Foo - OT: stencils/graffiti/stickers

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




Pages : [1] 2

View Full Version : OT: stencils/graffiti/stickers


mr.pickles
02-06-08, 11:20 AM
Show your stencil art, paste-ups, graffiti, stickers or plain old tags. It could be outdoors, indoors, on your mess bag, bike or whatever. I'm curious to see what street art peeps are doing. I'll kick things off.

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44/marc0s/450581592_l.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44/marc0s/450581664_l.jpg


sp00ki
02-06-08, 12:20 PM
http://bikeforums.net/report.php?p=6118716
http://bikeforums.net/report.php?p=6118716
http://bikeforums.net/report.php?p=6118716
http://bikeforums.net/report.php?p=6118716
http://bikeforums.net/report.php?p=6118716
http://bikeforums.net/report.php?p=6118716
http://bikeforums.net/report.php?p=6118716
http://bikeforums.net/report.php?p=6118716
http://bikeforums.net/report.php?p=6118716

FYI: there's an entire subforum dedicated to stuff that's not about bikes (http://bikeforums.net/forumdisplay.php?f=199). As far as i know, you can't ride a sticker collection.
If you need to post about non cycling stuff on a cycling forum, consider doing it there.

deathhare
02-06-08, 12:21 PM
Yeah but OT is the new MASH.


sp00ki
02-06-08, 12:23 PM
OT was like three weeks ago, and rendered the ssfg useless.

fetch
02-06-08, 12:24 PM
gg l2p crai moar?!

deathhare
02-06-08, 12:25 PM
OT was like three weeks ago, and rendered the ssfg useless.



It has a use? :)

sp00ki
02-06-08, 12:28 PM
speaking of OT, you listed your panasonic under the catagory "Item Specifics - BMX Bikes & Frames" on ebay. not sure if you did this intentionally, but as someone who's impulse bought by catagory browsing, i think you may want to update your listing...

ThunderChunky
02-06-08, 12:33 PM
but how will the ssfg community know about his mad street skillz if he posts in foo?

deathhare
02-06-08, 12:33 PM
Thats weird. It shouldnt have been there. I had trouble with my browser listing it and had to re-list it. Maybe i ****ed that up.
Thanks.

edit: Thanks again, i changed it. :)

doofo
02-06-08, 12:50 PM
speaking of OT, you listed your panasonic under the catagory "Item Specifics - BMX Bikes & Frames" on ebay. not sure if you did this intentionally, but as someone who's impulse bought by catagory browsing, i think you may want to update your listing...

deathhare when will you understand that track bikes just arent for tricks

?

deathhare
02-06-08, 12:54 PM
:)

Tom Stormcrowe
02-06-08, 12:58 PM
Speaking of Foo, welcome to Foo ;)

jsharr
02-06-08, 01:04 PM
One of my jobs at work is to design and print all the UPC stickers and shipping labels for our products. They are pretty boring though, so I really won't post any unless ya'll really want to see a upc label for a foam football.

dirtyphotons
02-06-08, 01:05 PM
srsly pickles. straighten up, fly right, and start being interested in sewing and vegan cooking. then you may return to ss/fg

Tude
02-06-08, 01:07 PM
One of my jobs at work is to design and print all the UPC stickers and shipping labels for our products. They are pretty boring though, so I really won't post any unless ya'll really want to see a upc label for a foam football.

Balls :( Are there any still left alive?

jsharr
02-06-08, 01:08 PM
We probably only have a hundred thousand on the floor right now. Were you needing something specific?

Tude
02-06-08, 01:12 PM
:(


Traveling balls Seņor ...

jsharr
02-06-08, 01:16 PM
Sadly, my work in that arena is done. I set them free and ya'll killed them. I even set loose a second and third wave of explorers, and they too vanished from the annals of recorded history. The death of a traveling ball is such a waste.

jsharr
02-06-08, 01:19 PM
Here are some exciting shots of labels in their natural state in my office.

http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r162/jsharr/upclabels002.jpg

http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r162/jsharr/upclabels001.jpg

http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r162/jsharr/upclabels003.jpg

Tude
02-06-08, 01:31 PM
Sadly, my work in that arena is done. I set them free and ya'll killed them. I even set loose a second and third wave of explorers, and they too vanished from the annals of recorded history. The death of a traveling ball is such a waste.


:(

<sniff> I took him barhoppin ...

http://img106.imageshack.us/img106/6750/barhoppinballvv8.jpg

Took him to my favorite liquor store ...

http://img125.imageshack.us/img125/5233/sgarageqp2.jpg

Zorro tried to kill it but we rescued it ...

http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/9989/letsseehowfar1lx8.jpg

And had to recoup at bar ...

http://img131.imageshack.us/img131/6759/snestrestaurantni8.jpg


<sob> poor ball!

fuzzbox
02-06-08, 02:32 PM
http://i26.tinypic.com/2hi55p1.jpg

http://i32.tinypic.com/esniww.jpg

ms.gio
02-06-08, 02:41 PM
I like the first one fuzz. :)

fuzzbox
02-06-08, 03:18 PM
Thanks.

RWK!

ajay677
02-07-08, 09:12 AM
Show your stencil art, paste-ups, graffiti, stickers or plain old tags. It could be outdoors, indoors, on your mess bag, bike or whatever. I'm curious to see what street art peeps are doing. I'll kick things off.

You mean immature, idiotic, adolescent, criminal, vandal, tagger, peeps?

botto
02-07-08, 09:17 AM
You mean immature, idiotic, adolescent, criminal, vandal, tagger, peeps?

http://www.maj.com/gallery/DanElHombre/smilies/popcorn.gif

markhr
02-07-08, 09:22 AM
You mean immature, idiotic, adolescent, criminal, vandal, tagger, peeps?

potentially rich immature, idiotic, adolescent, criminal, vandal, tagger, peeps

http://www.banksy.co.uk/

http://www.woostercollective.com/images/2006/02/2006_1_banksy3.jpg

ajay677
02-07-08, 09:41 AM
potentially rich immature, idiotic, adolescent, criminal, vandal, tagger, peeps

http://www.banksy.co.uk/

http://www.woostercollective.com/images/2006/02/2006_1_banksy3.jpg

Excellent! Deep pockets to pick. Nothing like having the person responsible, pay for the removal of their own "art".

markhr
02-07-08, 10:16 AM
Excellent! Deep pockets to pick. Nothing like having the person responsible, pay for the removal of their own "art".

it's very funny over here - every time a pissed off local council/authority paints over one :D there's a lot of protest noise from the "artsy fartsy crowd" (I can draw therefore I is one :o ). Inspite of the fact that it's graffiti and technically vandalism :rolleyes:

ajay677
02-07-08, 11:14 AM
it's very funny over here - every time a pissed off local council/authority paints over one :D there's a lot of protest noise from the "artsy fartsy crowd" (I can draw therefore I is one :o ). Inspite of the fact that it's graffiti and technically vandalism :rolleyes:

Most of what we have in my community is just rubbish, tags mostly. Hard to consider it art. Simply, I prefer these "artists" to keep their "art" off my property.

ajay677
02-07-08, 11:20 AM
My favourite grafitti site:

http://www.dougweb.com/clean.html

ajay677
02-07-08, 11:23 AM
My current favourite.

fuzzbox
02-07-08, 03:24 PM
Don't post if you are here to hate. It just makes you look dumb posting things like goof off.

skinnyone
02-07-08, 03:27 PM
Banksy kicks A

dmotoguy
02-07-08, 04:35 PM
Most of what we have in my community is just rubbish, tags mostly. Hard to consider it art. Simply, I prefer these "artists" to keep their "art" off my property.

business owners abroad cherish a Banksy and have been pissed when it was removed or covered.

markhr
02-07-08, 04:49 PM
Don't post if you are here to hate. It just makes you look dumb posting things like goof off.

Fuzzbox take note ;)

http://www.banksy.co.uk/outdoors/images/landscapes/rats/solittletosay.jpg

edit: a graffiti dis-liker (hate being too strong a word as at least they can draw - you've no right to call yourself an artist unless you can draw realistically - anyone can and it's very easy to learn too) qouting a graffiti "artist" to a graffiti-phile....where's the irony in that :rolleyes:

botto
02-08-08, 02:52 AM
Fuzzbox take note ; )

h ttp://www.banksy.co.uk/outdoors/images/landscapes/rats/solittletosay.jpg

edit: a graffiti dis-liker (hate being too strong a word as at least they can draw - you've no right to call yourself an artist unless you can draw realistically - anyone can and it's very easy to learn too) qouting a graffiti "artist" to a graffiti-phile....where's the irony in that :ro lleyes:

incorrect.

markhr
02-08-08, 03:08 AM
incorrect.

Given how incredibly easy it is to teach yourself to draw realistically please explain?

The primary tool of any competent artist is sketching out ideas. If they're so inept they can't even take the time to learn to draw properly then how would they ever convey their message clearly.

Even conceptual and performance artists need to do realistic sketches for scenes, layouts and any construction when preparing for the next show.

botto
02-08-08, 03:27 AM
Given how incredibly easy it is to teach yourself to draw realistically please explain?

you miss the point.


The primary tool of any competent artist is sketching out ideas.

not necessarily.


If they're so inept they can't even take the time to learn to draw properly then how would they ever convey their message clearly.

words.


Even conceptual and performance artists need to do realistic sketches for scenes, layouts and any construction when preparing for the next show.

incorrect.

twahl
02-08-08, 04:13 AM
Don't post if you are here to hate. It just makes you look dumb posting things like goof off.

As opposed to soliciting the worship of vandalism.

markhr
02-08-08, 04:51 AM
you miss the point.

not necessarily.

words.

incorrect.

Please explain?

How so?

Please describe, without referring to any other image (since we're using words only), a simple line drawing so that it can be reproduced as accurately as possible.

Here's a random one from "teh interwebz"

http://inkstink.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/michelle3.jpg

Please explain?

botto
02-08-08, 04:56 AM
Please explain?

How so?

Describe, without referring to any other image (since we're using words only), a simple line drawing please.

sorry, but i don;t mix work with play.

Here's a random one from "teh interwebz"

htt p://inkstink.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/michelle3.jpg

Please explain?

I'll let Sol Lewitt (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sol_LeWitt) explain:


Sentences on Conceptual Art

1. Conceptual artists are mystics rather than rationalists. They leap to conclusions that logic cannot reach.

2. Rational judgements repeat rational judgements.

3. Irrational judgements lead to new experience.

4. Formal art is essentially rational.

5. Irrational thoughts should be followed absolutely and logically.

6. If the artist changes his mind midway through the execution of the piece he compromises the result and repeats past results.

7. The artist's will is secondary to the process he initiates from idea to completion. His wilfulness may only be ego.

8. When words such as painting and sculpture are used, they connote a whole tradition and imply a consequent acceptance of this tradition, thus placing limitations on the artist who would be reluctant to make art that goes beyond the limitations.

9. The concept and idea are different. The former implies a general direction while the latter is the component. Ideas implement the concept.

10. Ideas can be works of art; they are in a chain of development that may eventually find some form. All ideas need not be made physical.

11. Ideas do not necessarily proceed in logical order. They may set one off in unexpected directions, but an idea must necessarily be completed in the mind before the next one is formed.

12. For each work of art that becomes physical there are many variations that do not.

13. A work of art may be understood as a conductor from the artist's mind to the viewer's. But it may never reach the viewer, or it may never leave the artist's mind.

14. The words of one artist to another may induce an idea chain, if they share the same concept.

15. Since no form is intrinsically superior to another, the artist may use any form, from an expression of words (written or spoken) to physical reality, equally.

16. If words are used, and they proceed from ideas about art, then they are art and not literature; numbers are not mathematics.

17. All ideas are art if they are concerned with art and fall within the conventions of art.

18. One usually understands the art of the past by applying the convention of the present, thus misunderstanding the art of the past.

19. The conventions of art are altered by works of art.

20. Successful art changes our understanding of the conventions by altering our perceptions.

21. Perception of ideas leads to new ideas.

22. The artist cannot imagine his art, and cannot perceive it until it is complete.

23. The artist may misperceive (understand it differently from the artist) a work of art but still be set off in his own chain of thought by that misconstrual.

24. Perception is subjective.

25. The artist may not necessarily understand his own art. His perception is neither better nor worse than that of others.

26. An artist may perceive the art of others better than his own.

27. The concept of a work of art may involve the matter of the piece or the process in which it is made.
28. Once the idea of the piece is established in the artist's mind and the final form is decided, the process is carried out blindly. There are many side effects that the artist cannot imagine. These may be used as ideas for new works.

29. The process is mechanical and should not be tampered with. It should run its course.

30. There are many elements involved in a work of art. The most important are the most obvious.

31. If an artist uses the same form in a group of works, and changes the material, one would assume the artist's concept involved the material.

32. Banal ideas cannot be rescued by beautiful execution.

33. It is difficult to bungle a good idea.

34. When an artist learns his craft too well he makes slick art.

35. These sentences comment on art, but are not art.

__________________________

btw - that's not a "simple line drawing", it's a hamfisted drawing with shading.

Indyv8a
02-08-08, 07:41 AM
Just another foo thread with some kooky guy riding a donkey jabbing sticks in the side of a wind driven grain mill.

ajay677
02-08-08, 07:50 AM
Just another foo thread with some kooky guy riding a donkey jabbing sticks in the side of a wind driven grain mill.

Come on over to P&R, the home of "windmill tilting".

markhr
02-08-08, 09:21 AM
Please explain?

How so?

Please describe, without referring to any other image (since we're using words only), a simple line drawing so that it can be reproduced as accurately as possible.

Here's a random one from "teh interwebz"

http://inkstink.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/michelle3.jpg

...

Botto? still no answer?

markhr
02-08-08, 09:32 AM
So, Botto, you dug out a reference which appears to say that as long as you can think it it's art from someone else?

Either you believe that just by thinking you are creating art and, being obtuse, that implies that sitting in an infinitely large black, lightless box, with no physical action while thinking [apathy clearly being the wrong word] is art?

I'd have to say that art needs to be shared to be art just as noises in the forest are not necessarily noises unless there's an ear to hear them?


...

[snip]

...
__________________________

btw - that's not a "simple line drawing", it's a hamfisted drawing with shading.

...and the deliberately chosen drawing, though out of proportion in a few places, is a line drawing with no tonal areas. I could choose a technical drawing should you prefer to describe that?

Please describe, without referring to any other image (since we're using words only), a simple line drawing so that it can be reproduced as accurately as possible.

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~garthz/research/uniroo/legdesign.gif

Edit: stupid user posted wrong link

botto
02-08-08, 10:18 AM
Botto? still no answer?

time for a visit to the optometrist.

http://bikeforums.net/showpost.php?p=6129067&postcount=41

markhr
02-08-08, 10:21 AM
time for a visit to the optometrist.

http://bikeforums.net/showpost.php?p=6129067&postcount=41

I thought you''d skate on that one :rolleyes::roflmao:

botto
02-08-08, 10:25 AM
So, Botto, you dug out a reference

no digging necessary.

if you don't know who sol lewitt is, then you should cut you losses with the 'discussion' right away.


which appears to say that as long as you can think it it's art from someone else?

sure, why not?


Either you believe that just by thinking you are creating art and, being obtuse, that implies that sitting in an infinitely large black, lightless box, with no physical action while thinking [apathy clearly being the wrong word] is art?

if you say so.


I'd have to say that art needs to be shared to be art

and many would agree with you.


just as noises in the forest are not necessarily noises unless there's an ear to hear them?

deep.


...and the deliberately chosen drawing, though out of proportion in a few places, is a line drawing with no tonal areas. I could choose a technical drawing should you prefer to describe that?

Please describe, without referring to any other image (since we're using words only), a simple line drawing so that it can be reproduced as accurately as possible.

htt p://www.cs.cmu.edu/~garthz/research/uniroo/legdesign.gif

Edit: stupid user posted wrong link

you did a reasonable enough job:


...and the deliberately chosen drawing, though out of proportion in a few places, is a line drawing with no tonal areas. I could choose a technical drawing should you prefer to describe that?

anyway, it's clear that you don't get it. that's fine.

markhr
02-08-08, 10:56 AM
Still sliding Botto?

http://komplexify.com/math/images/CircularReasoning.gif

botto
02-08-08, 11:00 AM
Still sliding Botto?

[IM G]ht tp://komplexify.com/math/images/CircularReasoning.gif[/IMG]

nothing to 'slide' from.