Singlespeed & Fixed Gear - Do We Need Gears?

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




View Full Version : Do We Need Gears?


ORBIT
02-23-03, 02:40 PM
I tried a expriment today.
I went out on my bike and decided not to change gear on the entire ride.
The result was that i really enjoyed just riding the bike on not thinking about changing gear.The thing was i dont think i was any slower than when using gears,i had to stand on some hills
and i will admitt i coasted down some hills.But i had a good work out,and had to work my legs.So when training is it best not to use gears?.Thus just concentrating on turning the pedals. :beer:


ORBIT
02-23-03, 02:50 PM
NB. Some thing i would not like to do on my recumbent.

Inkwolf
02-23-03, 02:56 PM
Not being male, and therefore having no need to appear particularly macho and tough--YES! I NEED MY GEARS!!!:cry:

I spent enough childhood hours pushing my one-speeds up that one steep hill I still fear....even though I've pedalled up higher and steeper ones since, I always remember THAT hill as being the one I can't ever climb! (I rather enjoy letting the hill keep its rep.)


ORBIT
02-23-03, 03:30 PM
I dont worry about looking macho (i ride a recumbentas well)
But what im getting at is a regular cyclist can probalbly do with out gears.

JDP
02-23-03, 04:43 PM
One thing I like about sticking in one gear is that I'm forced to speed up into a more comfortable cadence. If you have the choice of downshifting you won't push yourself as much to go faster. I think it may not be the most efficient thing but makes a great training tool and workout. Maybe I've got too much testosterone pumping but I feel so defeated when I have to downshift on a hill or when riding into a gusty headwind. Sometimes I'll be too tired to accelerate by increasing cadence but I can upshift and mash my way back to the comfortable cadence I had in the previous gear.

danr
02-23-03, 09:45 PM
Having not said this yet, it really depends on what type of riding you want to do. I had a one-gear Huffy when I was smaller and I loved the hell out of it. I now have a ss mountain bike, which I thoroughly love to ride. Yeah, I can go faster on a suspension mountain bike with gears, but it's not about speed for me.

But, when my knees go, it will be time for gears. So I say that eventually, I will need gears. One of my bikes now has gears.

Remember the old acronym KISS. Keep It Single Speed.

fubar5
02-24-03, 09:29 AM
I've done probably 80% of my training this year on a SS.

JustsayMo
02-25-03, 07:54 AM
I love the simplicity and focus of singlespeed riding. I'm not worried about how much travel my suspension has (or doesn't have) or how well it's tuned.

My focus is completely on the trail and the next obsticle. Rather than bowl through obsticles I must pick my line, use my momentum and dose my effort for the next challenge.

The first time I heard of single speed mountain biking I was sure it's enthusiasts were a few cogs short of a cluster (literally and figuratively). Once I tried it I discovered how much fun it was. I still have multigeared bikes but I still choose to ride the mono-cog whenever I can.

hayneda
02-26-03, 12:49 PM
One trick about riding ss or fixed is that you can "choose your poison" so to speak. I use a fixer as my ultra-low maintenance commuter bike. In addition to the low upkeep, by choosing a lower than normal gear, I can insure that I don't ride too hard on the way into work. Since I don't have a shower at work, I like to take it easy. However, how many times have you set out for "an easy ride" only to come back revved up and juicy? Same with me, I guess it's just a male's nature to push it. By using a low gear on my fixer, it's much easier to not get in a rush on the way into work. I can still spin it up on the way home to get a better workout. Or, I can flip the wheel over to that 15t!

Dave

stumpjumper
03-08-03, 08:52 PM
YES, you need gears!!! Without a gear in the back, the chain wouldnt move the wheel!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:D

Sailguy
03-08-03, 09:11 PM
Originally posted by stumpjumper
YES, you need gears!!! Without a gear in the back, the chain wouldnt move the wheel!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:D

Just use friction belt-drive. All you need is a couple cylinders and a good belt from your car or something similar. Good luck with the hills. :P

Barnaby
03-12-03, 08:19 AM
I feel so defeated when I have to downshift on a hill or when riding into a gusty headwind.

I think there is something here. I did the same thing as Orbit last spring. Each ride, one selected gear only, no shifting-for 3 months. I think it made me stronger and faster, and definately better on the hills. I went back to using gears just before an organized ride, and then found myself being much more aggressive (especially on the down hills.)

Some have compared the difference of singlespeed to mullti-gears to the difference between manual transmissions and automatics in a vehicle. The irony here is that the manual transmission, which requires constant shifting, is lickened to the non-shifting singlespeed bike, and the automatic, which requires no shifting is lickened to a geared bike that does. It gets confusing, but I know what the writer was getting at; it has to do with the connection of the rider to the bike and to the terrain and conditions which is more immediate when gear changing is not considered. This feel is more direct in a manual transmission than an automatic, which were originally introduced in boring "dad's cars" , while the little sporty models we all craved after were all manual. Nobody craved after the wood-panelled station wagon. Nobody wanted that station wagon in British racing green or with a close-ratio manual transmission.

I think singlespeed riding whether you choose to simply stay in one-gear for each ride on a geared bike, or you go the route of no derailleur and a single-speed freewheel is a return to a more direct connection to the idea of "pure" riding for the enjoyment of it. I have since started to wonder whether "fixed-gear" will be adding to this feeling or a zero sum game. I know I have looked forward to the coast on the downside of a hill that became challenging to get to the summit of while in a fairly high gear, and am not sure how high-cadence pedalling will feel after such an effort. I guess I will know soon after I get this thing on the road.

meltable
03-16-03, 01:18 PM
Singlespeed riding is simpler and might be more enjoyable, but I still think that gears are important. If you're mashing the pedals up a hill at 40 rpm, it's very ineffecient- and horrible for the knees. If you make it to the top, coming back down means you need to spin really fast to "catch" and increase your speed.

Singlespeeds are fun and work great most of the time, but there's always going to be the times you wish the shifters were there. They do make awesome training bikes because it forces you to come out of your comfort zone. So instead of pedalling a steady speed and force, you either have to push harder or faster than you normally would if you could shift.

If I get a new mountain bike, I'd really like to convert my current ride to single speed. But I don't think singlespeeds will be common in racing or distance rides, they're really more of a fun type of bike.

RacerX
03-16-03, 01:30 PM
singlespeeds are cool!
They have the singlespeed world championships and in every mtb race I've ever been too had at least a few.

GIANTBIKES
03-16-03, 01:46 PM
One of the bikes I have is a comfort mountain. I find myself most of the time using just one gear. Now being in Florida hills arent a problem. If I go for just a ride to a friends or families house and I use the comfort mountain it is very rare that I shift. When the bike was new I would bang through the gears but now one gear and I am done.

OneTinSloth
03-20-03, 11:42 PM
i've been riding single speed for pretty much all my life (i'm 21). i lvoe my fixed gear bikes and i love my BMX to death. i recently bought a road bike for the winter here in boston and i wound up hot-rodding the drivetrain on it so i'd have a 44T in the middle so i could get a 44/16 ratio. i basically only shifted to harder gears when i rode it so i wouldn't spin my legs too fast. all i know is that i feel SO MUCH more comfortable on a fixed gear bike than on a geared bike, or even a regular freewheeled singlespeed. something about the constant pedalling that helps me maintain my balance and composure in the crappy boston traffic.

urbanking
03-21-03, 04:46 PM
If you like singlespeed, then no you dont need gears, but if you ride offroad they come in handy. One thing i know is that they dont need to be changed as often as people do, I only use 1st, 7th, and 14th

diamondback
03-24-03, 01:06 PM
I do both, I prefer single speed, except for long long hills. there is no reason to push a modern lightweight single speed up hill. I have some very steep hills around my neighborhood and they are ridden by zigzagging up. For a ten mile hilly ride I'll take gears, for a 3-6 mile ride around town or to work single speed is it. check out the specialized P1 for a single speed or that Madwagon worked good but i did have to tear it apart and regrease it first. Forget those 60 pound single speeds unless your streets are flat. Deraillure Bikes with a lot of gears take me from gear to gear but a single speed takes 25 years off of my age.

Brennan
03-24-03, 04:49 PM
Do we need gears? Depends on the rider and the terrain. For me, single-speeding is much more enjoyable on level surfaces and rolling hills. But on the seriously steep stuff or century rides, yeah it's good to have some gears. But I feel that many riders have more gears than they need. I wonder how many casual riders with 24 or 27 speed mtb's never leave the flats (or the pavement). They've been sold on "the more gears, the better" philosophy. These riders can get by just fine with a ss or a 7 speed townie, they will get a better value bike, and there will be less maintenance.

surreal
03-24-03, 05:21 PM
i'm acquainted with several people with several bikes, all of which are SS or FG. they'd all tell you that you don't need gears, but i believe that everyone has different needs. if you go to the grocery store or the laundromat on a bicycle with panniers, you'll probably want some gears---that's why i have my mtn bike. you'd also want some gears, i'd wager, if you're on a loaded tour, or if physical limitations necessitate gears (eg, bad knees). not everyone needs gears, and i rarely do. I'll tell ya what, though--when i ride trails these days, i shift to a grannied out gear when i get to the park, and i stay in that gear til i'm headed home. shifting on trails is something i'll never be likely to master, and being in too high of a gear has screwed me innumerable times.

-rob

tFUnK
03-24-03, 09:55 PM
i dont need gears to have fun by myself. but gears would be nice in some other cases (hills, playing "tag"...).

NZLcyclist
04-14-03, 05:13 AM
playing tag? on a bike? surely not....how do u do that? anyways....as I have said elsewhere, the hills around here are killers. I also suffer from bad knees so I need to have gears. I often get into 4th, and then use high/low (39/52T) and thats it. If I really get goin i use 5th or 6th.

Brendon
:beer::beer:Here's to the 100 posts i have done :beer::beer:

xsnakobx
05-31-09, 02:12 AM
I agree that there are some times when gears are helpful, but living in SF, there are so few hills I won't climb or descend (and if there is a road I don't feel comfortable going down, I can usually find a way around it).
I know I pound harder going up hills, and that I'm exerting more energy, but I also climb faster than my geared counterparts. On long long rides, this can be a pain because I get tired faster, but I can usually keep it up for a good long while.

croscoe
05-31-09, 02:32 AM
Wow. Good job on the resurrection... LOL, rection.

Sixty Fiver
05-31-09, 02:41 AM
The fixed road bike is really fast but comparing that to my geared road bike is like comparing a house cat to a Cheetah.

Sixty Fiver
05-31-09, 02:42 AM
Wow. Good job on the resurrection... LOL, rection.

Didn't even see that this was a zombie thread... :lol:

helloamerican
05-31-09, 08:14 AM
it seems to me that with a well tuned geared bike the goal is not to shift just to make it easier on yourself, but to shift when its advantageous. If you consider it like a manual car it seems the most logical, you wouldn't hit a sharp turn you need to accelerate from in 5th gear, you'd shift down right before to come out faster on the other side and save time.


edit: total zombie thread, gotta pay attention to those post dates

MrCjolsen
05-31-09, 08:21 AM
If the world were flat and windless, gears would have never been invented.

uke
05-31-09, 08:57 AM
^ You'd also need a world where people never carried anything or got tired.

Yellowbeard
05-31-09, 10:31 AM
I don't know, I get pretty tired riding with a multi-speed drivetrain.

roadfix
05-31-09, 11:23 AM
it seems to me that with a well tuned geared bike the goal is not to shift just to make it easier on yourself, but to shift when its advantageous. If you consider it like a manual car it seems the most logical, you wouldn't hit a sharp turn you need to accelerate from in 5th gear, you'd shift down right before to come out faster on the other side and save time.

My car would never make it up the top of hill I live on, even in third gear. .....neither does my FG.....unless I gear it down to like 35 inches...

MrCjolsen
05-31-09, 11:36 AM
^ You'd also need a world where people never carried anything or got tired.

I greatly disagree. I speak from experience.

My commute is 14 miles and perfectly flat. When there is no wind, and I'm on my 27 speed Surly, I will often ride the whole way without shifting. When doing so, I generally find myself using a gear just slightly lower than what I run on my fixed gear.

When there's zero wind, and I'm on my fixed gear, I find that my times and average speed is usually just as fast as on my Surly.

If it's windy, and I'm on my fixed gear I don't go that much slower, but I'm far less comfortable. One day I rode my fixed gear home with a 15-20 mph headwind. I trudged along at 10-13 mph. About the same as when I've been caught in similar conditions on my Surly. However, I was entirely miserable on my fixed gear. With such low cadence, my legs were very sore when I got home.

Finally, a few things about how I use gears when I have them. The only time I shift is when the terrain or wind changes. I don't shift to accelerate - I always start in the gear I will be riding in. Also, I never shift for corners. Do most people ride like that?

Yellowbeard
05-31-09, 12:51 PM
Finally, a few things about how I use gears when I have them. The only time I shift is when the terrain or wind changes. I don't shift to accelerate - I always start in the gear I will be riding in. Also, I never shift for corners. Do most people ride like that?

I certainly don't. I shift continually on a bike, the same way I would in a car, keeping a comfortable cadence. I shift down to the lowest gear every time I need to come to a stop and upshift as I gain speed. I shift so much that even a short stint on a geared bike has me wondering if I can still pedal a singlespeed. Every time I get back on a singlespeed I wonder what the hell I needed multiple gears for.