Hummeth
08-11-06, 11:24 AM
Is there really that big of a difference? Are there any defining features or is it mainly marketing and styling with maybe a little better aerodynamics and perhaps ventilation on the road helmets?
Advocacy & Safety - Road vs MTB Helmets
Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.View Full Version : Road vs MTB Helmets
slowandsteady
08-11-06, 01:05 PM
Hmmm, never knew there was ever a distinction. It looks like those marketed as MTB helmets just have a visor.
ken cummings
08-20-06, 12:56 PM
If you mean those whole head helmets used by downhillers there is an obvious difference. Other than that I have not seen a significant difference in 90+% of the helmets in the unsolicited Nashbar and Performance catalogs I keep getting. I prefer a hard-shell as it is easier to attach a mirror to one.
songfta
08-20-06, 04:36 PM
There's a bit of a difference in design between road and MTB helmets from Giro. The difference has to do with the design of the vents.
On Giro road helmets, the vents are designed to be used at speed: drawing air in, moving it over the head to cool, and allowing for easy exhaust from the back. There are very few squared-off vent openings on Giro road helmets, as they want to allow air to enter from the front of the helmet as the rider moves forward.
On Giro ATB helmets, the vents are optimized for low-speed operation, where a lot of cooling involves radiation of heat without the aid of high-speed forward movement. Thus, the vents tend to be more squared-off. Additionally, there tends to be more foam/shell surface area on ATB helmets (especially ones aimed at the freeride set) to help protect against penetration from sharp objects (e.g. rocks, stumps, etc.).
Where you'll see more similarity is amongst helmets aimed at the ATB XC racing set, who are usually moving at a speed more akin to road riders - thus, the reason that the Bell Sweep XC is essentially the same as the Sweep R road helmet, the only difference being a visor. But for the less-speed-oriented ATB set, you'll tend to see the squared-off vent openings.
There's a similar design philosophy for Bell, MET, Rudy Project and Specialized helmets, too: bigger, more aero-designed vents for road-oriented helmets, more foam area and squared-off vents on ATB helmets.
On Giro road helmets, the vents are designed to be used at speed: drawing air in, moving it over the head to cool, and allowing for easy exhaust from the back. There are very few squared-off vent openings on Giro road helmets, as they want to allow air to enter from the front of the helmet as the rider moves forward.
On Giro ATB helmets, the vents are optimized for low-speed operation, where a lot of cooling involves radiation of heat without the aid of high-speed forward movement. Thus, the vents tend to be more squared-off. Additionally, there tends to be more foam/shell surface area on ATB helmets (especially ones aimed at the freeride set) to help protect against penetration from sharp objects (e.g. rocks, stumps, etc.).
Where you'll see more similarity is amongst helmets aimed at the ATB XC racing set, who are usually moving at a speed more akin to road riders - thus, the reason that the Bell Sweep XC is essentially the same as the Sweep R road helmet, the only difference being a visor. But for the less-speed-oriented ATB set, you'll tend to see the squared-off vent openings.
There's a similar design philosophy for Bell, MET, Rudy Project and Specialized helmets, too: bigger, more aero-designed vents for road-oriented helmets, more foam area and squared-off vents on ATB helmets.