my purpose; what I'm meant to do, and that is fight like a banshee for the promotion and proliferation of human-powered transport. I know that sounds weird and over the top and extremist; I don't mean it to. It just means this is what I want to commit myself to.

In answer to the question by donnamb, 'Does the traffic division have a bicycle patrol?'
Yes, we do and it astounds me that some cop would have such disdain and contempt for their own brothers and sisters in blue (actually they wear black now). In fact, I have heard talk recently that the bicycle patrol officers are about to be expanded. Maybe they should take cops like the one responsible for that remarkably ignorant statement and stick him on plain clothes bike patrol. Let's see what he thinks about 'all those cyclists' after his first shift.

It doesn't help when journalists in The Toronto Sun condemn the Chairman of the Toronto Bike Committee, Adam Giambrone (the councilor I am meeting with) for advocating bike lanes and cycling after "being stuck behind a road-hogging cyclist." I almost fell out of my chair after reading that and immediately responded with the letter below:

Before smugly condemning Adam Giambrone for being an advocate of bike
lanes and cycling and questioning whether motorists should support a
councilor after having been behind a 'road hogging cyclist,' be
reminded that a cyclist is, by law, entitled to the ENTIRE right lane:
there is debris, broken surface and other obstacles in that right lane
that would not be observed nor a concern for a motorist but are
treacherous for a cyclist and he must take thne lane to avoid being
killed. When road-hogging motorists brush by within a hair's breadth,
threatening the very life of the cyclist who dared to slightly
inconvenience or slow that motorist travelling alone in his/her
gas-guzzling pollution-spewing vehicle they are, in fact, not only
guilty passing too closely, a traffic violation (three feet must be
afforded), but of reckless endangerment as well. Please exercise
responsible commentary and don't speak of which you know not. Such
remarks give license to impressionable motorists who interpret that as
a license to run over cyclists. We are employed fathers, mothers,
sons, daughters, grandmothers and grandfathers with jobs and
responsibilities too.

trackhub
06-11-06, 06:37 PM
Oppenheim says she overheard the officer saying, "We really ought to get all those bikes off the streets of Toronto."

Well, that blows my theory out of the sky. I thought that only some (not all) American police officers had that attitude.

What if the victim had been on a motorcycle? (no answer required. we all know there would be a formal investigation, and the driver would probably be charged.)

ThatWhichRolls
06-11-06, 08:18 PM
Bike cops here only ride in the road in neighborhoods. They mostly stick to sidewalks. Gives others
an image that we belong on the sidewalk.

Largely the same here in Chicago. You only tend to see bike cops in traffic downtown when the month's winding down and it's time to squeeze in the extra tickets. I'll admit it's fairly hilarious to see motorists actually get it stuck to 'em by a cop on a bike, but given that a bad example's set the rest of the time, I can't help but generally dislike the precedent that's set.

As always, of course, it varies cop-to-cop. I've seen a non-bike-riding police officer haul a guy who hit a cyclist with his car out of the driver's seat by the scruff of the neck and cuff him right in the middle of traffic, which ruled. On the other hand, I nearly got creamed by a guy who ran a stop sign whilst headed east, looking south and turning into the northbound lane of South Halsted whilst talking on his cell phone (illegal while driving here) on my commute back from my weekend volunteer gig today. He only hit the brakes after a very loud "HEY!!!!! HEY!!!!!!!" from me and stopped short less than half a foot from either driving over me or pushing me out of the bike lane into stalled bumper-to-bumper traffic on my left. There was a cop two cars back who did nothing...even if he didn't see the guy blow the stop sign, he most definitely would have seen him on his phone after my shouting. Another case of viral negligence, I guess...

ghettocruiser
06-12-06, 08:42 AM
Other than the curiously over-the-top melodrama of the title, the star article wasn't too bad.

Although in the quest to hilight the bike lane issue and this *manifesto*,the article once again sidestepped the question of why cars and trucks around here just can't seem to stop running into everyone and everything else in the roadway.

closetbiker
06-12-06, 10:14 AM
Sounds like muck raking by the paper.

There is no real information on what is stated at the beggining, The mayor says the city's biking culture is changing for the better. Not everyone would agree, is ansewered.

The real story is cycling is not any more dangerous than walking or driving, but that's hardly a dramatic sell, is it?

Every spring, when a bunch of bicycles pop up on the street, there's a wealth of stories about them and the papers want stories that sell and conflict is an easy sell.

What the papers often avoid being accused of is they're the ones pulling the con. They use fear to sell, even if there is no basis for it.