Singlespeed & Fixed Gear - KMC SuperLite 1/8" chain: h/nh?

Does/has anyone run the kmc 1/8" superlite chain?
If so, how does it run? Is it compatible with masterlink type links?

http://www.benscycle.net/images/KMC%20SuperLite%20Silver.jpg

not sure on the master link questions. the 710 has a slotted plate master link.

the ride is great though, and it is a pretty and quiet chain in my experience (paired with a new EAI cog)

fantastic, thx.

the 710s i just got in the post two days ago have a clip-type (three piece) master link. i don't know why the 710SL would be different.

i run a KOOL chain, not the SL. its smooth and quiet. it came with a masterlink, but i don't use it.

i absolutely love this chain.
however i dont use a masterlink, so i can't answer that part.

i think i might have to buy this. i currently have the chain with extra thick side plates, and that thing weighs a ton. grr

1/8" and Superlite. Does the term 'contradictio in termini' also exist on your site of the ocean?

i'm guessing you read the topic title and posted, instead of researching anything about the chain in mention (hollow pinned, drilled, reduced material on plates, et al).

does "hi i have a reading disability" exist on yrs?

I'm still wondering what "h/nh" means.

hot/not hot

If you like to run a decidedly non super "lite" chain and slow **** on your bike. That's the chain to buy.

Brooks 4 lyfe

i'm guessing you read the topic title and posted, instead of researching anything about the chain in mention (hollow pinned, drilled, reduced material on plates, et al).

does "hi i have a reading disability" exist on yrs?

Your so consistant! I love it!

This chain looks wonderful but I dont have a drop of advice for you.

i'm guessing you read the topic title and posted, instead of researching anything about the chain in mention (hollow pinned, drilled, reduced material on plates, et al).

does "hi i have a reading disability" exist on yrs?

Whoa, easy horsy! :D

I was reacting to the comments above. It's just stupid, buying a 'light' track chain, because it's lighter. And no, I don't have a reading disability. It's one of the few things i'm not disabled in.

My point: if you want a light chain because your current one weighs a ton, go find another hobby. Or buy a 10 speed chain. Track chains are heavy, and for a purpose. If you think the superlite chain performs better, okay. But at what cost? Don't believe all the marketing crap. I doubt you (or anyone) can feel a big difference. If you do, and i'm wrong, let me know.

If you think it looks cool, buy one.

it's really not about cool.
here are two things i've learned in my (few) years of cycling:
1) 3/32" chains on a fixed gear drivetrain stretch faster than 1/8" chains
2) 1/8" chains are heavy. not unreasably so, but noticeably nonetheless.

i found out about a 1/8" chain which has its "unnecessary" portions removed. I put unnecessary in quotes, as i'm can't be sure that the reduced portions won't put it in category #1, hence my OP.
If this chain is both light and durable, it's not a bad way to spend 25 dollars. There's nothing contradictory about that.

it's really not about cool.
here are two things i've learned in my (few) years of cycling:
1) 3/32" compatible chains on a fixed gear drivetrain stretch faster than 1/8" compatible chains
2) 1/8" chains are heavy. not unreasably so, but noticeably nonetheless.

i found out about a 1/8" chain which has its "unnecessary" portions removed. I put unnecessary in quotes, as i'm can't be sure that the reduced portions won't put it in category #1, hence my OP.
If this chain is both light and durable, it's not a bad way to spend 25 dollars. There's nothing contradictory about that.

Given the way chains wear and "stretch", I am not sure that a 3/32" chain would wear out any faster.

i should say, they have in my experience.
i agree that they "shouldn't" as the only difference between the two is the space between the plates, but this has been what i've found. i use a tool to check my chain every month or so; 3/32 has worn out substantially faster, so i no longer use 3/32 drivetrains. I haven't given it enough thought to explain why...

ED: has anyone else experienced the same? i don't want to be responsible for doling out bad advice.

it's really not about cool.
here are two things i've learned in my (few) years of cycling:
1) 3/32" chains on a fixed gear drivetrain stretch faster than 1/8" chains
2) 1/8" chains are heavy. not unreasably so, but noticeably nonetheless.

i found out about a 1/8" chain which has its "unnecessary" portions removed. I put unnecessary in quotes, as i'm can't be sure that the reduced portions won't put it in category #1, hence my OP.
If this chain is both light and durable, it's not a bad way to spend 25 dollars. There's nothing contradictory about that.

I think we are on the same line here (don't know if that's the correct way to say it in English). You want a chain that lasts longer and is not as heavy as a normal 1/8" chain. 25 dollars isn't that expensive, so I would try it. My only concern is that the chain with less metal stretches just as fast as a 3/32" chain. But you'll have to find out.

yep. i ordered it (for my girlfriend). she rides daily, i'll let you know how it fares.