Advocacy & Safety - Haha! :) Judge Judy Bike/dog crash lawsuit on youtube

Is this anyone here?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p12x52UzJsc&mode=related&search=

A $5K bike? Definitely not me. lol

I love Judge Judy

[edit]

Just finished watching it. Awesome. I love how the defendant at the end says they are "baffled" and then states "make sure your dog is on a leash at all times"

Damn straight.

And a 5k bike? Sure plenty of people own an expensive bike. I commute on a 2K full carbon bike. Then again my commute is 32 miles each way and is basically from one rural location to another so my "commute" is essentially the same roads that the weekend warriors ride.

-D

haha thats awesome how she calls the owner lady out on her bull****. according to that idiot you aren't allowed to be farther than 5 miles from your home on a bike I guess?

I hear that attitude too many times around here.

"stay on the trail"

"this is not a bike trail"

Always out the car window though and never in court........yet.

I would be willing to be those white trash rednecks do not have enough money to pay this settlement.

Their dog should be put to sleep.

Oh my God!! I love Judge Judy:beer:

i love the defense: "he was 40 miles from his own residence ... biking is dangerous"

what a couple of idiots.

This has been posted on here before, by the person doing the suing. I wonder if he'll drop by or this is all in my head.

I saw that episode.
Great stuff !!!

The 'defense' is priceless :rolleyes:
And we think we can convert these people ?

I used to hate courtroom TV.

:D

According to the defendant, it was the cyclists fault because he shouldn't be on the PUBLIC road. (Sigh)

This is a testament to the public school system in America.

According to the defendant, it was the cyclists fault because he shouldn't be on the PUBLIC road. (Sigh)

This is a testament to the public school system in America.

You mean parents in America

Yeah, may I point out as soon as school wants to teach logical workings, the parents threaten to take their kids out and throw them in a religious school. :)

ahhhhh....That makes my day...

I've been dealing with a dickhead DJ at Hamilton radio station who wrote some crap on his blog and it's gotten me a bit miffed...Seeing that video just made me smile because I know some people are just to stupid to realize how stupid they sound...

i love the defense: "he was 40 miles from his own residence ... biking is dangerous"

what a couple of idiots.

I wonder what their statement would have been re me? I've been as far out as 700 miles from my residence by bike ;)

Tom, i think their heads would have exploded at the thought ... nice blog by the way (and congrats!)

"They are not dangerous unless there is a dog off the leash." Love the response.

Judge Judy makes my skin crawl, but even a broken clock is correct twice a day.

A three-way with Judge Judy and Dr. Laura sounds like an exquisite flavor of hell, IMO.
Glad for the plaintiff.

"Minnesota has thousands of mile of bike trails." :)

I wonder what their statement would have been re me? I've been as far out as 700 miles from my residence by bike ;)

You should never do that it's dangerous.

You might run into a wolf or something ! :)

Oh man... cycling along the far right edge of the road in a narrow lane... "Wear your helmet. It saved my life." Wait until the rest of A&S hears about this one :D

Great clip! Thanks.

I had an encounter once where a dog made me go down. Dislocated my left pinkie. All the other fingers were pointing north and south, the pinkie east and west. Besides that, it scraped up my bar end pretty good, now a lasting memory. Anyway, I rode straight to a doctor's office where he pulled it back into joint and I never even considered going back to where the dog was. Not sure why. I guess I figured I should have been able to avoid it though I know it wasn't my fault. My expenses were minimal.

I like the woman's response at the end. "I'm baffled"

The only thing I would have changed... I would have actually liked her to have continued her "If I backed up and he ran into me" argument because she was about to stick her foot in her mouth up to the knee... I don't think she realized that the person backing up is virtually always at fault... :D

A three-way with Judge Judy and Dr. Laura...

It's scary that such a thought even entered your mind! :eek:

I liked how it would have only cost them $1,100 if they stepped up, but because they were idiots, it ended up costing them $3,000.

Edit: Imagine how much it would have cost the idiots in added premium cost, if the cyclist had filed a claim with their homeowners insurance, rather than going straight to small claims court.

That guy had the coolest handlebar tape!

For a bike that expensive in a crash, they are probably lucky to get away with only $3000.

The only thing I would have changed... I would have actually liked her to have continued her "If I backed up and he ran into me" argument because she was about to stick her foot in her mouth up to the knee... I don't think she realized that the person backing up is virtually always at fault... :D


Agree.

And I think they could've been sued more than $3000.

Is this anyone here?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p12x52UzJsc&mode=related&search=

The guy should have kept his $5k bike on the bike path where it belongs, like the lady says.


(see you on the bike path). If not, you are just askin' for it.




Clueless dog owners. A bit of exaggeration there too. "He was ridig 30-40mph from his home on a highway"? It looked more like a local street. Judge Judy didn't buy it. Great judgment on Judge Judy's part.

According to the defendant, it was the cyclists fault because he shouldn't be on the PUBLIC road. (Sigh)

This is a testament to the public school system in America.

Yeah, but didn't you just love the way Judge Judy defended cyclists on the street, even using the term "cyclist." Hoo Rah!

My question is do you think the attitude towards cyclists of these people (the dog owners) represent the attitude of the majority or minority of non-cyclists?

My personal experience is that their attitutde is that of the majority of non-cyclists.

My question is do you think the attitude towards cyclists of these people (the dog owners) represent the attitude of the majority or minority of non-cyclists?

My personal experience is that their attitutde is that of the majority of non-cyclists.

I tend to agree.

I have a little "litmus test" I do every now and then to check the pulse of the general public. In public situations where conversations can freely flow, I ask about cyclists on the road and what people think. I keep it simple, I simply seed the conversation and watch the results. I don't let on that I am a cyclist, I just want to see what most people think about cyclists... then in the end I may or may not inject that I am a cyclist.

The conversations and discussion show that the attitude of most is that first they have no idea that cyclists have rights to the road, and that most simply want cyclists out of the way. Period. Issues regarding taxes come up from time to time too.

Try it. See what you find the general public thinks about cyclists.

My question is do you think the attitude towards cyclists of these people (the dog owners) represent the attitude of the majority or minority of non-cyclists?

My personal experience is that their attitutde is that of the majority of non-cyclists.

I think her attitude was very telling. He was 30-40 miles from home on a bike. How dare he!!!!. There are 10 miles of bike paths. Why is he riding his bike in my neighborhood. By the way, I live right off the highway. No bikes on the highway. - quite a bit of exaggeration here. it looked more like a local road from the picture. It certainly wasn't an interstate highway. Why is the cyclist to assume blame for being where, in a non-cylist's opinion, he does not belong? Does he forfeit his civil rights because what he is doing what seems illogical? Does it excuse their being irresponsible with the way they handle their dog?

Some people still have their heads up their butts!!!!!!

Oh man... cycling along the far right edge of the road in a narrow lane... "Wear your helmet. It saved my life." Wait until the rest of A&S hears about this one :D

yeah, that's about as bad as the bozos saying he was far away from home and not on a bike path! :D

all cyclist shoudl be quaranteened at the local bike path. Enlist border patrols with orders to shoot to kill; to keep us where we belong.

My question is do you think the attitude towards cyclists of these people (the dog owners) represent the attitude of the majority or minority of non-cyclists?

My personal experience is that their attitutde is that of the majority of non-cyclists.
I'm not sure about the "general public", but I'd say it's true of the majority of dog owners. Have you not heard that Gizmo is a precious gift from the heavens above, and should be bound by neither leash nor law? Some people love their pets so much that they sometimes will completely disregard others (like leaving dog **** on sidewalks, paths, etc) and, seemingly, even not care about their dogs injuring others.

I don't know about a majority but I know there's plenty of folks out there who figure it just isn't necessary for a cyclist to be on the highway. If cyclists need exercise, there's plenty of better places to do it, like bike paths or roads with no cars.

That's obviously what this lady was thinking.

Lady was thinking...

"He's in tights, he looks like a ******, therefore he deserves what he gets."

:D

I wonder what their statement would have been re me? I've been as far out as 700 miles from my residence by bike ;)


I'm sorry Tom....everyone knows you fall of the edge of the world if you ride that far from home:p

My question is do you think the attitude towards cyclists of these people (the dog owners) represent the attitude of the majority or minority of non-cyclists?
.

Absolutley. And the more bike paths, and bike lanes we get, the more general people ( and possibly future lawmakers) will expect us to stay there.

I must say, the planitff played his cards well. He had all his info, he kept his answers straightforward, he didn't say anything when the others were being talked to.

The defendants weren't as bad as some on these shows, but they played the 'not all my fault' and 'bad similie' game. Real judges hate that, so TV judges go ballistic.

I remember back in the 80's a Judge Wapner case where a couple of college students hit a cyclist (it was a comparatively poor black man whose bike was $100) and acted stunned that they should be blamed for anything. Wapner wasn't a yeller but he was obviously annoyed with the students, whose attitude was basicly 'What's the big deal? We hit a poor black guy on a bike! There's loads more where he came from and what are they doing there in the first place?'.

The man had no injuries, but his bike was totalled. He didn't have a receipt for it, however, so Wapner awarded him only 80% of its value.

LOL...that was funny. Go Judy! But those defendants made me ashamed that I grew up in Minnesota. Really, we aren't all that stupid...

So...like...if I backs out of my driveway and kill a cyclist (who has the right of way anyway, but I'm too stoopid to notice) is I at fault? He shuldn't of been der anyhoo. Not 40 miles frum home!

The wife may be ********. That is all.

... Brad

Absolutley. And the more bike paths, and bike lanes we get, the more general people ( and possibly future lawmakers) will expect us to stay there.

If there is one they're going to believe we should be there instead of the road. It's the "not my fault" excuse, has nothing to do with them actually thinking about it.