Mountain Biking - Lightweight?

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.




View Full Version : Lightweight?


Austin_
05-04-08, 10:58 PM
What would be considered "lightweight" for a mountain bike?

Also, what do you guys think about Reynolds 631?


BenLi
05-04-08, 10:59 PM
What would be considered "lightweight" for a mountain bike?

Also, what do you guys think about Reynolds 631?

Are you talking about frame materials? Or other components? Or general weight?

Austin_
05-04-08, 11:10 PM
I'm talking about overall weight. I'm looking at one that weighs in at around 24-25 pounds (my current bike weighs closer to 32). Most hardtails are pretty light...I think, so I assume most of the weight comes from the other parts.


Svr
05-05-08, 04:07 AM
What would be considered "lightweight" for a mountain bike?



For a cross country hardtail? Maybe 22 pounds.

What is considered "lightweight" also depends on the category of mountain bike -- XC, All-mountain, Trail, Freeride, Downhill, Trials....etc.

patentcad
05-05-08, 06:29 AM
My own personal MTB skills are rather lightweight. Does that help?

indygreg
05-05-08, 06:58 AM
22-24 is fairly light for an XC hardtail. Sub 22 is starting to get light and expensive. Sub 20 is starting to get exotic.

Full suspension . . . I am not sure. I think a 25 full suspension XC bike is fairly light.

Terrapin Ben
05-05-08, 09:54 AM
google "weight weenies" if you want to know light.

jsharr
05-05-08, 10:12 AM
Anything without lbd's is lightweight in my book.

ZeCanon
05-05-08, 10:23 AM
If we're talking xc, lightweight is under 22lbs or so. My race bike comes in a little under 20.

Bike Lover
05-05-08, 01:00 PM
22-24 is fairly light for an XC hardtail. Sub 22 is starting to get light and expensive. Sub 20 is starting to get exotic.

Full suspension . . . I am not sure. I think a 25 full suspension XC bike is fairly light.

Agreed. You can certainly do better than 25 for FS but it'll cost you too.

kramnnim
05-05-08, 05:34 PM
24 pounds is fairly light for one with a 631 frame...

patentcad
05-05-08, 05:42 PM
My new Fly Ti hard tail is 21 lbs complete with cages, heavier tires (Conti Explorer 2.1"), computer and pedals. Lightest hard tail I've ever had.

mcoine
05-05-08, 09:14 PM
My new Fly Ti hard tail is 21 lbs complete with cages, heavier tires (Conti Explorer 2.1"), computer and pedals. Lightest hard tail I've ever had.

For future reference, we weigh our bikes with pedals(crazy.. I know), but most of us don't use cages or computers.

ProFail
05-05-08, 10:18 PM
For future reference, we weigh our bikes with pedals(crazy.. I know), but most of us don't use cages or computers.

I use one cage, since I hate carrying Camelbacks and avoid it as often as possible. 5 pounds of water wreaks havoc on my little old back.

BenLi
05-05-08, 10:20 PM
I use one cage, since I hate carrying Camelbacks and avoid it as often as possible. 5 pounds of water wreaks havoc on my little old back.

...at the ripe old age of 14 :p

elf 232
05-06-08, 09:13 AM
I use one cage, since I hate carrying Camelbacks and avoid it as often as possible. 5 pounds of water wreaks havoc on my little old back.

haha i carry like 12 pounds of water in and use almost all of it for a 15 mile ride.

i might just strap a 5 gal industrial bucket to my back with a hose leading out of it, then slap some camelbak decals onto the side.

Bike Lover
05-06-08, 12:33 PM
This might help with the 5 gals:

http://media.rei.com/media/a/1531528.jpg

free_pizza
05-06-08, 12:40 PM
haha i carry like 12 pounds of water in and use almost all of it for a 15 mile ride.

where do you find room for five and a half litres?

mcoine
05-06-08, 01:24 PM
I hate carrying Camelbacks

Me too, thats why I use a hydrapak.

indygreg
05-06-08, 03:29 PM
haha i carry like 12 pounds of water in and use almost all of it for a 15 mile ride.

i might just strap a 5 gal industrial bucket to my back with a hose leading out of it, then slap some camelbak decals onto the side.

If you are drinking over a gallon of water for a 15 mile ride you are mostly certainly overhydrating. Which can be very bad. Well, this is assuming 15 miles is less than 2 hours in length.

ProFail
05-06-08, 05:51 PM
...at the ripe old age of 14 :p

:p

I have back and joint pain. I may have the mind of a fourteen year-old, but I might as well join 66.



:D I'm jay-playin'.

ed
05-06-08, 06:10 PM
My new Fly Ti hard tail is 21 lbs complete with cages, heavier tires (Conti Explorer 2.1"), computer and pedals. Lightest hard tail I've ever had.

Coming from a 32lb dually, I feel like my 26lbs hardtail is a featherweight.

Mine doesn't have any of that schmancy computer crap or cages. (mine has balls though, hahahaha)

xcracer13
05-06-08, 06:16 PM
haha i carry like 12 pounds of water in and use almost all of it for a 15 mile ride.

i might just strap a 5 gal industrial bucket to my back with a hose leading out of it, then slap some camelbak decals onto the side.

Still waiting for that pick elfy boy.

ProFail
05-06-08, 06:46 PM
By the way, when is Elf going to show us that eight foto drop?

patentcad
05-06-08, 06:53 PM
For future reference, we weigh our bikes with pedals(crazy.. I know), but most of us don't use cages or computers.

For future reference, bicycle industry weight figures are routinely quoted by manufacturers without pedals. MTB or road bicycles.

mcoine
05-06-08, 07:08 PM
For future reference, bicycle industry weight figures are routinely quoted by manufacturers without pedals. MTB or road bicycles.

First, please post some examples.

Second, when I said we, I meant mountain bikers, not manufacturers.

patentcad
05-06-08, 07:14 PM
First, please post some examples.

Second, when I said we, I meant mountain bikers, not manufacturers.

You MTB dudes do smoke a lot of weed. Find your own examples knobby boy. Pcad has better BFers to snipe with than you.

mcoine
05-06-08, 07:15 PM
You make an awful lot of bad assumptions.

patentcad
05-06-08, 07:21 PM
You make an awful lot of bad assumptions.

I'll be the judge of that.

ProFail
05-06-08, 07:22 PM
I'll be the judge of that.

You have to earn your clout here, PCad. :p

mcoine
05-06-08, 07:32 PM
I'll be the judge of that.

Another bad assumption.

ed
05-06-08, 07:38 PM
Pcad has better BFers to snipe with than you.

Another 3rd person reference...I AM gonna start calling you "Jimmy".

(and quit being such a dork)
I mean that in the best way possible;)

indygreg
05-07-08, 07:47 AM
Typically higher end bikes do not come with pedals, so the maker is not going to quote weights with pedals.

cryptid01
05-07-08, 08:00 AM
I looked at Specialized's website - they quote weights for their pedals but not for complete bikes.

What gives?

indygreg
05-07-08, 08:25 AM
Almost every maker is out of the weight reporting game. It is a no win situation for them so they all stopped.
#1 some were less than accurate. As in they lied.
#2 many were less than fully accurate . . . as in they use a smaller sized bike or maybe a slight tweak in parts
#3 there always will be variances. If they report it, they might get litigation if they do not meet it

mcoine
05-07-08, 08:29 AM
I looked at Specialized's website - they quote weights for their pedals but not for complete bikes.

What gives?

Thats the weight you have to add to the "higher end bikes" weight that was measured without pedals.

Where to find these manufacturer claimed weights for complete mountain bikes without pedals is still a mystery though.

idcruiserman
05-07-08, 08:31 AM
My Razorback was 26lbs, and it was very light at the time (2000). Of course the frame broke :).

indygreg
05-07-08, 08:43 AM
Thats the weight you have to add to the "higher end bikes" weight that was measured without pedals.

Where to find these manufacturer claimed weights for complete mountain bikes without pedals is still a mystery though.

I guess I am not following your post. He was saying specialized does not give weights for bikes. With or without pedals. Most makers are this way these days.

As part of this thread and looking around, I am surprised that many decent MTB come with pedals. Why is this? Road bikes do not as I recall. This is so that you can put the pedals you want on it. Is it that so many MTB'ers ride and SPD variant that they come with them?

born2bahick
05-07-08, 08:54 AM
I think it's a safety issue. Bikes intended for road use are supposed to have reflectors on the pedals.
Selling with no pedals might be a way around this for the manufactorers.

indygreg
05-07-08, 09:30 AM
I strongly believe a bike over $1500 should NOT include pedals. At that point most buyers are going to ride clipless and they have their own preference. There are many options, so you cannot please everyone. As such, I do not want to pay for pedals that I will not use.

never
05-07-08, 11:37 AM
Where to find these manufacturer claimed weights for complete mountain bikes without pedals is still a mystery though.

I've seen weights for complete bikes both with and without pedals. For an example of bikes without pedals, you can check out the Santa Cruz bike builder. It has the weight of each bike with the various options and none of the build kits are supplied with pedals (even though they are pictured).

elf 232
05-07-08, 09:33 PM
If you are drinking over a gallon of water for a 15 mile ride you are mostly certainly overhydrating. Which can be very bad. Well, this is assuming 15 miles is less than 2 hours in length.

Im just messin, but i do drink down a 3 liter/ 100 oz pack on a 15-18 mile ride and its always under 2 hours, my friends on their 20lb carbons make sure of that :(. I drink a sip here and there, whenever i feel my mouth getting dry, im a runner so i know my drinking limit fairly well.