Training & Nutrition - Racing without a base? Neuromuscular training.

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




DnvrFox
08-10-03, 12:23 PM
The common dictum is you must need a base of hundreds of miles before you get into advanced training.

Not so, says the latest issue of Outside Magazine

www.outsideonline.com

Howver, the article is not yet posted.

According to the theory and practices and training regimen of famous Owen Anderson, editor of Running Research News, the speed at which you train is the speed at which you aill perform - if you are training slowly through all those base miiles, that is how your body will perform.

"If you want to be a faster athlete, it's crazy to practice being a slow one."

Anderson is a leader of a tiny but growing faction of coaches and world-class athletes focused on exploting the unsonscious link between your brain and your muscles. Program the right pace and, according to the neuromuscular fitness philosophy, you'll run, bike or swim as quickly as you've conditoned yourself to go.

"For neuromuscular training, two things matter: one, that you work out as the level at which you plan to compete, and two, that you teach your brain to anticipate - and work through - the burning to your muscles that accompany intense effort. How much time will you save? Try months."

The article is lengthy, and I can only give you a flavor here.

They do state that nm traiing is probably not best for those who compete every week for 6-9 onths a year, instead of once or twice.

It needs to be completed in 6-8 week cycles that start with low mileage and build up to a specific competition. Otherwise, you may overtax your body.

Well, anyway, this is interesting food for thought.

Do a couple of googles on owen anderson crossed with NM Training, and you will find a lot more.

I am no expert and know nothing more. I just thought this was interesting.


late
08-10-03, 12:39 PM
One winter I used one of the old style periodised aerobic training charts. it was boring as hell. Come spring I felt like King Kong. I hope to do something similar this winter. Now, where's Fay Wray when you need her?

roadbuzz
08-15-03, 08:29 PM
Well, speaking as one with no credentials or authority, and who hasn't read the article... I'm guessing it's geared toward people who have trouble finding time to put the time for base and intensity.

There's no doubt that to get good at riding fast, you have to ride fast. And to get good at climbing, you need to climb. And, IMO, the long, "base" mileage can interfere with intense workouts/rides, because it leaves my legs/body tired in a way that takes longer to recover from. But, can you build up to a fast century by riding at AT for 20, then 25, 30, etc. up to 100? I dunno. Another school of thought claims you should ride very easily for a couple of months a year to build a capillary base necessary for endurance and hard efforts, and that intense efforts damage the "baby" caps, stunting their growth. That sounds a little dubious, too. Reality is probably somewhere in the middle.

I guess what it comes down to, is any training program works provided you stick with it, and don't over-do it.