Training & Nutrition - The differance between Cycle-ops & a nashbar or performance brand trainer?

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




N_C
08-28-03, 11:18 AM
I'm asking about the fluid trainers. Cycle-Ops, while being one of the best fluid trainers on the market is pretty expensive.

So I ask is the fluid trainers found in Nasbar and Performance Bike just as good while at a lot lower cost? Or does the lower cost also mean lower quality?

Or should I splurge and buy the Cycle-Ops Fluid II because it is the better one?

Thanks.


late
08-28-03, 11:33 AM
Hi,
I recently got a Kurt Kinetics trainer. Seems pretty good but my previous experience with them is nil plus zero. There are a bunch of trainer review at mtbreview.com and the Kinetics website has a couple I think.

roadbuzz
08-28-03, 07:19 PM
I'm not an expert... I've got a Performance TravelTrac Millenium, Fluid, Variable resistance, and it's the only trainer I've spent any time on. I have no major complaints. The resistance unit is spring loaded, so you can't adjust the pressure against the rear tire. I reduce tire pressure to prevent the rear tire slipping, which works okay. The resistance unit and frame support is good, I put about 1500 "miles" on mine last winter, everything from easy spinning to anaerobic intervals. I'm not sure the variable resistance is necessary. For major changes in resistance, I changed gears. I used the variable resistance for fine tuning. No bells or whistles, but a good product.

FWIW, the Performance trainers are rebranded Elites.
http://www.elite-it.com/jsp/c-Prodotti.jsp?ID=15%20f

Questions have been posted a number of times, there some good input.... search the T&N forum (that's Training & Nutrition, before Koffee busts me ;) ) over the last year or so.


mrfix
08-29-03, 05:34 AM
I have a cellar full of inexpensive trainers, some from nashbar, some from performance, all purchased when I was new at this. They are all very noisy and crude, the resistance is inconsistent and unpredictable. Just over Two years ago I bought a Cyclops fluid 2+, I have logged over 10,000 miles in my basement on this thing, it's quiet, it's consistent and feels about as close to the road as I think you can get. It gives a smooth steady workout and never has any issues. It's easy to clip the bike in and go. I built up a trainer road bike that doesen't have a front wheel, I use a fork stand to support the front of the bike, I geared the bike high with 2 step gearing, It saves my good bikes from the stresses of the trainer. I feel you can't go wrong with this one, it's money well spent if you want to keep up your conditioning when the weather goes south.

lotek
08-29-03, 08:41 AM
I have a Fluid 2, and if I'm not on rollers I'm on that.
The Kirk Kenetic is also very good unit.
I don't know about the nashbar and performance units but
on mine I don't have to set resistance, the unit is variable resistance and feels more "road like"

Marty

MKRG
09-27-03, 03:13 PM
I blew up the resistance unit on my cycle-ops fluid 2. I'm assuming my manliness just beat the poor thing until it just gave up. ;) Actually I'm thinking it was just a manufacturing defect or something. The point of the post is to say that it was replaced "no questions asked". I packed up the RU and sent it off to cycl-ops and a week later a new one showed up on the doorstep. So I just wanted to say that if standing behind their product is an issue in the old trainer debate, my vote is for cycle-ops. :thumbup: