[donrhummy]

Frequently when someone's quoting another poster, they respond to a vague quote and it's hard to know what they're responding to. For example:

** EXAMPLE POST **
That is flat out wrong!

Oh yeah, I've tried it myself and that's completely wrong.
** END EXAMPLE **

In this case, we have no idea what's "wrong." We'd have to go back through a potentially 6-page thread to find an obscure post that's being quoted before we can decide if we agree/disagree with them.

Just a suggestion... :)

[The BikeForums Team]

This is an archived thread, you can find the full version of this thread, with images, links and more content here.

Ready to buy? Check out these two online bike stores:
- http://www.nashbar.com (you can find the latest bike nashbar coupons in this thread)
- http://www.performancebike.com (you can find the latest performance bike coupons in this thread)

Cya on the forums,
- The BikeForums Team
- http://www.bikeforums.net

[Michel Gagnon]

It would be good sometimes.

But I have seen it on a few other forums and it quickly gets tiring. You get a guy quoting one of my page-long messages and adding one or two blurbs (Me too!), then somebody quoting the quote and second-level quote and adding a precision and... You see the problem. Threads would be even longer.

[donrhummy]

It would be good sometimes.

But I have seen it on a few other forums and it quickly gets tiring. You get a guy quoting one of my page-long messages and adding one or two blurbs (Me too!), then somebody quoting the quote and second-level quote and adding a precision and... You see the problem. Threads would be even longer.


??? I fail to see how this feature causes that. People quote others here all the time from many different pages in multiple page threads. It'd be no diff.