PDA

View Full Version : Adding a Forum?



Script
03-25-08, 05:18 AM
How does one go about getting a new forum added? I believe it's time to add a Bikelane, Bikeway, Facilities Advocacy forum under Advocacy and Safety. Trying to have a rational dialogue about the subject is not possible now when any question is attacked by the VC Advocates. :)

East Hill
03-25-08, 09:04 AM
Well, you've done the first step--asking :D .

There certainly are a lot of heated debates in A & S, which is why the VC subforum was set up.

Eventually one of the Admins will come by and take a look at your post, and I am sure they will mull it over.

East Hill

Roody
03-25-08, 09:27 AM
How does one go about getting a new forum added? I believe it's time to add a Bikelane, Bikeway, Facilities Advocacy forum under Advocacy and Safety. Trying to have a rational dialogue about the subject is not possible now when any question is attacked by the VC Advocates. :)

I thought they started the VC sub-subforum so that facility advocates could have their one-sided discussions in the regular A&S subforum. Is this not working for you?

Script
03-25-08, 03:40 PM
I thought they started the VC sub-subforum so that facility advocates could have their one-sided discussions in the regular A&S subforum. Is this not working for you?

Who are you talking about? Evidently you are a staunch VC'er.

If you read my posts, you'll find that I support compromise and common sense.

What is your agenda?:)

Roody
03-25-08, 04:13 PM
Who are you talking about? Evidently you are a staunch VC'er.

If you read my posts, you'll find that I support compromise and common sense.

What is your agenda?:)

I don't really have an agenda. Frankly, I don't really care and I wish I had never written that post. Bicycle advocacy is dead in America, as far as I can tell. Sorry to hijack your thread. Good luck on getting your subforum.

Tom Stormcrowe
03-25-08, 05:47 PM
It's not dead, just kind of mired in right now and suffering anomie. Just hit the report button with VC topics outside VC and we'll move them, if they truly are a VC topic, and not just a slight short deviation into VC land.

I don't really have an agenda. Frankly, I don't really care and I wish I had never written that post. Bicycle advocacy is dead in America, as far as I can tell. Sorry to hijack your thread. Good luck on getting your subforum.

East Hill
03-25-08, 05:55 PM
It's not dead, just kind of mired in right now and suffering anomie.

That's because HH is visiting in P & R :) .

In the meantime, how about Script's suggestion for a Bikelane, Bikeway, Facilities Advocacy forum?

East Hill

barba
03-25-08, 06:01 PM
What is the point of setting up ever more narrow echo chambers of opinion?

I am not much of a fan of A&S. It seems rife with trolls and is a dreadful advocate for cycling. If it serves as a sandbox to have the same old fight in, I would just let people have at it.

East Hill
03-25-08, 06:15 PM
What is the point of setting up ever more narrow echo chambers of opinion?

I am not much of a fan of A&S. It seems rife with trolls and is a dreadful advocate for cycling. If it serves as a sandbox to have the same old fight in, I would just let people have at it.

It's a source of great fun for moderators :) .

East Hill

Roody
03-25-08, 07:42 PM
I think a lot of novice riders come to this forum looking for practical advice on safe ways to ride their new bikes. Worries about safety are one of the main concerns that hold people back from doing more cycling, be it for recreation, fitness or transportation. I bet that a lot of new members here go to the A&S forum first, before they go anywhere else. I know I did, years ago.

But what a newbie will find in A&S are mainly a lot of repetitious quibbles about how great or how terrible bike lanes are. I know that issue is important on some level, and a lot of articulate people have fun debating it. I don't think we should (or even could) get rid of this stuff. But I also don't think it should be the first thing that newbies run across when they're looking for serious information about keeping themselves or their kids safe on bikes. I vote that we should make an "Advocacy" forum or a "Bicycle Philosophy" forum for the regulars to play in as they do now. But I'd also like to see a separate "Safety" forum that newbies can come to and learn about riding bikes.

Here's an example of what I mean. I recently started a thread on A&S called something like "Practical Tips for Riding on Snow and Ice". I specifically requested that nobody argue or rant, just pass along tips from their own experience, as well as any questions they might have. This thread got a lot of replies that I think would be beneficial to anyone who wanted to try winter riding for the first time.

So, I guess I do have an agenda after all. I think that there should be two forums. One should be a playground (as somebody else said) for people to argue about BL and VC and all the other ABCs. But the main forum should be a Safety forum, geared toward helping cyclists ride safely in whatever facilities or non-facilities they find.

East Hill
03-25-08, 07:47 PM
So, kind of a

"Arguments over trivial crap forum"

versus

"Stuff to keep you safe out there forum"

East Hill

barba
03-25-08, 07:49 PM
I agree Roody.

The forums in general are a fantastic resource and a great advocate for cycling as a part of ones lifestyle. A&S would lead you to believe that you will be killed. I doubt it is all that reassuring to the new cyclist that stumbles onto it.

Roody
03-25-08, 09:17 PM
So, kind of a

"Arguments over trivial crap forum"

versus

"Stuff to keep you safe out there forum"

East Hill

Yes, thanks. I tend to use too many words. :)

Roody
03-25-08, 09:20 PM
I agree Roody.

The forums in general are a fantastic resource and a great advocate for cycling as a part of ones lifestyle. A&S would lead you to believe that you will be killed. I doubt it is all that reassuring to the new cyclist that stumbles onto it.

Yes. Either you will be killed, or you will become so angry that you will kill the next bike advocate that you see. :D

Tom Stormcrowe
03-25-08, 09:42 PM
Roody, that's why we created the VC Subforum, so that there would be a place for the "Great Debate", theoretically leaving A&S for nonVC Argument topics. I think a lot of novice riders come to this forum looking for practical advice on safe ways to ride their new bikes. Worries about safety are one of the main concerns that hold people back from doing more cycling, be it for recreation, fitness or transportation. I bet that a lot of new members here go to the A&S forum first, before they go anywhere else. I know I did, years ago.

But what a newbie will find in A&S are mainly a lot of repetitious quibbles about how great or how terrible bike lanes are. I know that issue is important on some level, and a lot of articulate people have fun debating it. I don't think we should (or even could) get rid of this stuff. But I also don't think it should be the first thing that newbies run across when they're looking for serious information about keeping themselves or their kids safe on bikes. I vote that we should make an "Advocacy" forum or a "Bicycle Philosophy" forum for the regulars to play in as they do now. But I'd also like to see a separate "Safety" forum that newbies can come to and learn about riding bikes.

Here's an example of what I mean. I recently started a thread on A&S called something like "Practical Tips for Riding on Snow and Ice". I specifically requested that nobody argue or rant, just pass along tips from their own experience, as well as any questions they might have. This thread got a lot of replies that I think would be beneficial to anyone who wanted to try winter riding for the first time.

So, I guess I do have an agenda after all. I think that there should be two forums. One should be a playground (as somebody else said) for people to argue about BL and VC and all the other ABCs. But the main forum should be a Safety forum, geared toward helping cyclists ride safely in whatever facilities or non-facilities they find.

donnamb
03-25-08, 09:44 PM
What is the point of setting up ever more narrow echo chambers of opinion?

I am not much of a fan of A&S. It seems rife with trolls and is a dreadful advocate for cycling. If it serves as a sandbox to have the same old fight in, I would just let people have at it.
I agree with you, barba, but I'd also like to point out that we've had some small improvements since the VC subforum was created. Remember that the more people give A&S a chance and participate, the more diluted the trolls will become. :)

We're not going to split A&S any further. If bike lane/bike facilities/bikeway threads are being majorly hijacked by passionate supporters of VC, please report them. We will deal with it.