Singlespeed & Fixed Gear - SS mountain bikers, are you competetive?

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




popluhv
12-18-06, 08:28 PM
Against all logic, I want to turn my mountain bike into a singlespeed. I'm just wondering, are those of you who race SS competetive, or do you just go for the fun of it?


dutret
12-18-06, 08:35 PM
On the right course you can be very competitive. Long climbs, flats or gravel sections: forget about it. You need to ride smoother than everyone else and have a wicked spin too.

yonderboy
12-18-06, 08:39 PM
If by competitive, you mean riding in the singlespeed class: yes.


popluhv
12-18-06, 08:43 PM
So, I guess the answer is no.

(I'll probably end up making it a SS anyway)

Analog
12-18-06, 11:04 PM
Do it, it's worth it just for the fun of it

girona
12-19-06, 06:40 AM
whatever happened to all the ss mountain bikers?
they stopped showing up in the forum when the fixed gear fever caugth on... no more talk about singletrack, itīs all about making fun of people that ride pistas while wearing white belts...

Aeroplane
12-19-06, 06:50 AM
I raced SS and got 4th out of 6 in the division, which I thought was good considering my bike is NOT an XC machine (huge gussets, big fork, it's a tank, etc.) and my brakes went out on the second lap due to excessive mud. I might race again this year, but who knows right? I think I'd be competitive, I just don't care to treat it that way. Racing is fun. Riding is fun. Sometimes I have a lot of run riding fast, sometimes I have a lot of fun riding slow and hitting jumps with my friends.

Try it and see if you like it.

vpower
12-19-06, 07:10 AM
semi-related.

I just finished my first season of 'cross racing on a singlespeed crosscheck and now I'm totally hooked. I always looked at it like a race within a race to see if I could beat the other (very few) singlespeeders and how many people on geared bikes I could beat. I finished near the bottom of every race though (I could have trained way harder).

BUT, the last race I did, the Men's C winner was on a singlespeed cross bike with a 2:1 mountain gearing.

A lot of people do them on singlespeed mountain bikes.

pathdoc
12-19-06, 07:12 AM
No racing here but I love my singlespeed Bianchi mountain bike.

mihlbach
12-19-06, 07:28 AM
I don't race competatively, but when I ride local singletrack I usually find myself passing people, and never get passed. My BMX background clearly gives me an advantage over many of the other locals. The only guy in recent memory whose ever passed me on singleltrack was a seriously badass dude also riding SS. I think SS is optimal on single track with a moderate difficulty level...not to hard, not to easy. If the singletrack is really easy, with long smooth straight sections, a geared MTB will blow you away. Likewise, if there are huge, steep hills, and/or lots of highly technical obstcles, you'll get beat by gearies. On the other hand, if the hills are failry moderate and most of the singletrack consists of winding curves and short ups and downs (pretty standard around my neck of the woods), SS does not really have any disadvantages.

SamHouston
12-19-06, 07:29 AM
There were many courses in Tx that a SS would do just fine on, only some switchback climbing, mostly fast but technical singletrack. Pretty much anything in the piney woods or gulf coast area, those courses an SS would be very competetive on.

If you've got a good spin, I've heard good things from ss riders in 24hr adrenaline races, racing individual or team.

iridetitus
12-19-06, 08:55 AM
you can get into a redline monocog for less than 5 bills as a new complete bike (fully rigid). find an old trek or specialized or whatever through yer local resources (craigslist, mtbr, etc) and you can get into one for the cost of the beater and plus the conversion (addtl $100).

keep yer mtb geared, go this ^ route, and have options.

Devolution
12-19-06, 09:02 AM
There are plenty of competitive single speed mountain bike racers out there, but maybe not on this board. Show up to any race and you're bound to see them. They're everywhere, and typically not making a huge fuss over what bike other folks are riding.

legalize_it
12-19-06, 09:05 AM
whatever happened to all the ss mountain bikers?
they stopped showing up in the forum when the fixed gear fever caugth on... no more talk about singletrack, itīs all about making fun of people that ride pistas while wearing white belts...

we're still here lurking infrequently. i find my self writing half a post then deleting it. when i want to read and post about SS mtbing i am usually at mtbr.com.

but, about ss mtb racing and the competitiveness... ive done a bit of ss racing. i have done some racing on my ss mtb in a ss class, and raced my ss cross bike against geared riders. many of the other ss racers are as competitive as any normal(geared) racer, they're usually in the front of the pack. towards the middle/end of the pack you get the guys that dont take it as seriously and are doing it just for fun.

and, if you're in the philly area trophy bikes has a SS only team. we call ourselves team shiftless. over the past 2 years we have racked up some amazing results on the mtb and cross scene.

max-a-mill
12-19-06, 09:45 AM
popluhv - if your competitive now, switching to a singlespeed will definitely not make you much less so...

it's about having the right gear and the fitness to power it through the course going fast.

i raced with legalize-it this year, and since i am not as fast as him always finished toward the back of the singlespeed class but whan i looked at my times they were very similar to those in the same class riding geared bikes.

i don't think i am any slower on my singlespeed. any disadvantages you may have can be made up on the climbs; but again that depends a little on the specific course and alot about what you bring to the table as far as fitness.

finally, mountainbiking is so much funner than riding on the boring old street! i am surprised so few people here seem to do it...

Aeroplane
12-19-06, 10:16 AM
There are plenty of competitive single speed mountain bike racers out there, but maybe not on this board. Show up to any race and you're bound to see them. They're everywhere, and typically not making a huge fuss over what bike other folks are riding.
great freaking point. The best riders I know don't spend much time on the internet.

iridetitus
12-19-06, 10:27 AM
great freaking point. The best riders I know don't spend much time on the internet.

+1.

xlntRider79
12-19-06, 11:59 AM
The third place racer and 8 out of the top 25 riders at this year's Mohican 100 were singlespeeders
Sure, many of those were pro or factory team riders, but they still rode 100 miles (60% sloppy mud) in the same gear.

http://www.results.ombc.net/MTB100/Results%201.htm

TheSlav
12-19-06, 12:14 PM
I say go for it. I converted my MTB two years ago due to a propensity for breaking rear derailleurs and I havent looked back. Started racing last year in New England and there is, on average, 10 single speed racers per event (www.efta.com).

Some of the SS riders racing EFTA are extremely competetive. one rider came in top ten overall on about a 30 mile course in Maine riding SS

I love racing SS...lower chance of mechanicals and an awesome sense of pride when you finish a hard days ride and still manage to beat some gearies

max-a-mill
12-19-06, 12:27 PM
most of you don't have a singlespeed class? thats wierd to me.

here in the big mid atlantic summer race series there are three separate classes just for singlespeeds. beginner sport and expert.


you race the course with gearies but your timed against your fellow singlespeeders.

TheSlav
12-19-06, 12:40 PM
we have a SS class in New England. Ours doesnt break out into ability levels its just an Open class. I havent built up the fitness yet to really compete with most of the other SS guys.

Im not 100% sure but I think some of them may have lost the ability to get tired....So I usually check my time against geared sport riders in my age group to see where I come in.

Shiznaz
12-19-06, 12:56 PM
What kind of pedals do you guys use for SS MTB?

The singletrack around here is usually in steep ravines with alot of technical sections and steep ups and downs. I just finished building my SS MTB commuter and I've got a 34x18 and 36x16 gear on it and once a hill gets steep enough I can't put enough power into the pedals to keep them turning over because they are flat so I can only push down. This usually ends up with me aborting the climb right before the top when I stall. I have a feeling I'd be much better off with clipless so that I can really spin and keep my power output even, but flat pedals seem like a good idea because they're so easy to jump off in case something bad happens.

What kind of pedals do the skilled SS MTB riders you see use? I just don't understand how anyone could go up hills with flat pedals.

/ignorance

dutret
12-19-06, 01:02 PM
XC riders(ss or geared) don't use paltforms much.

I've found spds cranked down work well as do atacs. Pretty quickly you'll be able to clip out without thinking even while stalled on a climb or falling over a log

Shiznaz
12-19-06, 01:08 PM
I've taken my cross bike on the singletrack before with eggbeaters and mountain shoes (and also sidi geniuses and looks!) and I don't remember really getting into trouble because of it. I'm pretty sure I remained clipped into the bike while lying on my side once or twice but I definitely wouldn't have been able to do any of the hills otherwise.

I guess all I can do is try for myself

max-a-mill
12-19-06, 01:12 PM
shiz - i use Time's as they seem to be the easiest most predictable spd i've used.

and as for gearing 34x18 maybe but definitely not 36x16 unless your a freakin animal.

round here the FAST fast guys push a 2:1 and i am lucky to be able to make it around most courses without pushing up at least the biggest hills on a 34X20 (good gear for hillier rides imho).

dutret - singlespeeds can excel in hilly races, you just need a good engine to power the bike.... it is races with loooong flats and straights that really hamper your chances of keeping up the single. tight windy races where you don't have much "big ring time" are good for the single.

timmhaan
12-19-06, 01:24 PM
over the summer i got to ride the same singletrack course on a geared mtn bike and a SS. i found the geared bike to be a bit faster, but it was completely due to picking up more speed on a straight than anything else. the SS actually felt better through the turns as i didn't have the tendency to brake as much. momentum carried me through much better and i naturally picked better lines. plus there is no way to make a misshift and get bogged down in a wrong gear.

overall, if i was a mountain bike racer (which i'm not), i would do a lot of training on an SS.

dutret
12-19-06, 01:25 PM
maybe, admittedly I have a ****ty engine, but any climb over 1k and I'm crawling on my ss compared to geared I just can't mash that long. The vast majority of us(even mashers) are a lot more efficient at 80-100 rpms then we are at 40-60.


Technical courses with shorter rolling hills and I am about as fast ss maybe a even a little bit faster on the perfect course.

Shiznaz
12-19-06, 01:28 PM
shiz - i use Time's as they seem to be the easiest most predictable spd i've used.

and as for gearing 34x18 maybe but definitely not 36x16 unless your a freakin animal.

round here the FAST fast guys push a 2:1 and i am lucky to be able to make it around most courses without pushing up at least the biggest hills on a 34X20 (good gear for hillier rides imho).


I may be hindered by the fact that I built up my SS MTB as a snow bike commuter; its got higher gearing than I would have chosen for a 'trail riding' SS MTB because it sees quite a bit of pavement and my commute is mostly flat. Its also pretty heavy (heaviest bike I own by quite a bit) because of racks and fenders and cheap components, so that doesn't help with climbing . I was considering a lower gear, but anything less than the 34x18 felt like pulling teeth on pavement. Why can't it just freaking snow so I can ride this bike as I planned?

I guess theres nothing wrong with walking your bike up a hill every now and then. When I rode my cross bike on the singletrack I would always be climbing past these guys pushing their crazy expensive FS bikes up hills so they could bomb down them afterwards.

dutret
12-19-06, 01:32 PM
34x18 is a reasonable ratio. Anything lower and you're screwed on downhills and flats yet it's low enough that anything you can't ride up with that you can probably run up faster anyway. If everything you ride is super technical you could go lower but for most trails it seems decent.

Which brings me to another essential ss mtb skill... dismount/run/remount.

Aeroplane
12-19-06, 01:33 PM
What kind of pedals do the skilled SS MTB riders you see use? I just don't understand how anyone could go up hills with flat pedals.
I ride on old Shimano clipless/platform DH style pedals. I'm extraordinarily bad at clipping in on rough terrain, and that tends to be the areas where I either fall or stop, so I have to start there again. The platforms make starting without being clipped in a lot easier. My gearing was 34-20, but I have super-low 32-20 now and it's super-fun, I'm cleaning everything lately. Would probably suck for racing though.

I second max-a-mils comments on SS vs. geared too, and I'll add that gearies have an advantage on downhills as well. I have to just use gravity, while they can still pedal. Luckily most of the downhills around here are hairy enough that not many folks have the guts to hammer down them.

max-a-mill
12-19-06, 03:37 PM
dutret how many 1k climbs you seeing in GA (well i guess depending on where your at you might have a few for sure);)

at least here in eastern pennsyltucky where everything is pretty hilly, but really not too many climbs over 500 feet, and not too many straight flat sections either (at least where i like to ride/race); i am being totally honest to say i think i am faster on the ss.

but man - out west where you climb 1,500 footers regularly... or an area with long open stretches everywhere... give me some gears dammit.

i must say: i never owned a 3k 22lb geared racin machine either (nor could i afford too) but that could completely change my outlook on what is really fast.

nep
12-19-06, 03:43 PM
My .02,

A mechanic at the shop I work at races MTB and 'Cross almost exclusively SS. This year in the Sacramento cross series, he raced against elite men (not masters A's, even though he's 43) and won the overall series. He races competitively on his SS cross bike in larger races cross in NorCal as well, always making the top 3. On a mountain bike it's the exact same way (I just haven't seen it). He isn't hindered at all. Even at courses like Downieville (oooh elevation change!) he murders. If anyone knows the Forest Hill loop in Auburn, CA, he was training last year and made in in 36 minutes.... That's insane. Granted I, or anyone else I know, can't ride a SS or geared mountain bike anywhere near that fast but if you're one of those freaks, you'll definitely get by. As for pedals... Atacs!! As for gearing... 2:1 if you can cope with some punishment!!

Retem
12-19-06, 03:49 PM
its all about fixed mountain bikes
way too much fun

jim-bob
12-19-06, 03:54 PM
I'm not competitive, but that's my own fault, not the bike's.

I used to work with one of the first guys I knew to race SS (before there were SS classes) and he consistently placed pretty well, but he was also a friggin' animal.

dutret
12-19-06, 04:10 PM
dutret how many 1k climbs you seeing in GA (well i guess depending on where your at you might have a few for sure);)

at least here in eastern pennsyltucky where everything is pretty hilly, but really not too many climbs over 500 feet, and not too many straight flat sections either (at least where i like to ride/race); i am being totally honest to say i think i am faster on the ss.

but man - out west where you climb 1,500 footers regularly... or an area with long open stretches everywhere... give me some gears dammit.

i must say: i never owned a 3k 22lb geared racin machine either (nor could i afford too) but that could completely change my outlook on what is really fast.

I meant 1k distance not vert. I think there are only a handful of climbs that are close to to a 1k vertical in georgia and they are not rides I frequent. I'm from "out west" though and I while I know people who ride ss there I wouldn't consider it for most rides. After a kilo or so(of distance 100m or less of climbing) I crash on my ss. Where I would still be spinning along at a decent pace geared I slow to walking speed ss. It may just be my problem though(but I think not) and gearing low like aeroplanes might help(but that would kill me on descents and flats).

Yeah I agree I'm probably as fast or faster on the short steep rollie stuff too at least. It sure feels faster. The smoothness ss encourages has definitely helped all my riding too.

Aeroplane
12-20-06, 06:39 AM
Yeah I agree I'm probably as fast or faster on the short steep rollie stuff too at least.
That is definitely the most fun to ride too. Just rolly enough that you are barely making it to the top of every climb, and the downs are twisty enough that you can't really pedal anyways... so much fun. I miss mountain biking. :(