General Cycling Discussion - Shoes- stiff vs casual.

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
Will I really notice that big a difference in efficiency of power transfer if I move from soft soled bike shoes to something with rigid soles (e.g. the Sidi line)?
My old Northwaves are due to be replaced. They're the sort that you can walk around in all day (they were my commuting shoes). Now that I have stopped commuting and have moved over to mountabiking, I'm thinking of getting something much more biking-specific.
Further info: I don't race. I ride very hilly terrain that only necessitates carrying the bike for short distances.
East Hill
02-15-07, 06:58 AM
Quick answer--yes.
East Hill
bbattle
02-15-07, 07:02 AM
yes.
stapfam
02-15-07, 11:54 AM
Quick answer--yes.
East hill
You will only get one answer and that is yes but an ever bigger improvement will come if you fit clipless pedals aswell.
CommuterRun
02-15-07, 04:16 PM
Yes, you will notice a difference.
No, it will not be an appreciable difference unless you are actively trying to squeeze out every MPH possible.
In other words, if you're training to race, get stiff soles and clipless pedals. If your cycling is utility cycling, like mine is, then it doesn't really matter. Unless of course that's what you want, then by all means get new shoes.:)
Eatadonut
02-15-07, 04:26 PM
Yes, you will notice a difference.
No, it will not be an appreciable difference unless you are actively trying to squeeze out every MPH possible.
I'd have to disagree. I wear stiff (but still walkable) shoes on my commute. I average nearly 4mph faster than with my (admittedly, very flexy) running shoes. There's a huge difference - and if you ride fixed, the difference in skidding with a stiff shoe versus a floppy shoe is tremendous.
Once you get into the fiberglass and clipless range, there's not a lot of room to move up, then I would agree with commuterrun. I've ridden in fiberglass on toeclips, and there's a little difference moving to clipless. Moving from a good fiberglass shoe to a carbon fiber shoe is a tiny, but still noticeable difference.
Another thing to consider, since you mentioned mountain biking specifically, is that stiff shoes will greatly ease the pressure put on the ball of your foot when landing and such.
apclassic9
02-15-07, 05:21 PM
get the stiff shoes. your feet will thank you.
I should have mentioned: My old Northwaves are *already* clipless, so the question is the difference between fully rigid and 'stiff-ish" clipless shoes.
Looks like most people are of the opinion that fully rigid is noticeably better, so I'll give them a shot. Thanks everyone.
Indolent58
02-16-07, 12:00 AM
Don't know about power transfer, but more rigid is definitely more comfortable. The entire shoe acts as the platform.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.