Professional Cycling For the Fans - Levi, Wtf Man? *what The Expletive!*

WTF are you talking about? I'm bitter about anything. Go check your facts then get back to me. First every time that AC and MR took off the only one to even come close to countering them was Cadel. He waxed Levi in first TT and if you hadn't noticed had enough time to keep his lead over Levi even after Levi did the TT of his career. So I guess Cadel did a bit more than Levi and with a team that isn't even close to as strong.

And on the last mtn. stage when LL may have taken time from them both he instead rode for his team and attacked earlier in the stage even though it doesn't suit his style or the situation.

The guy rode a great tour/ had a great season/ and a phenominal TT

I would love to hear the performance reviews/ of the people making these comments/ by their bosses in their current lines of work...how do you stack up against the best in the world in your given profession

And Cadel was being questioned in the Alps for his tactics of only following...it's called tactics/race management otherwise lets make em all ITT"s

Lap them on the champs! Win the tour....

You will live forever!

I agree it would be awesome, but no man is going to lap the champs unless he is riding a motorcycle; and (for a yellow jersey contender) to attempt so would earn him the ire of the peloton.

Its not like its every man for themself and they only race the TDF. A rider/team may need to form alliances with any other rider/team in future races. While these "gentleman's rules" are seemingly arbitrary, breaking them will almost certainly not go unpunished.

brian allen sounds like a sore loser with a dud bet on LL. suck it up, mate, and deal with the fact that yellow jersey positions don't change on the last day. LL had his chances.

PS levi deserved his time penalty just like Vino did. the tour management don't bother slapping the time penalty on domestiques carrying water bottles, as they are no threat to the GC, which is where such a push really does matter.

gentleman's rules do exist in the sport, like when the four man break in the lead stopped and waited for riders who tangled with the dog on stage 16? 17? same goes for natural breaks, or flatting in the last few miles... don't you like gentleman's rules? are you anti-gentleman? "treat others as you would like them to treat you" is a good motto to live by, unless you're a cvnt who enjoys pain...

brian allen sounds like a sore loser with a dud bet on LL. ...

You are too kind. :p

Time penalty was BS? The mechanic pushed him uphill for a minute. Lucky he didn't get kicked out.

Paul Sherwin was certainly not to happy about that incident. Yesterdy ligget was saying well if he didnt get the push it would have cost more than 10 seconds so you have to balance it out. Personally i dont think there is any balancing when you are cheating, it was clearly against the rules and he should have been tossed.

Paul Sherwin was certainly not to happy about that incident. Yesterdy ligget was saying well if he didnt get the push it would have cost more than 10 seconds so you have to balance it out. Personally i dont think there is any balancing when you are cheating, it was clearly against the rules and he should have been tossed.

Sherwen speaks from experience as a rider. He called it a professional foul, in fact. Liggett suggested - probably correctly - that LL would have lost more without the push than with. But all in all, it is certainly better than doping, wouldn't you say, as an infraction everyone can live with? And it happens all the time in the longer races.

BTW, it was clearly uphill, though on a very small gradient.

After the doping, scandals and denigration to the sport, the "gentlemen's agreement" not to attack on the promenade to Paris was rather refreshing to me. A little good sportsmanship was nice to see for a change. The race is agreed to be over on the stage before the ride into Paris, so it is over. At least something to feel good about.