Mountain Biking - Quick Iron Horse frame question
Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
10-05-07, 06:59 PM
Which is the better frame regarding durability, Maverick or Warrior? It's a dual suspension frame.
10-05-07, 07:27 PM
10-05-07, 07:40 PM
Their site says that Maverick is lower in the line-up but was wondering if the frames are any different in real world durability as the pricepoints are similar, Warrior being a little more expensive.
10-05-07, 08:21 PM
they appear to be the same, but ill let the other guys on here clear that up.
10-05-07, 08:46 PM
They both appear to be basic single pivot designs. There most likely pretty equal in the durability department but the Warrior seems to be a bit beefier.
10-06-07, 06:30 AM
but the Warrior seems to be a bit beefier.
Thats what I ended up ordering from Performance, the Warrior 4.5, for that very reason. Have been looking to buy an MTB for a while, their one day 20% off coupon swayed it for me. Anyone have any experience of that particular bike? Anything I need to watch out for or quirks?
Both are single pivots but Warrior is higher in the IH offer. Azure and MKIII is where things get really good though.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.