Roody
11-04-06, 08:18 PM
I think you're underestimating the impact of peak and post-peak oil. Agriculture is far more oil intensive than it was before the "green revolution", back in the 1950s and 1960s, when we feared we couldn't feed more than 3 billion. We can now feed 6 billion because of much higher-yield crops, but these are heavily dependant on petrochemical fertilizers, and on mechanized cultivation, harvesting and distribution. By the time the oil crunch gets intense, there may be 9 billion to feed, but as oil gets "more expensive" (ie. scarcer) agricultural production will start to decline. If the earth could feed 3 billion in the pre-oil age, it will feed fewer than that in the post-oil age because of soil depletion and degradation. High yield crops won't help if the soil can't nourish them. The "recovery and adjustment" you speak so casually of could be as rocky as much of the farmland will be.
You're absolutely right to say that the agricultural industry can't feed billions more. We're going to have to switch to scientific organic farming on a small scale basis to feed the people of the future. That will be a large part of "the "recovery and adjustment" [I] speak so casually of.' But there's a chance that it can be done. A lot of recent research predicts that small organic farms can feed many more than the current 6 billion in a sustainable fashion. For example, here's a quote from a paper by a professor at UC-Berkely, Christos Vasilikiotis, Ph.D. called 'Can Organic Farming "Feed the World"?' (http://www.cnr.berkeley.edu/~christos/articles/cv_organic_farming.html):
Our current world food production is more than sufficient to provide an adequate diet to all humans, yet more than 840 million people are suffering from hunger. Hunger is a problem of poverty, distribution, and access to food. The question then, is not "how to feed the world", but rather, how can we develop sustainable farming methods that have the potential to help the world feed and sustain itself. Organic management practices promote soil health, water conservation and can reverse environmental degradation. The emphasis on small-scale family farms has the potential to revitalize rural areas and their economies. Counter to the widely held belief that industrial agriculture is more efficient and productive, small farms produce far more per acre than large farms. Industrial agriculture relies heavily on monocultures, the planting of a single crop throughout the farm, because they simplify management and allow the use of heavy machinery. Larger farms in the third world also tend to grow export luxury crops instead of providing staple foods to their growing population. Small farmers, especially in the Third World have integrated farming systems where they plant a variety of crops maximizing the use of their land.
This is one reason that I say it is better to continue to search for solutions rather than just decide we're already doomed. If interested, here's a Google search page (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=future+organic+farming+feeding+billions) with some more articles on the topic.
You're absolutely right to say that the agricultural industry can't feed billions more. We're going to have to switch to scientific organic farming on a small scale basis to feed the people of the future. That will be a large part of "the "recovery and adjustment" [I] speak so casually of.' But there's a chance that it can be done. A lot of recent research predicts that small organic farms can feed many more than the current 6 billion in a sustainable fashion. For example, here's a quote from a paper by a professor at UC-Berkely, Christos Vasilikiotis, Ph.D. called 'Can Organic Farming "Feed the World"?' (http://www.cnr.berkeley.edu/~christos/articles/cv_organic_farming.html):
Our current world food production is more than sufficient to provide an adequate diet to all humans, yet more than 840 million people are suffering from hunger. Hunger is a problem of poverty, distribution, and access to food. The question then, is not "how to feed the world", but rather, how can we develop sustainable farming methods that have the potential to help the world feed and sustain itself. Organic management practices promote soil health, water conservation and can reverse environmental degradation. The emphasis on small-scale family farms has the potential to revitalize rural areas and their economies. Counter to the widely held belief that industrial agriculture is more efficient and productive, small farms produce far more per acre than large farms. Industrial agriculture relies heavily on monocultures, the planting of a single crop throughout the farm, because they simplify management and allow the use of heavy machinery. Larger farms in the third world also tend to grow export luxury crops instead of providing staple foods to their growing population. Small farmers, especially in the Third World have integrated farming systems where they plant a variety of crops maximizing the use of their land.
This is one reason that I say it is better to continue to search for solutions rather than just decide we're already doomed. If interested, here's a Google search page (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=future+organic+farming+feeding+billions) with some more articles on the topic.
Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.