jhodder
07-07-08, 12:28 PM
Thought that I would post this and see what others think. I personally think that taking away the radios would be great. Let the teams battle it out on the road without managers and strategists yammering at them the entire time. Always seemed rediculous to me to have a coach telling them what to do the entire race.
Force the team captains to make the calls on their bikes as the race develops and the following would probably happen:
Breaks would not get caught with nearly today's frequency (no computers and GPS in team cars)
More favorites would be able to sneak into breaks
More riders would have to drop back to the cars to talk to managers (favorites would not just sit-in the entire race)
Less team-to-team deals during the stage (pull in the break for us today and we'll let you into a break tomorrow)
More rider-to-rider deals during the stage (enter the rotation for me, and I'll give you $10K if I win)
More racers would hit the wall during the stages, especially climbs
Unfortuantely, there would also likely be more crashes as team cars couldn't warn the racers about every obstacle that they may encounter up ahead.
Thoughts?
msu2001la
07-07-08, 12:39 PM
Just about every other sport I can think of allows coaching during the game. I'm not sure why cycling would be any different.
jhodder
07-07-08, 12:42 PM
However, US football won't let coaches talk the QB in the middle of a play. What cycling does is similar to the coach watching the monitor in the skybox telling the QB which receiver is open.
rogue9607
07-07-08, 01:36 PM
Tennis and AVP are two that come to mind where the coaches are not allowed communication during a match. (correct me if I'm wrong) Not that they have any direct relation to the TdF. I've been amazed at the ability of the peleton to catch a break in the closing km of a stage, but often find myself wondering what the sport would look like if that communication was severed and the strategy decisions fell to the riders. Seems like an interesting concept to me.
UnsafeAlpine
07-07-08, 01:42 PM
I'm not sure if it's still the case, but rugby coaches used to sit in the stands.
merlinextraligh
07-07-08, 01:52 PM
However, US football won't let coaches talk the QB in the middle of a play. What cycling does is similar to the coach watching the monitor in the skybox telling the QB which receiver is open.
NFL Quaterbacks have headsets in the helmets.
mcoomer
07-07-08, 02:15 PM
I would like to see the radios out of the team cars. I think that instant access to information has taken some of the edge out of the racing. It's certainly taken away the element of surprise. There's virtually no way for one of the race contenders to get out on a break and make things really interesting. Anyone that gets near to or off the front gets the radios going and he is quickly shut down. Take the radios out of the cars and make the riders manage the race.
Before race radios breaks were still caught and directors were still able to communicate with their teams.
Race motos would still display the time gap on a chaulkboard to the peloton and they would be able to do the math on what to do to catch the breakaway. Domestics would be used again to run messages between the D.S. and the team and they would also be used for scouting. This might mean an overall lowering of the peloton speed.
The leadership abilities of each team's top man would become a bigger factor.
DLBroox
07-07-08, 02:20 PM
I would like to see the radios out of the team cars. I think that instant access to information has taken some of the edge out of the racing. It's certainly taken away the element of surprise. There's virtually no way for one of the race contenders to get out on a break and make things really interesting. Anyone that gets near to or off the front gets the radios going and he is quickly shut down. Take the radios out of the cars and make the riders manage the race.
+1
UnsafeAlpine
07-07-08, 03:26 PM
I would like to see the radios out of the team cars. I think that instant access to information has taken some of the edge out of the racing. It's certainly taken away the element of surprise. There's virtually no way for one of the race contenders to get out on a break and make things really interesting. Anyone that gets near to or off the front gets the radios going and he is quickly shut down. Take the radios out of the cars and make the riders manage the race.
After what happened today, is that really accurate?
Ironic Mullet
07-07-08, 06:00 PM
NFL Quaterbacks have headsets in the helmets.
Which can only be used in between plays, which is the distinction that jhodder made.
huhenio
07-07-08, 06:05 PM
info is info ... who cares how is it delivered?
Ironic Mullet
07-07-08, 06:18 PM
info is info ... who cares how is it delivered?
Could you print this thread and mail it to me each time there's a new post?
Laggard
07-07-08, 06:19 PM
Hate car to rider radios!! Hate hate hate them. They do nothing good for the sport. You ever wonder why there are less successful breaks today compared to years past? It's all because of car-rider radios and even worse, televisions in team cars.
They've taken a lot of excitement out of racing.
The equivalent in the NFL would be if coaches looking down at the field could speak to QBs and tell them which receivers are open.
I'd like to see the radio's go away, but maybe they have for a short period of 50% of the stage distance, then your on your own. The team is issued a frequency and at the point in the race, they get jammed. The race directors would scan them to make sure no one is cheating...*snickers*, but it a thought.
2wheeled
07-07-08, 10:10 PM
Lemond is a fervent proponent against using them. He's always said that he would not have won the tour in '89 if they were in use. He talked about how he wound up the pace towards the end to take more time from Fignon.
I would agree that winning breaks are less successful nowadays but not sure if that because of radios or because there are more sprinter's teams in the peloton.
40 Cent
07-07-08, 10:27 PM
Could you print this thread and mail it to me each time there's a new post?
One more like that and we'll call you Rhetorical Question Mullet.
Suzie Green
07-07-08, 11:49 PM
I would like to see the radios out of the team cars. I think that instant access to information has taken some of the edge out of the racing.
And make Tiger Woods carry his own clubs too.
Pedaleur
07-07-08, 11:59 PM
"It was great for the morale and the team, but a stage win would have been cool," confessed 27 year-old Frischkorn, who is a member of one of two USA teams in the Tour de France this year. "I had thought of attacking right when the first attack went [by Dumoulin], but my directeur was in the ear-piece saying, 'Don't pull now, careful of Dumoulin.'"
bigtruck
07-08-08, 12:07 AM
I'm not sure if it's still the case, but rugby coaches used to sit in the stands.
They still mostly sit in the stands but have radios etc and send messages out via the water carriers
OP , I think it would be awesome but have no doubt its not going to happen
grudgemonkey
07-08-08, 07:17 AM
Seems to me it works well as a team sport with team support.
Cycle_logical
07-08-08, 07:19 AM
I read in the Cycling Sport magazine that it's only a rumor.. however, it's actually illegal to ride your bike with your iPod (or cassette player, depending on preference ^^).
PhateX1337
07-08-08, 07:52 AM
NFL Quaterbacks have headsets in the helmets.
Right, and they are not allowed to be used other than to call in plays. They are shut off during plays. So his initial comparison is correct, it would be like NFL Coaches telling the QBs which WRs are open mid-play.
UtahWasatch
07-08-08, 08:55 AM
And make Tiger Woods carry his own clubs too.
MAYBE that would level the playing field!!
Seems that some of the "purity" is lost with radio to rider. Oh well, things always evolve (or de-) so must adjust to what is here and now.
msu2001la
07-08-08, 09:17 AM
However, US football won't let coaches talk the QB in the middle of a play. What cycling does is similar to the coach watching the monitor in the skybox telling the QB which receiver is open.
Good point. Still, information on time splits and breakaways was available before the advent of race radios. It just involved more motorcycles and chalkboards.
It seems like what you're proposing would be a race run in a complete media blackout with riders just guessing as to how far out the breakaways are and who's in them.
While that sounds interesting, and is probably more "pure", I think the way it's done now is fine. It's still a level playing field since all the teams have radio communications.
(To further your NFL comparison, it would be as if every player on the field had a radio, and the defense was also alerted to pass/run, or even which direction the pass/run was going during the play. I think the advantages could go both ways)
Keith99
07-08-08, 11:59 AM
I'm not sure if it's still the case, but rugby coaches used to sit in the stands.
It is still the case at top level. No rules against coaches being on the sidelines, but they can not come on the field. So not as strict as Tennis, but the spirit of trying to keep some of the decisions in hte players hands is still there.
jhodder
07-08-08, 12:06 PM
It just seems to go a bit far these days. Getting split times to the break is one thing (motorbike with chalk board or the like), but having teams get second-to-second updates on what is going on in both the peleton and the break at the same time seems a bit much. For example:
Watching how the riders in breaks look and guiding the chase group's pace miles back based on whether they are cooperating or looking fatigued
Opposite is also true, using race radios to instantly direct break away's pace based on whether the chase is in hot pursuit or not
Team cars watching other teams' favorites' faces on TV and telling their guys to attack when they look tired (However, Lance flipped this and used it to his advantage once...)
Instantly assessing the contents of breaks and making deals with other teams via race radio on when to let the break go (takes the fun out of sneaking into breaks)
Physiologists in the team car giving instant corrections on from, etc. via radio (see Millar's car today)
Telling the riders exactly when a turn is approaching and what speed to hold through the turn
However, I must admit that it is cool that they can use the race radios to call the team back to a fallen leader in order to ride them back into the group. Along with domestiques fetching water, this is my personal favorite team aspect of professional cycling (now that team time trials have been deemed to be undesirable by organizers).
Keith99
07-08-08, 12:07 PM
Lemond is a fervent proponent against using them. He's always said that he would not have won the tour in '89 if they were in use. He talked about how he wound up the pace towards the end to take more time from Fignon.
I would agree that winning breaks are less successful nowadays but not sure if that because of radios or because there are more sprinter's teams in the peloton.
Or just more teams period! And perhaps more depth in the Peleton. If the number 7,8 and 9 riders from 3 or 4 teams can chase down a break then teams can afford to do it more.
More teams also points out a magnified problem with doing away with radios. Bigger differences between how far back riders on different teams have to go back to talk to their team manager.
I think it is rather unfair to the riders/managers to let the television audience know more than they do. It makes them seem fools when they do not react to information they do not have. On that I'd propose somethign other than doing awauy with radios entirely, instead do away with 2 way conversations, but give riders race info feeds. Riders can find out who is on a break, but the rider in the Peleton either has to decide who is a threat or drop back to the team car if discussion is desired.
jhodder
07-08-08, 12:15 PM
More teams also points out a magnified problem with doing away with radios. Bigger differences between how far back riders on different teams have to go back to talk to their team manager.
Yeah, but think about how much more important team car position will be... getting penalized to the back will require your team to drop all the way back to get instructions and this decrease the team's ability to do so.
jhodder
07-08-08, 12:18 PM
I think it is rather unfair to the riders/managers to let the television audience know more than they do. It makes them seem fools when they do not react to information they do not have.
Unfair to whom? I believe that it would be much more suspenseful to watch... something like "Holy <bleep> Jens is in that break and they aren't reacting!!!!"
Keith99
07-08-08, 12:34 PM
Yeah, but think about how much more important team car position will be... getting penalized to the back will require your team to drop all the way back to get instructions and this decrease the team's ability to do so.
Yes, it is interesting how this could work out. It just might make teams more concerend with having a highly placed GC rider and could make for more exciting racing early on.
ridethecliche
07-12-08, 03:10 PM
I know radios are here to stay and I think they should stay, but what would you think if they were set up as follow (Taken from my post on the 'Time bonus' thread).
I think it would be really really really interesting if each rider was given a radio with different channels, each channel for a language. The riders would be warned by the race organizers through translators and what not about dangers on the course, time gaps, etc. All the organizing for the chase and such would have to be done by the teams on their own without directors.
During TT's the radio would be between the rider and the team car.
I think that would be interesting. If the reason behind radios is to warn riders of dangers, then this would satisfy that need, while forcing the riders to think on their own, making it a rolling game of chess where the pawns are king.
merged Race Radio threads
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.