Fifty Plus (50+) - Young'ns Thread

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
Everybody is welcome to post here. We're inclusive, because we know that everyone is young at heart.
Tom Bombadil
05-14-08, 07:19 PM
This thread is too syrupy sweet.
Like THAT will last.... I just thought I'd give the ol' pendulum a push in a positive direction before all heck broke loose.
Little Darwin
05-14-08, 07:27 PM
You like me... You really like me!!!! :D
Yes!
Now we have to think of something to talk about. Sigh.
1) I like my Scott Cheyenne better than my Atlantis.
2) Horseback riding hurts worse than bike riding.
3) Possums are the ugliest roadkill.
Tom Bombadil
05-14-08, 09:01 PM
1) I like my Scott Cheyenne better than my Atlantis.
:eek::eek::eek:
Possums are the ugliest roadkill.
They make up for it by being so tasty.
cranky old dude
05-15-08, 12:12 AM
3) Possums are the ugliest roadkill.
Ya sure they were dead?:D
Digital Gee
05-15-08, 01:35 AM
When can we order jerseys? :innocent:
aqua4her
05-15-08, 04:24 AM
I tossed and turned all night worrying about this whole divisive age thing going on here.
Over the last 2 days I've ridden 62 miles and wondered if that would qualify me for an "I've almost ridden their age in two days." post. It was such a relief to awake to the this Young'ns Thread.
The Weak Link
05-15-08, 05:09 AM
"Young at heart" is a loathsome expression. It invariably translates into "old coot".
I'll have none of it.
maddmaxx
05-15-08, 05:21 AM
"Young at heart" is a loathsome expression. It invariably translates into "old coot".
I'll have none of it.
Ok then...................your a middle aged coot!
Wow! A thread called loathesome AND syrupy sweet! My job is done!
Beverly
05-15-08, 07:18 AM
1)
3) Possums are the ugliest roadkill.
I prefer them over skunk roadkill:eek:
qcpmsame
05-15-08, 07:21 AM
I prefer them over skunk roadkill:eek:
Especially if the oppossum is still nice and warm or the asphalt is keeping it good and hot, burrrrp:innocent:.
Bill
My obsessive summertime fear is that a ripe, swollen, several-days-dead raccoon will be run over by a car and that I, riding along in proximity to the car and raccoon (minding my own business) , will be sprayed with hot roadkill juices!
Timtruro
05-15-08, 07:33 AM
Everybody is welcome to post here. We're inclusive, because we know that everyone is young at heart.
Let 'em get their own damn forum, with their rap music and tattoos, they have not respect because they are too busy eating junk food and playing game boy. :notamused:
Timtruro
05-15-08, 07:34 AM
[
3) Possums are the ugliest roadkill.[/QUOTE]
has anyone ever sen a live possum??
BluesDawg
05-15-08, 08:06 AM
has anyone ever sen a live possum??
Yes. And if you think they are ugly when they are dead in the road...:twitchy:
qcpmsame
05-15-08, 10:11 AM
[
3) Possums are the ugliest roadkill.
has anyone ever sen a live possum??[/QUOTE]
Usually when they are racing an armadillo from the road side to underneath a car or truck tire to see which one can get a tire track over them first.
Bill
Road Fan
05-15-08, 10:14 AM
I tossed and turned all night worrying about this whole divisive age thing going on here.
Over the last 2 days I've ridden 62 miles and wondered if that would qualify me for an "I've almost ridden their age in two days." post. It was such a relief to awake to the this Young'ns Thread.
I'm 54, you've already ridden my age in 2 days!
Can't we all just get along? I'm gong over to the 55 1/2 forum. Maybe I'll find I have something in common with those good folks.
Never trust anyone over 56!!
stapfam
05-15-08, 01:31 PM
Can't we all just get along? I'm gong over to the 55 1/2 forum. Maybe I'll find I have something in common with those good folks.
Never trust anyone over 56!!
Just what I keep saying- Youngsters have no respect for their elders.
Now go to your room and read your comics---and NO supper.
swan652
05-15-08, 03:53 PM
[has anyone ever sen a live possum??
Usually late at night when I walk out onto my back porch when the lights are off and I least
expect it. :eek:
Hobartlemagne
05-15-08, 03:55 PM
Im only 34, but my curmudgeonly attitude fits in well around here
Tom Bombadil
05-15-08, 06:21 PM
Im only 34, but my curmudgeonly attitude fits in well around here
Says who?
:saweeet:
maddmaxx
05-15-08, 07:07 PM
Im only 34, but my curmudgeonly attitude fits in well around here
Hey..............you kids...................get off the grass!
SuperDave
05-15-08, 07:12 PM
I'm only 49.
My bike has triple chainrings.
With cages, not cleats.
Go ahead. Flame me. I read the Road Bike forum. I can take it.
I'm only 49.
My bike has triple chainrings.
With cages, not cleats.
Go ahead. Flame me. I read the Road Bike forum. I can take it.
ME TOO!
Jet Travis
05-15-08, 07:32 PM
I'm only 49.
My bike has triple chainrings.
With cages, not cleats.
Go ahead. Flame me. I read the Road Bike forum. I can take it.
Years: 49
Chainrings 3
TOTAL 51
THAT MAKES YOU 50+ BY ANYONE'S MATH. YOU'RE IN.
Tom Bombadil
05-15-08, 07:39 PM
Years: 49
Chainrings 3
TOTAL 51
:rolleyes:
Okay, am I missing the obvious?
:rolleyes:
Okay, am I missing the obvious?
:lol:
BUT! If that logic is valid... I'm 47 with 3 rings. Which just* puts me in!
Jet Travis
05-15-08, 08:11 PM
:rolleyes:
Okay, am I missing the obvious?
There you go again, foolishly trying to think you're way through one of my posts. Trust Solveg. She has a woman's intuitive grasp of my artistic rendering of silly things like numbers.
Tom Bombadil
05-15-08, 08:11 PM
:lol:
BUT! If that logic is valid... I'm 47 with 3 rings. Which just* puts me in!
You are at least 329 in dog years.
Jet Travis
05-15-08, 08:14 PM
You are at least 329 in dog years.
I've always said it: Tom Bombadil knows what a woman wants to hear.
:rolleyes:
Okay, am I missing the obvious?
How about this for a rationalization - the chain's got to be on one of those 3 rings, so whichever one the chain's on doesn't count?:D
- Bob
I am 201 in dog years. The 7 year:1 year thing isn't really accurate.
http://www.onlineconversion.com/dogyears.htm
Tom Bombadil
05-15-08, 08:54 PM
That calculator is wrong too. There is no standard conversion, as not all breeds of dogs have the same longevity expectation.
I submit that the on-line calculator is no more accurate than the old 7:1 assumption. For the average person lives to roughly 75. Using their calculator, the average dog would have to live to 15.5 for it to be accurate. But the fact is that few dogs live that long. The average across all dog breeds is closer to 12-13.
Here is a chart of expected lifespan by dog breed:
http://www.dog-answers.com/Dog-Longevity-by-Breed.html
Tom Bombadil
05-15-08, 09:01 PM
So in Pomeranian years, 47 would translate to 235 years
In Great Dane years, you are 376.
That calculator is wrong too. There is no standard conversion, as not all breeds of dogs have the same longevity expectation.
I submit that the on-line calculator is no more accurate than the old 7:1 assumption. For the average person lives to roughly 75. Using their calculator, the average dog would have to live to 15.5 for it to be accurate. But the fact is that few dogs live that long. The average across all dog breeds is closer to 12-13.
Here is a chart of expected lifespan by dog breed:
http://www.dog-answers.com/Dog-Longevity-by-Breed.html
That chart is very accurate!
Well, help me out here, because I have kind of a headache and not energetically thinking tonight. The actual way of converting years would be to compress human age to adulthood into when dogs reach adulthood, which is between 1.5-3 years if you go to when a dog's growth stabilizes and he's not expected to gain any more weight. So those years are weighted probably 10-1. Then you'd have to take the years remaining of the average lifespan and prorate them to the average lifespan of the human. There would be some male/female thing to consider there.
Then there would be some math magic that would happen to combine the ratio pre-adulthood with the ratio post-adulthood, which is beyond me right now.
Help?
Tom Bombadil
05-15-08, 09:08 PM
The simplest way is to simply find a ratio between the expected longevity of a particular dog and that of a human. So if a dog breed lives to 10 and a person to 75, then you use 7.5. I really don't see much reason to make it more complex.
A dog who is 5 has lived half of its expected life, as has a human who is 37.5. Although neither of those statements is accurate either, as for both dogs and humans, if you avoid dying from infant death causes and accidents at a young age, your life expectancy changes.
As its just a silly approximation anyway, I see no reason to overthink it.
The simplest way is to simply find a ratio between the expected longevity of a particular dog and that of a human. So if a dog breed lives to 10 and a person to 75, then you use 7.5. I really don't see much reason to make it more complex.
A dog who is 5 has lived half of its expected life, as has a human who is 37.5. Although neither of those statements is accurate either, as for both dogs and humans, if you avoid dying from infant death causes and accidents at a young age, your life expectancy changes.
As its just a silly approximation anyway, I see no reason to overthink it.
So, why am I thinking that if we go back 30 years, dogs lived longer, and the average was indeed 7:1, but now it's more like 5:1?
We would have had some great conversations in college, Tom.
You want to rehash skin tone?
Tom Bombadil
05-15-08, 09:26 PM
So, why am I thinking that if we go back 30 years, dogs lived longer, and the average was indeed 7:1, but now it's more like 5:1?
I would bet that dogs had shorter lives 30 years ago, given that vets do far more to prolong the life of a dog than they used to.
Technically even if dogs and humans lived shorted lives 30-50 years ago, the ratio could have been higher then. Consider the following:
Let's say humans now live 75 and dogs live 12: Ratio is 6.25:1
In the past let's say humans lived to 68 and dogs to 10: Ratio is 6.8:1.
The 7:1 probably stems from people living to around 70 and dogs living to around 10.
Jet Travis:
I like your new avatar, but the saddle height looks a little high.
No contest ( I actually had to make the dead possum photo kinda cute, because the original dead possum was so incredibly gross--it's still no contest):
Dead Possum:
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/44/138250017_240d914e39.jpg
Live Possum:
http://www.buzdor.com/_images/grapepossum.jpg
Road Fan
05-16-08, 09:40 PM
That calculator is wrong too. There is no standard conversion, as not all breeds of dogs have the same longevity expectation.
I submit that the on-line calculator is no more accurate than the old 7:1 assumption. For the average person lives to roughly 75. Using their calculator, the average dog would have to live to 15.5 for it to be accurate. But the fact is that few dogs live that long. The average across all dog breeds is closer to 12-13.
Here is a chart of expected lifespan by dog breed:
http://www.dog-answers.com/Dog-Longevity-by-Breed.html
Occam's razor: If you're doomed to be wrong anyway, at least keep it simple?
road fan
Occam's razor: If you're doomed to be wrong anyway, at least keep it simple?
road fan
That's the most logical thing I've read in a long time!!!!
DnvrFox
05-17-08, 04:56 AM
Im only 34, but my curmudgeonly attitude fits in well around here
NOT ALLOWED!
EVERYONE is allowed in this thread!!!!!
:welcome
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.