StupidlyBrave
06-19-07, 04:37 PM
AT&T quietly offers $10 DSL plan (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19305115/)
FCC agreement for customers in the 22-state service region
[AP feed]
FCC agreement for customers in the 22-state service region
[AP feed]
Foo - Cheap DSL ?
Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.View Full Version : Cheap DSL ?
EJ123
06-19-07, 04:39 PM
Would this be the 786/128 plan?
linux_author
06-19-07, 05:38 PM
- only for two years...
:-(
- better to share bandwidth - just hope your neighbor isn't doing naughty things on the 'net...
:-(
- better to share bandwidth - just hope your neighbor isn't doing naughty things on the 'net...
LastPlace
06-19-07, 08:39 PM
FWIW, I tried to get Bell South DSL for $24.95 and as soon as I 'signed' the digital online contract there was another charge. I think it was about $3.95, or
something like that.
Point being, I would not necessarily believe it is really going to be as cheap as they claim.
Just sayin............
something like that.
Point being, I would not necessarily believe it is really going to be as cheap as they claim.
Just sayin............
TexasGuy
06-19-07, 09:08 PM
SBC sucks so badly. People need to say no to crack and to SBC.
LastPlace
06-19-07, 10:11 PM
TexasGuy,
I would love an alternative to dial-up but can't afford cable, so DSL might be an improvement for me.
Just don't think they are telling the whole truth in their advertising.
I would love an alternative to dial-up but can't afford cable, so DSL might be an improvement for me.
Just don't think they are telling the whole truth in their advertising.
TexasGuy
06-19-07, 10:26 PM
TexasGuy,
I would love an alternative to dial-up but can't afford cable, so DSL might be an improvement for me.
Just don't think they are telling the whole truth in their advertising.
:(
You are paying SBC so SBC can sue every single individual, business or government entity that wants to put up any service that could be construed as competing with them.
Ask the people in Ohio and Louisianna about their battle to get fast internet and fast wireless and SBC's plans to sue them because they want to charge 100 a month to have "actual" high-speed internet or offer "low-speed internet" for 15-25 bucks with a one year committment
I would love an alternative to dial-up but can't afford cable, so DSL might be an improvement for me.
Just don't think they are telling the whole truth in their advertising.
:(
You are paying SBC so SBC can sue every single individual, business or government entity that wants to put up any service that could be construed as competing with them.
Ask the people in Ohio and Louisianna about their battle to get fast internet and fast wireless and SBC's plans to sue them because they want to charge 100 a month to have "actual" high-speed internet or offer "low-speed internet" for 15-25 bucks with a one year committment