General Cycling Discussion - How good is a 1994 Cannondale Super V 3000 by todays standards?
Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
05-29-08, 01:37 AM
I have a 1994 Super V 3000 mountain bike that I just started riding again. I rode it relatively regularly for about 6 years. No hardcore mountain biking, mostly paved surfaces and occasionally off-road trails. It was sitting in a garage for about 8 years, and I just started riding it again, so it's in quite good condition for it's age.
So is a 1994 Cannondale Super V 3000 considered a good bike by today's standards?
Any responses will be appreciated.
05-29-08, 01:41 AM
If it was a good bike then, it's a good bike now.
Sure, some of the parts are a little outdated,but if they do the job.. they do the job.
There is nothing wrong with it. Yes, dual suspension bikes have changed designs, but that doesn't make your Super V any less ridable.
The only thing I'd do is to check the pivots for wear, as well as the usual checks on the drivetrain (cables/housings, chain, brakes, tires, wheels in some decent true state, etc.)
The only bad thing about V bikes (I have one myself) is that people assume they are cheap because of all the X-Mart junk bikes that use a similar shape.
If you really like that bike, you could always give it a "second wind" by component upgrades such as Avid Single Digits so you have V-brake stopping power.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.