Thoughts on the Jamis Coda Sport and Jamis Coda?

[PHS1]

From what folks may know, is the steel frame a big advantage in the Jamis Coda line (and I like Jamis because they seem to provide a very solid product at a very fair price)? This is what keeps cropping up in my research for a hybrid bicycle - go with a lighter bike (which means no suspension fork) and a steel frame and fork for the most comfort, which is why I am now focused on the Coda Sport and Coda as my priorities as a newbie who wants to get back on a bicycle (50 years old, 6'0", 200 pounds, and in decent shape from two to three weight circuit training workouts per week for over 30 years) to ride mostly on pavement but with the capability to do light (rather than mountain) paths and trails.

In addition, as I continue to pinch pennies in attempting to squeeze this bicycle out as a Christmas present from the family, are the Coda Sport (MSRP $600) components worth the extra $125 over the Coda (MSRP $475) in your view?

Specifically, we are talking about the same frame, headset, fork, tires, rims, spokes, seat posts, tape, and brakes between the two. But the wheels are different (Shimano Road 2200 hubs versus Formula sealed alloy QR hubs), the derailleurs are different (Shimano Deore rear and Shimano R453-A bottom pull front versus Shimano Acera rear and Shimano C-102 bottom pull front), the shift levers are different (Shimano ST-440 for flat-bar versus SRAM TRX Unilever trigger-shift), the chains are different (KMC Z9000 versus KMC Z-82), the cassettes are different (SRAM PowerGlide 950, 9-speed, 11-32 versus Shimano CS-HG40, 8-speed, 11-32), the cranksets are different (FSA Vero Triple, 50/39/30 versus RPM alloy triple, 48/38/28), the BB sets are different (FSA Sealed Cartridge versus Sealed Cartridge BB), the pedals are different (full alloy platform type versus platform type, steel cage/resin body), the handlebars and stems are different (Ritchey Alloy flatbar and Ritchey Comp Adjustable stem versus alloy flatbar and alloy adjustable stem), the saddles are different (Selle San Marco Elba versus Jamis Touring with SL top and satin steel rails), and the weights are slightly different (25.75 pounds versus 26.50 pounds).

I am hoping to use this bicycle for pavement, paths, and trails without having to change the setup. Are the 700x28c Vittoria Zaffiro tires going to be acceptable for this? I almost wish a somewhat wider tire (700x32c or 700x35c or 700x38c) came standard, plus something that was puncture resistant.

Thanks for any input and advice.

[simsi]

I bought a 2006 model Coda Sport a little over a year ago and have been extremely happy with it (I no longer used wanted a mountain bike with suspension - it was overkill for the riding I do). I bought it for on-road commuting, which the 28 mm tyres handle really well, but wanted to be able to put on wider tyres for trail riding. It can take 35 mm tyres without a problem, which is about as wide as I want to put on. Also, the 9-speed transmission keeps it in line with the rest of the fleet, so no need to keep additional spares.

The only gripe, that adjustable stem. While I haven't swapped it, I certainly have never adjusted it, it does creak under the slightest force and so needs a regular dose of silicon spray to keep it quiet. Oh, yes, I also use a different saddle (Selle Italia Flite) and SPD pedals.

In conclusion, I think that the Coda Sport is a better bike and is worth that extra over the Coda.

Ian

[pushthatpedal]

i heard jamis coda is worth your money... get it bro, it always nice to reminisce that old feeling of holding your newly acquired bike... yeah...

[pushthatpedal]

i've heard jamis coda is worth your money... get one now, it's so nice to reminisce that feeling of holding that newly acquired bike... wooh...