Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg) - exercises (or other stuff) to help build endurance?

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
-Devil-
07-13-08, 01:28 PM
hey,
ok well i have only been regularly riding since mid Feb. after a 10+ year break ... (by regularly i mean 2 to 4 times a week for a total of 5 to 10 miles each time) ... and mixed in with that ... 1 to 3 times a week at the gym, more at the gym when weather is bad, and more on the bike when weather is good.
as i am able to ride further something i am running into, that i am looking for suggestions on what may help ...
my endurance.
first, a typical ride for me is 90% off road .. on singletrack and up and down fire road hills and so forth ... very little actually on the road.
it takes me almost 3 miles before my muscles get warmed up and i don't get tired as quickly ... i understand that is somewhat typical ... i normally stop after 2 to 3 miles to stretch some ... then pick up again ...
after that, i can make it about 6 to 8 more miles total (including some 2 to 5 min breaks) before my legs just don't want to work anymore ... mostly my hips and upper parts of my legs... they don't hurt or burn or anything ... they just dont want to move ... i have to force myself to make them go ... and then normally have to stop for a bit after that push ...
the furtherest i have gone non stop is about 7+ miles. and i wasn't really tired then .. but was having the same thing with my hips and upper legs ...
a little info on me ... i am 34 ... male, 235lbs (was 281 in jan) i try to consume 3,000 calories a day sometimes a little more ... which is split between carbs, protein, and a little fat ... very rarely do i eat anything that is 'processed' (junk food, or fast food, etc)
i have started noticing this within the past month ... i am not sure if it is just me, if it is maybe heat related .. or a combination of both .. (normally is about 85+ when i start riding in the morning ... and will be 93+ by the time i stop with the humidity in the 30 to 50%+ range)
is there any exercises that i can do to help build up my upper legs and hips? ... or is it one of those ... just keep pushing myself harder and longer .. till it isn't as much of an issue?
c_m_shooter
07-13-08, 01:42 PM
Mountain biking is pretty tough. I prefer riding off road, but have found that I need to do most of my rides on the road if I want to increase my fitness. It is just faster to recover when your not all beat up at the end of the ride. Try some road rides and learn how to pace yourself. You need to ride more often too, I heard that three days a week is enough to maintane your current fitness, but 5 or 6 days per week are needed if you want to improve.
-Devil-
07-13-08, 01:50 PM
thats what i was kinda figuring ... i guess with road riding i can focus more on the overall pace and distance, moreso then dodging the obstructions while off road ...
there is a weekly ride that involves about 9+ miles on top of a levee ... i may start trying it .. and add more to it...
heh may have to pick up some other tires tho so i don't eat through my good ones as quickly on the road.
i would gladly try 5 to 6 days a week on riding .. may have to just start pushing myself to do that ... each evening covering my road a few times before the sun goes down ... or in the morning before i get ready for work ...
Tom Stormcrowe
07-13-08, 04:15 PM
Sounds like you are pushing until you blow up. I'd love to get a HR record of your ride....I bet you're redlining the whole way. Try to alternate your rides between easy recovery and hard pushes and do a do a 6 day cycle of push/recover with the 7th off the bike.
-Devil-
07-13-08, 04:41 PM
hmmm ... i dont have a HR monitor ... but just judging from how it feels when compared to how it feels when i am at the gym and can monitor it (loosely and inaccuratly on their equipment) i would say i am topping out at about 190's ...
will have to look into the HR monitors and see if i can find a decent priced one that will store data ... now that my chest is down enough in size that i might can get one to fit around me ... any suggestions?
Tom Stormcrowe
07-13-08, 04:44 PM
Polar, and you can get an XL strap for it as well.
daintonj
07-13-08, 04:45 PM
i try to consume 3,000 calories a day sometimes a little more .
Why? Is there any particular reason you need more calories that most men do? You're not exactly covering massive distances that require you to replenish you energy reserves.
Rosso Corsa
07-13-08, 04:48 PM
I would say you should try spinning in a lower gear. A higher cadence is is easier on the joints and muscles and really allows them to work longer. I think the tradeoff is that is relier on your aerobic system more, but it seems that your muscles are dead before your lungs are. I suppose that makes sense.
Try to maintain a cadence of at least 90, up to 120. It is easy to know if your cadence is 120 if you have a watch because your foot makes 2 full circles per second.
Also, focus on keeping your knees in line with your feet (this usually feels like your knees are pushing in) and having a smooth pedal stroke where you are spinning in 'perfect circles', and it feels like you are putting power down the whole time, not just in up/down pulses.
-Devil-
07-13-08, 04:54 PM
Why? Is there any particular reason you need more calories that most men do? You're not exactly covering massive distances that require you to replenish you energy reserves.
from what i had figured i need between 2300 to 2800 on average a day... it is rare that i go over the 3k mark ... but i come close to it on a semi regular basis ... mostly because i enjoy eating.
-Devil-
07-13-08, 04:57 PM
I would say you should try spinning in a lower gear. A higher cadence is is easier on the joints and muscles and really allows them to work longer. I think the tradeoff is that is relier on your aerobic system more, but it seems that your muscles are dead before your lungs are. I suppose that makes sense.
Try to maintain a cadence of at least 90, up to 120. It is easy to know if your cadence is 120 if you have a watch because your foot makes 2 full circles per second.
Also, focus on keeping your knees in line with your feet (this usually feels like your knees are pushing in) and having a smooth pedal stroke where you are spinning in 'perfect circles', and it feels like you are putting power down the whole time, not just in up/down pulses.
i am not sure how to say what gear i use normally ... i have a 3*9 setup .. i am almost always in the middle ring up front (32t i beleive) .. and on the 4th or 5th ring in the back (11t-34t iirc) ... but my cadence if i had to estimate it .. is around the 70 mark ... i can spin 90+ on a stationary .. but i do not normally last for more then a few min ...
it sounds like i do just need to hit the road more often so i can work on these things more ... the main riding i do right now .. is hard to keep a cadence up for more then a few min before i have to change directions or get to a downhill part .. or an uphill where i end up changing gearing .. or walking if i don't have enough speed built up ... and i don't want to blow myself out trying to power up it...
Rosso Corsa
07-13-08, 05:11 PM
If you just consistently use a gear or two lower than what you usually think to be suitable, you would learn to spin eventually. It's true that is can be hard to focus on it when it's so broken up. Road sounds good. You may want to pay attention to the crankarm length on the roadbike you will be training on vs. those on your MTB.
You can print up charts which take your chainring and cog sizes into account and see how fast you need to go in a certain gear to have a certain cadence. EX. If you are in 2 up front and 4 in the back, you need to go 30km/h to have a cadence of 100. If you are in that gear and are only going 27, shift down, and you will maintain your speed but with a better cadence.
http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/
print the chart, put on bars, enjoy.
-Devil-
07-13-08, 05:18 PM
If you just consistently use a gear or two lower than what you usually think to be suitable, you would learn to spin eventually. It's true that is can be hard to focus on it when it's so broken up. Road sounds good. You may want to pay attention to the crankarm length on the roadbike you will be training on vs. those on your MTB.
You can print up charts which take your chainring and cog sizes into account and see how fast you need to go in a certain gear to have a certain cadence. EX. If you are in 2 up front and 4 in the back, you need to go 30km/h to have a cadence of 100. If you are in that gear and are only going 27, shift down, and you will maintain your speed but with a better cadence.
http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/
print the chart, put on bars, enjoy.
can't beleive i never saw that before on his site .. thanks for the link .. going to put my figures in for mph since i have a simple comp on the bike already ...
got an extra bike as well, may put some road tires on it .. (would be a hybrid type since it is a MTB) and start hitting my local roads on the non trail days ...
and going to start shopping for a HR that stores data ...
sounds like it is more of an overall training thing i need to work on ... more then an 'i am just not strong enough yet' like i was thinking ...
-edit-
just a quick calculation on sheldon's (rip) site .. and recalling my overall average mph on most sections where i am pedaling .. i am holding around a 70 to 80 cadence ... with the occasional bursts into 90 to 100+
after that, i can make it about 6 to 8 more miles total (including some 2 to 5 min breaks) before my legs just don't want to work anymore ... mostly my hips and upper parts of my legs... they don't hurt or burn or anything ... they just dont want to move ... i have to force myself to make them go ... and then normally have to stop for a bit after that push ...
Have you check you seat height??? Sometimes I feel just like this and when I check the seat height, I noticed it has settled a little and need to adjust it. Happened to me a couple of weeks ago. I have to move it around three or four times to really dial it in. I have yet to mark my new seat post, :rolleyes:.
I have started noticing this within the past month ... i am not sure if it is just me, if it is maybe heat related .. or a combination of both .. (normally is about 85+ when i start riding in the morning ... and will be 93+ by the time i stop with the humidity in the 30 to 50%+ range)
I ride in the same conditions as you and I use the Hammer Nutrition Endurolytes to help with the loss of electrolytes in the summer. Typically use 2 or 3 pills per hour and at least 1 water bottle will have the Hammer non flavored Heed. Saturdays 32 mile ride I drained 94 oz of fluid cause the humidity and heat were so high, but my legs felt good and I was not dehydrated when I got home.
-Devil-
07-13-08, 07:32 PM
hmmm my seat is about as high as i can get it and still feel safe ... it is about a half an inch lower then the 'ideal' location for it ... but i still have to dab a lot while on trails so i feel safer having it there ... could that little distance cause that to happen? ...
all i use while riding is water (i go through 50 to 80% of my camelpak mule 100oz it holds IIRC... ) i do carry ummm Cliff bar Shot Blocks ... but mostly only consume 2 of them during a 3 to 4 hour ride (thats about the max time i am out, not covering a lot of distance, just working hard for what i do cover) ... and normally a small bottle of G2 gatoraide ...
you mention dehydrated ... i normally weigh about the same when i get home as when i left, rarely just a little less ... so i think i am hydrated enough
Tom Stormcrowe
07-13-08, 07:38 PM
A shot block every 45 minutes is what's recommended for high exertion activity.
Have you ever taken the bike and had a fit done on it? Might be worth it. sounds like you are getting plenty of fluid as well. Odd indeed
-Devil-
07-13-08, 08:18 PM
A shot block every 45 minutes is what's recommended for high exertion activity.
if i break it down i think i would be using a block about every hour and a half because i am normally riding for about 3 to 4 hours
Have you ever taken the bike and had a fit done on it? Might be worth it. sounds like you are getting plenty of fluid as well. Odd indeed
i have had it fitted about as good as the local shops can do ... both of them say i need a 15.5" or 15" bike (mtb size) but i am on a 16" bike because thats what was available ... and crank size should be about 165mm but those are uncommon for mtb setups ... i have a shorter stem on the way to make the eff top tube legnth a little bit shorter so my arms arn't almost locked straight out while i am riding ... and have a (hopefully) more comfy saddle on the way ...
the math is getting lost:
max ride length is 8 miles
time for ride is 3 to 4 hours.
thats about 3 mils an hour. which is walking pace.
your ride might be longer than you think.
-Devil-
07-14-08, 06:52 AM
no the math isn't off ... out of the 3 to 4 hours i am gone riding ... about 30+ min of that is me taking a break... not always all at once .. but 5 min here and there ... and then sometimes 10 min inbetween laps
lil brown bat
07-14-08, 07:33 AM
So...it's kind of starting to sound like you get on your bike and (maybe) push really hard for a fairly short period of time, and then take a good amount of rest, lather, rinse, repeat. If this is how you've been riding all along, I'm not surprised you're having issues. You need to build a solid base of aerobic fitness before you start throwing in a lot of anaerobic activities. If you want to build endurance, you need to change your whole workout.
I would try getting on the road and not burning yourself out so fast. There are some nice hills around West Monroe, I used to live there years ago. Take it easy and you will still get a great workout staying on the roads.
wiggles
07-14-08, 11:58 AM
I second the HRM - my Polar F11 has become one of my most prized posessions.
-Devil-
07-14-08, 12:02 PM
So...it's kind of starting to sound like you get on your bike and (maybe) push really hard for a fairly short period of time, and then take a good amount of rest, lather, rinse, repeat. If this is how you've been riding all along, I'm not surprised you're having issues. You need to build a solid base of aerobic fitness before you start throwing in a lot of anaerobic activities. If you want to build endurance, you need to change your whole workout.
well since jan, till the weather got better (about a month or so ago) i have been in the gym 3 to 4 times a week for 30 min on a stationary ... and mixed weight machines and other stuff for another 30 to 45 min ... but that has slacked off as now most of the time i would be doing that i am now out on my bike ...
-Devil-
07-14-08, 12:04 PM
thanks for the replies ... i am starting to see that it is just a matter of how i do things ... i need to rethink my exercise at the gym vs riding my bike ... and break down and just do some extended rides on the road a few times (or more often) a week to build up more ...
yes i am still new back to bikes so there are a lot of holes in my routine ... hah ... but a HRM will be picked up by the end of the week ...
wiggles
07-14-08, 12:17 PM
Here's something that may help:
http://www.coolrunning.com/engine/2/2_3/181.shtml
That's a running plan to go from completely sedentary to being able to run a 5k (I'm cross training with it now; cycling one day, running the next). Now, I know you're not trying to run, you want to ride. You may want to try the combination of hard and slow to increase your endurance over time. Just work yourself up slowly. I mean, move on to a road and do 1.5 minutes at 18mph for one minute, then slow to 9-10 mph for 90 seconds. Adjust speed and times appropriately.
Just a thought :)
-Devil-
07-14-08, 12:40 PM
Here's something that may help:
http://www.coolrunning.com/engine/2/2_3/181.shtml
That's a running plan to go from completely sedentary to being able to run a 5k (I'm cross training with it now; cycling one day, running the next). Now, I know you're not trying to run, you want to ride. You may want to try the combination of hard and slow to increase your endurance over time. Just work yourself up slowly. I mean, move on to a road and do 1.5 minutes at 18mph for one minute, then slow to 9-10 mph for 90 seconds. Adjust speed and times appropriately.
Just a thought :)
thanks for the link, yeah i might can handle that ... going out after work to map out some roads around my house and see if they are ones i feel safe on (big enough shoulder, etc... disadvantage of living in the country near a gravel pit.... lotta traffic of big trucks but mostly limited to daytime)
was already planning on building a second bike, looks like i may direct the build more twards a hybrid setup .... or normal mtb and take my current one and put some more road worthy tires on it.
on the F11 you have, is it all that hard to use? ... going to pick up either that or the F6 before the week is over ... mostly to monitor what i am hitting, but also to be able to go back and see the average and max ...
lil brown bat
07-14-08, 01:09 PM
thanks for the replies ... i am starting to see that it is just a matter of how i do things ... i need to rethink my exercise at the gym vs riding my bike ... and break down and just do some extended rides on the road a few times (or more often) a week to build up more ...
You're still trying to run before you've learned to crawl. What you need most of all isn't to "do some extended rides" or anything like that; what you need is to create a workout that is systematic and progressive. Systematic means focused on the activities that will most efficiently help you achieve your fitness goal; progressive means that you define what "progress" means and make modest gains in that direction on a regular basis. Going into the gym and sitting on a stationary bike for 30 minutes 3-4 days a week is preferable to sitting on the couch, but the improvements you get from it will taper off pretty quickly; likewise, crashing around in the woods until your heart is ready to explode is a lot more likely to result in injury than fitness improvement. Take a big step back; find a basic systematic and progressive program for developing aerobic fitness using a bicycle; stick with it for six solid weeks, without throwing in a lot of extra stuff (just stick to basics); and at the end of that time, reevaluate where you are and where you want to go next.
jrafael
07-14-08, 01:19 PM
hmmm ... i dont have a HR monitor ... but just judging from how it feels when compared to how it feels when i am at the gym and can monitor it (loosely and inaccuratly on their equipment) i would say i am topping out at about 190's ...
will have to look into the HR monitors and see if i can find a decent priced one that will store data ... now that my chest is down enough in size that i might can get one to fit around me ... any suggestions?
I have both polar (chest strap) and this one (finger sensor) (http://www.markoffitness.com/MF-180%20What%20Is%20It%20web.htm) and the finger sensor its my favourite.
http://www.markoffitness.com/MF-180-for-web.jpg
bdinger
07-14-08, 01:20 PM
^^^^^ +10000
Seriously, you have to progress, you can't just jump into it and try to do the Tour De France next month. Last year I had a very spotty approach to cycling that wasn't crazy, but it lacked any sort of consistency. I progressed as a cyclist, sure, but not a lot.
This year I began the year with a pretty clear plan. First I shot for 100 mile weeks, after being off the bike on a daily basis for 3 months. The first two weeks were pretty difficult and almost discouraging, but I made it through it. Then I did 125 for a month. When I got my LHT, I shot for 150 and did it for a month. Now in July I'm at 200/week and things are great. I've progressed leaps and bounds this year, and my weight loss is also progressing at a absolutely predictable steady rate. Doing the consistent gain of mileage, by far, is the smartest thing I've done. The second smartest is that I took off the heart rate monitor and cyclocomputer, then told myself I'm not going to kill myself on the bike anymore. Guess what? I've gotten faster - way faster - in the two months since.
Reasonable goals and consistency are the only way to do it. Stop killing yourself and just build up a baseline.
-Devil-
07-14-08, 01:23 PM
You're still trying to run before you've learned to crawl. What you need most of all isn't to "do some extended rides" or anything like that; what you need is to create a workout that is systematic and progressive. Systematic means focused on the activities that will most efficiently help you achieve your fitness goal; progressive means that you define what "progress" means and make modest gains in that direction on a regular basis. Going into the gym and sitting on a stationary bike for 30 minutes 3-4 days a week is preferable to sitting on the couch, but the improvements you get from it will taper off pretty quickly; likewise, crashing around in the woods until your heart is ready to explode is a lot more likely to result in injury than fitness improvement. Take a big step back; find a basic systematic and progressive program for developing aerobic fitness using a bicycle; stick with it for six solid weeks, without throwing in a lot of extra stuff (just stick to basics); and at the end of that time, reevaluate where you are and where you want to go next.
that makes sense .. but i am still lost ... not really with what you say .. but in my search ... i have asked at local places before for help with a program that is focused twards bike riding ... and every place just tells me to 'get out and ride' ... even at the gym i go to ... when i bring that question up to a trainer .. they just point at the stationary bike ...
so would you happen to have a link or two that explains a basic program? i am sure there are links on this site, but so far in my browsing and such i haven't turned up any.
why dont you ride you bike to the gym.
I love it as i dont have to do cardio on a boring staionary bike.
I ride to the Y and lift 3 daya a week and swim 2 days a week. as part of my excersice.
Start hiking. It will get you into the mountains and it will build legs and hips.
Then do some backpacking. Nothing like walking up a steep slope for hours carrying a 25 pound pack to build legs.
Since you go to a gym anyway, you could also lift some weights while you're there.
Deadlifts, squats, hyperextensions, swiss ball crunches. They all help.
I also think you need to learn more about cycling. Roadies spend months base training. This is riding at a light to medium effort to build a fitness base. As much as anything else, I think you need base training.
I'd kill to be your age and able to do some hiking again.
-Devil-
07-14-08, 01:34 PM
why dont you ride you bike to the gym.
I love it as i dont have to do cardio on a boring staionary bike.
I ride to the Y and lift 3 daya a week and swim 2 days a week. as part of my excersice.
the gym i go to is close to 15 miles from my house ... in my current condition i don't think i could make it there and still work out .. then bike back home afterwards ...
Start hiking. It will get you into the mountains and it will build legs and hips.
Then do some backpacking. Nothing like walking up a steep slope for hours carrying a 25 pound pack to build legs.
Since you go to a gym anyway, you could also lift some weights while you're there.
Deadlifts, squats, hyperextensions, swiss ball crunches. They all help.
I also think you need to learn more about cycling. Roadies spend months base training. This is riding at a light to medium effort to build a fitness base. As much as anything else, I think you need base training.
I'd kill to be your age and able to do some hiking again.
sadly i live in an area that is 90% flat with no mountains within about 8 to 9 hours of me ...
the 'base training' as you put it ... is mostly what i am realizing i do need ... i shouldn't have just replaced my time at the gym with the bike riding and expected results ... (was doing combo of 30 min on a stationary, with 30 to 45 min weight lifting with high reps but lower weight ... well lower for what i can lift still higher then some)
wiggles
07-14-08, 01:50 PM
on the F11 you have, is it all that hard to use? ... going to pick up either that or the F6 before the week is over ... mostly to monitor what i am hitting, but also to be able to go back and see the average and max ...
The F11 is great. I believe the only huge differences between the F6 and F11 are the F11 has a more comfortable chest strap (important if you're going to be wearing it under underarmor, or a tight jersey), and it has a built in fitness test which estimates your level of fitness based your calculated VO2max (the maximum amount of O2 that can be carried in your bloodstream). Plus it has workout plans and everything it generates for you based on the results of the fitness tests.
Like I said, I love mine. Now, if you're just looking to get something that monitor your HR and calories burnt, by all means go for the F6. I'm a geek, and like my little doodads :)
Also, when you take a systematic approach to training, try to never increase more than 10% in a single week. You may feel like you can do it - but your body may not agree when you do it regularly. Its better to err on the side of caution - injuries suck. And if you get hurt, you can kiss most of your endurance training goodbye :(
lil brown bat
07-14-08, 02:34 PM
that makes sense .. but i am still lost ... not really with what you say .. but in my search ... i have asked at local places before for help with a program that is focused twards bike riding ... and every place just tells me to 'get out and ride' ... even at the gym i go to ... when i bring that question up to a trainer .. they just point at the stationary bike ...
so would you happen to have a link or two that explains a basic program? i am sure there are links on this site, but so far in my browsing and such i haven't turned up any.
My main source is the book "Conditioning for Outdoor Fitness (http://www.amazon.com/Conditioning-Outdoor-Fitness-Comprehensive-Training/dp/089886450X). The reason why I use that book is because when I started, my main goal was to be more fit so that I could do activities like hiking, skiing, etc. The first section is all about aerobic fitness, anaerobic fitness, exercise physiology, principles of creating a training program, etc. The second section is about anatomy (different areas of the body, strengthening same, common issues/injuries and prevention), and the third section talks specifically about how to develop functional fitness for different outdoor activities. I think it's a good book for anyone, even if your ultimate goal isn't fitness for outdoor activities, because its explanation of principles is so good and so thorough.
I go back and forth on this...I think what makes up a "good guide" depends on how thoroughly you want to understand what you're doing, and where you're going. The better your understanding, the more suited you are to guide your own progress -- and unless you're independently wealthy and can work with a personal trainer on a weekly-or-better basis, ultimately you are going to have to be your own guide. The amount of information can be a bit overwhelming, though.
-Devil-
07-14-08, 08:51 PM
i stopped by the LBS that does organized road rides in my town and talked with the owner for a bit ... going to see about tagging along on some of their beginner rides ...
also talked with one of the trainers at the gym i go to. though he doesn't know much about bikes ... he has offered to help me come up with a weekly routine that will cover everything .. in an 'aerobic' fashion (still not sure what that means) ... with steps on how i should progress it and increase what i do as the weeks go by ...
the only other issue i am having ... is convincing myself to do the gym thing .. when it is such a nice day outside and i could be riding ...
if i am understanding the basics of this ... i could do road riding ... for 3 days and gym for 3 ... and maybe 1 mtb ride a week ... but that would have me going 7 a week .. and no day off .. which i am figuring i should have ... or could do the gym 2 a week .. road 3 ... one day off .. and 1 mtb day ...
lil brown bat
07-15-08, 06:13 AM
also talked with one of the trainers at the gym i go to. though he doesn't know much about bikes ... he has offered to help me come up with a weekly routine that will cover everything .. in an 'aerobic' fashion (still not sure what that means) ... with steps on how i should progress it and increase what i do as the weeks go by ...
If you read that book I suggested, you'll know all you ever wanted about aerobic vs. anaerobic activity. The short version is that aerobic activity is fueled with blood glucose and is lower intensity, while anaerobic activity is peak effort sprint-type activity, fueled by ATP, which in turn is produced from fat and glucose that is already within the cell. Anaerobic activity can burn a lot of calories, it's true, but if you don't already have a base of aerobic fitness, you're going to be very limited in what you can do at anaerobic levels, you'll need much longer recovery time between sprints (thus largely defeating the purpose), and you're a lot more likely to get hurt.
the only other issue i am having ... is convincing myself to do the gym thing .. when it is such a nice day outside and i could be riding ...
So then go riding. What's the issue?
if i am understanding the basics of this ... i could do road riding ... for 3 days and gym for 3 ... and maybe 1 mtb ride a week ... but that would have me going 7 a week .. and no day off .. which i am figuring i should have ... or could do the gym 2 a week .. road 3 ... one day off .. and 1 mtb day ...
Why are you making this so complex? Go do aerobic exercise. Pick your preferred form and just do it. You really don't need a finely tuned program at this point, just do it. Pick a time of day and do it at that time every day. If you want to take a day off once a week, that's okay; if you don't feel the need to, then don't. Increase the duration of what you're doing by 10% a week. Do that for about six weeks, then it's time to think about maybe changing in other ways. Crawl, then walk, then run.
-Devil-
07-15-08, 06:32 AM
i will be looking for that book today at the local book store ...
i am making it complex, because right now it seems to me that is what it is .. till i can read enough to understand more ...
wiggles
07-15-08, 08:16 AM
i will be looking for that book today at the local book store ...
i am making it complex, because right now it seems to me that is what it is .. till i can read enough to understand more ...
Its a bit intimidating at first, but the basics are:
1) Eat healthy
2) Do aerobic exercise
1 really is a little off topic, basically avoid processed foods, and stick with stuff you either make yourself or simple things like fruits, veggies, and homecooked meals. Thats what worked for me. This is fuel for your metabolism - your heart can't be pumping blood if it doesn't have energy to power it. You body will burn whatever is easiest for it to burn to get energy - whether it be fat, carbs, glycogen, muscle tissue, or your own internal organs. Thats why you wanna eat right.
2 is the real meat of the subject. If you want to do nothing but cycle, then go out and cycle to your hearts content. Your body will adjust rapidly and you'll quickly build up your ability. However, don't expect to be able to run a marathon just because you can do quintuple century before breakfast. Your body will build up aerobic ability, but if you only use one type of exercise you'll start to see limited health benefits because your body will start to tailor itself towards cycling.
Thats why i like cross training - cycling day, jogging day, then a day of airsoft/paingball/sprints/jumprope/whatever - there are tons of things that work the cardiovascular system. It all uses cardio, but it switches it up so your body can't adjust to just one. You'll see slower results in your abilities with each, but you'll see a much better benefit towards your overall endurance and cardio. Unlike weight training, you can do cardio every day so go nuts. Just because its a jogging day doesn't mean you can't cycle, and vice versa.
Weight training won't help very much for what you're looking for with one catch. See, when you build muscle, you build new blood vessels along with it. That means more blood is able to reach muscle tissue, which translates to more oxygen getting to the cells that need it. It also increases the capacity that current blood vessels can hold. Worth it? Up to you. It will help you shape your body however you want it, and you can weight train for either toning (light weights with many reps), or muscle building (heavy weights with very few reps).
Hope that didn't muddy things up even further. There are a ton of options and you really can pick which route you want to take. :)
-Devil-
07-15-08, 08:44 AM
the eat healthy part i understand, been doing that since jan of this year ... its the aerobic part that confuses me ...
but how you put it, makes it a lot more clear basically aerobic = cardio ? right? ... if so... then doh! ...
thanks for breaking it down like that ... =)
lil brown bat
07-15-08, 08:46 AM
i will be looking for that book today at the local book store ...
i am making it complex, because right now it seems to me that is what it is .. till i can read enough to understand more ...
Understanding is great -- I think if you really understand how exercise physiology works and how calories get burned, you'll be a lot less likely to be fooled into some exercise or diet fad, or to lie to yourself about how healthy your lifestyle really is. Another great book, BTW, is "Eat Drink and Be Healthy" by Walter Willett -- focused on nutrition, it complements the exercise book nicely. It's focused on cutting through the lies and half-truths that we're told about nutrition, and boiling it down to a relatively few general recommendations that have good empirical support. Each chapter handles a different aspect of diet and nutrition -- for example, chapter three ("Healthy Weight") explains the body mass index and how ranges of healthy weight are determined; chapter four talks about different types of fats and gives you the whole skinny on trans, saturated, polyunsaturated, monounsaturated, etc. -- and then provides a few simple recommendations.
Here's the thing about simple, though -- "simple" and "easy" are two different things. Important to remember that too.
wiggles
07-15-08, 08:47 AM
Yup! Cardio just means that it stresses/exercises your heart. You stress your heart by using muscles over long enough periods of time that the heart has to speed up to give them the oxygen they need to keep going :)
-Devil-
07-15-08, 02:44 PM
Understanding is great -- I think if you really understand how exercise physiology works and how calories get burned, you'll be a lot less likely to be fooled into some exercise or diet fad, or to lie to yourself about how healthy your lifestyle really is. Another great book, BTW, is "Eat Drink and Be Healthy" by Walter Willett -- focused on nutrition, it complements the exercise book nicely. It's focused on cutting through the lies and half-truths that we're told about nutrition, and boiling it down to a relatively few general recommendations that have good empirical support. Each chapter handles a different aspect of diet and nutrition -- for example, chapter three ("Healthy Weight") explains the body mass index and how ranges of healthy weight are determined; chapter four talks about different types of fats and gives you the whole skinny on trans, saturated, polyunsaturated, monounsaturated, etc. -- and then provides a few simple recommendations.
Here's the thing about simple, though -- "simple" and "easy" are two different things. Important to remember that too.
they didn't have the book so prob will order it online, i have prob spent 200$ so far in books alone just to understand nutrition and such ... i still don't fully apply it but each month i am adjusting to the changes even more...
for the exercise part of it ... or cardio ... i think now i have a basic grasp of what everyone was trying to say ... but getting the book to have a place to go to for help and questions ...
Yup! Cardio just means that it stresses/exercises your heart. You stress your heart by using muscles over long enough periods of time that the heart has to speed up to give them the oxygen they need to keep going :)
got me a HRM, to start seeing where i am at in my range ... and to use it to pace myself as i start doing more time on the bike on the roads ... will prob go between that, and occasionally at the gym on the treadmill or elipitical if the weather is to bad, or i had to work to late to get on the bike (gym is 24/7)
since bike riding is my main interest. i will keep doing it a majority of the time .. but will try to find other stuff to mix in (maybe vollyball with the in-laws or other stuff at the gym .. will have to just pay attention to my options and go from there) ...
-Devil-
07-15-08, 09:45 PM
Sounds like you are pushing until you blow up. I'd love to get a HR record of your ride....I bet you're redlining the whole way. Try to alternate your rides between easy recovery and hard pushes and do a do a 6 day cycle of push/recover with the 7th off the bike.
started keeping a chart for my HR and such and just set the baseline tonight at the gym ... posting it up for if it shows anything to those who know more ...
21 min on stationary bike 122 avg heart rate 19 min was above 111
21 min on treadmill 128 avg heart rate 20 min was above 111
from what i am figuring ... my max heart rate is about 185 ... i should be shooting for a min of 111 for warming up and such ... then trying to stay around 130 to 147 (in the 70% to 80% range) for a duration .. then going back down for a cool down... is that the basics of it? ...
on each of the above peices, i never really was 'out of breath' .... but was winded... i felt as though i could have gone longer on each, but starting with a number i know i can do, and going to stick with it for at least a week before changing it ...
Tom Stormcrowe
07-16-08, 06:48 AM
Sounds like a plan to me. ;)
10 Wheels
07-16-08, 07:18 AM
i will be looking for that book today at the local book store ...
i am making it complex, because right now it seems to me that is what it is .. till i can read enough to understand more ...
It is very SIMPLE:
You don't need the gym time period.
You don't need a heart monitor.
Just ride and keep drinking while you ride.
Monday 80 miles Temps 100* on the bike.
Tuesday 86 miles Temps on the bike 104*
JUSY RIDE THE BIKE>........
wiggles
07-16-08, 08:45 AM
It is very SIMPLE:
You don't need the gym time period.
You don't need a heart monitor.
Just ride and keep drinking while you ride.
Monday 80 miles Temps 100* on the bike.
Tuesday 86 miles Temps on the bike 104*
JUSY RIDE THE BIKE>........
You don't need a heart rate monitor, but you will never find a more useful piece of equipment if you're trying to lose weight. Estimating calories burnt and guessing whether or not you're in your target heart rate zone is not the most easy thing to do.
-Devil-
07-16-08, 08:49 AM
till i used it at the gym last night .. i always thought i was at a higher HR then i actually was .. which explains why i am not loosing like i think i would ... but it also showed me that i need to work at upping the legnth and intensity of what i can sustain ... just to get up into the 70% to 80% range with my HR ...
wiggles
07-16-08, 08:51 AM
Did you end up getting the f6?
-Devil-
07-16-08, 08:59 AM
i ended up going with a nike triax C8 ... they let me try on the chest straps and the nike one was better fitting for me .. plus they had them 25% off so only paid about 78$ after tax for it.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.