Bicycle Mechanics - Basic question - swapping a cassette

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




Plainsman
11-12-07, 08:51 PM
This is my frist time swapping a cassette. Old one is off, new one is on. Lockring says 40 n-m. I have no idea how that should feel, so is the torque critical, or do I just hand tighten it and ride?


HillRider
11-12-07, 08:57 PM
The torque isn't critical but 40 N-m is 29 ft-lb which is quite a lot. It's way more than hand tight so bear down rather firmly on the locknut tool.

Plainsman
11-12-07, 09:23 PM
Thanks for the help HillRider!


dvs cycles
11-13-07, 07:04 AM
This is my frist time swapping a cassette. Old one is off, new one is on. Lockring says 40 n-m. I have no idea how that should feel, so is the torque critical, or do I just hand tighten it and ride?It is critical as far as not overtightening. if you under tighten you will probably have the lock ring come loose eventually.
Get a torque wrench.;)

I_bRAD
11-13-07, 08:22 AM
Get a torque wrench.;)
"Good and tight" is just fine for a cassette lockring.

tellyho
11-13-07, 10:02 AM
Torque wrench is totally unnecessary. Whoops, I shouldn't have said that. Just crank it down.

cyccommute
11-13-07, 12:00 PM
It is critical as far as not overtightening. if you under tighten you will probably have the lock ring come loose eventually.
Get a torque wrench.;)

The lockring probably won't come loose under normal working conditions unless it's really loose to begin with. I put mine on and tighten so that I hear two or three clicks as it engages with the cassette. You can get it on too tight...trust me:(

Philatio
11-13-07, 12:53 PM
The lockring probably won't come loose under normal working conditions unless it's really loose to begin with. I put mine on and tighten so that I hear two or three clicks as it engages with the cassette. You can get it on too tight...trust me:(
two or three? Is that all? Now I'm worried I've been over tightening....

Al1943
11-13-07, 01:21 PM
I think it depends on the particular cassette and lockring but I know for sure that 2 or 3 clicks would not be enough on any of my cassettes, not even close.

For my old arm "quite a bit" is the right answer. And be sure that the smallest cog is properly aligned with the splines.

Al

Philatio
11-13-07, 01:25 PM
I think it depends on the particular cassette and lockring but I know for sure that 2 or 3 clicks would not be enough on any of my cassettes, not even close.

For my old arm "quite a bit" is the right answer. And be sure that the smallest cog is properly aligned with the splines.

Al
that makes me feel better. I have an SRAM, and 2 or 3 clicks would be extremely loose. I would estimate that when I tighten it to feel snug enough, roughly 45lb (with 8 in wrench), I hear 20-30 clicks.

Bill Kapaun
11-13-07, 01:59 PM
that makes me feel better. I have an SRAM, and 2 or 3 clicks would be extremely loose. I would estimate that when I tighten it to feel snug enough, roughly 45lb (with 8 in wrench), I hear 20-30 clicks.

+1
Mine starts clicking a good 1/2 turn before it gets snug. Maybe 3-4 clicks after "tight".

vasracer
11-13-07, 02:08 PM
You really can't go by clicks because every cassette is different. We usually put the cassette tool in a vise and spin the wheel on that and continue until it's tight. Maybe it's just me but you get a feeling in your wrist and know when to stop.

vpiuva
11-13-07, 02:38 PM
+1
Mine starts clicking a good 1/2 turn before it gets snug. Maybe 3-4 clicks after "tight".

+1 Hope this is what cyc intended

cyccommute
11-13-07, 02:49 PM
that makes me feel better. I have an SRAM, and 2 or 3 clicks would be extremely loose. I would estimate that when I tighten it to feel snug enough, roughly 45lb (with 8 in wrench), I hear 20-30 clicks.

That's a whole bunch. It doesn't need to be that tight. I keep it on the loose side so that I can remove it in the field if I have to. I have Sram 9 speed too and never found I had to do much more then just snug it up. I never have had one work loose.

vasracer
11-13-07, 03:16 PM
The problem with having the cassette loose is 1. the lockring can come off unexpectedly and 2. the cogs can shift slightly and gouge the hub body. These two thing might or might not happen its all a matter of hub body material and cassette combination. But having the lockring loose is never a good idea.

Philatio
11-13-07, 03:27 PM
That's a whole bunch. It doesn't need to be that tight. I keep it on the loose side so that I can remove it in the field if I have to. I have Sram 9 speed too and never found I had to do much more then just snug it up. I never have had one work loose.
Alright, I'm going to loosen it up. Thanks alot :)

edit: I loosened fully and reinstalled. I took it 1/2 a turn after the clicking started. I think I must've been off with the "20-30" clicks - it was roughly the same spot I had it before.

Anyways, thanks again. Glad to know my stuff is right.

Al1943
11-13-07, 03:29 PM
the cogs can shift slightly and gouge the hub body.

+1

Loose cogs can damage aluminum freehub bodies as well as rattle annoyingly.

Al

cyccommute
11-13-07, 04:52 PM
The problem with having the cassette loose is 1. the lockring can come off unexpectedly and 2. the cogs can shift slightly and gouge the hub body. These two thing might or might not happen its all a matter of hub body material and cassette combination. But having the lockring loose is never a good idea.

My lockring isn't loose. But it's doesn't have to be on as tight as you can get on a vise. Once it is threaded on and makes contact with the cassette, I don't find you need to tighten it past about a 1/8 to 1/4 turn. If the cassette rattles or is loose, then certainly it needs to be tightened further. But if the cassette isn't moving, I find you don't need to over do it.

vasracer
11-13-07, 04:58 PM
I'm no saying your wrong, but you must take into account that a chain puts alot more pressure and tension, side to side, than your hand can ever exert. If the lock ring is just snug and the cassette does not move with a light tug of your hand that does not mean that the chain with not move the cogs on your hub body and tear it apart. It's better to tighten it slightly more and be sure that the cassette will not move at all.

dvs cycles
11-13-07, 05:53 PM
What's so hard about getting a torque wrench and using it?
If you plan on working on your own bike at least be professional about it.
The old days you could just crank on things and not worry but todays components
are more fragile and should be torqued properly.
If you dis agree, I'm sorry. It's your bike and sometimes body that can be damaged.
Do what you like but a torque wrench IS GOOD ADVICE.

kenhill3
11-13-07, 07:48 PM
Hey all- 40 nanometers is indeed 'pretty damn tight'. I use a good torque wrench when really necessary but for this I just don't bother. I've wrenched bikes for like 14 years. Put the spline tool in and secure with a skewer, put a 15" crescent on it and tighten 'pretty damn tight', which usually is about 1/2 turn maximum after hand tight. Done. All parts greased and NEVER an issue with removal.

BikingGrad80
11-13-07, 08:45 PM
remember to grease the locknut.

artemidorus
11-13-07, 09:32 PM
I agree with those posters maintaining that 40Nm is much too tight. I use 5-10 Nm routinely and have never had a lockring loosen. I find that if I've had a rear wheel worked on by a mechanic, the next time I go to loosen the lockring, I need to fasten the cassette tool onto the lockring with a skewer to allow me to wield enough force to crack the lockring. 40Nm seems just so unnecessary with steel freehubs. (My comments are not necessarily applicable to alloy freehubs, as I've never used one.)

kenhill3
11-13-07, 10:09 PM
I agree with those posters maintaining that 40Nm is much too tight. I use 5-10 Nm routinely and have never had a lockring loosen. I find that if I've had a rear wheel worked on by a mechanic, the next time I go to loosen the lockring, I need to fasten the cassette tool onto the lockring with a skewer to allow me to wield enough force to crack the lockring. 40Nm seems just so unnecessary with steel freehubs. (My comments are not necessarily applicable to alloy freehubs, as I've never used one.)

Thanks. You & others have convinced me to back off on the amt. of torque. 40 nm is definitely overkill.

Joshua A.C. New
11-14-07, 01:47 PM
Kenhill, that's Newton-Meters. N-M. Nm is a terribly small measure of distance.

kenhill3
11-14-07, 02:09 PM
Kenhill, that's Newton-Meters. N-M. Nm is a terribly small measure of distance.

Joshua-

Thanks for correction. I glossed right over that distinction. I don't believe there is any need in bike mechanics to measure in nanometers, joules, avogadro's number, any of that silly scientific stuff!

Joshua A.C. New
11-15-07, 08:30 AM
Yeah. I'm still suspicious when my caliper tells me a part is sized in non-whole millimeters.

Joules *are* useful. It's the amount of power over time! Watts/seconds! It's what biking's all about! (Not that I don't have to look that up every time it comes up...)

And Avogadro's Number describes the amount of snottiness my wife experiences when she goes in the bike shop downtown!

See? There's all sort of science things in bikes!

artemidorus
11-15-07, 05:58 PM
Kenhill, that's Newton-Meters. N-M. Nm is a terribly small measure of distance.
Sorry to be pedantic, but Nm is correct, NM is wrong.

Joshua A.C. New
11-15-07, 06:51 PM
Huh! Look at that! We're all wrong (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton_metre)! N·m or N m. Space or dot, lower-case "m". Google also has a lot of N-m. In any event, Nm is "nanometer".

Wikipedia, if I may paraphrase, says "Newton-meter something something joule something." So now I know better!

artemidorus
11-15-07, 07:03 PM
Huh! Look at that! We're all wrong (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton_metre)! N·m or N m. Space or dot, lower-case "m". Google also has a lot of N-m. In any event, Nm is "nanometer".

Wikipedia, if I may paraphrase, says "Newton-meter something something joule something." So now I know better!
No, "nm" is nanometer. That is why the dot or space in "Nm" is unnecessary.

Joshua A.C. New
11-16-07, 09:12 AM
Sum*****! You're right (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanometer)!

From now on, I'm using N m for all my measurements!

rydaddy
11-16-07, 10:03 AM
Joules *are* useful. It's the amount of power over time! Watts/seconds! It's what biking's all about! (Not that I don't have to look that up every time it comes up...)


Since we are getting all scientific I will point out that a Watt is a Joule/Second.

Power = Energy/Time

Joshua A.C. New
11-16-07, 10:43 AM
Your mom's all scientific. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joule)

rydaddy
11-16-07, 10:53 AM
Joules *are* useful. It's the amount of power over time! Watts/seconds

Wrong! A Joule is a unit of energy.


Watts/seconds

Wrong again! Energy/Time is Power (ie Joule/Sec = Watts).

Learn about it (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watt) and then come at me with something better than a 'yo momma' joke. :rolleyes:

kenhill3
11-16-07, 01:40 PM
I think I'll leave and let the 'scientists' finish this thread.

graeme
11-17-07, 03:52 AM
Kenhill, that's Newton-Meters. N-M. Nm is a terribly small measure of distance.

Nm is newton metres
nm is nanometres
A lower case for a proper noun for a unit spelt out eg newton, joule , upper case for N, J