Road Cycling - Handlebar Question

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




View Full Version : Handlebar Question


Radical 9000
06-13-03, 07:54 PM
Is it better to have a shoulder width handlebar than a smaller one? I have heard mixed reviews and i hope you can help me with this problem, thanks.


Radical 9000
06-13-03, 07:56 PM
In addition...

what type of handlebar should i buy, i am thinking about getting a new one, and if i do should i put foam under the grip tape? thanks again.

dexmax
06-13-03, 09:28 PM
well, I like mine shoulder width..

foam under the tape? I don't put foam under there, but I wrap a thin handlebar tape first, then I wrap on top of it with my favorite handlebar tape... This would make it softer, but not too soft..


Snowblower
06-13-03, 09:57 PM
I would select a bar that is just as wide as you shoulders, which is the measured distance between the shoulder joints. A wider bar opens your chest for better breathing and provides more leverage, but makes you less aerodynamic. Going too wide (hands outside your shoulders) can make your arms sore and tired very fast. A narrower bar creates a smaller profile aerodynamically but at the same time will restrict your breathing. I found smaller bars can also make it a little more difficult to steer because you will feel a little jammed.

As bars go, I like Richie, 3TTT or Cinelli. I use the oversize bars (31.8) because they don't seem to flex as much as the standard size bars. I am 190 Lbs and don't bend my Richie bar (WCS) at all.

Padding under the tape is preference, I have found if you have a carbon fork it really dapens the ride and padding is unnecessary. I have friends that swear by carbon handlebars and that they add even more "softness" if you are looking for a real smooth ride but are expensive. I have stayed away from carbon bars because I have heard some horror stories about them snapping when putting a lot of force against them (like climbing out of the saddle).

Snowblower

khuon
06-13-03, 10:02 PM
I find that if I can "wear" the handlebars around my shoulders, it works pretty good for me. As far as padding goes, I have small hands relatively speaking and already wear padded gloves plus my handlebar, fork and steerer are carbon so I thought padded bartape would be overkill and might make the bars a bit too thick for my liking.

MichaelW
06-14-03, 03:57 AM
You need a Goldilocks fit: not too narrow, not too wide.
Check out the different styles of bar at 3TTT. The drop radius is another variable, some like the touring Morphe bar have a smaller radius than the racing models.

Radical 9000
06-14-03, 07:31 AM
Thanks very much everyone! I didn't expect anyone to answer, and you have certainly helped me in my decision.

Phatman
06-14-03, 10:02 AM
as for the padding, i think that cinelli makes "anti-viration pads" that you can wrap under bar tape. take a look at their site for more info.

Michel Gagnon
06-14-03, 08:01 PM
I don't think there is a definite answer. If you have access to a few bikes, the best would be to do a trial run with a few bikes to see what you like.

Current "wisdom" calls for handlebars shoulder width or even slightly wider than shoulder width. One recommendation I read called for handlebars that you could wear (like a coat), which means 1-2 cm wider than your shoulder bones. For makes, that would mean 42-48 cm wide bars (at the drops)... and there even are a few 52-cm bars for sale.

However, 20-25 years ago, I'm not sure how was defined the standard, but 38-40 cm bars were the norm.

Pros and cons:

- narrow bars are slightly more aerodynamic;
- with narrow bars, it's easy to ride through tight spots;
- with wide bars, there is more steering control, especially on windy terrain or when towing a child;
- if you ride from the tops, the interesting measurement is the width at the top curves, where you typically ride; that's rarely measured in catalogues;
- too narrow bars might impede hard breating;
- too wide bars and there is more stress in your shoulders.

I have two touring bikes. One dates from 1980 and has 39-cm bars and the other dates from 2000 and has 46-cm bars. I enjoy both equally. I don't feel any pain with either, even when I ride for a long time, but I think, in hindsight, that "perfect width" would be approximately 44 cm.

Radical 9000
06-14-03, 08:05 PM
Thanks for the input, also should i go with a drop that has the kink in it that fits your hand better. I think they call an ergonomic handlebar.

khuon
06-14-03, 08:08 PM
Originally posted by Radical 9000
Thanks for the input, also should i go with a drop that has the kink in it that fits your hand better. I think they call an ergonomic handlebar.

I prefer less curves for some reason so yes I'd cast my vote for ergobars. I have the Easton EC90 which doesn't really even have a curved transition from the tops to the hoods. The straight sections seem to fit my grip style better.

FOG
06-14-03, 09:33 PM
I don't think you need padding if you use cork wrap.

MichaelW
06-16-03, 03:14 AM
I tried the ergo bar with a flat section on the drops. I never liked it. My hands kept sliding down the slope. With a curve, I can jam my hand in and stay there.

Phatman
06-16-03, 03:11 PM
My hands cramp in the traditional drops on my bianchi.

Revenig
06-17-03, 02:04 AM
The shoulder wide handle bars came with my Lemond that I purchased earlier this year. With my old bike, which I rode for 15 years, the handle bars were much narrower. It wasn't until I got the Lemond that I realized how much more comfortable and less pain the shoulder wide handle bars could be especially when in the drops.