djs_tx
08-23-03, 06:25 PM
I made myself ride a hand me down inexpensive bike for 1000miles before I blew a lot of money in a new hobby. Well I just rolled over 1k (in less than 6 months, not bad for a newbie) on my buddies 15 year old Le Mans Centurion.
So now I'm ready to spend some coin on a "good" road bike. I'm not a racer, most of my road riding is solo for the fitness / mental therapy aspect. I'm on the gulf coast so I have almost NO hills but I do plan on doing the occasional MS150 (Houston to Austin). I'm your typical stressed out professional with a demanding job, wife and kid so my primary goal is durability and low maintenance (keep in mind I'm on track to log 2k+ miles / year).
I went to my local LBS trying to make up my mind between the 2003 Trek 2000 (on sale for $999 this week) and the 2003 Trek 2200 (sale for $1429). 2000 was a "good enough" bike but I really liked the Bontrager wheelset since I seem to have a knack for hitting road trash and tweaking my rims (twice in 6 months). Anyway, they had a 2004 Trek 1500 on the wall. I had not seen this model but the componentry looked good for the price, $979 on sale.
http://www.trekbike.com/bikes/2004/road/1500.jsp
http://www.trekbike.com/bikes/2003/road/2000.jsp
So I'm enthusiastic but not terribly educated on the topic so I'm looking for some opinions. To me it looks like I get the same frame and componentry except I gain the good wheels (bontrager select) and also get an Ultegra rear derailleur and lose clipless pedals and get a bontrager crank instead of a 105.
Is the Bontrager crank anything to be concerned about? Should I upgrade the front derailleur to 105?
I wish I could ride one but they don't have a 1500 in the store yet. So I have to put down a deposit now to get the sale price (sale ends next week) and wait a few weeks for it to come in. If I don't like it they will happily credit my deposit towards a 2003 2000 at the sale price but there is no gaurantee they will have one left .
So you guys are my experts. I think the 1500 is a great bike for me, it has all the features of the 2000 except nicer wheels and RD in exchange for Bontrager crank and no clipless pedals (I already have clipless pedals). Is there something in the 1500 specs that should make me concerned? For $20 less, I'm leaning toward the 2004 1500.
thanks for your time.
David
So now I'm ready to spend some coin on a "good" road bike. I'm not a racer, most of my road riding is solo for the fitness / mental therapy aspect. I'm on the gulf coast so I have almost NO hills but I do plan on doing the occasional MS150 (Houston to Austin). I'm your typical stressed out professional with a demanding job, wife and kid so my primary goal is durability and low maintenance (keep in mind I'm on track to log 2k+ miles / year).
I went to my local LBS trying to make up my mind between the 2003 Trek 2000 (on sale for $999 this week) and the 2003 Trek 2200 (sale for $1429). 2000 was a "good enough" bike but I really liked the Bontrager wheelset since I seem to have a knack for hitting road trash and tweaking my rims (twice in 6 months). Anyway, they had a 2004 Trek 1500 on the wall. I had not seen this model but the componentry looked good for the price, $979 on sale.
http://www.trekbike.com/bikes/2004/road/1500.jsp
http://www.trekbike.com/bikes/2003/road/2000.jsp
So I'm enthusiastic but not terribly educated on the topic so I'm looking for some opinions. To me it looks like I get the same frame and componentry except I gain the good wheels (bontrager select) and also get an Ultegra rear derailleur and lose clipless pedals and get a bontrager crank instead of a 105.
Is the Bontrager crank anything to be concerned about? Should I upgrade the front derailleur to 105?
I wish I could ride one but they don't have a 1500 in the store yet. So I have to put down a deposit now to get the sale price (sale ends next week) and wait a few weeks for it to come in. If I don't like it they will happily credit my deposit towards a 2003 2000 at the sale price but there is no gaurantee they will have one left .
So you guys are my experts. I think the 1500 is a great bike for me, it has all the features of the 2000 except nicer wheels and RD in exchange for Bontrager crank and no clipless pedals (I already have clipless pedals). Is there something in the 1500 specs that should make me concerned? For $20 less, I'm leaning toward the 2004 1500.
thanks for your time.
David
Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.