Bicycle Mechanics - Compact Vs. Regular chain rings
Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
02-11-08, 03:04 PM
I just got me a sweet new road bike but it has horribly small chain rings...Compact stuff I am use to riding Huge Rings 53 X 42. Will this screw up my ride? I have yet to ride it do to weather..Can I just go to regular sized rings? Help..
02-11-08, 03:27 PM
With a given cassette, the difference between a compact and standard double will be that for each gear combo, the compact will be a little lower gear.
Give it a try and see how you like it. You can compare the setup you are used to to the current setup here: http://sheldonbrown.com/gears/. You may find the compact crank with an 11-23T cassette gives you about the same (or better) range with the benefit of overall lower weight.
02-11-08, 04:36 PM
As a general rule of thumb 3 teeth in the front is about the same difference in gear inches as 1 tooth in the rear. So approximately 50/17 should be about the same as 53/18 as an example. It's actually 79.4 inches versus 79.5
Ultimately you end up running one cog higher at the rear and thats about the only difference.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.