Bicycle Mechanics - Top tube question

Bikeforums.net is a forum about nothing but bikes. Our community can help you find information about hard-to-find and localized information like bicycle tours, specialties like where in your area to have your recumbent bike serviced, or what are the best bicycle tires and seats for the activities you use your bike for.
When considering reach (stem and handlebar length) do you use the horizontal top tube length (i.e., parallel to the ground) or the center-to-center top tube length?
For my current bike (which fits well), the horizontal tt is 545mm and the c-c is 542.5mm and I use a 90mm stem.
I am looking at another frame with a horizontal tt of 549 and c-c of 531. What size stem would elicit the same reach?
Thank you!
JiveTurkey
07-23-08, 08:38 PM
Always use the effective/horizontal length if the top tube is not parallel to the ground (i.e., sloping)--it is still measured cnter of head tube to center of seat tube. If the top tube is parallel to the ground, then the center-to-center top tube length and horizontal length are the same.
The new frame is 4mm longer, so all things being equal you'd want a 4mm shorter stem (effective length of the stem, parallel to the ground). Things that do not make this "all things being equal" include but is not limited to: head and seat tube angles; saddle to handlebar drop; reach, drop and width of handlebars...you get the point. 4mm is not that big of a difference.
Thanks for your response, very helpful! I was thinking along the same lines, but needed another opinion.
For my current bike (which fits well), the horizontal tt is 545mm and the c-c is 542.5mm and I use a 90mm stem.
A 90mm stem is pretty short, sounds like you need a shorter top tube, not longer.
Al,
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.