Google sponsored links


Wilbur Bud
 
I'm finding that I stop going back to check an interesting thread once 2 or 3 individuals take it over for awhile with 20, 30, or 40 posts along the lines of "I'm right, no, you're wrong and I'm right, no, you're an idiot because . . . " and I wonder if there is any automated way that the forum could flag these with a suggestion to take their new topic to another thread or to PM? Probably this is a chronic difficulty to manage in any forum.

Keep in mind this kind of post isn't offensive in any way, at least to me, but I find once I spend 3 or 5 minutes running through two pages of that I just back out and never return although I expect some of these threads do eventually get back on topic.

Yes, I do see the report post link within each posting, but I'm not offended by these kind of posts, and I'm sure there is some satisfying characteristic for the posters involved to see there comments in the forum and not just in a PM exchange, so I'm really just wondering two things:

A/ How could the discovery of this kind of distraction be somewhat automated, e.g., profiling? so that likely cases are prompted to the moderators for possible consequence?

and

B/ How could this exchange go somewhere else so the thread could stay on topic?

The child-rearing notion of giving them a "time out" from the thread in question once discovered (in terms of a temporary ban of a few hours to the particular thread or an inability to post again until 10 other replies are posted), along with a prompt to go to PM or a new thread dedicated to themselves, would seem like a more appropriate first step than deleting the thread or banning the users, which I've read happens from time to time although I've not observed it because I'm not that active.

I'm targeting the forums that are not Foo with this comment. Foo, by its nature, is agreeably less restrictive.


The BikeForums Team
-adv-
This is an archived thread, you can find the full version of this thread, with images, links and more content here.

Ready to buy? Check out these two online bike stores:
- http://www.nashbar.com (you can find the latest bike nashbar coupons in this thread)
- http://www.performancebike.com (you can find the latest performance bike coupons in this thread)

Cya on the forums,
- The BikeForums Team
- http://www.bikeforums.net

Tom Stormcrowe
 
We're looking into solutions now. Can't say more because I'm not at that level of being told!:p I'm finding that I stop going back to check an interesting thread once 2 or 3 individuals take it over for awhile with 20, 30, or 40 posts along the lines of "I'm right, no, you're wrong and I'm right, no, you're an idiot because . . . " and I wonder if there is any automated way that the forum could flag these with a suggestion to take their new topic to another thread or to PM? Probably this is a chronic difficulty to manage in any forum.

Keep in mind this kind of post isn't offensive in any way, at least to me, but I find once I spend 3 or 5 minutes running through two pages of that I just back out and never return although I expect some of these threads do eventually get back on topic.

Yes, I do see the report post link within each posting, but I'm not offended by these kind of posts, and I'm sure there is some satisfying characteristic for the posters involved to see there comments in the forum and not just in a PM exchange, so I'm really just wondering two things:

A/ How could the discovery of this kind of distraction be somewhat automated, e.g., profiling? so that likely cases are prompted to the moderators for possible consequence?

and

B/ How could this exchange go somewhere else so the thread could stay on topic?

The child-rearing notion of giving them a "time out" from the thread in question once discovered (in terms of a temporary ban of a few hours to the particular thread or an inability to post again until 10 other replies are posted), along with a prompt to go to PM or a new thread dedicated to themselves, would seem like a more appropriate first step than deleting the thread or banning the users, which I've read happens from time to time although I've not observed it because I'm not that active.

I'm targeting the forums that are not Foo with this comment. Foo, by its nature, is agreeably less restrictive.


Maelstrom
 
Holy micro managing. That would be a brutal way to run the show. With the amount of mods BF has now it might be easier, but seriously, (and I am thinking last year when we had some real winners) that would have been a full time job and a logistical nightmare.


dekindy
 
They had better find a way to achieve this but cause I am just as tired as the OP to have to read through a lot of replies to find one that is on topic. It makes the website useless if this activity dominates the website.


Brian
 
Next you'll want Google to only return relevant responses. Obviously, other people have found ways to live with it. Mael is correct.

Currently Active Users: 3392 (730 members and 2662 guests)


Previous - Top - Next