Road Cycling - light tubes

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
Has any one used Lightweight tubes? Do you have more flats? is it worth the expence?
phat bahsturd
08-08-03, 09:35 AM
I want to get some Panaracer green lites. Bicycling magazine said they were good.
Light tubes, those under 100gms, are expensive, fragile and offer only modest performance improvements. Inner tubes are probably the lowest quality controlled item on your bike and have lots of ways to fail. I would not use them in any 'critical' riding: races, time trials, long rides away from home, or rides like centuries where you are driving a long way to get there. Very thin tubes in my experience are too frustrating to consider. Steve
SinGate
08-08-03, 07:18 PM
Originally posted by sch
Light tubes, those under 100gms, are expensive, fragile and offer only modest performance improvements. I would not use them in any 'critical' riding: races, time trials, long rides away from home, or rides like centuries where you are driving a long way to get there.
Gosh I sure hope you are wrong on this point as I just put on two superlight tubes on my bike for a very important time trial I have this coming Wed.:eek:
L J Horton
08-08-03, 08:40 PM
One of the problems with the light tubes is that they don't hold air very well. You need to refill them on an almost daily basis.
SinGate
08-08-03, 08:45 PM
L J Horton, I'll give you that, but I find that now that I'm a grown up it seems like my tires are allways in need of air. I don't ever recall pumping my tires as a kid, now I do it before every ride; Light tubes or not.
shokhead
08-09-03, 07:16 AM
Reg tubes are under 100g and lites are 35-70g.Thats what i have seen and not much price diff.
Phatman
08-10-03, 06:13 PM
I got a Bontrager tube that weighs 56grams in my seat pack...The reason i bought it was becuase it was small...and it cost the same as the continetals, which were 25g heavier.
OregonBound
08-10-03, 07:22 PM
Just my personal opinion, but the times I've tried light tubes, whatever minute gain in speed from the lowered weight was more than blanked out by the large number of flats.
Paul
Races are not won on the side of the road fixing a flat. The performance increase does in no way outway the dependability of a butyl tube.
Ajay213
08-11-03, 07:37 AM
Like lots of other things pick the right equipment for the right job. If you are running on clean well kept roads then the risk of puncture may well be worth it in the end. Face it, anything can happen out there on the road, even on a "closed course" setting.
If you really want lightweight and keep good puncture resistance, switch to tubulars :D
Andrew
Phatman
08-11-03, 09:38 AM
most of these light tubes are butyl.
2Boxers
08-12-03, 12:22 PM
I used 3 vittoria ultra-light latex tubes on one ride and ended up riding home w/ a friends butyl tube in the tire. I will not use them again. Way too many flats for a single ride! From now on I am sticking to butyl tubes.
Bikesick
08-12-03, 12:43 PM
I've been using Continental Race 700 Lights lately and they have performed just fine. ...including on century+ rides and the whole deal. ..they're fine. BTW: there is no particular brand fetish here or anything, this is what the LBS stocks.
My two bits - - -> get the light tubes and don't worry about it. If you get a couple bad tubes .....then you can start worrying :)
Now, (as Freddy Mercury used to say).. "GET on your bike and ride!!"
Salud :beer:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.